Loading…

Does Conservation Ethic Include Intergenerational Bequest? A Random Utility Model Analysis of Conservation Easements and Agricultural Landowners

As the average age of agricultural producers continues to rise, farm succession planning and the large number of anticipated land transfers are expected to transform rural American agricultural production and landscapes. Policy tools like conservation easements (CEs) can facilitate agricultural land...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rural sociology 2021-12, Vol.86 (4), p.703-727
Main Authors: Keske, Catherine M. H., Arnold, Parker, Cross, Jennifer E., Bastian, Christopher T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3370-5079a50de3c2c835c4a8f44b6344b65a88d6461e76fb0653e9e913a9ec177ce03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3370-5079a50de3c2c835c4a8f44b6344b65a88d6461e76fb0653e9e913a9ec177ce03
container_end_page 727
container_issue 4
container_start_page 703
container_title Rural sociology
container_volume 86
creator Keske, Catherine M. H.
Arnold, Parker
Cross, Jennifer E.
Bastian, Christopher T.
description As the average age of agricultural producers continues to rise, farm succession planning and the large number of anticipated land transfers are expected to transform rural American agricultural production and landscapes. Policy tools like conservation easements (CEs) can facilitate agricultural land preservation through “dead hand control” by restricting the development through binding legal contracts that can be transferred across generations. We examine whether agricultural landowners seek CE agreements to keep the land in agriculture for intergenerational bequest, rather than selling the land for financial gains that could be enjoyed immediately or passed to heirs. We assess whether this may be influenced by landowner conservation ethic or perceived threat to sense of place. We analyze the survey data collected from 2,270 agricultural landowners in Colorado and Wyoming utilizing a random utility model estimation. We find that landowners are less likely to reject a CE agreement when there is a desire to bequest agricultural land to the next generation or a perceived threat to sense of place; however, conservation ethic mitigates intergenerational bequest effects. This indicates that conservation ethic encompasses a desire to pass land to the next generation. Our findings contribute to the conservation literature by advocating for the regenerative approach to land conservation rather than the theory of planned behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ruso.12370
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2608272151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2608272151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3370-5079a50de3c2c835c4a8f44b6344b65a88d6461e76fb0653e9e913a9ec177ce03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OwzAMxiMEEmNw4QkicUPqSJqmf05ojAGThiYNdo6y1B2ZumYkLVPfgkcmXTlxwAf74J8_2x9C15SMqI872zgzoiFLyAkaUB5lAUkZPUUDQlgcEErDc3Th3Jb44DweoO9HAw5PTOXAfslamwpP6w-t8KxSZZODrzXYDVRgj11Z4gf4bMDV93iMl7LKzQ6val3qusWvJocSjz3UOu2wKf4ISwc7qGqH_Rgeb6xWTVk31mvOO6GDX-Iu0VkhSwdXv3WIVk_T98lLMF88zybjeaCY_y7gJMkkJzkwFaqUcRXJtIiidcy6xGWa5nEUU0jiYk1iziCDjDKZgaJJooCwIbrpdffWHP8RW9NYf7oTYUzSMAkpp5667SlljXMWCrG3eidtKygRneOic1wcHfcw7eGDLqH9hxTL1duin_kBydGF3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2608272151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Conservation Ethic Include Intergenerational Bequest? A Random Utility Model Analysis of Conservation Easements and Agricultural Landowners</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Keske, Catherine M. H. ; Arnold, Parker ; Cross, Jennifer E. ; Bastian, Christopher T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Keske, Catherine M. H. ; Arnold, Parker ; Cross, Jennifer E. ; Bastian, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><description>As the average age of agricultural producers continues to rise, farm succession planning and the large number of anticipated land transfers are expected to transform rural American agricultural production and landscapes. Policy tools like conservation easements (CEs) can facilitate agricultural land preservation through “dead hand control” by restricting the development through binding legal contracts that can be transferred across generations. We examine whether agricultural landowners seek CE agreements to keep the land in agriculture for intergenerational bequest, rather than selling the land for financial gains that could be enjoyed immediately or passed to heirs. We assess whether this may be influenced by landowner conservation ethic or perceived threat to sense of place. We analyze the survey data collected from 2,270 agricultural landowners in Colorado and Wyoming utilizing a random utility model estimation. We find that landowners are less likely to reject a CE agreement when there is a desire to bequest agricultural land to the next generation or a perceived threat to sense of place; however, conservation ethic mitigates intergenerational bequest effects. This indicates that conservation ethic encompasses a desire to pass land to the next generation. Our findings contribute to the conservation literature by advocating for the regenerative approach to land conservation rather than the theory of planned behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-0112</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-0831</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ruso.12370</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Columbia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural development ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural production ; Bequests ; Binding ; Conservation ; Conservation (Concept) ; Conservation easements ; Contracts ; Desire ; Easements ; Ethical standards ; Ethics ; Farms ; Intergenerational relationships ; Land conservation ; Land management ; Land use ; Landowners ; Landscape ; Landscape preservation ; Preservation ; Sense of place ; Succession ; Succession planning ; Theory of planned behavior ; Threats</subject><ispartof>Rural sociology, 2021-12, Vol.86 (4), p.703-727</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Rural Sociological Society (RSS).</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3370-5079a50de3c2c835c4a8f44b6344b65a88d6461e76fb0653e9e913a9ec177ce03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3370-5079a50de3c2c835c4a8f44b6344b65a88d6461e76fb0653e9e913a9ec177ce03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8383-5630</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222,33773</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keske, Catherine M. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Parker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastian, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><title>Does Conservation Ethic Include Intergenerational Bequest? A Random Utility Model Analysis of Conservation Easements and Agricultural Landowners</title><title>Rural sociology</title><description>As the average age of agricultural producers continues to rise, farm succession planning and the large number of anticipated land transfers are expected to transform rural American agricultural production and landscapes. Policy tools like conservation easements (CEs) can facilitate agricultural land preservation through “dead hand control” by restricting the development through binding legal contracts that can be transferred across generations. We examine whether agricultural landowners seek CE agreements to keep the land in agriculture for intergenerational bequest, rather than selling the land for financial gains that could be enjoyed immediately or passed to heirs. We assess whether this may be influenced by landowner conservation ethic or perceived threat to sense of place. We analyze the survey data collected from 2,270 agricultural landowners in Colorado and Wyoming utilizing a random utility model estimation. We find that landowners are less likely to reject a CE agreement when there is a desire to bequest agricultural land to the next generation or a perceived threat to sense of place; however, conservation ethic mitigates intergenerational bequest effects. This indicates that conservation ethic encompasses a desire to pass land to the next generation. Our findings contribute to the conservation literature by advocating for the regenerative approach to land conservation rather than the theory of planned behavior.</description><subject>Agricultural development</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Bequests</subject><subject>Binding</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation (Concept)</subject><subject>Conservation easements</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Desire</subject><subject>Easements</subject><subject>Ethical standards</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Intergenerational relationships</subject><subject>Land conservation</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape preservation</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Sense of place</subject><subject>Succession</subject><subject>Succession planning</subject><subject>Theory of planned behavior</subject><subject>Threats</subject><issn>0036-0112</issn><issn>1549-0831</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9OwzAMxiMEEmNw4QkicUPqSJqmf05ojAGThiYNdo6y1B2ZumYkLVPfgkcmXTlxwAf74J8_2x9C15SMqI872zgzoiFLyAkaUB5lAUkZPUUDQlgcEErDc3Th3Jb44DweoO9HAw5PTOXAfslamwpP6w-t8KxSZZODrzXYDVRgj11Z4gf4bMDV93iMl7LKzQ6val3qusWvJocSjz3UOu2wKf4ISwc7qGqH_Rgeb6xWTVk31mvOO6GDX-Iu0VkhSwdXv3WIVk_T98lLMF88zybjeaCY_y7gJMkkJzkwFaqUcRXJtIiidcy6xGWa5nEUU0jiYk1iziCDjDKZgaJJooCwIbrpdffWHP8RW9NYf7oTYUzSMAkpp5667SlljXMWCrG3eidtKygRneOic1wcHfcw7eGDLqH9hxTL1duin_kBydGF3w</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Keske, Catherine M. H.</creator><creator>Arnold, Parker</creator><creator>Cross, Jennifer E.</creator><creator>Bastian, Christopher T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8383-5630</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Does Conservation Ethic Include Intergenerational Bequest? A Random Utility Model Analysis of Conservation Easements and Agricultural Landowners</title><author>Keske, Catherine M. H. ; Arnold, Parker ; Cross, Jennifer E. ; Bastian, Christopher T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3370-5079a50de3c2c835c4a8f44b6344b65a88d6461e76fb0653e9e913a9ec177ce03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural development</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Bequests</topic><topic>Binding</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation (Concept)</topic><topic>Conservation easements</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Desire</topic><topic>Easements</topic><topic>Ethical standards</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Intergenerational relationships</topic><topic>Land conservation</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape preservation</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Sense of place</topic><topic>Succession</topic><topic>Succession planning</topic><topic>Theory of planned behavior</topic><topic>Threats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keske, Catherine M. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Parker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastian, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Rural sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keske, Catherine M. H.</au><au>Arnold, Parker</au><au>Cross, Jennifer E.</au><au>Bastian, Christopher T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Conservation Ethic Include Intergenerational Bequest? A Random Utility Model Analysis of Conservation Easements and Agricultural Landowners</atitle><jtitle>Rural sociology</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>703</spage><epage>727</epage><pages>703-727</pages><issn>0036-0112</issn><eissn>1549-0831</eissn><abstract>As the average age of agricultural producers continues to rise, farm succession planning and the large number of anticipated land transfers are expected to transform rural American agricultural production and landscapes. Policy tools like conservation easements (CEs) can facilitate agricultural land preservation through “dead hand control” by restricting the development through binding legal contracts that can be transferred across generations. We examine whether agricultural landowners seek CE agreements to keep the land in agriculture for intergenerational bequest, rather than selling the land for financial gains that could be enjoyed immediately or passed to heirs. We assess whether this may be influenced by landowner conservation ethic or perceived threat to sense of place. We analyze the survey data collected from 2,270 agricultural landowners in Colorado and Wyoming utilizing a random utility model estimation. We find that landowners are less likely to reject a CE agreement when there is a desire to bequest agricultural land to the next generation or a perceived threat to sense of place; however, conservation ethic mitigates intergenerational bequest effects. This indicates that conservation ethic encompasses a desire to pass land to the next generation. Our findings contribute to the conservation literature by advocating for the regenerative approach to land conservation rather than the theory of planned behavior.</abstract><cop>Columbia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ruso.12370</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8383-5630</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-0112
ispartof Rural sociology, 2021-12, Vol.86 (4), p.703-727
issn 0036-0112
1549-0831
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2608272151
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Agricultural development
Agricultural land
Agricultural production
Bequests
Binding
Conservation
Conservation (Concept)
Conservation easements
Contracts
Desire
Easements
Ethical standards
Ethics
Farms
Intergenerational relationships
Land conservation
Land management
Land use
Landowners
Landscape
Landscape preservation
Preservation
Sense of place
Succession
Succession planning
Theory of planned behavior
Threats
title Does Conservation Ethic Include Intergenerational Bequest? A Random Utility Model Analysis of Conservation Easements and Agricultural Landowners
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A01%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Conservation%20Ethic%20Include%20Intergenerational%20Bequest?%20A%20Random%20Utility%20Model%20Analysis%20of%20Conservation%20Easements%20and%20Agricultural%20Landowners&rft.jtitle=Rural%20sociology&rft.au=Keske,%20Catherine%20M.%20H.&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=703&rft.epage=727&rft.pages=703-727&rft.issn=0036-0112&rft.eissn=1549-0831&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ruso.12370&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2608272151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3370-5079a50de3c2c835c4a8f44b6344b65a88d6461e76fb0653e9e913a9ec177ce03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2608272151&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true