Financial and Economic Investment Evaluation of Wastewater Treatment Plant

• Published in: Water (Basel) 2022-01, Vol.14 (1), p.122
• Main Authors: Ćetković, Jasmina, Knežević, Miloš, Lakić, Slobodan, Žarković, Miloš, Vujadinović, Radoje, Živković, Angelina, Cvijović, Jelena
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alternative energy sources; Analysis; Antibiotics; Biochemical oxygen demand; Biogas; Chemical contaminants; Chemical oxygen demand; Climate change; Cost benefit analysis; Cost control; Decision making; Economic analysis; Economic aspects; Economic development; Environmental economics; Environmental effects; Environmental impact; Feasibility studies; Infrastructure (Economics); Montenegro; Natural resources; North Macedonia; Phosphorus; Pollutant removal; Pollutants; Purification; Sewage; Sustainable development; Wastewater treatment; Wastewater treatment plants; Water pollution; Water treatment; Water treatment plants
• ISSN: 2073-4441; 2073-4441
• DOI: 10.3390/w14010122

Improved Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) analysis requires a broader analytical framework, in order to perceive each project individually from the perspective of potentially measurable and significant effects on the environment and society as a whole. The main goal of our paper is to assess the financial and economic justification for variant V3 (as the most technically optimal) of the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) construction project in Nov Dojran, North Macedonia, with the purpose of advancing municipal infrastructure and environmental benefits from improved water treatment. Based on the economic analysis conducted, we conclude that the investment in the WWTP project is justified, because the economic internal rate of return is higher than the opportunity cost of capital (EIRR = 16.38%), the economic net present value is higher than 0, and EBCR (benefit-cost ratio) is greater than 1 (EBCR = 2.11). The highest environmental benefit of 49.2% in total environmental benefits is associated with nitrogen, while phosphorus is the next pollutant in the structure of environmental benefits at 46.1%. The environmental benefits of removing biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) are significantly less important, despite the removal of significant amounts of these pollutants during treatment. The situation is similar with suspended particles.