Loading…

Cost Control of Arbitration in Construction Projects

AbstractArbitration has been the alternative dispute resolution to litigation in many contractual agreements and among many construction projects. It was promoted as a better alternative dispute resolution method to the litigation process due to the presumed decrease in both time and expense. Howeve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction 2022-05, Vol.14 (2)
Main Authors: Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed, Jennings, Scott, Kumar, Shantanu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a211t-635069c890e8b55b1fe4655f9afb19c67fc925c71ae0f3c48267bf93a27acd373
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction
container_volume 14
creator Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed
Jennings, Scott
Kumar, Shantanu
description AbstractArbitration has been the alternative dispute resolution to litigation in many contractual agreements and among many construction projects. It was promoted as a better alternative dispute resolution method to the litigation process due to the presumed decrease in both time and expense. However, over the last decades, arbitration proceedings have become longer, more expensive, and almost comparable to litigation. Despite having many other alternative dispute resolution methods, arbitration is still the most prevalent method in many contractual agreements. Therefore, arbitration cost and time overrun issues have to be addressed in order to understand the reasons behind the cost overruns and to allow the discovery of different opportunities to mitigate arbitration costs while maintaining the arbitration process efficiency. This research study identifies the root causes for arbitration cost overruns and analyzes the different scenarios that lead to these overruns. The study also analyzes the different control and mitigation strategies that can be utilized to better control arbitration costs.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000530
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2623987842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2623987842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a211t-635069c890e8b55b1fe4655f9afb19c67fc925c71ae0f3c48267bf93a27acd373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOI6-Q9GNLjrmnsZdKeMFCgrqOqQxgZaxGZN04dvbTsdx5dmc6_8f-AC4RHCFIEe31-Vrtb6pyxWSlOQUCbiCYzACj8DiMDs-1ByfgrMYOwg544QuAK18TFnl-xT8JvMuK0PTpqBT6_us7adNTGEwu_4l-M6aFM_BidObaC_2eQne79dv1WNePz88VWWda4xQyjlhkEtTSGiLhrEGOUs5Y05q1yBpuHBGYmYE0hY6YmiBuWicJBoLbT6IIEtwNftug_8abEyq80Pox5cKc0xkIQqKx6u7-coEH2OwTm1D-6nDt0JQTZSUmiipulQTBTURUXtKo5jPYh2N_bP_Vf4v_AHZA2p1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2623987842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost Control of Arbitration in Construction Projects</title><source>ASCE Online Journals</source><creator>Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed ; Jennings, Scott ; Kumar, Shantanu</creator><creatorcontrib>Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed ; Jennings, Scott ; Kumar, Shantanu</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractArbitration has been the alternative dispute resolution to litigation in many contractual agreements and among many construction projects. It was promoted as a better alternative dispute resolution method to the litigation process due to the presumed decrease in both time and expense. However, over the last decades, arbitration proceedings have become longer, more expensive, and almost comparable to litigation. Despite having many other alternative dispute resolution methods, arbitration is still the most prevalent method in many contractual agreements. Therefore, arbitration cost and time overrun issues have to be addressed in order to understand the reasons behind the cost overruns and to allow the discovery of different opportunities to mitigate arbitration costs while maintaining the arbitration process efficiency. This research study identifies the root causes for arbitration cost overruns and analyzes the different scenarios that lead to these overruns. The study also analyzes the different control and mitigation strategies that can be utilized to better control arbitration costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-4162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Alternative dispute resolution ; Arbitration ; Cost analysis ; Litigation ; Scholarly Paper ; Scholarly Papers</subject><ispartof>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 2022-05, Vol.14 (2)</ispartof><rights>2022 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a211t-635069c890e8b55b1fe4655f9afb19c67fc925c71ae0f3c48267bf93a27acd373</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7932-4726</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000530$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000530$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3252,10068,27924,27925,76191,76199</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Shantanu</creatorcontrib><title>Cost Control of Arbitration in Construction Projects</title><title>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</title><description>AbstractArbitration has been the alternative dispute resolution to litigation in many contractual agreements and among many construction projects. It was promoted as a better alternative dispute resolution method to the litigation process due to the presumed decrease in both time and expense. However, over the last decades, arbitration proceedings have become longer, more expensive, and almost comparable to litigation. Despite having many other alternative dispute resolution methods, arbitration is still the most prevalent method in many contractual agreements. Therefore, arbitration cost and time overrun issues have to be addressed in order to understand the reasons behind the cost overruns and to allow the discovery of different opportunities to mitigate arbitration costs while maintaining the arbitration process efficiency. This research study identifies the root causes for arbitration cost overruns and analyzes the different scenarios that lead to these overruns. The study also analyzes the different control and mitigation strategies that can be utilized to better control arbitration costs.</description><subject>Alternative dispute resolution</subject><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Scholarly Paper</subject><subject>Scholarly Papers</subject><issn>1943-4162</issn><issn>1943-4170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOI6-Q9GNLjrmnsZdKeMFCgrqOqQxgZaxGZN04dvbTsdx5dmc6_8f-AC4RHCFIEe31-Vrtb6pyxWSlOQUCbiCYzACj8DiMDs-1ByfgrMYOwg544QuAK18TFnl-xT8JvMuK0PTpqBT6_us7adNTGEwu_4l-M6aFM_BidObaC_2eQne79dv1WNePz88VWWda4xQyjlhkEtTSGiLhrEGOUs5Y05q1yBpuHBGYmYE0hY6YmiBuWicJBoLbT6IIEtwNftug_8abEyq80Pox5cKc0xkIQqKx6u7-coEH2OwTm1D-6nDt0JQTZSUmiipulQTBTURUXtKo5jPYh2N_bP_Vf4v_AHZA2p1</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed</creator><creator>Jennings, Scott</creator><creator>Kumar, Shantanu</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7932-4726</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Cost Control of Arbitration in Construction Projects</title><author>Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed ; Jennings, Scott ; Kumar, Shantanu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a211t-635069c890e8b55b1fe4655f9afb19c67fc925c71ae0f3c48267bf93a27acd373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Alternative dispute resolution</topic><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Scholarly Paper</topic><topic>Scholarly Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Shantanu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hashem M. Mehany, Mohammed</au><au>Jennings, Scott</au><au>Kumar, Shantanu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost Control of Arbitration in Construction Projects</atitle><jtitle>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</jtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>1943-4162</issn><eissn>1943-4170</eissn><abstract>AbstractArbitration has been the alternative dispute resolution to litigation in many contractual agreements and among many construction projects. It was promoted as a better alternative dispute resolution method to the litigation process due to the presumed decrease in both time and expense. However, over the last decades, arbitration proceedings have become longer, more expensive, and almost comparable to litigation. Despite having many other alternative dispute resolution methods, arbitration is still the most prevalent method in many contractual agreements. Therefore, arbitration cost and time overrun issues have to be addressed in order to understand the reasons behind the cost overruns and to allow the discovery of different opportunities to mitigate arbitration costs while maintaining the arbitration process efficiency. This research study identifies the root causes for arbitration cost overruns and analyzes the different scenarios that lead to these overruns. The study also analyzes the different control and mitigation strategies that can be utilized to better control arbitration costs.</abstract><cop>Reston</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000530</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7932-4726</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1943-4162
ispartof Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 2022-05, Vol.14 (2)
issn 1943-4162
1943-4170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2623987842
source ASCE Online Journals
subjects Alternative dispute resolution
Arbitration
Cost analysis
Litigation
Scholarly Paper
Scholarly Papers
title Cost Control of Arbitration in Construction Projects
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A54%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost%20Control%20of%20Arbitration%20in%20Construction%20Projects&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20legal%20affairs%20and%20dispute%20resolution%20in%20engineering%20and%20construction&rft.au=Hashem%20M.%20Mehany,%20Mohammed&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=1943-4162&rft.eissn=1943-4170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000530&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2623987842%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a211t-635069c890e8b55b1fe4655f9afb19c67fc925c71ae0f3c48267bf93a27acd373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2623987842&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true