Loading…

Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations

In this paper we compare recent efforts towards the constitutionalization of the right to water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru to understand the opportunities and limitations related to the attempts to enhance access to piped water to the highest normative level. Peru passed a constitutional amendmen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water (Basel) 2021-12, Vol.13 (24), p.3519
Main Authors: Côrtes, Lara, Gianella, Camila, Páez, Angela M., Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e300fcc125eae8cb002edc309eb1db4a86ae9f68b5888d0591917b36aa205aa13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e300fcc125eae8cb002edc309eb1db4a86ae9f68b5888d0591917b36aa205aa13
container_end_page
container_issue 24
container_start_page 3519
container_title Water (Basel)
container_volume 13
creator Côrtes, Lara
Gianella, Camila
Páez, Angela M.
Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina
description In this paper we compare recent efforts towards the constitutionalization of the right to water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru to understand the opportunities and limitations related to the attempts to enhance access to piped water to the highest normative level. Peru passed a constitutional amendment in 2017 while Brazil and Colombia have seen much right-to-water activism but have not succeeded in passing such reforms. We explore the role of the existing domestic legal frameworks on drinkable water provision and water management towards the approval of constitutional amendments. We find that all three countries have specialized laws, water governing institutions, and constitutional jurisprudence connecting access to water with rights, but the legal opportunity structures to enforce socio-economic rights vary; they are stronger in Colombia and Brazil, and weaker in Peru. We argue that legal opportunity structures build legal environments that influence constitutional reform success. Legal opportunity structures act as incentives both for social movements to push for reforms and for actors with legislative power to accept or reject them. Our findings also show that in some contexts political cost is a key element of constitutional reforms that enshrine the right to water; therefore, this is an element that should be considered when analyzing these processes.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/w13243519
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2612854627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A810295008</galeid><sourcerecordid>A810295008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e300fcc125eae8cb002edc309eb1db4a86ae9f68b5888d0591917b36aa205aa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUdtKw0AQDaJg0T74Bws-CW3dS5JufNNSL1BQRPExTDaTdiXZjbsbvPyCP-2WijjzMMPhXBgmSU4YnQlR0PN3JngqMlbsJSNO52Kapinb_7cfJmPvX2mstJAyo6Pke2G7Hpw2a7L86NFpNAo9sQ1ZWOODDkPQ1kBLHrGxrvMkWLI0fhMVSMIGyaNeb8IWfYGAjmhDrhx86XYSDVrbVRomBExNHtANF-S-760Lg9FBx5QtvtKdDrAN8cfJQQOtx_HvPEqer5dPi9vp6v7mbnG5miohWJiioLRRivEMAaWqKOVYK0ELrFhdpSBzwKLJZZVJKWuaFaxg80rkAJxmAEwcJac7397ZtwF9KF_t4OKRvuQ54zJLcz6PrNmOtYYWS20aGxyo2DV2WlmDjY74pWSUFxmlMgrOdgLlrPcOm7J3ugP3WTJabv9T_v1H_ACuZINR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2612854627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Côrtes, Lara ; Gianella, Camila ; Páez, Angela M. ; Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina</creator><creatorcontrib>Côrtes, Lara ; Gianella, Camila ; Páez, Angela M. ; Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper we compare recent efforts towards the constitutionalization of the right to water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru to understand the opportunities and limitations related to the attempts to enhance access to piped water to the highest normative level. Peru passed a constitutional amendment in 2017 while Brazil and Colombia have seen much right-to-water activism but have not succeeded in passing such reforms. We explore the role of the existing domestic legal frameworks on drinkable water provision and water management towards the approval of constitutional amendments. We find that all three countries have specialized laws, water governing institutions, and constitutional jurisprudence connecting access to water with rights, but the legal opportunity structures to enforce socio-economic rights vary; they are stronger in Colombia and Brazil, and weaker in Peru. We argue that legal opportunity structures build legal environments that influence constitutional reform success. Legal opportunity structures act as incentives both for social movements to push for reforms and for actors with legislative power to accept or reject them. Our findings also show that in some contexts political cost is a key element of constitutional reforms that enshrine the right to water; therefore, this is an element that should be considered when analyzing these processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w13243519</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Activism ; Book publishing ; Constitutional law ; Constitutions ; COVID-19 ; Drinking water ; Freshwater resources ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legislation ; Management ; Neoliberalism ; Pipelines ; Politics ; Reforms ; Social activism ; Social aspects ; Water ; Water management ; Water rights</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2021-12, Vol.13 (24), p.3519</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e300fcc125eae8cb002edc309eb1db4a86ae9f68b5888d0591917b36aa205aa13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e300fcc125eae8cb002edc309eb1db4a86ae9f68b5888d0591917b36aa205aa13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2656-0589 ; 0000-0003-2585-4865 ; 0000-0002-7481-0861</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2612854627/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2612854627?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,38493,43871,44566,74382,75096</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Côrtes, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianella, Camila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Páez, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>In this paper we compare recent efforts towards the constitutionalization of the right to water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru to understand the opportunities and limitations related to the attempts to enhance access to piped water to the highest normative level. Peru passed a constitutional amendment in 2017 while Brazil and Colombia have seen much right-to-water activism but have not succeeded in passing such reforms. We explore the role of the existing domestic legal frameworks on drinkable water provision and water management towards the approval of constitutional amendments. We find that all three countries have specialized laws, water governing institutions, and constitutional jurisprudence connecting access to water with rights, but the legal opportunity structures to enforce socio-economic rights vary; they are stronger in Colombia and Brazil, and weaker in Peru. We argue that legal opportunity structures build legal environments that influence constitutional reform success. Legal opportunity structures act as incentives both for social movements to push for reforms and for actors with legislative power to accept or reject them. Our findings also show that in some contexts political cost is a key element of constitutional reforms that enshrine the right to water; therefore, this is an element that should be considered when analyzing these processes.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Book publishing</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Freshwater resources</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Pipelines</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Social activism</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water rights</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUdtKw0AQDaJg0T74Bws-CW3dS5JufNNSL1BQRPExTDaTdiXZjbsbvPyCP-2WijjzMMPhXBgmSU4YnQlR0PN3JngqMlbsJSNO52Kapinb_7cfJmPvX2mstJAyo6Pke2G7Hpw2a7L86NFpNAo9sQ1ZWOODDkPQ1kBLHrGxrvMkWLI0fhMVSMIGyaNeb8IWfYGAjmhDrhx86XYSDVrbVRomBExNHtANF-S-760Lg9FBx5QtvtKdDrAN8cfJQQOtx_HvPEqer5dPi9vp6v7mbnG5miohWJiioLRRivEMAaWqKOVYK0ELrFhdpSBzwKLJZZVJKWuaFaxg80rkAJxmAEwcJac7397ZtwF9KF_t4OKRvuQ54zJLcz6PrNmOtYYWS20aGxyo2DV2WlmDjY74pWSUFxmlMgrOdgLlrPcOm7J3ugP3WTJabv9T_v1H_ACuZINR</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Côrtes, Lara</creator><creator>Gianella, Camila</creator><creator>Páez, Angela M.</creator><creator>Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2656-0589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2585-4865</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7481-0861</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations</title><author>Côrtes, Lara ; Gianella, Camila ; Páez, Angela M. ; Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e300fcc125eae8cb002edc309eb1db4a86ae9f68b5888d0591917b36aa205aa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Book publishing</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Freshwater resources</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Pipelines</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Social activism</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Côrtes, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianella, Camila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Páez, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Côrtes, Lara</au><au>Gianella, Camila</au><au>Páez, Angela M.</au><au>Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>3519</spage><pages>3519-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>In this paper we compare recent efforts towards the constitutionalization of the right to water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru to understand the opportunities and limitations related to the attempts to enhance access to piped water to the highest normative level. Peru passed a constitutional amendment in 2017 while Brazil and Colombia have seen much right-to-water activism but have not succeeded in passing such reforms. We explore the role of the existing domestic legal frameworks on drinkable water provision and water management towards the approval of constitutional amendments. We find that all three countries have specialized laws, water governing institutions, and constitutional jurisprudence connecting access to water with rights, but the legal opportunity structures to enforce socio-economic rights vary; they are stronger in Colombia and Brazil, and weaker in Peru. We argue that legal opportunity structures build legal environments that influence constitutional reform success. Legal opportunity structures act as incentives both for social movements to push for reforms and for actors with legislative power to accept or reject them. Our findings also show that in some contexts political cost is a key element of constitutional reforms that enshrine the right to water; therefore, this is an element that should be considered when analyzing these processes.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w13243519</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2656-0589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2585-4865</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7481-0861</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4441
ispartof Water (Basel), 2021-12, Vol.13 (24), p.3519
issn 2073-4441
2073-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2612854627
source Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Activism
Book publishing
Constitutional law
Constitutions
COVID-19
Drinking water
Freshwater resources
Laws, regulations and rules
Legislation
Management
Neoliberalism
Pipelines
Politics
Reforms
Social activism
Social aspects
Water
Water management
Water rights
title Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T18%3A45%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Experiences%20of%20Constitutional%20Reforms%20to%20Enshrine%20the%20Right%20to%20Water%20in%20Brazil,%20Colombia,%20and%20Peru:%20Opportunities%20and%20Limitations&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=C%C3%B4rtes,%20Lara&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=3519&rft.pages=3519-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w13243519&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA810295008%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e300fcc125eae8cb002edc309eb1db4a86ae9f68b5888d0591917b36aa205aa13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2612854627&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A810295008&rfr_iscdi=true