Loading…
Future drought changes and associated uncertainty over the homogenous regions of India: A multimodel approach
Drought frequency and intensity have increased in recent decades and are expected to escalate in future under the changing climate scenario. However, a wide range of uncertainty exists regarding the risk, variability and severity of the drought. This study evaluates the future drought and associated...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of climatology 2022-01, Vol.42 (1), p.652-670 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-426680fe74b399874148a650ef9ed2519af690e895606796d3332be72f1757543 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-426680fe74b399874148a650ef9ed2519af690e895606796d3332be72f1757543 |
container_end_page | 670 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 652 |
container_title | International journal of climatology |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Saharwardi, Md Saquib Kumar, Pankaj |
description | Drought frequency and intensity have increased in recent decades and are expected to escalate in future under the changing climate scenario. However, a wide range of uncertainty exists regarding the risk, variability and severity of the drought. This study evaluates the future drought and associated uncertainty over homogeneous regions of India using the suites of CMIP5 global climate models (GCMs) and CORDEX‐SA regional climate models (RCMs). The drought characteristics and its projected future changes are analysed using probability density functions derived from hydroclimatic parameters, including the standardized precipitation index (SPI) and the standardized precipitation‐evapotranspiration index (SPEI). Besides, uncertainties from various sources such as inter‐model variability, indices type, timescale, adapted methods, and time‐slices are explored under the RCP8.5 emission scenario to the end of the 21st century. Our study reveals large biases in the individual model; however, both the multi model ensembles (GCM and RCM) generally demonstrate better performance with respect to observation. In particular, the RCM ensemble showed limitations in capturing the regional precipitation pattern while temperature and potential evapotranspiration (PET) showed considerable enhancement concerning GCMs. SPI (SPEI) generally exhibited enhanced wetness (dryness) derived from increased precipitation (PET), although a few discrepancies were noticed. The regional heterogeneity was also found to exist, although some robust changes were noticed in drought frequency and severity with different return periods. Our finding underscores a wide range of uncertainties in drought projection, with maximum contribution from indices selection followed by model variability whereas other sources have the least contribution. The primary drivers for all these uncertainty sources arise due to variations among models simulated hydroclimatic variables that need to be parameterized more precisely for sustainable drought management.
The figure broadly shows the representation of the present study. The two basic things have been done (a) drought projection, and (b) associated uncertainty assessment. The figure shows the future changes in drought frequency over India and highlights the uncertainty sources like model variability, indices selection, regional heterogeneity and time‐slices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/joc.7265 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2617232730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2617232730</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-426680fe74b399874148a650ef9ed2519af690e895606796d3332be72f1757543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLw0AUBeBBFKxV8CcMuHGTOo9kHu5KsVopdKPrME1uHqWZqfNQ-u-N1q2ru_nuOXAQuqVkRglhDztXzSQTxRmaUKJlRohS52hClNaZyqm6RFch7AghWlMxQcMyxeQB196ltou46oxtIWBja2xCcFVvItQ42Qp8NL2NR-w-wePYAe7c4FqwLgXsoe2dDdg1eGXr3jziOR7SPvaDq2GPzeHgnam6a3TRmH2Am787Re_Lp7fFS7bePK8W83VWMc2LLGdCKNKAzLdcayVzmisjCgKNhpoVVJtGaAJKF4IIqUXNOWdbkKyhspBFzqfo7pQ71n4kCLHcueTtWFkyQSXjTHIyqvuTqrwLwUNTHnw_GH8sKSl_xhy_qvJnzJFmJ_rV7-H4rytfN4tf_w17lHVF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2617232730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Future drought changes and associated uncertainty over the homogenous regions of India: A multimodel approach</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Saharwardi, Md Saquib ; Kumar, Pankaj</creator><creatorcontrib>Saharwardi, Md Saquib ; Kumar, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><description>Drought frequency and intensity have increased in recent decades and are expected to escalate in future under the changing climate scenario. However, a wide range of uncertainty exists regarding the risk, variability and severity of the drought. This study evaluates the future drought and associated uncertainty over homogeneous regions of India using the suites of CMIP5 global climate models (GCMs) and CORDEX‐SA regional climate models (RCMs). The drought characteristics and its projected future changes are analysed using probability density functions derived from hydroclimatic parameters, including the standardized precipitation index (SPI) and the standardized precipitation‐evapotranspiration index (SPEI). Besides, uncertainties from various sources such as inter‐model variability, indices type, timescale, adapted methods, and time‐slices are explored under the RCP8.5 emission scenario to the end of the 21st century. Our study reveals large biases in the individual model; however, both the multi model ensembles (GCM and RCM) generally demonstrate better performance with respect to observation. In particular, the RCM ensemble showed limitations in capturing the regional precipitation pattern while temperature and potential evapotranspiration (PET) showed considerable enhancement concerning GCMs. SPI (SPEI) generally exhibited enhanced wetness (dryness) derived from increased precipitation (PET), although a few discrepancies were noticed. The regional heterogeneity was also found to exist, although some robust changes were noticed in drought frequency and severity with different return periods. Our finding underscores a wide range of uncertainties in drought projection, with maximum contribution from indices selection followed by model variability whereas other sources have the least contribution. The primary drivers for all these uncertainty sources arise due to variations among models simulated hydroclimatic variables that need to be parameterized more precisely for sustainable drought management.
The figure broadly shows the representation of the present study. The two basic things have been done (a) drought projection, and (b) associated uncertainty assessment. The figure shows the future changes in drought frequency over India and highlights the uncertainty sources like model variability, indices selection, regional heterogeneity and time‐slices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-8418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0088</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/joc.7265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Climate ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Drought ; Drought characteristics ; drought projections ; Emission analysis ; Evapotranspiration ; GCM and RCM ; Global climate ; Global climate models ; Heterogeneity ; Potential evapotranspiration ; Precipitation ; Precipitation patterns ; Probability density functions ; Probability theory ; Regional climate models ; Regional climates ; return period ; SPI and SPEI indices ; Standardized precipitation index ; Uncertainty ; uncertainty assessment ; Variability</subject><ispartof>International journal of climatology, 2022-01, Vol.42 (1), p.652-670</ispartof><rights>2021 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><rights>2022 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-426680fe74b399874148a650ef9ed2519af690e895606796d3332be72f1757543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-426680fe74b399874148a650ef9ed2519af690e895606796d3332be72f1757543</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1906-9852</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saharwardi, Md Saquib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><title>Future drought changes and associated uncertainty over the homogenous regions of India: A multimodel approach</title><title>International journal of climatology</title><description>Drought frequency and intensity have increased in recent decades and are expected to escalate in future under the changing climate scenario. However, a wide range of uncertainty exists regarding the risk, variability and severity of the drought. This study evaluates the future drought and associated uncertainty over homogeneous regions of India using the suites of CMIP5 global climate models (GCMs) and CORDEX‐SA regional climate models (RCMs). The drought characteristics and its projected future changes are analysed using probability density functions derived from hydroclimatic parameters, including the standardized precipitation index (SPI) and the standardized precipitation‐evapotranspiration index (SPEI). Besides, uncertainties from various sources such as inter‐model variability, indices type, timescale, adapted methods, and time‐slices are explored under the RCP8.5 emission scenario to the end of the 21st century. Our study reveals large biases in the individual model; however, both the multi model ensembles (GCM and RCM) generally demonstrate better performance with respect to observation. In particular, the RCM ensemble showed limitations in capturing the regional precipitation pattern while temperature and potential evapotranspiration (PET) showed considerable enhancement concerning GCMs. SPI (SPEI) generally exhibited enhanced wetness (dryness) derived from increased precipitation (PET), although a few discrepancies were noticed. The regional heterogeneity was also found to exist, although some robust changes were noticed in drought frequency and severity with different return periods. Our finding underscores a wide range of uncertainties in drought projection, with maximum contribution from indices selection followed by model variability whereas other sources have the least contribution. The primary drivers for all these uncertainty sources arise due to variations among models simulated hydroclimatic variables that need to be parameterized more precisely for sustainable drought management.
The figure broadly shows the representation of the present study. The two basic things have been done (a) drought projection, and (b) associated uncertainty assessment. The figure shows the future changes in drought frequency over India and highlights the uncertainty sources like model variability, indices selection, regional heterogeneity and time‐slices.</description><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Drought characteristics</subject><subject>drought projections</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>GCM and RCM</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Global climate models</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Potential evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Precipitation patterns</subject><subject>Probability density functions</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Regional climate models</subject><subject>Regional climates</subject><subject>return period</subject><subject>SPI and SPEI indices</subject><subject>Standardized precipitation index</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>uncertainty assessment</subject><subject>Variability</subject><issn>0899-8418</issn><issn>1097-0088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10EtLw0AUBeBBFKxV8CcMuHGTOo9kHu5KsVopdKPrME1uHqWZqfNQ-u-N1q2ru_nuOXAQuqVkRglhDztXzSQTxRmaUKJlRohS52hClNaZyqm6RFch7AghWlMxQcMyxeQB196ltou46oxtIWBja2xCcFVvItQ42Qp8NL2NR-w-wePYAe7c4FqwLgXsoe2dDdg1eGXr3jziOR7SPvaDq2GPzeHgnam6a3TRmH2Am787Re_Lp7fFS7bePK8W83VWMc2LLGdCKNKAzLdcayVzmisjCgKNhpoVVJtGaAJKF4IIqUXNOWdbkKyhspBFzqfo7pQ71n4kCLHcueTtWFkyQSXjTHIyqvuTqrwLwUNTHnw_GH8sKSl_xhy_qvJnzJFmJ_rV7-H4rytfN4tf_w17lHVF</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Saharwardi, Md Saquib</creator><creator>Kumar, Pankaj</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1906-9852</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Future drought changes and associated uncertainty over the homogenous regions of India: A multimodel approach</title><author>Saharwardi, Md Saquib ; Kumar, Pankaj</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-426680fe74b399874148a650ef9ed2519af690e895606796d3332be72f1757543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Drought characteristics</topic><topic>drought projections</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>GCM and RCM</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Global climate models</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Potential evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Precipitation patterns</topic><topic>Probability density functions</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Regional climate models</topic><topic>Regional climates</topic><topic>return period</topic><topic>SPI and SPEI indices</topic><topic>Standardized precipitation index</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>uncertainty assessment</topic><topic>Variability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saharwardi, Md Saquib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saharwardi, Md Saquib</au><au>Kumar, Pankaj</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Future drought changes and associated uncertainty over the homogenous regions of India: A multimodel approach</atitle><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>652</spage><epage>670</epage><pages>652-670</pages><issn>0899-8418</issn><eissn>1097-0088</eissn><abstract>Drought frequency and intensity have increased in recent decades and are expected to escalate in future under the changing climate scenario. However, a wide range of uncertainty exists regarding the risk, variability and severity of the drought. This study evaluates the future drought and associated uncertainty over homogeneous regions of India using the suites of CMIP5 global climate models (GCMs) and CORDEX‐SA regional climate models (RCMs). The drought characteristics and its projected future changes are analysed using probability density functions derived from hydroclimatic parameters, including the standardized precipitation index (SPI) and the standardized precipitation‐evapotranspiration index (SPEI). Besides, uncertainties from various sources such as inter‐model variability, indices type, timescale, adapted methods, and time‐slices are explored under the RCP8.5 emission scenario to the end of the 21st century. Our study reveals large biases in the individual model; however, both the multi model ensembles (GCM and RCM) generally demonstrate better performance with respect to observation. In particular, the RCM ensemble showed limitations in capturing the regional precipitation pattern while temperature and potential evapotranspiration (PET) showed considerable enhancement concerning GCMs. SPI (SPEI) generally exhibited enhanced wetness (dryness) derived from increased precipitation (PET), although a few discrepancies were noticed. The regional heterogeneity was also found to exist, although some robust changes were noticed in drought frequency and severity with different return periods. Our finding underscores a wide range of uncertainties in drought projection, with maximum contribution from indices selection followed by model variability whereas other sources have the least contribution. The primary drivers for all these uncertainty sources arise due to variations among models simulated hydroclimatic variables that need to be parameterized more precisely for sustainable drought management.
The figure broadly shows the representation of the present study. The two basic things have been done (a) drought projection, and (b) associated uncertainty assessment. The figure shows the future changes in drought frequency over India and highlights the uncertainty sources like model variability, indices selection, regional heterogeneity and time‐slices.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/joc.7265</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1906-9852</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-8418 |
ispartof | International journal of climatology, 2022-01, Vol.42 (1), p.652-670 |
issn | 0899-8418 1097-0088 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2617232730 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Climate Climate change Climate models Drought Drought characteristics drought projections Emission analysis Evapotranspiration GCM and RCM Global climate Global climate models Heterogeneity Potential evapotranspiration Precipitation Precipitation patterns Probability density functions Probability theory Regional climate models Regional climates return period SPI and SPEI indices Standardized precipitation index Uncertainty uncertainty assessment Variability |
title | Future drought changes and associated uncertainty over the homogenous regions of India: A multimodel approach |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A20%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Future%20drought%20changes%20and%20associated%20uncertainty%20over%20the%20homogenous%20regions%20of%20India:%20A%20multimodel%20approach&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20climatology&rft.au=Saharwardi,%20Md%20Saquib&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=652&rft.epage=670&rft.pages=652-670&rft.issn=0899-8418&rft.eissn=1097-0088&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/joc.7265&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2617232730%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-426680fe74b399874148a650ef9ed2519af690e895606796d3332be72f1757543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2617232730&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |