Loading…

Latent profile analysis of ethical consumers in the United States and Malaysia

Through using Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) and the Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) method, this study proposes a new approach to ethical consumer categorization. Based on a survey using national survey data of more than 1,000 people in the United States and Malaysia, this study found three common et...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of consumer studies 2022-01, Vol.46 (1), p.249-267
Main Authors: Shim, KyuJin, Cho, Hichang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-3cf37b041b14841ff290ee6f9582261add2a728c7d9e653961075e9dc0b8eae53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-3cf37b041b14841ff290ee6f9582261add2a728c7d9e653961075e9dc0b8eae53
container_end_page 267
container_issue 1
container_start_page 249
container_title International journal of consumer studies
container_volume 46
creator Shim, KyuJin
Cho, Hichang
description Through using Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) and the Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) method, this study proposes a new approach to ethical consumer categorization. Based on a survey using national survey data of more than 1,000 people in the United States and Malaysia, this study found three common ethical consumer groups based on ethical sensitivity in both countries—moral enthusiast, moral interested, and moral indifferent. In addition to the aforementioned commonalities, we found national differences in consumer profiles: the U.S. sample also shows a moral progressivist group inclined to liberal ethics, while the Malaysia sample shows a moral intuitionist group with a relativistic approach in ethical decision making. The results indicate that ethical consumer profiling based on MFT has a sufficient level of criterion validity as it helps predict moral outrage, pro‐business attitudes, and boycott intentions in response to corporate irresponsibility. The study also demonstrates cross‐cultural differences in moral foundations and moral judgments in the context of ethical consumerism and corporate social irresponsibility.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ijcs.12671
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2621470439</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2621470439</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-3cf37b041b14841ff290ee6f9582261add2a728c7d9e653961075e9dc0b8eae53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw4RdE4obUESdt2h7RxMfQgMPYOcpSR8vUtSPJhPbvySjiiC_24Xkt-yHkGtgEUt25jQkT4LKEEzKCvGSZzAWc_s1cnJOLEDaMgawKMSJvcx2xi3Tne-tapLrT7SG4QHtLMa6d0S01fRf2W_SBuo7GNdJl5yI2dBFTNqRIQ191q1NMX5Izq9uAV799TJaPDx_T52z-_jSb3s8zI4oKMmGsKFcshxXkVQ7W8pohSlsXFecSdNNwXfLKlE2NshC1BFYWWDeGrSrUWIgxuRn2prs_9xii2vR7n24Pikt-fDYXdaJuB8r4PgSPVu2822p_UMDU0Zc6-lI_vhIMA_yVPBz-IdXsZboYMt_H3Wyt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621470439</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Latent profile analysis of ethical consumers in the United States and Malaysia</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Shim, KyuJin ; Cho, Hichang</creator><creatorcontrib>Shim, KyuJin ; Cho, Hichang</creatorcontrib><description>Through using Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) and the Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) method, this study proposes a new approach to ethical consumer categorization. Based on a survey using national survey data of more than 1,000 people in the United States and Malaysia, this study found three common ethical consumer groups based on ethical sensitivity in both countries—moral enthusiast, moral interested, and moral indifferent. In addition to the aforementioned commonalities, we found national differences in consumer profiles: the U.S. sample also shows a moral progressivist group inclined to liberal ethics, while the Malaysia sample shows a moral intuitionist group with a relativistic approach in ethical decision making. The results indicate that ethical consumer profiling based on MFT has a sufficient level of criterion validity as it helps predict moral outrage, pro‐business attitudes, and boycott intentions in response to corporate irresponsibility. The study also demonstrates cross‐cultural differences in moral foundations and moral judgments in the context of ethical consumerism and corporate social irresponsibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-6423</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-6431</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>boycott ; Boycotts ; Consumerism ; Cultural differences ; Decision making ; ethical consumerism ; Ethics ; latent profile analysis ; moral foundations theory ; Moral judgment ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Profiles</subject><ispartof>International journal of consumer studies, 2022-01, Vol.46 (1), p.249-267</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-3cf37b041b14841ff290ee6f9582261add2a728c7d9e653961075e9dc0b8eae53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-3cf37b041b14841ff290ee6f9582261add2a728c7d9e653961075e9dc0b8eae53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1715-4797 ; 0000-0001-6391-1854</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shim, KyuJin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Hichang</creatorcontrib><title>Latent profile analysis of ethical consumers in the United States and Malaysia</title><title>International journal of consumer studies</title><description>Through using Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) and the Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) method, this study proposes a new approach to ethical consumer categorization. Based on a survey using national survey data of more than 1,000 people in the United States and Malaysia, this study found three common ethical consumer groups based on ethical sensitivity in both countries—moral enthusiast, moral interested, and moral indifferent. In addition to the aforementioned commonalities, we found national differences in consumer profiles: the U.S. sample also shows a moral progressivist group inclined to liberal ethics, while the Malaysia sample shows a moral intuitionist group with a relativistic approach in ethical decision making. The results indicate that ethical consumer profiling based on MFT has a sufficient level of criterion validity as it helps predict moral outrage, pro‐business attitudes, and boycott intentions in response to corporate irresponsibility. The study also demonstrates cross‐cultural differences in moral foundations and moral judgments in the context of ethical consumerism and corporate social irresponsibility.</description><subject>boycott</subject><subject>Boycotts</subject><subject>Consumerism</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>ethical consumerism</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>latent profile analysis</subject><subject>moral foundations theory</subject><subject>Moral judgment</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><issn>1470-6423</issn><issn>1470-6431</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw4RdE4obUESdt2h7RxMfQgMPYOcpSR8vUtSPJhPbvySjiiC_24Xkt-yHkGtgEUt25jQkT4LKEEzKCvGSZzAWc_s1cnJOLEDaMgawKMSJvcx2xi3Tne-tapLrT7SG4QHtLMa6d0S01fRf2W_SBuo7GNdJl5yI2dBFTNqRIQ191q1NMX5Izq9uAV799TJaPDx_T52z-_jSb3s8zI4oKMmGsKFcshxXkVQ7W8pohSlsXFecSdNNwXfLKlE2NshC1BFYWWDeGrSrUWIgxuRn2prs_9xii2vR7n24Pikt-fDYXdaJuB8r4PgSPVu2822p_UMDU0Zc6-lI_vhIMA_yVPBz-IdXsZboYMt_H3Wyt</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Shim, KyuJin</creator><creator>Cho, Hichang</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1715-4797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6391-1854</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Latent profile analysis of ethical consumers in the United States and Malaysia</title><author>Shim, KyuJin ; Cho, Hichang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-3cf37b041b14841ff290ee6f9582261add2a728c7d9e653961075e9dc0b8eae53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>boycott</topic><topic>Boycotts</topic><topic>Consumerism</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>ethical consumerism</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>latent profile analysis</topic><topic>moral foundations theory</topic><topic>Moral judgment</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shim, KyuJin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Hichang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of consumer studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shim, KyuJin</au><au>Cho, Hichang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Latent profile analysis of ethical consumers in the United States and Malaysia</atitle><jtitle>International journal of consumer studies</jtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>249-267</pages><issn>1470-6423</issn><eissn>1470-6431</eissn><abstract>Through using Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) and the Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) method, this study proposes a new approach to ethical consumer categorization. Based on a survey using national survey data of more than 1,000 people in the United States and Malaysia, this study found three common ethical consumer groups based on ethical sensitivity in both countries—moral enthusiast, moral interested, and moral indifferent. In addition to the aforementioned commonalities, we found national differences in consumer profiles: the U.S. sample also shows a moral progressivist group inclined to liberal ethics, while the Malaysia sample shows a moral intuitionist group with a relativistic approach in ethical decision making. The results indicate that ethical consumer profiling based on MFT has a sufficient level of criterion validity as it helps predict moral outrage, pro‐business attitudes, and boycott intentions in response to corporate irresponsibility. The study also demonstrates cross‐cultural differences in moral foundations and moral judgments in the context of ethical consumerism and corporate social irresponsibility.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ijcs.12671</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1715-4797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6391-1854</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-6423
ispartof International journal of consumer studies, 2022-01, Vol.46 (1), p.249-267
issn 1470-6423
1470-6431
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2621470439
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects boycott
Boycotts
Consumerism
Cultural differences
Decision making
ethical consumerism
Ethics
latent profile analysis
moral foundations theory
Moral judgment
Polls & surveys
Profiles
title Latent profile analysis of ethical consumers in the United States and Malaysia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A21%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Latent%20profile%20analysis%20of%20ethical%20consumers%20in%20the%20United%20States%20and%20Malaysia&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20consumer%20studies&rft.au=Shim,%20KyuJin&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=249-267&rft.issn=1470-6423&rft.eissn=1470-6431&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijcs.12671&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2621470439%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-3cf37b041b14841ff290ee6f9582261add2a728c7d9e653961075e9dc0b8eae53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621470439&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true