Loading…
Latent profile analysis of ethical consumers in the United States and Malaysia
Through using Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) and the Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) method, this study proposes a new approach to ethical consumer categorization. Based on a survey using national survey data of more than 1,000 people in the United States and Malaysia, this study found three common et...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of consumer studies 2022-01, Vol.46 (1), p.249-267 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-3cf37b041b14841ff290ee6f9582261add2a728c7d9e653961075e9dc0b8eae53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-3cf37b041b14841ff290ee6f9582261add2a728c7d9e653961075e9dc0b8eae53 |
container_end_page | 267 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 249 |
container_title | International journal of consumer studies |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Shim, KyuJin Cho, Hichang |
description | Through using Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) and the Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) method, this study proposes a new approach to ethical consumer categorization. Based on a survey using national survey data of more than 1,000 people in the United States and Malaysia, this study found three common ethical consumer groups based on ethical sensitivity in both countries—moral enthusiast, moral interested, and moral indifferent. In addition to the aforementioned commonalities, we found national differences in consumer profiles: the U.S. sample also shows a moral progressivist group inclined to liberal ethics, while the Malaysia sample shows a moral intuitionist group with a relativistic approach in ethical decision making. The results indicate that ethical consumer profiling based on MFT has a sufficient level of criterion validity as it helps predict moral outrage, pro‐business attitudes, and boycott intentions in response to corporate irresponsibility. The study also demonstrates cross‐cultural differences in moral foundations and moral judgments in the context of ethical consumerism and corporate social irresponsibility. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ijcs.12671 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2621470439</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2621470439</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-3cf37b041b14841ff290ee6f9582261add2a728c7d9e653961075e9dc0b8eae53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw4RdE4obUESdt2h7RxMfQgMPYOcpSR8vUtSPJhPbvySjiiC_24Xkt-yHkGtgEUt25jQkT4LKEEzKCvGSZzAWc_s1cnJOLEDaMgawKMSJvcx2xi3Tne-tapLrT7SG4QHtLMa6d0S01fRf2W_SBuo7GNdJl5yI2dBFTNqRIQ191q1NMX5Izq9uAV799TJaPDx_T52z-_jSb3s8zI4oKMmGsKFcshxXkVQ7W8pohSlsXFecSdNNwXfLKlE2NshC1BFYWWDeGrSrUWIgxuRn2prs_9xii2vR7n24Pikt-fDYXdaJuB8r4PgSPVu2822p_UMDU0Zc6-lI_vhIMA_yVPBz-IdXsZboYMt_H3Wyt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621470439</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Latent profile analysis of ethical consumers in the United States and Malaysia</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Shim, KyuJin ; Cho, Hichang</creator><creatorcontrib>Shim, KyuJin ; Cho, Hichang</creatorcontrib><description>Through using Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) and the Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) method, this study proposes a new approach to ethical consumer categorization. Based on a survey using national survey data of more than 1,000 people in the United States and Malaysia, this study found three common ethical consumer groups based on ethical sensitivity in both countries—moral enthusiast, moral interested, and moral indifferent. In addition to the aforementioned commonalities, we found national differences in consumer profiles: the U.S. sample also shows a moral progressivist group inclined to liberal ethics, while the Malaysia sample shows a moral intuitionist group with a relativistic approach in ethical decision making. The results indicate that ethical consumer profiling based on MFT has a sufficient level of criterion validity as it helps predict moral outrage, pro‐business attitudes, and boycott intentions in response to corporate irresponsibility. The study also demonstrates cross‐cultural differences in moral foundations and moral judgments in the context of ethical consumerism and corporate social irresponsibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-6423</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-6431</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>boycott ; Boycotts ; Consumerism ; Cultural differences ; Decision making ; ethical consumerism ; Ethics ; latent profile analysis ; moral foundations theory ; Moral judgment ; Polls & surveys ; Profiles</subject><ispartof>International journal of consumer studies, 2022-01, Vol.46 (1), p.249-267</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-3cf37b041b14841ff290ee6f9582261add2a728c7d9e653961075e9dc0b8eae53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-3cf37b041b14841ff290ee6f9582261add2a728c7d9e653961075e9dc0b8eae53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1715-4797 ; 0000-0001-6391-1854</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shim, KyuJin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Hichang</creatorcontrib><title>Latent profile analysis of ethical consumers in the United States and Malaysia</title><title>International journal of consumer studies</title><description>Through using Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) and the Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) method, this study proposes a new approach to ethical consumer categorization. Based on a survey using national survey data of more than 1,000 people in the United States and Malaysia, this study found three common ethical consumer groups based on ethical sensitivity in both countries—moral enthusiast, moral interested, and moral indifferent. In addition to the aforementioned commonalities, we found national differences in consumer profiles: the U.S. sample also shows a moral progressivist group inclined to liberal ethics, while the Malaysia sample shows a moral intuitionist group with a relativistic approach in ethical decision making. The results indicate that ethical consumer profiling based on MFT has a sufficient level of criterion validity as it helps predict moral outrage, pro‐business attitudes, and boycott intentions in response to corporate irresponsibility. The study also demonstrates cross‐cultural differences in moral foundations and moral judgments in the context of ethical consumerism and corporate social irresponsibility.</description><subject>boycott</subject><subject>Boycotts</subject><subject>Consumerism</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>ethical consumerism</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>latent profile analysis</subject><subject>moral foundations theory</subject><subject>Moral judgment</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><issn>1470-6423</issn><issn>1470-6431</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw4RdE4obUESdt2h7RxMfQgMPYOcpSR8vUtSPJhPbvySjiiC_24Xkt-yHkGtgEUt25jQkT4LKEEzKCvGSZzAWc_s1cnJOLEDaMgawKMSJvcx2xi3Tne-tapLrT7SG4QHtLMa6d0S01fRf2W_SBuo7GNdJl5yI2dBFTNqRIQ191q1NMX5Izq9uAV799TJaPDx_T52z-_jSb3s8zI4oKMmGsKFcshxXkVQ7W8pohSlsXFecSdNNwXfLKlE2NshC1BFYWWDeGrSrUWIgxuRn2prs_9xii2vR7n24Pikt-fDYXdaJuB8r4PgSPVu2822p_UMDU0Zc6-lI_vhIMA_yVPBz-IdXsZboYMt_H3Wyt</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Shim, KyuJin</creator><creator>Cho, Hichang</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1715-4797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6391-1854</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Latent profile analysis of ethical consumers in the United States and Malaysia</title><author>Shim, KyuJin ; Cho, Hichang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-3cf37b041b14841ff290ee6f9582261add2a728c7d9e653961075e9dc0b8eae53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>boycott</topic><topic>Boycotts</topic><topic>Consumerism</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>ethical consumerism</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>latent profile analysis</topic><topic>moral foundations theory</topic><topic>Moral judgment</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shim, KyuJin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Hichang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of consumer studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shim, KyuJin</au><au>Cho, Hichang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Latent profile analysis of ethical consumers in the United States and Malaysia</atitle><jtitle>International journal of consumer studies</jtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>249-267</pages><issn>1470-6423</issn><eissn>1470-6431</eissn><abstract>Through using Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) and the Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) method, this study proposes a new approach to ethical consumer categorization. Based on a survey using national survey data of more than 1,000 people in the United States and Malaysia, this study found three common ethical consumer groups based on ethical sensitivity in both countries—moral enthusiast, moral interested, and moral indifferent. In addition to the aforementioned commonalities, we found national differences in consumer profiles: the U.S. sample also shows a moral progressivist group inclined to liberal ethics, while the Malaysia sample shows a moral intuitionist group with a relativistic approach in ethical decision making. The results indicate that ethical consumer profiling based on MFT has a sufficient level of criterion validity as it helps predict moral outrage, pro‐business attitudes, and boycott intentions in response to corporate irresponsibility. The study also demonstrates cross‐cultural differences in moral foundations and moral judgments in the context of ethical consumerism and corporate social irresponsibility.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ijcs.12671</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1715-4797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6391-1854</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-6423 |
ispartof | International journal of consumer studies, 2022-01, Vol.46 (1), p.249-267 |
issn | 1470-6423 1470-6431 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2621470439 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | boycott Boycotts Consumerism Cultural differences Decision making ethical consumerism Ethics latent profile analysis moral foundations theory Moral judgment Polls & surveys Profiles |
title | Latent profile analysis of ethical consumers in the United States and Malaysia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A21%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Latent%20profile%20analysis%20of%20ethical%20consumers%20in%20the%20United%20States%20and%20Malaysia&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20consumer%20studies&rft.au=Shim,%20KyuJin&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=249-267&rft.issn=1470-6423&rft.eissn=1470-6431&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijcs.12671&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2621470439%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-3cf37b041b14841ff290ee6f9582261add2a728c7d9e653961075e9dc0b8eae53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621470439&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |