Loading…

The InSight HP\(^3\) mole on Mars: Lessons learned from attempts to penetrate to depth in the Martian soil

The NASA InSight mission payload includes the Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package HP\(^3\) to measure the surface heat flow. The package was designed to use a small penetrator -- nicknamed the mole -- to implement a string of temperature sensors in the soil to a depth of 5m. The mole itself is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2021-12
Main Authors: Spohn, T, Hudson, T L, Witte, L, Wippermann, T, Wisniewski, L, Kediziora, B, Vrettos, C, Lorenz, R D, Golombek, M, Lichtenfeld, R, Grott, M, Knollenberg, J, Krause, C, Fantinati, C, Nagihara, S, Grygorczuk, J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Spohn, T
Hudson, T L
Witte, L
Wippermann, T
Wisniewski, L
Kediziora, B
Vrettos, C
Lorenz, R D
Golombek, M
Lichtenfeld, R
Grott, M
Knollenberg, J
Krause, C
Fantinati, C
Nagihara, S
Grygorczuk, J
description The NASA InSight mission payload includes the Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package HP\(^3\) to measure the surface heat flow. The package was designed to use a small penetrator -- nicknamed the mole -- to implement a string of temperature sensors in the soil to a depth of 5m. The mole itself is equipped with sensors to measure a thermal conductivity as it proceeds to depth. The heat flow would be calculated from the product of the temperature gradient and the thermal conductivity. To avoid the perturbation caused by annual surface temperature variations, the measurements would be taken at a depth between 3 m and 5 m. The mole was designed to penetrate cohesionless soil similar to Quartz sand which was expected to provide a good analogue material for Martian sand. The sand would provide friction to the buried mole hull to balance the remaining recoil of the mole hammer mechanism that drives the mole forward. Unfortunately, the mole did not penetrate more than a mole length of 40 cm. The failure to penetrate deeper was largely due to a few tens of centimeter thick cohesive duricrust that failed to provide the required friction. Although a suppressor mass and spring in the hammer mechanism absorbed much of the recoil, the available mass did not allow a system that would have eliminated the recoil. The mole penetrated to 40 cm depth benefiting from friction provided by springs in the support structure from which it was deployed. It was found in addition that the Martian soil provided unexpected levels of penetration resistance that would have motivated to designing a more powerful mole. It is concluded that more mass would have allowed to design a more robust system with little or no recoil, more energy of the mole hammer mechanism and a more massive support structure.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2112.03234
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2607468414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2607468414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_26074684143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMFKAzEURUNBsGg_wN0DN-2iY_KSmQ5ui1JBQbDLYgn01ckwk4x5r-LnO4V-gKvD5VyOUndGF64uS_3g82_4KdAYLLRF6yZqitaaZe0Qr9WMudVaY7XCsrRT1W4bgpf4Eb4agc37bv5pdwvoU0eQIrz5zI_wSswpMnTkc6QDHHPqwYtQPwiDJBgokmQvdB4HGqSBEEHG8hiQ4CNwCt2tujr6jml24Y26f37arjfLIafvE7Hs23TKcVR7rPTKVbUzzv7v9Qeb000O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2607468414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The InSight HP\(^3\) mole on Mars: Lessons learned from attempts to penetrate to depth in the Martian soil</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Spohn, T ; Hudson, T L ; Witte, L ; Wippermann, T ; Wisniewski, L ; Kediziora, B ; Vrettos, C ; Lorenz, R D ; Golombek, M ; Lichtenfeld, R ; Grott, M ; Knollenberg, J ; Krause, C ; Fantinati, C ; Nagihara, S ; Grygorczuk, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Spohn, T ; Hudson, T L ; Witte, L ; Wippermann, T ; Wisniewski, L ; Kediziora, B ; Vrettos, C ; Lorenz, R D ; Golombek, M ; Lichtenfeld, R ; Grott, M ; Knollenberg, J ; Krause, C ; Fantinati, C ; Nagihara, S ; Grygorczuk, J</creatorcontrib><description>The NASA InSight mission payload includes the Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package HP\(^3\) to measure the surface heat flow. The package was designed to use a small penetrator -- nicknamed the mole -- to implement a string of temperature sensors in the soil to a depth of 5m. The mole itself is equipped with sensors to measure a thermal conductivity as it proceeds to depth. The heat flow would be calculated from the product of the temperature gradient and the thermal conductivity. To avoid the perturbation caused by annual surface temperature variations, the measurements would be taken at a depth between 3 m and 5 m. The mole was designed to penetrate cohesionless soil similar to Quartz sand which was expected to provide a good analogue material for Martian sand. The sand would provide friction to the buried mole hull to balance the remaining recoil of the mole hammer mechanism that drives the mole forward. Unfortunately, the mole did not penetrate more than a mole length of 40 cm. The failure to penetrate deeper was largely due to a few tens of centimeter thick cohesive duricrust that failed to provide the required friction. Although a suppressor mass and spring in the hammer mechanism absorbed much of the recoil, the available mass did not allow a system that would have eliminated the recoil. The mole penetrated to 40 cm depth benefiting from friction provided by springs in the support structure from which it was deployed. It was found in addition that the Martian soil provided unexpected levels of penetration resistance that would have motivated to designing a more powerful mole. It is concluded that more mass would have allowed to design a more robust system with little or no recoil, more energy of the mole hammer mechanism and a more massive support structure.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.03234</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Friction ; Hammers ; Heat conductivity ; Heat transfer ; Heat transmission ; Mars ; Penetration resistance ; Perturbation ; Physical properties ; Recoil ; Sand ; Seasonal variations ; Soils ; Temperature sensors ; Thermal conductivity</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2021-12</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2607468414?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>776,780,25731,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spohn, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, T L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witte, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wippermann, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisniewski, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kediziora, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrettos, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenz, R D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golombek, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtenfeld, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grott, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knollenberg, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fantinati, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagihara, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grygorczuk, J</creatorcontrib><title>The InSight HP\(^3\) mole on Mars: Lessons learned from attempts to penetrate to depth in the Martian soil</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>The NASA InSight mission payload includes the Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package HP\(^3\) to measure the surface heat flow. The package was designed to use a small penetrator -- nicknamed the mole -- to implement a string of temperature sensors in the soil to a depth of 5m. The mole itself is equipped with sensors to measure a thermal conductivity as it proceeds to depth. The heat flow would be calculated from the product of the temperature gradient and the thermal conductivity. To avoid the perturbation caused by annual surface temperature variations, the measurements would be taken at a depth between 3 m and 5 m. The mole was designed to penetrate cohesionless soil similar to Quartz sand which was expected to provide a good analogue material for Martian sand. The sand would provide friction to the buried mole hull to balance the remaining recoil of the mole hammer mechanism that drives the mole forward. Unfortunately, the mole did not penetrate more than a mole length of 40 cm. The failure to penetrate deeper was largely due to a few tens of centimeter thick cohesive duricrust that failed to provide the required friction. Although a suppressor mass and spring in the hammer mechanism absorbed much of the recoil, the available mass did not allow a system that would have eliminated the recoil. The mole penetrated to 40 cm depth benefiting from friction provided by springs in the support structure from which it was deployed. It was found in addition that the Martian soil provided unexpected levels of penetration resistance that would have motivated to designing a more powerful mole. It is concluded that more mass would have allowed to design a more robust system with little or no recoil, more energy of the mole hammer mechanism and a more massive support structure.</description><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Hammers</subject><subject>Heat conductivity</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Heat transmission</subject><subject>Mars</subject><subject>Penetration resistance</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Recoil</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Temperature sensors</subject><subject>Thermal conductivity</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjMFKAzEURUNBsGg_wN0DN-2iY_KSmQ5ui1JBQbDLYgn01ckwk4x5r-LnO4V-gKvD5VyOUndGF64uS_3g82_4KdAYLLRF6yZqitaaZe0Qr9WMudVaY7XCsrRT1W4bgpf4Eb4agc37bv5pdwvoU0eQIrz5zI_wSswpMnTkc6QDHHPqwYtQPwiDJBgokmQvdB4HGqSBEEHG8hiQ4CNwCt2tujr6jml24Y26f37arjfLIafvE7Hs23TKcVR7rPTKVbUzzv7v9Qeb000O</recordid><startdate>20211206</startdate><enddate>20211206</enddate><creator>Spohn, T</creator><creator>Hudson, T L</creator><creator>Witte, L</creator><creator>Wippermann, T</creator><creator>Wisniewski, L</creator><creator>Kediziora, B</creator><creator>Vrettos, C</creator><creator>Lorenz, R D</creator><creator>Golombek, M</creator><creator>Lichtenfeld, R</creator><creator>Grott, M</creator><creator>Knollenberg, J</creator><creator>Krause, C</creator><creator>Fantinati, C</creator><creator>Nagihara, S</creator><creator>Grygorczuk, J</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211206</creationdate><title>The InSight HP\(^3\) mole on Mars: Lessons learned from attempts to penetrate to depth in the Martian soil</title><author>Spohn, T ; Hudson, T L ; Witte, L ; Wippermann, T ; Wisniewski, L ; Kediziora, B ; Vrettos, C ; Lorenz, R D ; Golombek, M ; Lichtenfeld, R ; Grott, M ; Knollenberg, J ; Krause, C ; Fantinati, C ; Nagihara, S ; Grygorczuk, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_26074684143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Hammers</topic><topic>Heat conductivity</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Heat transmission</topic><topic>Mars</topic><topic>Penetration resistance</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Recoil</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Temperature sensors</topic><topic>Thermal conductivity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spohn, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, T L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witte, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wippermann, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisniewski, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kediziora, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrettos, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenz, R D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golombek, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtenfeld, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grott, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knollenberg, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fantinati, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagihara, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grygorczuk, J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spohn, T</au><au>Hudson, T L</au><au>Witte, L</au><au>Wippermann, T</au><au>Wisniewski, L</au><au>Kediziora, B</au><au>Vrettos, C</au><au>Lorenz, R D</au><au>Golombek, M</au><au>Lichtenfeld, R</au><au>Grott, M</au><au>Knollenberg, J</au><au>Krause, C</au><au>Fantinati, C</au><au>Nagihara, S</au><au>Grygorczuk, J</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>The InSight HP\(^3\) mole on Mars: Lessons learned from attempts to penetrate to depth in the Martian soil</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2021-12-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>The NASA InSight mission payload includes the Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package HP\(^3\) to measure the surface heat flow. The package was designed to use a small penetrator -- nicknamed the mole -- to implement a string of temperature sensors in the soil to a depth of 5m. The mole itself is equipped with sensors to measure a thermal conductivity as it proceeds to depth. The heat flow would be calculated from the product of the temperature gradient and the thermal conductivity. To avoid the perturbation caused by annual surface temperature variations, the measurements would be taken at a depth between 3 m and 5 m. The mole was designed to penetrate cohesionless soil similar to Quartz sand which was expected to provide a good analogue material for Martian sand. The sand would provide friction to the buried mole hull to balance the remaining recoil of the mole hammer mechanism that drives the mole forward. Unfortunately, the mole did not penetrate more than a mole length of 40 cm. The failure to penetrate deeper was largely due to a few tens of centimeter thick cohesive duricrust that failed to provide the required friction. Although a suppressor mass and spring in the hammer mechanism absorbed much of the recoil, the available mass did not allow a system that would have eliminated the recoil. The mole penetrated to 40 cm depth benefiting from friction provided by springs in the support structure from which it was deployed. It was found in addition that the Martian soil provided unexpected levels of penetration resistance that would have motivated to designing a more powerful mole. It is concluded that more mass would have allowed to design a more robust system with little or no recoil, more energy of the mole hammer mechanism and a more massive support structure.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2112.03234</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2021-12
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2607468414
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Friction
Hammers
Heat conductivity
Heat transfer
Heat transmission
Mars
Penetration resistance
Perturbation
Physical properties
Recoil
Sand
Seasonal variations
Soils
Temperature sensors
Thermal conductivity
title The InSight HP\(^3\) mole on Mars: Lessons learned from attempts to penetrate to depth in the Martian soil
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T04%3A46%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=The%20InSight%20HP%5C(%5E3%5C)%20mole%20on%20Mars:%20Lessons%20learned%20from%20attempts%20to%20penetrate%20to%20depth%20in%20the%20Martian%20soil&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Spohn,%20T&rft.date=2021-12-06&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2112.03234&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2607468414%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_26074684143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2607468414&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true