Loading…
Cost Control of Arbitration in Construction Projects
AbstractArbitration has been the alternative dispute resolution to litigation in many contractual agreements and among many construction projects. It was promoted as a better alternative dispute resolution method to the litigation process due to the presumed decrease in both time and expense. Howeve...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction 2022-05, Vol.14 (2) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a211t-635069c890e8b55b1fe4655f9afb19c67fc925c71ae0f3c48267bf93a27acd373 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed Jennings, Scott Kumar, Shantanu |
description | AbstractArbitration has been the alternative dispute resolution to litigation in many contractual agreements and among many construction projects. It was promoted as a better alternative dispute resolution method to the litigation process due to the presumed decrease in both time and expense. However, over the last decades, arbitration proceedings have become longer, more expensive, and almost comparable to litigation. Despite having many other alternative dispute resolution methods, arbitration is still the most prevalent method in many contractual agreements. Therefore, arbitration cost and time overrun issues have to be addressed in order to understand the reasons behind the cost overruns and to allow the discovery of different opportunities to mitigate arbitration costs while maintaining the arbitration process efficiency. This research study identifies the root causes for arbitration cost overruns and analyzes the different scenarios that lead to these overruns. The study also analyzes the different control and mitigation strategies that can be utilized to better control arbitration costs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000530 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2623987842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2623987842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a211t-635069c890e8b55b1fe4655f9afb19c67fc925c71ae0f3c48267bf93a27acd373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOI6-Q9GNLjrmnsZdKeMFCgrqOqQxgZaxGZN04dvbTsdx5dmc6_8f-AC4RHCFIEe31-Vrtb6pyxWSlOQUCbiCYzACj8DiMDs-1ByfgrMYOwg544QuAK18TFnl-xT8JvMuK0PTpqBT6_us7adNTGEwu_4l-M6aFM_BidObaC_2eQne79dv1WNePz88VWWda4xQyjlhkEtTSGiLhrEGOUs5Y05q1yBpuHBGYmYE0hY6YmiBuWicJBoLbT6IIEtwNftug_8abEyq80Pox5cKc0xkIQqKx6u7-coEH2OwTm1D-6nDt0JQTZSUmiipulQTBTURUXtKo5jPYh2N_bP_Vf4v_AHZA2p1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2623987842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost Control of Arbitration in Construction Projects</title><source>ASCE Online Journals</source><creator>Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed ; Jennings, Scott ; Kumar, Shantanu</creator><creatorcontrib>Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed ; Jennings, Scott ; Kumar, Shantanu</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractArbitration has been the alternative dispute resolution to litigation in many contractual agreements and among many construction projects. It was promoted as a better alternative dispute resolution method to the litigation process due to the presumed decrease in both time and expense. However, over the last decades, arbitration proceedings have become longer, more expensive, and almost comparable to litigation. Despite having many other alternative dispute resolution methods, arbitration is still the most prevalent method in many contractual agreements. Therefore, arbitration cost and time overrun issues have to be addressed in order to understand the reasons behind the cost overruns and to allow the discovery of different opportunities to mitigate arbitration costs while maintaining the arbitration process efficiency. This research study identifies the root causes for arbitration cost overruns and analyzes the different scenarios that lead to these overruns. The study also analyzes the different control and mitigation strategies that can be utilized to better control arbitration costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-4162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Alternative dispute resolution ; Arbitration ; Cost analysis ; Litigation ; Scholarly Paper ; Scholarly Papers</subject><ispartof>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 2022-05, Vol.14 (2)</ispartof><rights>2022 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a211t-635069c890e8b55b1fe4655f9afb19c67fc925c71ae0f3c48267bf93a27acd373</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7932-4726</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000530$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000530$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3252,10068,27924,27925,76191,76199</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Shantanu</creatorcontrib><title>Cost Control of Arbitration in Construction Projects</title><title>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</title><description>AbstractArbitration has been the alternative dispute resolution to litigation in many contractual agreements and among many construction projects. It was promoted as a better alternative dispute resolution method to the litigation process due to the presumed decrease in both time and expense. However, over the last decades, arbitration proceedings have become longer, more expensive, and almost comparable to litigation. Despite having many other alternative dispute resolution methods, arbitration is still the most prevalent method in many contractual agreements. Therefore, arbitration cost and time overrun issues have to be addressed in order to understand the reasons behind the cost overruns and to allow the discovery of different opportunities to mitigate arbitration costs while maintaining the arbitration process efficiency. This research study identifies the root causes for arbitration cost overruns and analyzes the different scenarios that lead to these overruns. The study also analyzes the different control and mitigation strategies that can be utilized to better control arbitration costs.</description><subject>Alternative dispute resolution</subject><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Scholarly Paper</subject><subject>Scholarly Papers</subject><issn>1943-4162</issn><issn>1943-4170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOI6-Q9GNLjrmnsZdKeMFCgrqOqQxgZaxGZN04dvbTsdx5dmc6_8f-AC4RHCFIEe31-Vrtb6pyxWSlOQUCbiCYzACj8DiMDs-1ByfgrMYOwg544QuAK18TFnl-xT8JvMuK0PTpqBT6_us7adNTGEwu_4l-M6aFM_BidObaC_2eQne79dv1WNePz88VWWda4xQyjlhkEtTSGiLhrEGOUs5Y05q1yBpuHBGYmYE0hY6YmiBuWicJBoLbT6IIEtwNftug_8abEyq80Pox5cKc0xkIQqKx6u7-coEH2OwTm1D-6nDt0JQTZSUmiipulQTBTURUXtKo5jPYh2N_bP_Vf4v_AHZA2p1</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed</creator><creator>Jennings, Scott</creator><creator>Kumar, Shantanu</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7932-4726</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Cost Control of Arbitration in Construction Projects</title><author>Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed ; Jennings, Scott ; Kumar, Shantanu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a211t-635069c890e8b55b1fe4655f9afb19c67fc925c71ae0f3c48267bf93a27acd373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Alternative dispute resolution</topic><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Scholarly Paper</topic><topic>Scholarly Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Shantanu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed</au><au>Jennings, Scott</au><au>Kumar, Shantanu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost Control of Arbitration in Construction Projects</atitle><jtitle>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</jtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>1943-4162</issn><eissn>1943-4170</eissn><abstract>AbstractArbitration has been the alternative dispute resolution to litigation in many contractual agreements and among many construction projects. It was promoted as a better alternative dispute resolution method to the litigation process due to the presumed decrease in both time and expense. However, over the last decades, arbitration proceedings have become longer, more expensive, and almost comparable to litigation. Despite having many other alternative dispute resolution methods, arbitration is still the most prevalent method in many contractual agreements. Therefore, arbitration cost and time overrun issues have to be addressed in order to understand the reasons behind the cost overruns and to allow the discovery of different opportunities to mitigate arbitration costs while maintaining the arbitration process efficiency. This research study identifies the root causes for arbitration cost overruns and analyzes the different scenarios that lead to these overruns. The study also analyzes the different control and mitigation strategies that can be utilized to better control arbitration costs.</abstract><cop>Reston</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000530</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7932-4726</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1943-4162 |
ispartof | Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 2022-05, Vol.14 (2) |
issn | 1943-4162 1943-4170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2623987842 |
source | ASCE Online Journals |
subjects | Alternative dispute resolution Arbitration Cost analysis Litigation Scholarly Paper Scholarly Papers |
title | Cost Control of Arbitration in Construction Projects |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A54%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost%20Control%20of%20Arbitration%20in%20Construction%20Projects&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20legal%20affairs%20and%20dispute%20resolution%20in%20engineering%20and%20construction&rft.au=Hashem%20M.%20Mehany,%20Mohammed&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=1943-4162&rft.eissn=1943-4170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000530&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2623987842%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a211t-635069c890e8b55b1fe4655f9afb19c67fc925c71ae0f3c48267bf93a27acd373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2623987842&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |