Loading…

Punishing in the public interest: Exploratory Canadian evidence pertaining to convictions and incarcerations for tax offences

•Predominant tax crime for which a conviction is obtained is failure to file a tax return.•Males are significantly more likely to be convicted of a tax crime than females.•Professionals are far more likely to be incarcerated than non-professionals.•Underreporting related to excise tax as a form of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of accounting and public policy 2021-09, Vol.40 (5), p.106848, Article 106848
Main Authors: Okafor, Oliver Nnamdi, Farrar, Jonathan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-8f83f9db4c151350a6b91e3e9b450f9466f8640cc78dc189d761840ea698eac3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-8f83f9db4c151350a6b91e3e9b450f9466f8640cc78dc189d761840ea698eac3
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 106848
container_title Journal of accounting and public policy
container_volume 40
creator Okafor, Oliver Nnamdi
Farrar, Jonathan
description •Predominant tax crime for which a conviction is obtained is failure to file a tax return.•Males are significantly more likely to be convicted of a tax crime than females.•Professionals are far more likely to be incarcerated than non-professionals.•Underreporting related to excise tax as a form of tax evasion is more likely to result in harsher sentencing than underreporting related to income tax. Although naming and shaming is a deterrence strategy used by tax authorities, ostensibly to increase tax compliance, the contents of tax conviction notices in which taxpayers are named and shamed have not been investigated in empirical research. To this end, this study uses a sample of 2,570 taxpayers convicted of tax offences by the Canadian tax authority over a ten-year period (2006 through 2015) to identify key characteristics of convictions and incarcerations for tax crimes, and to understand how key conviction characteristics are associated with incarceration. Over this period, findings show that 55% of tax convictions in Canada relate to failure to file tax returns, and that 14% of convicted individuals are incarcerated for an average of 17 months. The mean unreported income per convicted taxpayer is $89,978, the mean unremitted excise tax per convicted taxpayer is $15,330, and the mean fine amount per convicted taxpayer is $48,201. Males are more likely to be convicted of a tax crime than females. Further, professionals are far more likely to be incarcerated than non-professionals. Results also indicate that underreporting related to excise tax as a form of tax evasion is more likely to result in harsher sentencing than underreporting related to income tax. Lastly, we observe a downward trend in convictions and incarceration over the 10-year span, such that the total convictions and incarcerations at the end of the sample period are roughly one-third of the convictions at the beginning. Implications for public policy are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106848
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2606198959</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278425421000314</els_id><sourcerecordid>2606198959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-8f83f9db4c151350a6b91e3e9b450f9466f8640cc78dc189d761840ea698eac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWB__IeB6ajKTySTutPgCQRfuQ3onsRlqMiZpqQv_uxkruHR1uZdzvss5CGFK5pRQfjnMBw0wbpZjWM9rUtNy5oKJAzSjomuqmnTkEM1I3YmK1S07RicpDYSQrmbtDH29bLxLK-ffsPM4rwwuqLWDsmUTTcpX-HY3rkPUOcRPvNBe9057bLauNx6K3MSsnZ8AOWAIfusgu-AT1r4vFNARTHH_nGyIOOsdDtZO5nSGjqxeJ3P-O0_R693t6-Khenq-f1xcP1XAapErYUVjZb9kQFvatETzpaSmMXLJWmIl49wKzghAJ3qgQvYdp4IRo7kURkNzii722DGGj00JpYawib58VDUnnEohW1lUYq-CGFKKxqoxuncdPxUlaupaDeqvazV1rfZdF-vN3mpKiK0zUSVwU8LeRQNZ9cH9D_kGgTOPpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2606198959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Punishing in the public interest: Exploratory Canadian evidence pertaining to convictions and incarcerations for tax offences</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Okafor, Oliver Nnamdi ; Farrar, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Okafor, Oliver Nnamdi ; Farrar, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>•Predominant tax crime for which a conviction is obtained is failure to file a tax return.•Males are significantly more likely to be convicted of a tax crime than females.•Professionals are far more likely to be incarcerated than non-professionals.•Underreporting related to excise tax as a form of tax evasion is more likely to result in harsher sentencing than underreporting related to income tax. Although naming and shaming is a deterrence strategy used by tax authorities, ostensibly to increase tax compliance, the contents of tax conviction notices in which taxpayers are named and shamed have not been investigated in empirical research. To this end, this study uses a sample of 2,570 taxpayers convicted of tax offences by the Canadian tax authority over a ten-year period (2006 through 2015) to identify key characteristics of convictions and incarcerations for tax crimes, and to understand how key conviction characteristics are associated with incarceration. Over this period, findings show that 55% of tax convictions in Canada relate to failure to file tax returns, and that 14% of convicted individuals are incarcerated for an average of 17 months. The mean unreported income per convicted taxpayer is $89,978, the mean unremitted excise tax per convicted taxpayer is $15,330, and the mean fine amount per convicted taxpayer is $48,201. Males are more likely to be convicted of a tax crime than females. Further, professionals are far more likely to be incarcerated than non-professionals. Results also indicate that underreporting related to excise tax as a form of tax evasion is more likely to result in harsher sentencing than underreporting related to income tax. Lastly, we observe a downward trend in convictions and incarceration over the 10-year span, such that the total convictions and incarcerations at the end of the sample period are roughly one-third of the convictions at the beginning. Implications for public policy are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2070</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106848</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Crime ; Criminal sentences ; Deterrence ; Excise taxes ; Imprisonment ; Incarceration ; Income taxes ; Males ; Naming ; Naming and shaming ; Notices ; Offenses ; Prisoners ; Professionals ; Public interest ; Public policy ; Research methodology ; Tax conviction notices ; Tax evasion ; Tax returns ; Taxation ; Taxpayers ; Underreporting</subject><ispartof>Journal of accounting and public policy, 2021-09, Vol.40 (5), p.106848, Article 106848</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Sep/Oct 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-8f83f9db4c151350a6b91e3e9b450f9466f8640cc78dc189d761840ea698eac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-8f83f9db4c151350a6b91e3e9b450f9466f8640cc78dc189d761840ea698eac3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0188-7195</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,33200</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Okafor, Oliver Nnamdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrar, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>Punishing in the public interest: Exploratory Canadian evidence pertaining to convictions and incarcerations for tax offences</title><title>Journal of accounting and public policy</title><description>•Predominant tax crime for which a conviction is obtained is failure to file a tax return.•Males are significantly more likely to be convicted of a tax crime than females.•Professionals are far more likely to be incarcerated than non-professionals.•Underreporting related to excise tax as a form of tax evasion is more likely to result in harsher sentencing than underreporting related to income tax. Although naming and shaming is a deterrence strategy used by tax authorities, ostensibly to increase tax compliance, the contents of tax conviction notices in which taxpayers are named and shamed have not been investigated in empirical research. To this end, this study uses a sample of 2,570 taxpayers convicted of tax offences by the Canadian tax authority over a ten-year period (2006 through 2015) to identify key characteristics of convictions and incarcerations for tax crimes, and to understand how key conviction characteristics are associated with incarceration. Over this period, findings show that 55% of tax convictions in Canada relate to failure to file tax returns, and that 14% of convicted individuals are incarcerated for an average of 17 months. The mean unreported income per convicted taxpayer is $89,978, the mean unremitted excise tax per convicted taxpayer is $15,330, and the mean fine amount per convicted taxpayer is $48,201. Males are more likely to be convicted of a tax crime than females. Further, professionals are far more likely to be incarcerated than non-professionals. Results also indicate that underreporting related to excise tax as a form of tax evasion is more likely to result in harsher sentencing than underreporting related to income tax. Lastly, we observe a downward trend in convictions and incarceration over the 10-year span, such that the total convictions and incarcerations at the end of the sample period are roughly one-third of the convictions at the beginning. Implications for public policy are discussed.</description><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Criminal sentences</subject><subject>Deterrence</subject><subject>Excise taxes</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Incarceration</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Naming</subject><subject>Naming and shaming</subject><subject>Notices</subject><subject>Offenses</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Tax conviction notices</subject><subject>Tax evasion</subject><subject>Tax returns</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxpayers</subject><subject>Underreporting</subject><issn>0278-4254</issn><issn>1873-2070</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWB__IeB6ajKTySTutPgCQRfuQ3onsRlqMiZpqQv_uxkruHR1uZdzvss5CGFK5pRQfjnMBw0wbpZjWM9rUtNy5oKJAzSjomuqmnTkEM1I3YmK1S07RicpDYSQrmbtDH29bLxLK-ffsPM4rwwuqLWDsmUTTcpX-HY3rkPUOcRPvNBe9057bLauNx6K3MSsnZ8AOWAIfusgu-AT1r4vFNARTHH_nGyIOOsdDtZO5nSGjqxeJ3P-O0_R693t6-Khenq-f1xcP1XAapErYUVjZb9kQFvatETzpaSmMXLJWmIl49wKzghAJ3qgQvYdp4IRo7kURkNzii722DGGj00JpYawib58VDUnnEohW1lUYq-CGFKKxqoxuncdPxUlaupaDeqvazV1rfZdF-vN3mpKiK0zUSVwU8LeRQNZ9cH9D_kGgTOPpA</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Okafor, Oliver Nnamdi</creator><creator>Farrar, Jonathan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0188-7195</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Punishing in the public interest: Exploratory Canadian evidence pertaining to convictions and incarcerations for tax offences</title><author>Okafor, Oliver Nnamdi ; Farrar, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-8f83f9db4c151350a6b91e3e9b450f9466f8640cc78dc189d761840ea698eac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Criminal sentences</topic><topic>Deterrence</topic><topic>Excise taxes</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Incarceration</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Naming</topic><topic>Naming and shaming</topic><topic>Notices</topic><topic>Offenses</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Tax conviction notices</topic><topic>Tax evasion</topic><topic>Tax returns</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxpayers</topic><topic>Underreporting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okafor, Oliver Nnamdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrar, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of accounting and public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okafor, Oliver Nnamdi</au><au>Farrar, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Punishing in the public interest: Exploratory Canadian evidence pertaining to convictions and incarcerations for tax offences</atitle><jtitle>Journal of accounting and public policy</jtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>106848</spage><pages>106848-</pages><artnum>106848</artnum><issn>0278-4254</issn><eissn>1873-2070</eissn><abstract>•Predominant tax crime for which a conviction is obtained is failure to file a tax return.•Males are significantly more likely to be convicted of a tax crime than females.•Professionals are far more likely to be incarcerated than non-professionals.•Underreporting related to excise tax as a form of tax evasion is more likely to result in harsher sentencing than underreporting related to income tax. Although naming and shaming is a deterrence strategy used by tax authorities, ostensibly to increase tax compliance, the contents of tax conviction notices in which taxpayers are named and shamed have not been investigated in empirical research. To this end, this study uses a sample of 2,570 taxpayers convicted of tax offences by the Canadian tax authority over a ten-year period (2006 through 2015) to identify key characteristics of convictions and incarcerations for tax crimes, and to understand how key conviction characteristics are associated with incarceration. Over this period, findings show that 55% of tax convictions in Canada relate to failure to file tax returns, and that 14% of convicted individuals are incarcerated for an average of 17 months. The mean unreported income per convicted taxpayer is $89,978, the mean unremitted excise tax per convicted taxpayer is $15,330, and the mean fine amount per convicted taxpayer is $48,201. Males are more likely to be convicted of a tax crime than females. Further, professionals are far more likely to be incarcerated than non-professionals. Results also indicate that underreporting related to excise tax as a form of tax evasion is more likely to result in harsher sentencing than underreporting related to income tax. Lastly, we observe a downward trend in convictions and incarceration over the 10-year span, such that the total convictions and incarcerations at the end of the sample period are roughly one-third of the convictions at the beginning. Implications for public policy are discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106848</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0188-7195</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-4254
ispartof Journal of accounting and public policy, 2021-09, Vol.40 (5), p.106848, Article 106848
issn 0278-4254
1873-2070
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2606198959
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; PAIS Index
subjects Crime
Criminal sentences
Deterrence
Excise taxes
Imprisonment
Incarceration
Income taxes
Males
Naming
Naming and shaming
Notices
Offenses
Prisoners
Professionals
Public interest
Public policy
Research methodology
Tax conviction notices
Tax evasion
Tax returns
Taxation
Taxpayers
Underreporting
title Punishing in the public interest: Exploratory Canadian evidence pertaining to convictions and incarcerations for tax offences
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T17%3A41%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Punishing%20in%20the%20public%20interest:%20Exploratory%20Canadian%20evidence%20pertaining%20to%20convictions%20and%20incarcerations%20for%20tax%20offences&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20accounting%20and%20public%20policy&rft.au=Okafor,%20Oliver%20Nnamdi&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=106848&rft.pages=106848-&rft.artnum=106848&rft.issn=0278-4254&rft.eissn=1873-2070&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106848&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2606198959%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-8f83f9db4c151350a6b91e3e9b450f9466f8640cc78dc189d761840ea698eac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2606198959&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true