Loading…
A phyto-guide to species selection for optimized South African green infrastructure
In South Africa, rapid environmental degeneration caused by anthropogenic pollution poses a major ecological engineering problem, demanding proper resource mitigation strategies. For the treatment of polluted water and degraded soil systems, green infrastructure (GI) ofers an efective, sustainable a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water S. A. 2021-10, Vol.47 (4), p.515-522 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 522 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 515 |
container_title | Water S. A. |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Jacklin, DM Brink, IC Jacobs, SM |
description | In South Africa, rapid environmental degeneration caused by anthropogenic pollution poses a major ecological engineering problem, demanding proper resource mitigation strategies. For the treatment of polluted water and degraded soil systems, green infrastructure (GI) ofers an efective, sustainable and afordable nature-based alternative to grey infrastructure. An additive benefit within GI, plant species provide enormous potential to treatment; however, species vary substantially in their pollutant removal and hydrologic performance. South African civil engineers tasked with designing GI often lack expertise and knowledge of plant behaviour and ecosystem dynamics. Therefore, this paper proposes a decision framework to facilitate selection for designing local GI in the form of a phyto-guide, based on existing recommendations and knowledge of removal processes and plant behaviour. Interdisciplinarity at the core of the phyto-guide relies on continuous specialist collaboration with each selection criteria, whilst eficiency and sustainability are considered equally important contributors to successful GI functioning. The spread of invasive alien plants, whether accidental or deliberate, negatively impacts an ecosystem's capacity to deliver goods and services. Thus, the desire to optimize GI by incorporating efective phytoremediators cannot be prioritised over conservation concerns. In addition, this paper seeks to advance the GI limitation of relying solely on previously identified phytoremediators, by including evaluation criteria of beneficial plant traits as well as plant distribution, behaviour and diversity into the decision-making process for optimized GI. It is recommended that future research engages in discovering less invasive, naturally occurring local species as potential phytoremediators, inspired by South Africa's rich biodiversity and endemism, as well as conveying the importance of consultation with engineers and ecologists for optimized GI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.17159/wsa/2021.v47.i4.3875 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2609423830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A683998705</galeid><sabinet_id>https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-waters-v47-n4-a14</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>A683998705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-900b2393299d6161a3a060029467db15fd2c5d7f7b9ddec1fa601401d75964f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkU-LFDEQxYMoOK5-BCHguXuTzr_OcVhcV1jwsHoO6aQynWE2aZO0i356IyN1KKh6v3oPCqGPlIxUUaFvX6q9nchEx19cjZGPbFbiFTrQmcpBaUFeowNhah64YvNb9K7WMyETY1wf0NMRb-vvlofTHj3glnHdwEWouMIFXIs54ZALzluLz_EPePyU97biYyjR2YRPBSDhmEKxtZXdtb3Ae_Qm2EuFD__7Dfpx__n73cPw-O3L17vj4-C4EG3QhCwT02zS2ksqqWWWyB5Mc6n8QkXwkxNeBbVo78HRYCWhnFCvhJY8cHaDPl3vbiX_3KE2c857Sd3STJJoPrGZka4ar6qTvYDpSXMr1vXy8BxdThBinx_lzLSeFREduL8C1S4xQTPVwrYvZm1tq2b1F7Pa5Dvzb0eJmIiBszMvtkGppr_AJG4s5ewv2zx9kQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2609423830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A phyto-guide to species selection for optimized South African green infrastructure</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Jacklin, DM ; Brink, IC ; Jacobs, SM</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacklin, DM ; Brink, IC ; Jacobs, SM</creatorcontrib><description>In South Africa, rapid environmental degeneration caused by anthropogenic pollution poses a major ecological engineering problem, demanding proper resource mitigation strategies. For the treatment of polluted water and degraded soil systems, green infrastructure (GI) ofers an efective, sustainable and afordable nature-based alternative to grey infrastructure. An additive benefit within GI, plant species provide enormous potential to treatment; however, species vary substantially in their pollutant removal and hydrologic performance. South African civil engineers tasked with designing GI often lack expertise and knowledge of plant behaviour and ecosystem dynamics. Therefore, this paper proposes a decision framework to facilitate selection for designing local GI in the form of a phyto-guide, based on existing recommendations and knowledge of removal processes and plant behaviour. Interdisciplinarity at the core of the phyto-guide relies on continuous specialist collaboration with each selection criteria, whilst eficiency and sustainability are considered equally important contributors to successful GI functioning. The spread of invasive alien plants, whether accidental or deliberate, negatively impacts an ecosystem's capacity to deliver goods and services. Thus, the desire to optimize GI by incorporating efective phytoremediators cannot be prioritised over conservation concerns. In addition, this paper seeks to advance the GI limitation of relying solely on previously identified phytoremediators, by including evaluation criteria of beneficial plant traits as well as plant distribution, behaviour and diversity into the decision-making process for optimized GI. It is recommended that future research engages in discovering less invasive, naturally occurring local species as potential phytoremediators, inspired by South Africa's rich biodiversity and endemism, as well as conveying the importance of consultation with engineers and ecologists for optimized GI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1816-7950</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17159/wsa/2021.v47.i4.3875</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Gezina: Water Research Commission (WRC)</publisher><subject>Additives ; Anthropogenic factors ; Biodiversity ; Bioremediation ; Civil engineers ; Climate change ; Collaboration ; Criteria ; Decision making ; Degeneration ; Design ; Ecological effects ; ecological engineering ; Ecologists ; Ecology ; Ecosystem dynamics ; Ecosystems ; Efficiency ; Endemism ; Engineering ; Engineers ; Environmental engineering ; Environmental impact ; Flowers & plants ; Green infrastructure ; Human influences ; Hydrology ; Infrastructure ; Infrastructure (Economics) ; Invasive plants ; Invasive species ; Knowledge ; Mitigation ; Morphology ; Physiology ; Phytoremediation ; phytotechnologies ; Plant introductions ; Plant species ; Pollutant removal ; Pollutants ; Pollution ; Practical guide ; Rehabilitation ; Removal ; Sediment pollution ; Soil degradation ; Soil pollution ; Soil water ; Stormwater management ; Success ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; System effectiveness ; Urban planning ; Wastewater treatment ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>Water S. A., 2021-10, Vol.47 (4), p.515-522</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Water Research Commission</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://www.wrc.org.za/water-sa/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2609423830/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2609423830?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacklin, DM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brink, IC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, SM</creatorcontrib><title>A phyto-guide to species selection for optimized South African green infrastructure</title><title>Water S. A.</title><description>In South Africa, rapid environmental degeneration caused by anthropogenic pollution poses a major ecological engineering problem, demanding proper resource mitigation strategies. For the treatment of polluted water and degraded soil systems, green infrastructure (GI) ofers an efective, sustainable and afordable nature-based alternative to grey infrastructure. An additive benefit within GI, plant species provide enormous potential to treatment; however, species vary substantially in their pollutant removal and hydrologic performance. South African civil engineers tasked with designing GI often lack expertise and knowledge of plant behaviour and ecosystem dynamics. Therefore, this paper proposes a decision framework to facilitate selection for designing local GI in the form of a phyto-guide, based on existing recommendations and knowledge of removal processes and plant behaviour. Interdisciplinarity at the core of the phyto-guide relies on continuous specialist collaboration with each selection criteria, whilst eficiency and sustainability are considered equally important contributors to successful GI functioning. The spread of invasive alien plants, whether accidental or deliberate, negatively impacts an ecosystem's capacity to deliver goods and services. Thus, the desire to optimize GI by incorporating efective phytoremediators cannot be prioritised over conservation concerns. In addition, this paper seeks to advance the GI limitation of relying solely on previously identified phytoremediators, by including evaluation criteria of beneficial plant traits as well as plant distribution, behaviour and diversity into the decision-making process for optimized GI. It is recommended that future research engages in discovering less invasive, naturally occurring local species as potential phytoremediators, inspired by South Africa's rich biodiversity and endemism, as well as conveying the importance of consultation with engineers and ecologists for optimized GI.</description><subject>Additives</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bioremediation</subject><subject>Civil engineers</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Degeneration</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>ecological engineering</subject><subject>Ecologists</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem dynamics</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Endemism</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineers</subject><subject>Environmental engineering</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Green infrastructure</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Infrastructure (Economics)</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Phytoremediation</subject><subject>phytotechnologies</subject><subject>Plant introductions</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Pollutant removal</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Practical guide</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Sediment pollution</subject><subject>Soil degradation</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Stormwater management</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>System effectiveness</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>0378-4738</issn><issn>1816-7950</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotkU-LFDEQxYMoOK5-BCHguXuTzr_OcVhcV1jwsHoO6aQynWE2aZO0i356IyN1KKh6v3oPCqGPlIxUUaFvX6q9nchEx19cjZGPbFbiFTrQmcpBaUFeowNhah64YvNb9K7WMyETY1wf0NMRb-vvlofTHj3glnHdwEWouMIFXIs54ZALzluLz_EPePyU97biYyjR2YRPBSDhmEKxtZXdtb3Ae_Qm2EuFD__7Dfpx__n73cPw-O3L17vj4-C4EG3QhCwT02zS2ksqqWWWyB5Mc6n8QkXwkxNeBbVo78HRYCWhnFCvhJY8cHaDPl3vbiX_3KE2c857Sd3STJJoPrGZka4ar6qTvYDpSXMr1vXy8BxdThBinx_lzLSeFREduL8C1S4xQTPVwrYvZm1tq2b1F7Pa5Dvzb0eJmIiBszMvtkGppr_AJG4s5ewv2zx9kQ</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Jacklin, DM</creator><creator>Brink, IC</creator><creator>Jacobs, SM</creator><general>Water Research Commission (WRC)</general><general>Water Research Commission</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>A phyto-guide to species selection for optimized South African green infrastructure</title><author>Jacklin, DM ; Brink, IC ; Jacobs, SM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-900b2393299d6161a3a060029467db15fd2c5d7f7b9ddec1fa601401d75964f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Additives</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bioremediation</topic><topic>Civil engineers</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Degeneration</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>ecological engineering</topic><topic>Ecologists</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem dynamics</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Endemism</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineers</topic><topic>Environmental engineering</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Green infrastructure</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Infrastructure (Economics)</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Phytoremediation</topic><topic>phytotechnologies</topic><topic>Plant introductions</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Pollutant removal</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Practical guide</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Sediment pollution</topic><topic>Soil degradation</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Stormwater management</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>System effectiveness</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacklin, DM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brink, IC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, SM</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacklin, DM</au><au>Brink, IC</au><au>Jacobs, SM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A phyto-guide to species selection for optimized South African green infrastructure</atitle><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>515</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>515-522</pages><issn>0378-4738</issn><eissn>1816-7950</eissn><abstract>In South Africa, rapid environmental degeneration caused by anthropogenic pollution poses a major ecological engineering problem, demanding proper resource mitigation strategies. For the treatment of polluted water and degraded soil systems, green infrastructure (GI) ofers an efective, sustainable and afordable nature-based alternative to grey infrastructure. An additive benefit within GI, plant species provide enormous potential to treatment; however, species vary substantially in their pollutant removal and hydrologic performance. South African civil engineers tasked with designing GI often lack expertise and knowledge of plant behaviour and ecosystem dynamics. Therefore, this paper proposes a decision framework to facilitate selection for designing local GI in the form of a phyto-guide, based on existing recommendations and knowledge of removal processes and plant behaviour. Interdisciplinarity at the core of the phyto-guide relies on continuous specialist collaboration with each selection criteria, whilst eficiency and sustainability are considered equally important contributors to successful GI functioning. The spread of invasive alien plants, whether accidental or deliberate, negatively impacts an ecosystem's capacity to deliver goods and services. Thus, the desire to optimize GI by incorporating efective phytoremediators cannot be prioritised over conservation concerns. In addition, this paper seeks to advance the GI limitation of relying solely on previously identified phytoremediators, by including evaluation criteria of beneficial plant traits as well as plant distribution, behaviour and diversity into the decision-making process for optimized GI. It is recommended that future research engages in discovering less invasive, naturally occurring local species as potential phytoremediators, inspired by South Africa's rich biodiversity and endemism, as well as conveying the importance of consultation with engineers and ecologists for optimized GI.</abstract><cop>Gezina</cop><pub>Water Research Commission (WRC)</pub><doi>10.17159/wsa/2021.v47.i4.3875</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-4738 |
ispartof | Water S. A., 2021-10, Vol.47 (4), p.515-522 |
issn | 0378-4738 1816-7950 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2609423830 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Additives Anthropogenic factors Biodiversity Bioremediation Civil engineers Climate change Collaboration Criteria Decision making Degeneration Design Ecological effects ecological engineering Ecologists Ecology Ecosystem dynamics Ecosystems Efficiency Endemism Engineering Engineers Environmental engineering Environmental impact Flowers & plants Green infrastructure Human influences Hydrology Infrastructure Infrastructure (Economics) Invasive plants Invasive species Knowledge Mitigation Morphology Physiology Phytoremediation phytotechnologies Plant introductions Plant species Pollutant removal Pollutants Pollution Practical guide Rehabilitation Removal Sediment pollution Soil degradation Soil pollution Soil water Stormwater management Success Sustainability Sustainable development System effectiveness Urban planning Wastewater treatment Water pollution |
title | A phyto-guide to species selection for optimized South African green infrastructure |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A31%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20phyto-guide%20to%20species%20selection%20for%20optimized%20South%20African%20green%20infrastructure&rft.jtitle=Water%20S.%20A.&rft.au=Jacklin,%20DM&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=515&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=515-522&rft.issn=0378-4738&rft.eissn=1816-7950&rft_id=info:doi/10.17159/wsa/2021.v47.i4.3875&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA683998705%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-900b2393299d6161a3a060029467db15fd2c5d7f7b9ddec1fa601401d75964f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2609423830&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A683998705&rft_sabinet_id=https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-waters-v47-n4-a14&rfr_iscdi=true |