Loading…
Does Conservation Ethic Include Intergenerational Bequest? A Random Utility Model Analysis of Conservation Easements and Agricultural Landowners
As the average age of agricultural producers continues to rise, farm succession planning and the large number of anticipated land transfers are expected to transform rural American agricultural production and landscapes. Policy tools like conservation easements (CEs) can facilitate agricultural land...
Saved in:
Published in: | Rural sociology 2021-12, Vol.86 (4), p.703-727 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3370-5079a50de3c2c835c4a8f44b6344b65a88d6461e76fb0653e9e913a9ec177ce03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3370-5079a50de3c2c835c4a8f44b6344b65a88d6461e76fb0653e9e913a9ec177ce03 |
container_end_page | 727 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 703 |
container_title | Rural sociology |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Keske, Catherine M. H. Arnold, Parker Cross, Jennifer E. Bastian, Christopher T. |
description | As the average age of agricultural producers continues to rise, farm succession planning and the large number of anticipated land transfers are expected to transform rural American agricultural production and landscapes. Policy tools like conservation easements (CEs) can facilitate agricultural land preservation through “dead hand control” by restricting the development through binding legal contracts that can be transferred across generations. We examine whether agricultural landowners seek CE agreements to keep the land in agriculture for intergenerational bequest, rather than selling the land for financial gains that could be enjoyed immediately or passed to heirs. We assess whether this may be influenced by landowner conservation ethic or perceived threat to sense of place. We analyze the survey data collected from 2,270 agricultural landowners in Colorado and Wyoming utilizing a random utility model estimation. We find that landowners are less likely to reject a CE agreement when there is a desire to bequest agricultural land to the next generation or a perceived threat to sense of place; however, conservation ethic mitigates intergenerational bequest effects. This indicates that conservation ethic encompasses a desire to pass land to the next generation. Our findings contribute to the conservation literature by advocating for the regenerative approach to land conservation rather than the theory of planned behavior. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ruso.12370 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2608272151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2608272151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3370-5079a50de3c2c835c4a8f44b6344b65a88d6461e76fb0653e9e913a9ec177ce03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OwzAMxiMEEmNw4QkicUPqSJqmf05ojAGThiYNdo6y1B2ZumYkLVPfgkcmXTlxwAf74J8_2x9C15SMqI872zgzoiFLyAkaUB5lAUkZPUUDQlgcEErDc3Th3Jb44DweoO9HAw5PTOXAfslamwpP6w-t8KxSZZODrzXYDVRgj11Z4gf4bMDV93iMl7LKzQ6val3qusWvJocSjz3UOu2wKf4ISwc7qGqH_Rgeb6xWTVk31mvOO6GDX-Iu0VkhSwdXv3WIVk_T98lLMF88zybjeaCY_y7gJMkkJzkwFaqUcRXJtIiidcy6xGWa5nEUU0jiYk1iziCDjDKZgaJJooCwIbrpdffWHP8RW9NYf7oTYUzSMAkpp5667SlljXMWCrG3eidtKygRneOic1wcHfcw7eGDLqH9hxTL1duin_kBydGF3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2608272151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Conservation Ethic Include Intergenerational Bequest? A Random Utility Model Analysis of Conservation Easements and Agricultural Landowners</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Keske, Catherine M. H. ; Arnold, Parker ; Cross, Jennifer E. ; Bastian, Christopher T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Keske, Catherine M. H. ; Arnold, Parker ; Cross, Jennifer E. ; Bastian, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><description>As the average age of agricultural producers continues to rise, farm succession planning and the large number of anticipated land transfers are expected to transform rural American agricultural production and landscapes. Policy tools like conservation easements (CEs) can facilitate agricultural land preservation through “dead hand control” by restricting the development through binding legal contracts that can be transferred across generations. We examine whether agricultural landowners seek CE agreements to keep the land in agriculture for intergenerational bequest, rather than selling the land for financial gains that could be enjoyed immediately or passed to heirs. We assess whether this may be influenced by landowner conservation ethic or perceived threat to sense of place. We analyze the survey data collected from 2,270 agricultural landowners in Colorado and Wyoming utilizing a random utility model estimation. We find that landowners are less likely to reject a CE agreement when there is a desire to bequest agricultural land to the next generation or a perceived threat to sense of place; however, conservation ethic mitigates intergenerational bequest effects. This indicates that conservation ethic encompasses a desire to pass land to the next generation. Our findings contribute to the conservation literature by advocating for the regenerative approach to land conservation rather than the theory of planned behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-0112</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-0831</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ruso.12370</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Columbia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural development ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural production ; Bequests ; Binding ; Conservation ; Conservation (Concept) ; Conservation easements ; Contracts ; Desire ; Easements ; Ethical standards ; Ethics ; Farms ; Intergenerational relationships ; Land conservation ; Land management ; Land use ; Landowners ; Landscape ; Landscape preservation ; Preservation ; Sense of place ; Succession ; Succession planning ; Theory of planned behavior ; Threats</subject><ispartof>Rural sociology, 2021-12, Vol.86 (4), p.703-727</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Rural Sociological Society (RSS).</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3370-5079a50de3c2c835c4a8f44b6344b65a88d6461e76fb0653e9e913a9ec177ce03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3370-5079a50de3c2c835c4a8f44b6344b65a88d6461e76fb0653e9e913a9ec177ce03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8383-5630</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222,33773</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keske, Catherine M. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Parker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastian, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><title>Does Conservation Ethic Include Intergenerational Bequest? A Random Utility Model Analysis of Conservation Easements and Agricultural Landowners</title><title>Rural sociology</title><description>As the average age of agricultural producers continues to rise, farm succession planning and the large number of anticipated land transfers are expected to transform rural American agricultural production and landscapes. Policy tools like conservation easements (CEs) can facilitate agricultural land preservation through “dead hand control” by restricting the development through binding legal contracts that can be transferred across generations. We examine whether agricultural landowners seek CE agreements to keep the land in agriculture for intergenerational bequest, rather than selling the land for financial gains that could be enjoyed immediately or passed to heirs. We assess whether this may be influenced by landowner conservation ethic or perceived threat to sense of place. We analyze the survey data collected from 2,270 agricultural landowners in Colorado and Wyoming utilizing a random utility model estimation. We find that landowners are less likely to reject a CE agreement when there is a desire to bequest agricultural land to the next generation or a perceived threat to sense of place; however, conservation ethic mitigates intergenerational bequest effects. This indicates that conservation ethic encompasses a desire to pass land to the next generation. Our findings contribute to the conservation literature by advocating for the regenerative approach to land conservation rather than the theory of planned behavior.</description><subject>Agricultural development</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Bequests</subject><subject>Binding</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation (Concept)</subject><subject>Conservation easements</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Desire</subject><subject>Easements</subject><subject>Ethical standards</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Intergenerational relationships</subject><subject>Land conservation</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape preservation</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Sense of place</subject><subject>Succession</subject><subject>Succession planning</subject><subject>Theory of planned behavior</subject><subject>Threats</subject><issn>0036-0112</issn><issn>1549-0831</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9OwzAMxiMEEmNw4QkicUPqSJqmf05ojAGThiYNdo6y1B2ZumYkLVPfgkcmXTlxwAf74J8_2x9C15SMqI872zgzoiFLyAkaUB5lAUkZPUUDQlgcEErDc3Th3Jb44DweoO9HAw5PTOXAfslamwpP6w-t8KxSZZODrzXYDVRgj11Z4gf4bMDV93iMl7LKzQ6val3qusWvJocSjz3UOu2wKf4ISwc7qGqH_Rgeb6xWTVk31mvOO6GDX-Iu0VkhSwdXv3WIVk_T98lLMF88zybjeaCY_y7gJMkkJzkwFaqUcRXJtIiidcy6xGWa5nEUU0jiYk1iziCDjDKZgaJJooCwIbrpdffWHP8RW9NYf7oTYUzSMAkpp5667SlljXMWCrG3eidtKygRneOic1wcHfcw7eGDLqH9hxTL1duin_kBydGF3w</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Keske, Catherine M. H.</creator><creator>Arnold, Parker</creator><creator>Cross, Jennifer E.</creator><creator>Bastian, Christopher T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8383-5630</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Does Conservation Ethic Include Intergenerational Bequest? A Random Utility Model Analysis of Conservation Easements and Agricultural Landowners</title><author>Keske, Catherine M. H. ; Arnold, Parker ; Cross, Jennifer E. ; Bastian, Christopher T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3370-5079a50de3c2c835c4a8f44b6344b65a88d6461e76fb0653e9e913a9ec177ce03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural development</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Bequests</topic><topic>Binding</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation (Concept)</topic><topic>Conservation easements</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Desire</topic><topic>Easements</topic><topic>Ethical standards</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Intergenerational relationships</topic><topic>Land conservation</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape preservation</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Sense of place</topic><topic>Succession</topic><topic>Succession planning</topic><topic>Theory of planned behavior</topic><topic>Threats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keske, Catherine M. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Parker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastian, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Rural sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keske, Catherine M. H.</au><au>Arnold, Parker</au><au>Cross, Jennifer E.</au><au>Bastian, Christopher T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Conservation Ethic Include Intergenerational Bequest? A Random Utility Model Analysis of Conservation Easements and Agricultural Landowners</atitle><jtitle>Rural sociology</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>703</spage><epage>727</epage><pages>703-727</pages><issn>0036-0112</issn><eissn>1549-0831</eissn><abstract>As the average age of agricultural producers continues to rise, farm succession planning and the large number of anticipated land transfers are expected to transform rural American agricultural production and landscapes. Policy tools like conservation easements (CEs) can facilitate agricultural land preservation through “dead hand control” by restricting the development through binding legal contracts that can be transferred across generations. We examine whether agricultural landowners seek CE agreements to keep the land in agriculture for intergenerational bequest, rather than selling the land for financial gains that could be enjoyed immediately or passed to heirs. We assess whether this may be influenced by landowner conservation ethic or perceived threat to sense of place. We analyze the survey data collected from 2,270 agricultural landowners in Colorado and Wyoming utilizing a random utility model estimation. We find that landowners are less likely to reject a CE agreement when there is a desire to bequest agricultural land to the next generation or a perceived threat to sense of place; however, conservation ethic mitigates intergenerational bequest effects. This indicates that conservation ethic encompasses a desire to pass land to the next generation. Our findings contribute to the conservation literature by advocating for the regenerative approach to land conservation rather than the theory of planned behavior.</abstract><cop>Columbia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ruso.12370</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8383-5630</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0036-0112 |
ispartof | Rural sociology, 2021-12, Vol.86 (4), p.703-727 |
issn | 0036-0112 1549-0831 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2608272151 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Agricultural development Agricultural land Agricultural production Bequests Binding Conservation Conservation (Concept) Conservation easements Contracts Desire Easements Ethical standards Ethics Farms Intergenerational relationships Land conservation Land management Land use Landowners Landscape Landscape preservation Preservation Sense of place Succession Succession planning Theory of planned behavior Threats |
title | Does Conservation Ethic Include Intergenerational Bequest? A Random Utility Model Analysis of Conservation Easements and Agricultural Landowners |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A01%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Conservation%20Ethic%20Include%20Intergenerational%20Bequest?%20A%20Random%20Utility%20Model%20Analysis%20of%20Conservation%20Easements%20and%20Agricultural%20Landowners&rft.jtitle=Rural%20sociology&rft.au=Keske,%20Catherine%20M.%20H.&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=703&rft.epage=727&rft.pages=703-727&rft.issn=0036-0112&rft.eissn=1549-0831&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ruso.12370&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2608272151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3370-5079a50de3c2c835c4a8f44b6344b65a88d6461e76fb0653e9e913a9ec177ce03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2608272151&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |