Loading…
Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations
In this paper we compare recent efforts towards the constitutionalization of the right to water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru to understand the opportunities and limitations related to the attempts to enhance access to piped water to the highest normative level. Peru passed a constitutional amendmen...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water (Basel) 2021-12, Vol.13 (24), p.3519 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e300fcc125eae8cb002edc309eb1db4a86ae9f68b5888d0591917b36aa205aa13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e300fcc125eae8cb002edc309eb1db4a86ae9f68b5888d0591917b36aa205aa13 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 3519 |
container_title | Water (Basel) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Côrtes, Lara Gianella, Camila Páez, Angela M. Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina |
description | In this paper we compare recent efforts towards the constitutionalization of the right to water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru to understand the opportunities and limitations related to the attempts to enhance access to piped water to the highest normative level. Peru passed a constitutional amendment in 2017 while Brazil and Colombia have seen much right-to-water activism but have not succeeded in passing such reforms. We explore the role of the existing domestic legal frameworks on drinkable water provision and water management towards the approval of constitutional amendments. We find that all three countries have specialized laws, water governing institutions, and constitutional jurisprudence connecting access to water with rights, but the legal opportunity structures to enforce socio-economic rights vary; they are stronger in Colombia and Brazil, and weaker in Peru. We argue that legal opportunity structures build legal environments that influence constitutional reform success. Legal opportunity structures act as incentives both for social movements to push for reforms and for actors with legislative power to accept or reject them. Our findings also show that in some contexts political cost is a key element of constitutional reforms that enshrine the right to water; therefore, this is an element that should be considered when analyzing these processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/w13243519 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2612854627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A810295008</galeid><sourcerecordid>A810295008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e300fcc125eae8cb002edc309eb1db4a86ae9f68b5888d0591917b36aa205aa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUdtKw0AQDaJg0T74Bws-CW3dS5JufNNSL1BQRPExTDaTdiXZjbsbvPyCP-2WijjzMMPhXBgmSU4YnQlR0PN3JngqMlbsJSNO52Kapinb_7cfJmPvX2mstJAyo6Pke2G7Hpw2a7L86NFpNAo9sQ1ZWOODDkPQ1kBLHrGxrvMkWLI0fhMVSMIGyaNeb8IWfYGAjmhDrhx86XYSDVrbVRomBExNHtANF-S-760Lg9FBx5QtvtKdDrAN8cfJQQOtx_HvPEqer5dPi9vp6v7mbnG5miohWJiioLRRivEMAaWqKOVYK0ELrFhdpSBzwKLJZZVJKWuaFaxg80rkAJxmAEwcJac7397ZtwF9KF_t4OKRvuQ54zJLcz6PrNmOtYYWS20aGxyo2DV2WlmDjY74pWSUFxmlMgrOdgLlrPcOm7J3ugP3WTJabv9T_v1H_ACuZINR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2612854627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Côrtes, Lara ; Gianella, Camila ; Páez, Angela M. ; Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina</creator><creatorcontrib>Côrtes, Lara ; Gianella, Camila ; Páez, Angela M. ; Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper we compare recent efforts towards the constitutionalization of the right to water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru to understand the opportunities and limitations related to the attempts to enhance access to piped water to the highest normative level. Peru passed a constitutional amendment in 2017 while Brazil and Colombia have seen much right-to-water activism but have not succeeded in passing such reforms. We explore the role of the existing domestic legal frameworks on drinkable water provision and water management towards the approval of constitutional amendments. We find that all three countries have specialized laws, water governing institutions, and constitutional jurisprudence connecting access to water with rights, but the legal opportunity structures to enforce socio-economic rights vary; they are stronger in Colombia and Brazil, and weaker in Peru. We argue that legal opportunity structures build legal environments that influence constitutional reform success. Legal opportunity structures act as incentives both for social movements to push for reforms and for actors with legislative power to accept or reject them. Our findings also show that in some contexts political cost is a key element of constitutional reforms that enshrine the right to water; therefore, this is an element that should be considered when analyzing these processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w13243519</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Activism ; Book publishing ; Constitutional law ; Constitutions ; COVID-19 ; Drinking water ; Freshwater resources ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legislation ; Management ; Neoliberalism ; Pipelines ; Politics ; Reforms ; Social activism ; Social aspects ; Water ; Water management ; Water rights</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2021-12, Vol.13 (24), p.3519</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e300fcc125eae8cb002edc309eb1db4a86ae9f68b5888d0591917b36aa205aa13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e300fcc125eae8cb002edc309eb1db4a86ae9f68b5888d0591917b36aa205aa13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2656-0589 ; 0000-0003-2585-4865 ; 0000-0002-7481-0861</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2612854627/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2612854627?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,38493,43871,44566,74382,75096</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Côrtes, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianella, Camila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Páez, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>In this paper we compare recent efforts towards the constitutionalization of the right to water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru to understand the opportunities and limitations related to the attempts to enhance access to piped water to the highest normative level. Peru passed a constitutional amendment in 2017 while Brazil and Colombia have seen much right-to-water activism but have not succeeded in passing such reforms. We explore the role of the existing domestic legal frameworks on drinkable water provision and water management towards the approval of constitutional amendments. We find that all three countries have specialized laws, water governing institutions, and constitutional jurisprudence connecting access to water with rights, but the legal opportunity structures to enforce socio-economic rights vary; they are stronger in Colombia and Brazil, and weaker in Peru. We argue that legal opportunity structures build legal environments that influence constitutional reform success. Legal opportunity structures act as incentives both for social movements to push for reforms and for actors with legislative power to accept or reject them. Our findings also show that in some contexts political cost is a key element of constitutional reforms that enshrine the right to water; therefore, this is an element that should be considered when analyzing these processes.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Book publishing</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Freshwater resources</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Pipelines</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Social activism</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water rights</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUdtKw0AQDaJg0T74Bws-CW3dS5JufNNSL1BQRPExTDaTdiXZjbsbvPyCP-2WijjzMMPhXBgmSU4YnQlR0PN3JngqMlbsJSNO52Kapinb_7cfJmPvX2mstJAyo6Pke2G7Hpw2a7L86NFpNAo9sQ1ZWOODDkPQ1kBLHrGxrvMkWLI0fhMVSMIGyaNeb8IWfYGAjmhDrhx86XYSDVrbVRomBExNHtANF-S-760Lg9FBx5QtvtKdDrAN8cfJQQOtx_HvPEqer5dPi9vp6v7mbnG5miohWJiioLRRivEMAaWqKOVYK0ELrFhdpSBzwKLJZZVJKWuaFaxg80rkAJxmAEwcJac7397ZtwF9KF_t4OKRvuQ54zJLcz6PrNmOtYYWS20aGxyo2DV2WlmDjY74pWSUFxmlMgrOdgLlrPcOm7J3ugP3WTJabv9T_v1H_ACuZINR</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Côrtes, Lara</creator><creator>Gianella, Camila</creator><creator>Páez, Angela M.</creator><creator>Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2656-0589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2585-4865</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7481-0861</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations</title><author>Côrtes, Lara ; Gianella, Camila ; Páez, Angela M. ; Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e300fcc125eae8cb002edc309eb1db4a86ae9f68b5888d0591917b36aa205aa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Book publishing</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Freshwater resources</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Pipelines</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Social activism</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Côrtes, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianella, Camila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Páez, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Côrtes, Lara</au><au>Gianella, Camila</au><au>Páez, Angela M.</au><au>Vallejo Piedrahíta, Catalina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>3519</spage><pages>3519-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>In this paper we compare recent efforts towards the constitutionalization of the right to water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru to understand the opportunities and limitations related to the attempts to enhance access to piped water to the highest normative level. Peru passed a constitutional amendment in 2017 while Brazil and Colombia have seen much right-to-water activism but have not succeeded in passing such reforms. We explore the role of the existing domestic legal frameworks on drinkable water provision and water management towards the approval of constitutional amendments. We find that all three countries have specialized laws, water governing institutions, and constitutional jurisprudence connecting access to water with rights, but the legal opportunity structures to enforce socio-economic rights vary; they are stronger in Colombia and Brazil, and weaker in Peru. We argue that legal opportunity structures build legal environments that influence constitutional reform success. Legal opportunity structures act as incentives both for social movements to push for reforms and for actors with legislative power to accept or reject them. Our findings also show that in some contexts political cost is a key element of constitutional reforms that enshrine the right to water; therefore, this is an element that should be considered when analyzing these processes.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w13243519</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2656-0589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2585-4865</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7481-0861</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2073-4441 |
ispartof | Water (Basel), 2021-12, Vol.13 (24), p.3519 |
issn | 2073-4441 2073-4441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2612854627 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Activism Book publishing Constitutional law Constitutions COVID-19 Drinking water Freshwater resources Laws, regulations and rules Legislation Management Neoliberalism Pipelines Politics Reforms Social activism Social aspects Water Water management Water rights |
title | Comparing Experiences of Constitutional Reforms to Enshrine the Right to Water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru: Opportunities and Limitations |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T18%3A45%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Experiences%20of%20Constitutional%20Reforms%20to%20Enshrine%20the%20Right%20to%20Water%20in%20Brazil,%20Colombia,%20and%20Peru:%20Opportunities%20and%20Limitations&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=C%C3%B4rtes,%20Lara&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=3519&rft.pages=3519-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w13243519&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA810295008%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-e300fcc125eae8cb002edc309eb1db4a86ae9f68b5888d0591917b36aa205aa13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2612854627&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A810295008&rfr_iscdi=true |