Picking Places and People: Centralizing Provincial Governance in China

China's political system has been characterized by two institutions since the 1980s: an explicit “layer-by-layer administrative hierarchy” and the “appointment of cadres one level down.” There have, however, been two departures from these administrative practices. First, some provinces have “em...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The China quarterly (London) 2021-12, Vol.248 (1), p.957-986
Main Authors: Lu, Warren Wenzhi, Tsai, Kellee S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adaptation
Cadres
Central government
Cities
Counties
Economic development
Empowerment
Federal government
GDP
Governance
Gross Domestic Product
Improvisation
Intergovernmental relations
Non-state actors
Political institutions
Political systems
Politics
Provinces
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:China's political system has been characterized by two institutions since the 1980s: an explicit “layer-by-layer administrative hierarchy” and the “appointment of cadres one level down.” There have, however, been two departures from these administrative practices. First, some provinces have “empowered prosperous counties” by placing them in a dual-reporting relationship with both prefecture-level cities and provinces. Second, some provinces have restored personnel control going “two levels down” by appointing key officials at the county and urban district levels of government. These deviations evolved as responses to China's GDP-centric policy environment during the early reform era. Based on field interviews and nationwide analysis of city-level personnel data, this article argues that such adaptations have generated unintended conflicts between provinces and prefecture-level cities. While prior studies of evolutionary change in China highlight the relationship between state and non-state actors, this study demonstrates how interactions among state actors themselves may fundamentally transform the dynamics of administrative governance.
ISSN:0305-7410
1468-2648
DOI:10.1017/S0305741021000606