Loading…
Disciplining Statelessness: Fragmentary Outcomes of the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy in India
Tibetan settlements in India house the largest population of Tibetan exiles and are crucial repositories of Tibetan culture and nationalism in the political struggle for Tibet. The settlements privilege the moral narrative of statelessness as an integral part of the Tibetan struggle. However, given...
Saved in:
Published in: | Asian studies review 2022-01, Vol.46 (1), p.74-92 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-1c7e7f332cdcdfc023690ca60d2e2ab6affca229f10a95234e606b7ad9727fee3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-1c7e7f332cdcdfc023690ca60d2e2ab6affca229f10a95234e606b7ad9727fee3 |
container_end_page | 92 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 74 |
container_title | Asian studies review |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Balasubramaniam, Madhura Gupta, Sonika |
description | Tibetan settlements in India house the largest population of Tibetan exiles and are crucial repositories of Tibetan culture and nationalism in the political struggle for Tibet. The settlements privilege the moral narrative of statelessness as an integral part of the Tibetan struggle. However, given the precarity of land tenure, these settlements are steadily hollowing out, with an increasing number of Tibetans choosing to migrate out of India. In response, the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) and the Indian government have jointly framed the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP) to consolidate the Tibetan population in India. The TRP functions as a disciplinary regime that is delivered through a centralised process for creating secure land tenure for Tibetan settlements, and aims to retain the Tibetans as a stateless population in India. Using three case studies of Tibetan settlements across India, we demonstrate that Tibetans are resisting this moral injunction of statelessness by opting out of the disciplinary logic of the TRP. This resistance includes processes of outmigration and pursuing citizen-like claims in India. These forms of resistance reflect the fragmentation within the exile community over the political value of statelessness, with many Tibetans exploring new ways to imagine their struggle as rooted in citizenship claims. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10357823.2021.1931030 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2622854618</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2622854618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-1c7e7f332cdcdfc023690ca60d2e2ab6affca229f10a95234e606b7ad9727fee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhRdRsFZ_ghDwvHWS7GZ3PSlqtVCoaL0astmkTdkmNUmR_ntTWq8ehhmG994wX5ZdYxhhqOEWAy2rmtARAYJHuKFpASfZABesyusC6Gmakybfi86zixBWAMBwQwbZ15MJ0mx6Y41doI8ooupVCDbVHRp7sVgrG4Xfodk2SrdWATmN4lKhuWlVFBa9q6VoTW-S0ziL3lxv5A4Ziya2M-IyO9OiD-rq2IfZ5_h5_viaT2cvk8eHaS4prWOOZaUqTSmRney0BEJZA1Iw6IgiomVCaykIaTQG0ZSEFooBayvRNRWptFJ0mN0ccjfefW9ViHzltt6mk5wwQuqyYLhOqvKgkt6F4JXmG2_W6TuOge9R8j-UfI-SH1Em3_3BZ6x2fi1-nO87HsWud157YaUJnP4f8Quw4XvT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2622854618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disciplining Statelessness: Fragmentary Outcomes of the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy in India</title><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Balasubramaniam, Madhura ; Gupta, Sonika</creator><creatorcontrib>Balasubramaniam, Madhura ; Gupta, Sonika</creatorcontrib><description>Tibetan settlements in India house the largest population of Tibetan exiles and are crucial repositories of Tibetan culture and nationalism in the political struggle for Tibet. The settlements privilege the moral narrative of statelessness as an integral part of the Tibetan struggle. However, given the precarity of land tenure, these settlements are steadily hollowing out, with an increasing number of Tibetans choosing to migrate out of India. In response, the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) and the Indian government have jointly framed the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP) to consolidate the Tibetan population in India. The TRP functions as a disciplinary regime that is delivered through a centralised process for creating secure land tenure for Tibetan settlements, and aims to retain the Tibetans as a stateless population in India. Using three case studies of Tibetan settlements across India, we demonstrate that Tibetans are resisting this moral injunction of statelessness by opting out of the disciplinary logic of the TRP. This resistance includes processes of outmigration and pursuing citizen-like claims in India. These forms of resistance reflect the fragmentation within the exile community over the political value of statelessness, with many Tibetans exploring new ways to imagine their struggle as rooted in citizenship claims.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1035-7823</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10357823.2021.1931030</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nathan: Routledge</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) ; Citizenship ; Clearing houses ; discipline ; Exile ; India ; Land tenure ; Nationalism ; Population policy ; Public administration ; Refugees ; Rehabilitation ; Resistance ; Statelessness ; Tibetan exile ; Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP)</subject><ispartof>Asian studies review, 2022-01, Vol.46 (1), p.74-92</ispartof><rights>2021 Asian Studies Association of Australia 2021</rights><rights>2021 Asian Studies Association of Australia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-1c7e7f332cdcdfc023690ca60d2e2ab6affca229f10a95234e606b7ad9727fee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-1c7e7f332cdcdfc023690ca60d2e2ab6affca229f10a95234e606b7ad9727fee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3815-6575 ; 0000-0003-4049-3615</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,33755</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balasubramaniam, Madhura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Sonika</creatorcontrib><title>Disciplining Statelessness: Fragmentary Outcomes of the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy in India</title><title>Asian studies review</title><description>Tibetan settlements in India house the largest population of Tibetan exiles and are crucial repositories of Tibetan culture and nationalism in the political struggle for Tibet. The settlements privilege the moral narrative of statelessness as an integral part of the Tibetan struggle. However, given the precarity of land tenure, these settlements are steadily hollowing out, with an increasing number of Tibetans choosing to migrate out of India. In response, the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) and the Indian government have jointly framed the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP) to consolidate the Tibetan population in India. The TRP functions as a disciplinary regime that is delivered through a centralised process for creating secure land tenure for Tibetan settlements, and aims to retain the Tibetans as a stateless population in India. Using three case studies of Tibetan settlements across India, we demonstrate that Tibetans are resisting this moral injunction of statelessness by opting out of the disciplinary logic of the TRP. This resistance includes processes of outmigration and pursuing citizen-like claims in India. These forms of resistance reflect the fragmentation within the exile community over the political value of statelessness, with many Tibetans exploring new ways to imagine their struggle as rooted in citizenship claims.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Central Tibetan Administration (CTA)</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Clearing houses</subject><subject>discipline</subject><subject>Exile</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Land tenure</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Population policy</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Refugees</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Statelessness</subject><subject>Tibetan exile</subject><subject>Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP)</subject><issn>1035-7823</issn><issn>1467-8403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhRdRsFZ_ghDwvHWS7GZ3PSlqtVCoaL0astmkTdkmNUmR_ntTWq8ehhmG994wX5ZdYxhhqOEWAy2rmtARAYJHuKFpASfZABesyusC6Gmakybfi86zixBWAMBwQwbZ15MJ0mx6Y41doI8ooupVCDbVHRp7sVgrG4Xfodk2SrdWATmN4lKhuWlVFBa9q6VoTW-S0ziL3lxv5A4Ziya2M-IyO9OiD-rq2IfZ5_h5_viaT2cvk8eHaS4prWOOZaUqTSmRney0BEJZA1Iw6IgiomVCaykIaTQG0ZSEFooBayvRNRWptFJ0mN0ccjfefW9ViHzltt6mk5wwQuqyYLhOqvKgkt6F4JXmG2_W6TuOge9R8j-UfI-SH1Em3_3BZ6x2fi1-nO87HsWud157YaUJnP4f8Quw4XvT</recordid><startdate>20220102</startdate><enddate>20220102</enddate><creator>Balasubramaniam, Madhura</creator><creator>Gupta, Sonika</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3815-6575</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4049-3615</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220102</creationdate><title>Disciplining Statelessness: Fragmentary Outcomes of the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy in India</title><author>Balasubramaniam, Madhura ; Gupta, Sonika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-1c7e7f332cdcdfc023690ca60d2e2ab6affca229f10a95234e606b7ad9727fee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Central Tibetan Administration (CTA)</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Clearing houses</topic><topic>discipline</topic><topic>Exile</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Land tenure</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Population policy</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Refugees</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Statelessness</topic><topic>Tibetan exile</topic><topic>Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balasubramaniam, Madhura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Sonika</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Asian studies review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balasubramaniam, Madhura</au><au>Gupta, Sonika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disciplining Statelessness: Fragmentary Outcomes of the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy in India</atitle><jtitle>Asian studies review</jtitle><date>2022-01-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>74</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>74-92</pages><issn>1035-7823</issn><eissn>1467-8403</eissn><abstract>Tibetan settlements in India house the largest population of Tibetan exiles and are crucial repositories of Tibetan culture and nationalism in the political struggle for Tibet. The settlements privilege the moral narrative of statelessness as an integral part of the Tibetan struggle. However, given the precarity of land tenure, these settlements are steadily hollowing out, with an increasing number of Tibetans choosing to migrate out of India. In response, the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) and the Indian government have jointly framed the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP) to consolidate the Tibetan population in India. The TRP functions as a disciplinary regime that is delivered through a centralised process for creating secure land tenure for Tibetan settlements, and aims to retain the Tibetans as a stateless population in India. Using three case studies of Tibetan settlements across India, we demonstrate that Tibetans are resisting this moral injunction of statelessness by opting out of the disciplinary logic of the TRP. This resistance includes processes of outmigration and pursuing citizen-like claims in India. These forms of resistance reflect the fragmentation within the exile community over the political value of statelessness, with many Tibetans exploring new ways to imagine their struggle as rooted in citizenship claims.</abstract><cop>Nathan</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10357823.2021.1931030</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3815-6575</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4049-3615</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1035-7823 |
ispartof | Asian studies review, 2022-01, Vol.46 (1), p.74-92 |
issn | 1035-7823 1467-8403 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2622854618 |
source | Taylor & Francis; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Case studies Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) Citizenship Clearing houses discipline Exile India Land tenure Nationalism Population policy Public administration Refugees Rehabilitation Resistance Statelessness Tibetan exile Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP) |
title | Disciplining Statelessness: Fragmentary Outcomes of the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy in India |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A47%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disciplining%20Statelessness:%20Fragmentary%20Outcomes%20of%20the%20Tibetan%20Rehabilitation%20Policy%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=Asian%20studies%20review&rft.au=Balasubramaniam,%20Madhura&rft.date=2022-01-02&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=74&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=74-92&rft.issn=1035-7823&rft.eissn=1467-8403&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10357823.2021.1931030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2622854618%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-1c7e7f332cdcdfc023690ca60d2e2ab6affca229f10a95234e606b7ad9727fee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2622854618&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |