Environmental investment decisions of family firms—An analysis of competitor and government influence

Prior research suggests that family firms are more likely to engage in environment‐friendly practices. However, the source of this difference is less clear. This study investigates how environmental innovations and stakeholder pressure tradeoffs (specifically from competitors and government) are sim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Business strategy and the environment 2022-01, Vol.31 (1), p.1-14
Main Author: Bendell, Bari L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Business competition
Companies
Competitors
conjoint analysis
Decision analysis
decision‐making
environmental innovation investment
family firms
Family owned businesses
government and competitor relationships
Innovations
Investment decision
Investments
Peers
Reputations
Social responsibility
Stakeholders
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Prior research suggests that family firms are more likely to engage in environment‐friendly practices. However, the source of this difference is less clear. This study investigates how environmental innovations and stakeholder pressure tradeoffs (specifically from competitors and government) are simultaneously evaluated within family and nonfamily firms. An experimental rating‐based conjoint methodology was used to capture and analyze 1936 firm environmental innovation investment decisions. The results indicate that firms were significantly more likely to invest in an environmental innovation that helped reduce regulatory oversight, and less likely to do so when it leads to a negative reputation among their industry peers. The findings also suggest that while firms will make an environmental innovation investment decisions to keep the government close, they are much more likely to avoid these investments if doing so will negatively impact their reputation among their peers—thus keeping their competitors closer. However, the results also demonstrated that family firms who were highly engaged with their peers were significantly less influenced by the possibility of negative peer reputation repercussions when making investment decisions compared with other firms. This research contributes to the development of a more comprehensive theoretical synthesis among the fields of corporate social responsibility (CSR), family business, and stakeholder theory.
ISSN:0964-4733
1099-0836
DOI:10.1002/bse.2870