Loading…

Disciplining Statelessness: Fragmentary Outcomes of the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy in India

Tibetan settlements in India house the largest population of Tibetan exiles and are crucial repositories of Tibetan culture and nationalism in the political struggle for Tibet. The settlements privilege the moral narrative of statelessness as an integral part of the Tibetan struggle. However, given...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Asian studies review 2022-01, Vol.46 (1), p.74-92
Main Authors: Balasubramaniam, Madhura, Gupta, Sonika
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-1c7e7f332cdcdfc023690ca60d2e2ab6affca229f10a95234e606b7ad9727fee3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-1c7e7f332cdcdfc023690ca60d2e2ab6affca229f10a95234e606b7ad9727fee3
container_end_page 92
container_issue 1
container_start_page 74
container_title Asian studies review
container_volume 46
creator Balasubramaniam, Madhura
Gupta, Sonika
description Tibetan settlements in India house the largest population of Tibetan exiles and are crucial repositories of Tibetan culture and nationalism in the political struggle for Tibet. The settlements privilege the moral narrative of statelessness as an integral part of the Tibetan struggle. However, given the precarity of land tenure, these settlements are steadily hollowing out, with an increasing number of Tibetans choosing to migrate out of India. In response, the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) and the Indian government have jointly framed the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP) to consolidate the Tibetan population in India. The TRP functions as a disciplinary regime that is delivered through a centralised process for creating secure land tenure for Tibetan settlements, and aims to retain the Tibetans as a stateless population in India. Using three case studies of Tibetan settlements across India, we demonstrate that Tibetans are resisting this moral injunction of statelessness by opting out of the disciplinary logic of the TRP. This resistance includes processes of outmigration and pursuing citizen-like claims in India. These forms of resistance reflect the fragmentation within the exile community over the political value of statelessness, with many Tibetans exploring new ways to imagine their struggle as rooted in citizenship claims.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10357823.2021.1931030
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2622854618</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2622854618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-1c7e7f332cdcdfc023690ca60d2e2ab6affca229f10a95234e606b7ad9727fee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhRdRsFZ_ghDwvHWS7GZ3PSlqtVCoaL0astmkTdkmNUmR_ntTWq8ehhmG994wX5ZdYxhhqOEWAy2rmtARAYJHuKFpASfZABesyusC6Gmakybfi86zixBWAMBwQwbZ15MJ0mx6Y41doI8ooupVCDbVHRp7sVgrG4Xfodk2SrdWATmN4lKhuWlVFBa9q6VoTW-S0ziL3lxv5A4Ziya2M-IyO9OiD-rq2IfZ5_h5_viaT2cvk8eHaS4prWOOZaUqTSmRney0BEJZA1Iw6IgiomVCaykIaTQG0ZSEFooBayvRNRWptFJ0mN0ccjfefW9ViHzltt6mk5wwQuqyYLhOqvKgkt6F4JXmG2_W6TuOge9R8j-UfI-SH1Em3_3BZ6x2fi1-nO87HsWud157YaUJnP4f8Quw4XvT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2622854618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disciplining Statelessness: Fragmentary Outcomes of the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy in India</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Balasubramaniam, Madhura ; Gupta, Sonika</creator><creatorcontrib>Balasubramaniam, Madhura ; Gupta, Sonika</creatorcontrib><description>Tibetan settlements in India house the largest population of Tibetan exiles and are crucial repositories of Tibetan culture and nationalism in the political struggle for Tibet. The settlements privilege the moral narrative of statelessness as an integral part of the Tibetan struggle. However, given the precarity of land tenure, these settlements are steadily hollowing out, with an increasing number of Tibetans choosing to migrate out of India. In response, the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) and the Indian government have jointly framed the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP) to consolidate the Tibetan population in India. The TRP functions as a disciplinary regime that is delivered through a centralised process for creating secure land tenure for Tibetan settlements, and aims to retain the Tibetans as a stateless population in India. Using three case studies of Tibetan settlements across India, we demonstrate that Tibetans are resisting this moral injunction of statelessness by opting out of the disciplinary logic of the TRP. This resistance includes processes of outmigration and pursuing citizen-like claims in India. These forms of resistance reflect the fragmentation within the exile community over the political value of statelessness, with many Tibetans exploring new ways to imagine their struggle as rooted in citizenship claims.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1035-7823</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10357823.2021.1931030</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nathan: Routledge</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) ; Citizenship ; Clearing houses ; discipline ; Exile ; India ; Land tenure ; Nationalism ; Population policy ; Public administration ; Refugees ; Rehabilitation ; Resistance ; Statelessness ; Tibetan exile ; Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP)</subject><ispartof>Asian studies review, 2022-01, Vol.46 (1), p.74-92</ispartof><rights>2021 Asian Studies Association of Australia 2021</rights><rights>2021 Asian Studies Association of Australia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-1c7e7f332cdcdfc023690ca60d2e2ab6affca229f10a95234e606b7ad9727fee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-1c7e7f332cdcdfc023690ca60d2e2ab6affca229f10a95234e606b7ad9727fee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3815-6575 ; 0000-0003-4049-3615</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,33755</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balasubramaniam, Madhura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Sonika</creatorcontrib><title>Disciplining Statelessness: Fragmentary Outcomes of the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy in India</title><title>Asian studies review</title><description>Tibetan settlements in India house the largest population of Tibetan exiles and are crucial repositories of Tibetan culture and nationalism in the political struggle for Tibet. The settlements privilege the moral narrative of statelessness as an integral part of the Tibetan struggle. However, given the precarity of land tenure, these settlements are steadily hollowing out, with an increasing number of Tibetans choosing to migrate out of India. In response, the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) and the Indian government have jointly framed the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP) to consolidate the Tibetan population in India. The TRP functions as a disciplinary regime that is delivered through a centralised process for creating secure land tenure for Tibetan settlements, and aims to retain the Tibetans as a stateless population in India. Using three case studies of Tibetan settlements across India, we demonstrate that Tibetans are resisting this moral injunction of statelessness by opting out of the disciplinary logic of the TRP. This resistance includes processes of outmigration and pursuing citizen-like claims in India. These forms of resistance reflect the fragmentation within the exile community over the political value of statelessness, with many Tibetans exploring new ways to imagine their struggle as rooted in citizenship claims.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Central Tibetan Administration (CTA)</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Clearing houses</subject><subject>discipline</subject><subject>Exile</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Land tenure</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Population policy</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Refugees</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Statelessness</subject><subject>Tibetan exile</subject><subject>Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP)</subject><issn>1035-7823</issn><issn>1467-8403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhRdRsFZ_ghDwvHWS7GZ3PSlqtVCoaL0astmkTdkmNUmR_ntTWq8ehhmG994wX5ZdYxhhqOEWAy2rmtARAYJHuKFpASfZABesyusC6Gmakybfi86zixBWAMBwQwbZ15MJ0mx6Y41doI8ooupVCDbVHRp7sVgrG4Xfodk2SrdWATmN4lKhuWlVFBa9q6VoTW-S0ziL3lxv5A4Ziya2M-IyO9OiD-rq2IfZ5_h5_viaT2cvk8eHaS4prWOOZaUqTSmRney0BEJZA1Iw6IgiomVCaykIaTQG0ZSEFooBayvRNRWptFJ0mN0ccjfefW9ViHzltt6mk5wwQuqyYLhOqvKgkt6F4JXmG2_W6TuOge9R8j-UfI-SH1Em3_3BZ6x2fi1-nO87HsWud157YaUJnP4f8Quw4XvT</recordid><startdate>20220102</startdate><enddate>20220102</enddate><creator>Balasubramaniam, Madhura</creator><creator>Gupta, Sonika</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3815-6575</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4049-3615</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220102</creationdate><title>Disciplining Statelessness: Fragmentary Outcomes of the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy in India</title><author>Balasubramaniam, Madhura ; Gupta, Sonika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-1c7e7f332cdcdfc023690ca60d2e2ab6affca229f10a95234e606b7ad9727fee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Central Tibetan Administration (CTA)</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Clearing houses</topic><topic>discipline</topic><topic>Exile</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Land tenure</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Population policy</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Refugees</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Statelessness</topic><topic>Tibetan exile</topic><topic>Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balasubramaniam, Madhura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Sonika</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Asian studies review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balasubramaniam, Madhura</au><au>Gupta, Sonika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disciplining Statelessness: Fragmentary Outcomes of the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy in India</atitle><jtitle>Asian studies review</jtitle><date>2022-01-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>74</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>74-92</pages><issn>1035-7823</issn><eissn>1467-8403</eissn><abstract>Tibetan settlements in India house the largest population of Tibetan exiles and are crucial repositories of Tibetan culture and nationalism in the political struggle for Tibet. The settlements privilege the moral narrative of statelessness as an integral part of the Tibetan struggle. However, given the precarity of land tenure, these settlements are steadily hollowing out, with an increasing number of Tibetans choosing to migrate out of India. In response, the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) and the Indian government have jointly framed the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP) to consolidate the Tibetan population in India. The TRP functions as a disciplinary regime that is delivered through a centralised process for creating secure land tenure for Tibetan settlements, and aims to retain the Tibetans as a stateless population in India. Using three case studies of Tibetan settlements across India, we demonstrate that Tibetans are resisting this moral injunction of statelessness by opting out of the disciplinary logic of the TRP. This resistance includes processes of outmigration and pursuing citizen-like claims in India. These forms of resistance reflect the fragmentation within the exile community over the political value of statelessness, with many Tibetans exploring new ways to imagine their struggle as rooted in citizenship claims.</abstract><cop>Nathan</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10357823.2021.1931030</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3815-6575</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4049-3615</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1035-7823
ispartof Asian studies review, 2022-01, Vol.46 (1), p.74-92
issn 1035-7823
1467-8403
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2622854618
source Taylor & Francis; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Case studies
Central Tibetan Administration (CTA)
Citizenship
Clearing houses
discipline
Exile
India
Land tenure
Nationalism
Population policy
Public administration
Refugees
Rehabilitation
Resistance
Statelessness
Tibetan exile
Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy (TRP)
title Disciplining Statelessness: Fragmentary Outcomes of the Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy in India
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A47%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disciplining%20Statelessness:%20Fragmentary%20Outcomes%20of%20the%20Tibetan%20Rehabilitation%20Policy%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=Asian%20studies%20review&rft.au=Balasubramaniam,%20Madhura&rft.date=2022-01-02&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=74&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=74-92&rft.issn=1035-7823&rft.eissn=1467-8403&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10357823.2021.1931030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2622854618%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-1c7e7f332cdcdfc023690ca60d2e2ab6affca229f10a95234e606b7ad9727fee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2622854618&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true