Loading…

Shackle’s approach towards priority setting and decision-making in Science, Technology, and Innovation

•Shackle’s framework is a coherent theoretical foundation for ST&I domain.•Shackle’s approach guides the priority setting and decision-making process in ST&I.•The decision maker’s participation requires planning its operational feasibility.•The analysis of alternatives needs to handle increa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies planning and futures studies, 2021-12, Vol.134, p.102838, Article 102838
Main Authors: Metcalfe, Stan, Salles-Filho, Sergio, Duarte, Leonardo T., Bin, Adriana, Azevedo, Aníbal T., Feitosa, Paulo H.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-928162698e154538bf390a5692b3b96acb163679969ca6e4508a614b5c6376193
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-928162698e154538bf390a5692b3b96acb163679969ca6e4508a614b5c6376193
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102838
container_title Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies
container_volume 134
creator Metcalfe, Stan
Salles-Filho, Sergio
Duarte, Leonardo T.
Bin, Adriana
Azevedo, Aníbal T.
Feitosa, Paulo H.A.
description •Shackle’s framework is a coherent theoretical foundation for ST&I domain.•Shackle’s approach guides the priority setting and decision-making process in ST&I.•The decision maker’s participation requires planning its operational feasibility.•The analysis of alternatives needs to handle increasing volumes of data. This article explores the possibilities of reprising the potential surprise approach of Shackle’s framework as an approach for prospective, priority setting and decision-making process in Science, Technology, and Innovation (ST&I). These domains have been the focus of extensive studies that have promoted several analytical contributions, although it has often been challenging to grapple with the inherent condition of fundamental uncertainty. This article contributes to the literature in two main ways. First, it demonstrates that Shackle’s potential surprise and ascendency function approach can constitute a coherent theoretical and empirical foundation for ST&I prioritisation and decision-making. Second, it presents an application in a real context to demonstrate its feasibility as an applied tool. Operational conditions and an organisational routine with necessary steps are also suggested to contribute to the development of the proposed approach. Finally, we argue that further studies in the subject require methodological advances, combinations of methods, and incorporation of computational solutions to tackle operational constraints.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.futures.2021.102838
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2619667604</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016328721001476</els_id><sourcerecordid>2619667604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-928162698e154538bf390a5692b3b96acb163679969ca6e4508a614b5c6376193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOAjEUhhujiYg-gskkbhnshem0K2OIFxISF-C66XQK0wFabAuGna_h6_kkFoe9q5Nz-p3TfD8AtwgOEUT0vh0udnHndRhiiFGaYUbYGeghVpKckpKdgx5MYE4wKy_BVQhtakkBcQ80s0aq1Vr_fH2HTG633knVZNF9Sl-HbOuN8yYesqBjNHaZSVtntVYmGGfzjVwdZ8ZmM2W0VXqQzbVqrFu75WHwx06sdXsZE30NLhZyHfTNqfbB-_PTfPyaT99eJuPHaa4IKWPOMUMUU840KkYFYdWCcCgLynFFKk6lqhAltOScciWpHhWQSYpGVaGSKEWc9MFddzepfOx0iKJ1O2_TlwKnd0pLCkeJKjpKeReC1wuRVDfSHwSC4hiqaMUpVHEMVXShpr2Hbk8nhb3RXoROvTZeqyhqZ_658AszO4N_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2619667604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shackle’s approach towards priority setting and decision-making in Science, Technology, and Innovation</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Metcalfe, Stan ; Salles-Filho, Sergio ; Duarte, Leonardo T. ; Bin, Adriana ; Azevedo, Aníbal T. ; Feitosa, Paulo H.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, Stan ; Salles-Filho, Sergio ; Duarte, Leonardo T. ; Bin, Adriana ; Azevedo, Aníbal T. ; Feitosa, Paulo H.A.</creatorcontrib><description>•Shackle’s framework is a coherent theoretical foundation for ST&amp;I domain.•Shackle’s approach guides the priority setting and decision-making process in ST&amp;I.•The decision maker’s participation requires planning its operational feasibility.•The analysis of alternatives needs to handle increasing volumes of data. This article explores the possibilities of reprising the potential surprise approach of Shackle’s framework as an approach for prospective, priority setting and decision-making process in Science, Technology, and Innovation (ST&amp;I). These domains have been the focus of extensive studies that have promoted several analytical contributions, although it has often been challenging to grapple with the inherent condition of fundamental uncertainty. This article contributes to the literature in two main ways. First, it demonstrates that Shackle’s potential surprise and ascendency function approach can constitute a coherent theoretical and empirical foundation for ST&amp;I prioritisation and decision-making. Second, it presents an application in a real context to demonstrate its feasibility as an applied tool. Operational conditions and an organisational routine with necessary steps are also suggested to contribute to the development of the proposed approach. Finally, we argue that further studies in the subject require methodological advances, combinations of methods, and incorporation of computational solutions to tackle operational constraints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-3287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2021.102838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Decision theory ; Empirical analysis ; G. L. S. Shackle ; Innovations ; Literature ; Methods ; Potential surprise ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, 2021-12, Vol.134, p.102838, Article 102838</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-928162698e154538bf390a5692b3b96acb163679969ca6e4508a614b5c6376193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-928162698e154538bf390a5692b3b96acb163679969ca6e4508a614b5c6376193</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0290-0080 ; 0000-0002-2388-7543</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, Stan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salles-Filho, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Leonardo T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bin, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, Aníbal T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feitosa, Paulo H.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Shackle’s approach towards priority setting and decision-making in Science, Technology, and Innovation</title><title>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies</title><description>•Shackle’s framework is a coherent theoretical foundation for ST&amp;I domain.•Shackle’s approach guides the priority setting and decision-making process in ST&amp;I.•The decision maker’s participation requires planning its operational feasibility.•The analysis of alternatives needs to handle increasing volumes of data. This article explores the possibilities of reprising the potential surprise approach of Shackle’s framework as an approach for prospective, priority setting and decision-making process in Science, Technology, and Innovation (ST&amp;I). These domains have been the focus of extensive studies that have promoted several analytical contributions, although it has often been challenging to grapple with the inherent condition of fundamental uncertainty. This article contributes to the literature in two main ways. First, it demonstrates that Shackle’s potential surprise and ascendency function approach can constitute a coherent theoretical and empirical foundation for ST&amp;I prioritisation and decision-making. Second, it presents an application in a real context to demonstrate its feasibility as an applied tool. Operational conditions and an organisational routine with necessary steps are also suggested to contribute to the development of the proposed approach. Finally, we argue that further studies in the subject require methodological advances, combinations of methods, and incorporation of computational solutions to tackle operational constraints.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>G. L. S. Shackle</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Potential surprise</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0016-3287</issn><issn>1873-6378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOAjEUhhujiYg-gskkbhnshem0K2OIFxISF-C66XQK0wFabAuGna_h6_kkFoe9q5Nz-p3TfD8AtwgOEUT0vh0udnHndRhiiFGaYUbYGeghVpKckpKdgx5MYE4wKy_BVQhtakkBcQ80s0aq1Vr_fH2HTG633knVZNF9Sl-HbOuN8yYesqBjNHaZSVtntVYmGGfzjVwdZ8ZmM2W0VXqQzbVqrFu75WHwx06sdXsZE30NLhZyHfTNqfbB-_PTfPyaT99eJuPHaa4IKWPOMUMUU840KkYFYdWCcCgLynFFKk6lqhAltOScciWpHhWQSYpGVaGSKEWc9MFddzepfOx0iKJ1O2_TlwKnd0pLCkeJKjpKeReC1wuRVDfSHwSC4hiqaMUpVHEMVXShpr2Hbk8nhb3RXoROvTZeqyhqZ_658AszO4N_</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Metcalfe, Stan</creator><creator>Salles-Filho, Sergio</creator><creator>Duarte, Leonardo T.</creator><creator>Bin, Adriana</creator><creator>Azevedo, Aníbal T.</creator><creator>Feitosa, Paulo H.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0290-0080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2388-7543</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Shackle’s approach towards priority setting and decision-making in Science, Technology, and Innovation</title><author>Metcalfe, Stan ; Salles-Filho, Sergio ; Duarte, Leonardo T. ; Bin, Adriana ; Azevedo, Aníbal T. ; Feitosa, Paulo H.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-928162698e154538bf390a5692b3b96acb163679969ca6e4508a614b5c6376193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>G. L. S. Shackle</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Potential surprise</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, Stan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salles-Filho, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Leonardo T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bin, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, Aníbal T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feitosa, Paulo H.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Metcalfe, Stan</au><au>Salles-Filho, Sergio</au><au>Duarte, Leonardo T.</au><au>Bin, Adriana</au><au>Azevedo, Aníbal T.</au><au>Feitosa, Paulo H.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shackle’s approach towards priority setting and decision-making in Science, Technology, and Innovation</atitle><jtitle>Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>134</volume><spage>102838</spage><pages>102838-</pages><artnum>102838</artnum><issn>0016-3287</issn><eissn>1873-6378</eissn><abstract>•Shackle’s framework is a coherent theoretical foundation for ST&amp;I domain.•Shackle’s approach guides the priority setting and decision-making process in ST&amp;I.•The decision maker’s participation requires planning its operational feasibility.•The analysis of alternatives needs to handle increasing volumes of data. This article explores the possibilities of reprising the potential surprise approach of Shackle’s framework as an approach for prospective, priority setting and decision-making process in Science, Technology, and Innovation (ST&amp;I). These domains have been the focus of extensive studies that have promoted several analytical contributions, although it has often been challenging to grapple with the inherent condition of fundamental uncertainty. This article contributes to the literature in two main ways. First, it demonstrates that Shackle’s potential surprise and ascendency function approach can constitute a coherent theoretical and empirical foundation for ST&amp;I prioritisation and decision-making. Second, it presents an application in a real context to demonstrate its feasibility as an applied tool. Operational conditions and an organisational routine with necessary steps are also suggested to contribute to the development of the proposed approach. Finally, we argue that further studies in the subject require methodological advances, combinations of methods, and incorporation of computational solutions to tackle operational constraints.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.futures.2021.102838</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0290-0080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2388-7543</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-3287
ispartof Futures : the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, 2021-12, Vol.134, p.102838, Article 102838
issn 0016-3287
1873-6378
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2619667604
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Decision making
Decision theory
Empirical analysis
G. L. S. Shackle
Innovations
Literature
Methods
Potential surprise
Uncertainty
title Shackle’s approach towards priority setting and decision-making in Science, Technology, and Innovation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A07%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shackle%E2%80%99s%20approach%20towards%20priority%20setting%20and%20decision-making%20in%20Science,%20Technology,%20and%20Innovation&rft.jtitle=Futures%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20policy,%20planning%20and%20futures%20studies&rft.au=Metcalfe,%20Stan&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=134&rft.spage=102838&rft.pages=102838-&rft.artnum=102838&rft.issn=0016-3287&rft.eissn=1873-6378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102838&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2619667604%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-928162698e154538bf390a5692b3b96acb163679969ca6e4508a614b5c6376193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2619667604&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true