Loading…

The case for a more precise definition of regulated PFAS

We argue that there is a need for a more precise of PFAS in a way that avoids including compounds with single CF 3 -, -CF 2 -, or &z.dbdsl;CF- groups and excludes TFA and compounds that degrade to just give TFA. An example that meets this need is the definition by the U.S. Environmental Protecti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental science--processes & impacts 2021-12, Vol.23 (12), p.1834-1838
Main Authors: Wallington, T. J, Andersen, M. P. Sulbaek, Nielsen, O. J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We argue that there is a need for a more precise of PFAS in a way that avoids including compounds with single CF 3 -, -CF 2 -, or &z.dbdsl;CF- groups and excludes TFA and compounds that degrade to just give TFA. An example that meets this need is the definition by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency of PFAS as "per- and polyfluorinated substances that structurally contain the unit R-(CF 2 )-C(F)(R 1 )R 2 . Both the CF 2 and CF moieties are saturated carbons and none of the R groups (R, R 1 , or R 2 ) can be hydrogen". Adoption of this definition, or one like it, would place future technical and regulatory discussions of the environmental impacts of organo-fluorine compounds on a sounder technical footing by focusing PFAS discussions and regulation on long-chain perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acids and perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids. Many existing definitions of PFAS are overly broad, there is a strong case for a more precise definition of regulated PFAS.
ISSN:2050-7887
2050-7895
DOI:10.1039/d1em00296a