Loading…
The InSight HP\(^3\) mole on Mars: Lessons learned from attempts to penetrate to depth in the Martian soil
The NASA InSight mission payload includes the Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package HP\(^3\) to measure the surface heat flow. The package was designed to use a small penetrator -- nicknamed the mole -- to implement a string of temperature sensors in the soil to a depth of 5m. The mole itself is...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2021-12 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Spohn, T Hudson, T L Witte, L Wippermann, T Wisniewski, L Kediziora, B Vrettos, C Lorenz, R D Golombek, M Lichtenfeld, R Grott, M Knollenberg, J Krause, C Fantinati, C Nagihara, S Grygorczuk, J |
description | The NASA InSight mission payload includes the Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package HP\(^3\) to measure the surface heat flow. The package was designed to use a small penetrator -- nicknamed the mole -- to implement a string of temperature sensors in the soil to a depth of 5m. The mole itself is equipped with sensors to measure a thermal conductivity as it proceeds to depth. The heat flow would be calculated from the product of the temperature gradient and the thermal conductivity. To avoid the perturbation caused by annual surface temperature variations, the measurements would be taken at a depth between 3 m and 5 m. The mole was designed to penetrate cohesionless soil similar to Quartz sand which was expected to provide a good analogue material for Martian sand. The sand would provide friction to the buried mole hull to balance the remaining recoil of the mole hammer mechanism that drives the mole forward. Unfortunately, the mole did not penetrate more than a mole length of 40 cm. The failure to penetrate deeper was largely due to a few tens of centimeter thick cohesive duricrust that failed to provide the required friction. Although a suppressor mass and spring in the hammer mechanism absorbed much of the recoil, the available mass did not allow a system that would have eliminated the recoil. The mole penetrated to 40 cm depth benefiting from friction provided by springs in the support structure from which it was deployed. It was found in addition that the Martian soil provided unexpected levels of penetration resistance that would have motivated to designing a more powerful mole. It is concluded that more mass would have allowed to design a more robust system with little or no recoil, more energy of the mole hammer mechanism and a more massive support structure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2112.03234 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2607468414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2607468414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_26074684143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMFKAzEURUNBsGg_wN0DN-2iY_KSmQ5ui1JBQbDLYgn01ckwk4x5r-LnO4V-gKvD5VyOUndGF64uS_3g82_4KdAYLLRF6yZqitaaZe0Qr9WMudVaY7XCsrRT1W4bgpf4Eb4agc37bv5pdwvoU0eQIrz5zI_wSswpMnTkc6QDHHPqwYtQPwiDJBgokmQvdB4HGqSBEEHG8hiQ4CNwCt2tujr6jml24Y26f37arjfLIafvE7Hs23TKcVR7rPTKVbUzzv7v9Qeb000O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2607468414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The InSight HP\(^3\) mole on Mars: Lessons learned from attempts to penetrate to depth in the Martian soil</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Spohn, T ; Hudson, T L ; Witte, L ; Wippermann, T ; Wisniewski, L ; Kediziora, B ; Vrettos, C ; Lorenz, R D ; Golombek, M ; Lichtenfeld, R ; Grott, M ; Knollenberg, J ; Krause, C ; Fantinati, C ; Nagihara, S ; Grygorczuk, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Spohn, T ; Hudson, T L ; Witte, L ; Wippermann, T ; Wisniewski, L ; Kediziora, B ; Vrettos, C ; Lorenz, R D ; Golombek, M ; Lichtenfeld, R ; Grott, M ; Knollenberg, J ; Krause, C ; Fantinati, C ; Nagihara, S ; Grygorczuk, J</creatorcontrib><description>The NASA InSight mission payload includes the Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package HP\(^3\) to measure the surface heat flow. The package was designed to use a small penetrator -- nicknamed the mole -- to implement a string of temperature sensors in the soil to a depth of 5m. The mole itself is equipped with sensors to measure a thermal conductivity as it proceeds to depth. The heat flow would be calculated from the product of the temperature gradient and the thermal conductivity. To avoid the perturbation caused by annual surface temperature variations, the measurements would be taken at a depth between 3 m and 5 m. The mole was designed to penetrate cohesionless soil similar to Quartz sand which was expected to provide a good analogue material for Martian sand. The sand would provide friction to the buried mole hull to balance the remaining recoil of the mole hammer mechanism that drives the mole forward. Unfortunately, the mole did not penetrate more than a mole length of 40 cm. The failure to penetrate deeper was largely due to a few tens of centimeter thick cohesive duricrust that failed to provide the required friction. Although a suppressor mass and spring in the hammer mechanism absorbed much of the recoil, the available mass did not allow a system that would have eliminated the recoil. The mole penetrated to 40 cm depth benefiting from friction provided by springs in the support structure from which it was deployed. It was found in addition that the Martian soil provided unexpected levels of penetration resistance that would have motivated to designing a more powerful mole. It is concluded that more mass would have allowed to design a more robust system with little or no recoil, more energy of the mole hammer mechanism and a more massive support structure.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.03234</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Friction ; Hammers ; Heat conductivity ; Heat transfer ; Heat transmission ; Mars ; Penetration resistance ; Perturbation ; Physical properties ; Recoil ; Sand ; Seasonal variations ; Soils ; Temperature sensors ; Thermal conductivity</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2021-12</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2607468414?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>776,780,25731,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spohn, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, T L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witte, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wippermann, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisniewski, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kediziora, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrettos, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenz, R D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golombek, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtenfeld, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grott, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knollenberg, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fantinati, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagihara, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grygorczuk, J</creatorcontrib><title>The InSight HP\(^3\) mole on Mars: Lessons learned from attempts to penetrate to depth in the Martian soil</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>The NASA InSight mission payload includes the Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package HP\(^3\) to measure the surface heat flow. The package was designed to use a small penetrator -- nicknamed the mole -- to implement a string of temperature sensors in the soil to a depth of 5m. The mole itself is equipped with sensors to measure a thermal conductivity as it proceeds to depth. The heat flow would be calculated from the product of the temperature gradient and the thermal conductivity. To avoid the perturbation caused by annual surface temperature variations, the measurements would be taken at a depth between 3 m and 5 m. The mole was designed to penetrate cohesionless soil similar to Quartz sand which was expected to provide a good analogue material for Martian sand. The sand would provide friction to the buried mole hull to balance the remaining recoil of the mole hammer mechanism that drives the mole forward. Unfortunately, the mole did not penetrate more than a mole length of 40 cm. The failure to penetrate deeper was largely due to a few tens of centimeter thick cohesive duricrust that failed to provide the required friction. Although a suppressor mass and spring in the hammer mechanism absorbed much of the recoil, the available mass did not allow a system that would have eliminated the recoil. The mole penetrated to 40 cm depth benefiting from friction provided by springs in the support structure from which it was deployed. It was found in addition that the Martian soil provided unexpected levels of penetration resistance that would have motivated to designing a more powerful mole. It is concluded that more mass would have allowed to design a more robust system with little or no recoil, more energy of the mole hammer mechanism and a more massive support structure.</description><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Hammers</subject><subject>Heat conductivity</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Heat transmission</subject><subject>Mars</subject><subject>Penetration resistance</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Recoil</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Temperature sensors</subject><subject>Thermal conductivity</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjMFKAzEURUNBsGg_wN0DN-2iY_KSmQ5ui1JBQbDLYgn01ckwk4x5r-LnO4V-gKvD5VyOUndGF64uS_3g82_4KdAYLLRF6yZqitaaZe0Qr9WMudVaY7XCsrRT1W4bgpf4Eb4agc37bv5pdwvoU0eQIrz5zI_wSswpMnTkc6QDHHPqwYtQPwiDJBgokmQvdB4HGqSBEEHG8hiQ4CNwCt2tujr6jml24Y26f37arjfLIafvE7Hs23TKcVR7rPTKVbUzzv7v9Qeb000O</recordid><startdate>20211206</startdate><enddate>20211206</enddate><creator>Spohn, T</creator><creator>Hudson, T L</creator><creator>Witte, L</creator><creator>Wippermann, T</creator><creator>Wisniewski, L</creator><creator>Kediziora, B</creator><creator>Vrettos, C</creator><creator>Lorenz, R D</creator><creator>Golombek, M</creator><creator>Lichtenfeld, R</creator><creator>Grott, M</creator><creator>Knollenberg, J</creator><creator>Krause, C</creator><creator>Fantinati, C</creator><creator>Nagihara, S</creator><creator>Grygorczuk, J</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211206</creationdate><title>The InSight HP\(^3\) mole on Mars: Lessons learned from attempts to penetrate to depth in the Martian soil</title><author>Spohn, T ; Hudson, T L ; Witte, L ; Wippermann, T ; Wisniewski, L ; Kediziora, B ; Vrettos, C ; Lorenz, R D ; Golombek, M ; Lichtenfeld, R ; Grott, M ; Knollenberg, J ; Krause, C ; Fantinati, C ; Nagihara, S ; Grygorczuk, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_26074684143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Hammers</topic><topic>Heat conductivity</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Heat transmission</topic><topic>Mars</topic><topic>Penetration resistance</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Recoil</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Temperature sensors</topic><topic>Thermal conductivity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spohn, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, T L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witte, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wippermann, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisniewski, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kediziora, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrettos, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenz, R D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golombek, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtenfeld, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grott, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knollenberg, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fantinati, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagihara, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grygorczuk, J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spohn, T</au><au>Hudson, T L</au><au>Witte, L</au><au>Wippermann, T</au><au>Wisniewski, L</au><au>Kediziora, B</au><au>Vrettos, C</au><au>Lorenz, R D</au><au>Golombek, M</au><au>Lichtenfeld, R</au><au>Grott, M</au><au>Knollenberg, J</au><au>Krause, C</au><au>Fantinati, C</au><au>Nagihara, S</au><au>Grygorczuk, J</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>The InSight HP\(^3\) mole on Mars: Lessons learned from attempts to penetrate to depth in the Martian soil</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2021-12-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>The NASA InSight mission payload includes the Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package HP\(^3\) to measure the surface heat flow. The package was designed to use a small penetrator -- nicknamed the mole -- to implement a string of temperature sensors in the soil to a depth of 5m. The mole itself is equipped with sensors to measure a thermal conductivity as it proceeds to depth. The heat flow would be calculated from the product of the temperature gradient and the thermal conductivity. To avoid the perturbation caused by annual surface temperature variations, the measurements would be taken at a depth between 3 m and 5 m. The mole was designed to penetrate cohesionless soil similar to Quartz sand which was expected to provide a good analogue material for Martian sand. The sand would provide friction to the buried mole hull to balance the remaining recoil of the mole hammer mechanism that drives the mole forward. Unfortunately, the mole did not penetrate more than a mole length of 40 cm. The failure to penetrate deeper was largely due to a few tens of centimeter thick cohesive duricrust that failed to provide the required friction. Although a suppressor mass and spring in the hammer mechanism absorbed much of the recoil, the available mass did not allow a system that would have eliminated the recoil. The mole penetrated to 40 cm depth benefiting from friction provided by springs in the support structure from which it was deployed. It was found in addition that the Martian soil provided unexpected levels of penetration resistance that would have motivated to designing a more powerful mole. It is concluded that more mass would have allowed to design a more robust system with little or no recoil, more energy of the mole hammer mechanism and a more massive support structure.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2112.03234</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2021-12 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2607468414 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Friction Hammers Heat conductivity Heat transfer Heat transmission Mars Penetration resistance Perturbation Physical properties Recoil Sand Seasonal variations Soils Temperature sensors Thermal conductivity |
title | The InSight HP\(^3\) mole on Mars: Lessons learned from attempts to penetrate to depth in the Martian soil |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T04%3A46%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=The%20InSight%20HP%5C(%5E3%5C)%20mole%20on%20Mars:%20Lessons%20learned%20from%20attempts%20to%20penetrate%20to%20depth%20in%20the%20Martian%20soil&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Spohn,%20T&rft.date=2021-12-06&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2112.03234&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2607468414%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_26074684143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2607468414&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |