Loading…

New common set of weights method in black-box and two-stage data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) strives to evaluate the production units under their best conditions. DEA flexibility in selecting the appropriate input/output weights always results in unreal and zero weights. Treating decision-making units (DMUs) as black-box regardless of their internal structure...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of operations research 2022-02, Vol.309 (1), p.143-162
Main Authors: Kiaei, Hamid, Kazemi Matin, Reza
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-364b35289a3675eecca56202b8501cc147f49301af2398a626daaa5d3399a9d93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-364b35289a3675eecca56202b8501cc147f49301af2398a626daaa5d3399a9d93
container_end_page 162
container_issue 1
container_start_page 143
container_title Annals of operations research
container_volume 309
creator Kiaei, Hamid
Kazemi Matin, Reza
description Data envelopment analysis (DEA) strives to evaluate the production units under their best conditions. DEA flexibility in selecting the appropriate input/output weights always results in unreal and zero weights. Treating decision-making units (DMUs) as black-box regardless of their internal structures misleads the DEA performance evaluation. While considering units as a network process, it is more likely to identify more inefficiency sources. This paper suggests using a new common set of weights (CSWs) approach to evaluate the units in both black-box and two-stage structures based on a unified criterion. Indeed, our contribution to this line of research is as follows: Firstly, we improve the model proposed by Kao and Hung (J Oper res Soc 56(10): 1196–1203, 2005) to calculate the CSWs in a linear-based optimization model. Secondly, a new CSWs method is suggested in the two-stage network DEA (NDEA) as multiple objectives fractional programming (MOFP) problem. Thirdly, the MOFP problem is converted into a single objective linear programming problem in the two-stage network case. Finally, an enlightening application is presented.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10479-021-04304-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2620837653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A689823190</galeid><sourcerecordid>A689823190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-364b35289a3675eecca56202b8501cc147f49301af2398a626daaa5d3399a9d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS1EJZaWL8DJEldc_CdO4mNVAa1UwYWerYkzSVMSe8l4Wfrt63YroBJClmxp_HujefMYe6vkqZKy-UBKVo0TUishKyMr4V6wjbKNFs6Y9iXbSG0rYY2Rr9hrolsppVKt3bDrL7jnIS1Lipww8zTwPU7jTSa-YL5JPZ8i72YI30WXfnGIPc_7JCjDiLyHDBzjT5zTdsGYyzfMdzTRCTsaYCZ88_Qes-tPH7-dX4irr58vz8-uRKi0ycLUVWesbh2YurGIIYCttdRda6UKQVXNUDkjFQzauBZqXfcAYHtjnAPXO3PM3h36btf0Y4eU_W3arWUI8ro0ak1TF8-_qRFm9FMcUl4hLBMFf1a3rtVGOVmo039Q5fS4TCFFHKZSfyZ4_5eg29EUkcpFj-sbYUf0HNcHPKyJaMXBb9dpgfXOK-kfQvSHEH0J0T-G6B8MmoOIChxHXP8Y_I_qHgUhnJ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2620837653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New common set of weights method in black-box and two-stage data envelopment analysis</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Access via Business Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Kiaei, Hamid ; Kazemi Matin, Reza</creator><creatorcontrib>Kiaei, Hamid ; Kazemi Matin, Reza</creatorcontrib><description>Data envelopment analysis (DEA) strives to evaluate the production units under their best conditions. DEA flexibility in selecting the appropriate input/output weights always results in unreal and zero weights. Treating decision-making units (DMUs) as black-box regardless of their internal structures misleads the DEA performance evaluation. While considering units as a network process, it is more likely to identify more inefficiency sources. This paper suggests using a new common set of weights (CSWs) approach to evaluate the units in both black-box and two-stage structures based on a unified criterion. Indeed, our contribution to this line of research is as follows: Firstly, we improve the model proposed by Kao and Hung (J Oper res Soc 56(10): 1196–1203, 2005) to calculate the CSWs in a linear-based optimization model. Secondly, a new CSWs method is suggested in the two-stage network DEA (NDEA) as multiple objectives fractional programming (MOFP) problem. Thirdly, the MOFP problem is converted into a single objective linear programming problem in the two-stage network case. Finally, an enlightening application is presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-5330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04304-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Combinatorics ; Data analysis ; Data envelopment analysis ; Decision making ; Industrial equipment ; Linear programming ; Mathematical programming ; Methods ; Operations research ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Optimization ; Original Research ; Performance evaluation ; Theory of Computation</subject><ispartof>Annals of operations research, 2022-02, Vol.309 (1), p.143-162</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-364b35289a3675eecca56202b8501cc147f49301af2398a626daaa5d3399a9d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-364b35289a3675eecca56202b8501cc147f49301af2398a626daaa5d3399a9d93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0282-1801</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2620837653/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2620837653?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kiaei, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazemi Matin, Reza</creatorcontrib><title>New common set of weights method in black-box and two-stage data envelopment analysis</title><title>Annals of operations research</title><addtitle>Ann Oper Res</addtitle><description>Data envelopment analysis (DEA) strives to evaluate the production units under their best conditions. DEA flexibility in selecting the appropriate input/output weights always results in unreal and zero weights. Treating decision-making units (DMUs) as black-box regardless of their internal structures misleads the DEA performance evaluation. While considering units as a network process, it is more likely to identify more inefficiency sources. This paper suggests using a new common set of weights (CSWs) approach to evaluate the units in both black-box and two-stage structures based on a unified criterion. Indeed, our contribution to this line of research is as follows: Firstly, we improve the model proposed by Kao and Hung (J Oper res Soc 56(10): 1196–1203, 2005) to calculate the CSWs in a linear-based optimization model. Secondly, a new CSWs method is suggested in the two-stage network DEA (NDEA) as multiple objectives fractional programming (MOFP) problem. Thirdly, the MOFP problem is converted into a single objective linear programming problem in the two-stage network case. Finally, an enlightening application is presented.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Combinatorics</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Industrial equipment</subject><subject>Linear programming</subject><subject>Mathematical programming</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Theory of Computation</subject><issn>0254-5330</issn><issn>1572-9338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS1EJZaWL8DJEldc_CdO4mNVAa1UwYWerYkzSVMSe8l4Wfrt63YroBJClmxp_HujefMYe6vkqZKy-UBKVo0TUishKyMr4V6wjbKNFs6Y9iXbSG0rYY2Rr9hrolsppVKt3bDrL7jnIS1Lipww8zTwPU7jTSa-YL5JPZ8i72YI30WXfnGIPc_7JCjDiLyHDBzjT5zTdsGYyzfMdzTRCTsaYCZ88_Qes-tPH7-dX4irr58vz8-uRKi0ycLUVWesbh2YurGIIYCttdRda6UKQVXNUDkjFQzauBZqXfcAYHtjnAPXO3PM3h36btf0Y4eU_W3arWUI8ro0ak1TF8-_qRFm9FMcUl4hLBMFf1a3rtVGOVmo039Q5fS4TCFFHKZSfyZ4_5eg29EUkcpFj-sbYUf0HNcHPKyJaMXBb9dpgfXOK-kfQvSHEH0J0T-G6B8MmoOIChxHXP8Y_I_qHgUhnJ8</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Kiaei, Hamid</creator><creator>Kazemi Matin, Reza</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0282-1801</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>New common set of weights method in black-box and two-stage data envelopment analysis</title><author>Kiaei, Hamid ; Kazemi Matin, Reza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-364b35289a3675eecca56202b8501cc147f49301af2398a626daaa5d3399a9d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Combinatorics</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Industrial equipment</topic><topic>Linear programming</topic><topic>Mathematical programming</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Theory of Computation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kiaei, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazemi Matin, Reza</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Business Insights: Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer science database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kiaei, Hamid</au><au>Kazemi Matin, Reza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New common set of weights method in black-box and two-stage data envelopment analysis</atitle><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle><stitle>Ann Oper Res</stitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>309</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>143</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>143-162</pages><issn>0254-5330</issn><eissn>1572-9338</eissn><abstract>Data envelopment analysis (DEA) strives to evaluate the production units under their best conditions. DEA flexibility in selecting the appropriate input/output weights always results in unreal and zero weights. Treating decision-making units (DMUs) as black-box regardless of their internal structures misleads the DEA performance evaluation. While considering units as a network process, it is more likely to identify more inefficiency sources. This paper suggests using a new common set of weights (CSWs) approach to evaluate the units in both black-box and two-stage structures based on a unified criterion. Indeed, our contribution to this line of research is as follows: Firstly, we improve the model proposed by Kao and Hung (J Oper res Soc 56(10): 1196–1203, 2005) to calculate the CSWs in a linear-based optimization model. Secondly, a new CSWs method is suggested in the two-stage network DEA (NDEA) as multiple objectives fractional programming (MOFP) problem. Thirdly, the MOFP problem is converted into a single objective linear programming problem in the two-stage network case. Finally, an enlightening application is presented.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10479-021-04304-9</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0282-1801</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0254-5330
ispartof Annals of operations research, 2022-02, Vol.309 (1), p.143-162
issn 0254-5330
1572-9338
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2620837653
source ABI/INFORM Global; Access via Business Source (EBSCOhost); Springer Nature
subjects Business and Management
Combinatorics
Data analysis
Data envelopment analysis
Decision making
Industrial equipment
Linear programming
Mathematical programming
Methods
Operations research
Operations Research/Decision Theory
Optimization
Original Research
Performance evaluation
Theory of Computation
title New common set of weights method in black-box and two-stage data envelopment analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A09%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20common%20set%20of%20weights%20method%20in%20black-box%20and%20two-stage%20data%20envelopment%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20operations%20research&rft.au=Kiaei,%20Hamid&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=309&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=143-162&rft.issn=0254-5330&rft.eissn=1572-9338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10479-021-04304-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA689823190%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-364b35289a3675eecca56202b8501cc147f49301af2398a626daaa5d3399a9d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2620837653&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A689823190&rfr_iscdi=true