On the Distinction between the Abstract Tacts Art and Craft: A Concept Analysis

We may marvel at both the creativity and quality of work in a piece of pottery or a sculpture, or of a well-played basketball game or well-acted play. Although each may have similarities, and each may have instances of what might be called creativity, one is often considered art, whereas the other a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Psychological record 2021-12, Vol.71 (4), p.585-594
Main Authors: Nishimuta, Maasa, Layng, T. V. Joe
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aesthetics
Artists
Basketball
Behavior
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Conceptual analysis
Contingencies
Creativity
Impressionism
Philosophers
Pottery
Psychology
Sculpture
Theoretical Article
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We may marvel at both the creativity and quality of work in a piece of pottery or a sculpture, or of a well-played basketball game or well-acted play. Although each may have similarities, and each may have instances of what might be called creativity, one is often considered art, whereas the other a craft. This article, using concept analyses, will explore what may be guiding the abstract tact “art” and the abstract tact “craft.” The critical features of each as well as the varying features will be described, compared, and contrasted. The consequential contingencies governing the creation or performance of each, and the effect of the work on the audience are the basis of the concept analysis. In the process it will be demonstrated how a consequential contingency analysis may contribute to understanding art, craft, their creation, and definition.
ISSN:0033-2933
2163-3452
DOI:10.1007/s40732-021-00491-w