Analysis of Land Use and Land Cover Using Machine Learning Algorithms on Google Earth Engine for Munneru River Basin, India

• Published in: Sustainability 2021-12, Vol.13 (24), p.13758
• Main Authors: Loukika, Kotapati Narayana, Keesara, Venkata Reddy, Sridhar, Venkataramana
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Agriculture; Algorithms; Barren lands; Classification; Climate change; Climate change research; Datasets; Human populations; Knowledge management; Land cover; Land use; Landsat; Learning algorithms; Machine learning; Natural resource management; Natural resources; Normalized difference vegetative index; Remote sensing; Resource management; River basins; Satellite imagery; Spatial data; Support vector machines; Sustainability; Vegetation; Watershed management
• ISSN: 2071-1050; 2071-1050
• DOI: 10.3390/su132413758

The growing human population accelerates alterations in land use and land cover (LULC) over time, putting tremendous strain on natural resources. Monitoring and assessing LULC change over large areas is critical in a variety of fields, including natural resource management and climate change research. LULC change has emerged as a critical concern for policymakers and environmentalists. As the need for the reliable estimation of LULC maps from remote sensing data grows, it is critical to comprehend how different machine learning classifiers perform. The primary goal of the present study was to classify LULC on the Google Earth Engine platform using three different machine learning algorithms—namely, support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and classification and regression trees (CART)—and to compare their performance using accuracy assessments. The LULC of the study area was classified via supervised classification. For improved classification accuracy, NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) and NDWI (normalized difference water index) indices were also derived and included. For the years 2016, 2018, and 2020, multitemporal Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data with spatial resolutions of 10 m and 30 m were used for the LULC classification. ‘Water bodies’, ‘forest’, ‘barren land’, ‘vegetation’, and ‘built-up’ were the major land use classes. The average overall accuracy of SVM, RF, and CART classifiers for Landsat-8 images was 90.88%, 94.85%, and 82.88%, respectively, and 93.8%, 95.8%, and 86.4% for Sentinel-2 images. These results indicate that RF classifiers outperform both SVM and CART classifiers in terms of accuracy.