Loading…

Use of Social Networking Sites among Greek Deaf People: Communication Accessibility or Preferences?

While societies have become increasingly dependent on both internet- and information technology-based knowledge retrieval and applications and as social media has become an inextricable aspect of most people’s daily lives, a keen interest has emerged regarding the impact that these technologies have...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sign language studies 2021-01, Vol.21 (2), p.181-207
Main Authors: MARTZOS, THEODOROS G., DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA, OKALIDOU, ARETI
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-d2916a0f28c1a83fe1aea65d8f82844fab79ca58f54e8b3602653130654a05f13
cites
container_end_page 207
container_issue 2
container_start_page 181
container_title Sign language studies
container_volume 21
creator MARTZOS, THEODOROS G.
DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA
OKALIDOU, ARETI
description While societies have become increasingly dependent on both internet- and information technology-based knowledge retrieval and applications and as social media has become an inextricable aspect of most people’s daily lives, a keen interest has emerged regarding the impact that these technologies have on Deaf people’s lives. This article describes an original preliminary investigation of how these technologies affect Greek Deaf people’s lives—we intended to collect preliminary data on which future studies can be based. The collected data can be considered an early indication of the Greek Deaf community’s generic attitude toward social media. The data also indicate that the use of social networking sites (SNSs) is altering the concept of the Greek Deaf community. It investigates—for the first time—the utilization frequency of most known SNSs (such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, Google+, and LinkedIn) by Greek Deaf adults, the daily amount of hours they spend surfing these sites, and their hardware technology preferences. Additionally, this research records the views of Greek Deaf adults regarding the purpose of social media utilization. The researchers compare their responses with those of hearing people, and they then conclude whether the results coincide or not. A questionnaire was filled out electronically by 49 Deaf people (24 males/25 females) and 229 hearing people (30 males/199 females) from across Greece via the Google.docs application. The gestural, visual–spatial modality of Greek Sign Language, as well as the Greek Deaf community’s adjustment to the technology era, is mirrored in the responses of both Deaf and hearing participants. Hearing people use both Facebook (p = .021) and YouTube (p = .000) at a greater rate, while Deaf people significantly prefer Instagram (p = .006). Additionally, Deaf participants preferred to use desktop computers (p = .004), indicating introversion, while hearing participants preferred laptop computers (p = .002) for surfing social media. Lastly, the Deaf participants significantly used SNSs for gathering information, communicating, being entertained, and socializing.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/sls.2020.0033
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2624997219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1284175</ericid><jstor_id>27088500</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27088500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-d2916a0f28c1a83fe1aea65d8f82844fab79ca58f54e8b3602653130654a05f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LAzEURYMoWKtLl8KA66kvn5NZStWqFBVq1yGdvshMp01Npoj_3gyVdpUHOe_e5BByTWFEueR3sY0jBgxGAJyfkAGVnOeKKX5KBsCB5VQU8pxcxNgAQCmKckDUPGLmXTbzVW3b7A27Hx9W9eYrm9UdxsyufZonAXGVPaB12Qf6bYuX5MzZNuLV_zkk86fHz_FzPn2fvIzvp3nFpejyJSupsuCYrqjV3CG1aJVcaqeZFsLZRVFWVmonBeoFV8CU5JSDksKCdJQPye0-dxv89w5jZxq_C5tUaZhioiwLRstE5XuqCj7GgM5sQ7224ddQML0aE_uFpMb0ahJ_s-cx1NWBfXyl6VG0kOleHFobrLr1LuKxuNCQfmVmvd7ebp8LIPUxtomdD4dcVoDWMhX_Adzhd38</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2624997219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Social Networking Sites among Greek Deaf People: Communication Accessibility or Preferences?</title><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>MARTZOS, THEODOROS G. ; DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA ; OKALIDOU, ARETI</creator><creatorcontrib>MARTZOS, THEODOROS G. ; DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA ; OKALIDOU, ARETI</creatorcontrib><description>While societies have become increasingly dependent on both internet- and information technology-based knowledge retrieval and applications and as social media has become an inextricable aspect of most people’s daily lives, a keen interest has emerged regarding the impact that these technologies have on Deaf people’s lives. This article describes an original preliminary investigation of how these technologies affect Greek Deaf people’s lives—we intended to collect preliminary data on which future studies can be based. The collected data can be considered an early indication of the Greek Deaf community’s generic attitude toward social media. The data also indicate that the use of social networking sites (SNSs) is altering the concept of the Greek Deaf community. It investigates—for the first time—the utilization frequency of most known SNSs (such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, Google+, and LinkedIn) by Greek Deaf adults, the daily amount of hours they spend surfing these sites, and their hardware technology preferences. Additionally, this research records the views of Greek Deaf adults regarding the purpose of social media utilization. The researchers compare their responses with those of hearing people, and they then conclude whether the results coincide or not. A questionnaire was filled out electronically by 49 Deaf people (24 males/25 females) and 229 hearing people (30 males/199 females) from across Greece via the Google.docs application. The gestural, visual–spatial modality of Greek Sign Language, as well as the Greek Deaf community’s adjustment to the technology era, is mirrored in the responses of both Deaf and hearing participants. Hearing people use both Facebook (p = .021) and YouTube (p = .000) at a greater rate, while Deaf people significantly prefer Instagram (p = .006). Additionally, Deaf participants preferred to use desktop computers (p = .004), indicating introversion, while hearing participants preferred laptop computers (p = .002) for surfing social media. Lastly, the Deaf participants significantly used SNSs for gathering information, communicating, being entertained, and socializing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-1475</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1533-6263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-6263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/sls.2020.0033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Gallaudet University Press</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Adults ; Captions ; Communication ; Communication (Thought Transfer) ; Community Relations ; Comparative Analysis ; Computers ; Deafness ; Extraversion Introversion ; Foreign Countries ; Governance ; Greek ; Hearing (Physiology) ; Hearing loss ; Information Seeking ; Information Technology ; Internet ; Laptop Computers ; Literature Reviews ; Oral Language ; Participant Characteristics ; Photography ; Politics ; Preferences ; Sign Language ; Social Adjustment ; Social factors ; Social Media ; Social Networks ; Social research ; Time Management ; Video Technology ; Virtual communities</subject><ispartof>Sign language studies, 2021-01, Vol.21 (2), p.181-207</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Gallaudet University.</rights><rights>Copyright Gallaudet University Press Winter 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-d2916a0f28c1a83fe1aea65d8f82844fab79ca58f54e8b3602653130654a05f13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2624997219/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2624997219?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12851,12861,21378,21382,21394,27924,27925,31269,33611,33877,33911,34775,43733,43880,43896,44200,58238,58471,62661,62662,62677,74196,74221,74397,74413,74728</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1284175$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MARTZOS, THEODOROS G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OKALIDOU, ARETI</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Social Networking Sites among Greek Deaf People: Communication Accessibility or Preferences?</title><title>Sign language studies</title><description>While societies have become increasingly dependent on both internet- and information technology-based knowledge retrieval and applications and as social media has become an inextricable aspect of most people’s daily lives, a keen interest has emerged regarding the impact that these technologies have on Deaf people’s lives. This article describes an original preliminary investigation of how these technologies affect Greek Deaf people’s lives—we intended to collect preliminary data on which future studies can be based. The collected data can be considered an early indication of the Greek Deaf community’s generic attitude toward social media. The data also indicate that the use of social networking sites (SNSs) is altering the concept of the Greek Deaf community. It investigates—for the first time—the utilization frequency of most known SNSs (such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, Google+, and LinkedIn) by Greek Deaf adults, the daily amount of hours they spend surfing these sites, and their hardware technology preferences. Additionally, this research records the views of Greek Deaf adults regarding the purpose of social media utilization. The researchers compare their responses with those of hearing people, and they then conclude whether the results coincide or not. A questionnaire was filled out electronically by 49 Deaf people (24 males/25 females) and 229 hearing people (30 males/199 females) from across Greece via the Google.docs application. The gestural, visual–spatial modality of Greek Sign Language, as well as the Greek Deaf community’s adjustment to the technology era, is mirrored in the responses of both Deaf and hearing participants. Hearing people use both Facebook (p = .021) and YouTube (p = .000) at a greater rate, while Deaf people significantly prefer Instagram (p = .006). Additionally, Deaf participants preferred to use desktop computers (p = .004), indicating introversion, while hearing participants preferred laptop computers (p = .002) for surfing social media. Lastly, the Deaf participants significantly used SNSs for gathering information, communicating, being entertained, and socializing.</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Captions</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication (Thought Transfer)</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Deafness</subject><subject>Extraversion Introversion</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Greek</subject><subject>Hearing (Physiology)</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Information Seeking</subject><subject>Information Technology</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Laptop Computers</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Participant Characteristics</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Sign Language</subject><subject>Social Adjustment</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social Networks</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Time Management</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><subject>Virtual communities</subject><issn>0302-1475</issn><issn>1533-6263</issn><issn>1533-6263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1LAzEURYMoWKtLl8KA66kvn5NZStWqFBVq1yGdvshMp01Npoj_3gyVdpUHOe_e5BByTWFEueR3sY0jBgxGAJyfkAGVnOeKKX5KBsCB5VQU8pxcxNgAQCmKckDUPGLmXTbzVW3b7A27Hx9W9eYrm9UdxsyufZonAXGVPaB12Qf6bYuX5MzZNuLV_zkk86fHz_FzPn2fvIzvp3nFpejyJSupsuCYrqjV3CG1aJVcaqeZFsLZRVFWVmonBeoFV8CU5JSDksKCdJQPye0-dxv89w5jZxq_C5tUaZhioiwLRstE5XuqCj7GgM5sQ7224ddQML0aE_uFpMb0ahJ_s-cx1NWBfXyl6VG0kOleHFobrLr1LuKxuNCQfmVmvd7ebp8LIPUxtomdD4dcVoDWMhX_Adzhd38</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>MARTZOS, THEODOROS G.</creator><creator>DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA</creator><creator>OKALIDOU, ARETI</creator><general>Gallaudet University Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Use of Social Networking Sites among Greek Deaf People</title><author>MARTZOS, THEODOROS G. ; DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA ; OKALIDOU, ARETI</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-d2916a0f28c1a83fe1aea65d8f82844fab79ca58f54e8b3602653130654a05f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Captions</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication (Thought Transfer)</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Deafness</topic><topic>Extraversion Introversion</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Greek</topic><topic>Hearing (Physiology)</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Information Seeking</topic><topic>Information Technology</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Laptop Computers</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Participant Characteristics</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Sign Language</topic><topic>Social Adjustment</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social Networks</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Time Management</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><topic>Virtual communities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MARTZOS, THEODOROS G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OKALIDOU, ARETI</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Sign language studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MARTZOS, THEODOROS G.</au><au>DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA</au><au>OKALIDOU, ARETI</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1284175</ericid><atitle>Use of Social Networking Sites among Greek Deaf People: Communication Accessibility or Preferences?</atitle><jtitle>Sign language studies</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>181-207</pages><issn>0302-1475</issn><issn>1533-6263</issn><eissn>1533-6263</eissn><abstract>While societies have become increasingly dependent on both internet- and information technology-based knowledge retrieval and applications and as social media has become an inextricable aspect of most people’s daily lives, a keen interest has emerged regarding the impact that these technologies have on Deaf people’s lives. This article describes an original preliminary investigation of how these technologies affect Greek Deaf people’s lives—we intended to collect preliminary data on which future studies can be based. The collected data can be considered an early indication of the Greek Deaf community’s generic attitude toward social media. The data also indicate that the use of social networking sites (SNSs) is altering the concept of the Greek Deaf community. It investigates—for the first time—the utilization frequency of most known SNSs (such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, Google+, and LinkedIn) by Greek Deaf adults, the daily amount of hours they spend surfing these sites, and their hardware technology preferences. Additionally, this research records the views of Greek Deaf adults regarding the purpose of social media utilization. The researchers compare their responses with those of hearing people, and they then conclude whether the results coincide or not. A questionnaire was filled out electronically by 49 Deaf people (24 males/25 females) and 229 hearing people (30 males/199 females) from across Greece via the Google.docs application. The gestural, visual–spatial modality of Greek Sign Language, as well as the Greek Deaf community’s adjustment to the technology era, is mirrored in the responses of both Deaf and hearing participants. Hearing people use both Facebook (p = .021) and YouTube (p = .000) at a greater rate, while Deaf people significantly prefer Instagram (p = .006). Additionally, Deaf participants preferred to use desktop computers (p = .004), indicating introversion, while hearing participants preferred laptop computers (p = .002) for surfing social media. Lastly, the Deaf participants significantly used SNSs for gathering information, communicating, being entertained, and socializing.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Gallaudet University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/sls.2020.0033</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-1475
ispartof Sign language studies, 2021-01, Vol.21 (2), p.181-207
issn 0302-1475
1533-6263
1533-6263
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2624997219
source Art, Design and Architecture Collection; Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Linguistics Collection; ProQuest One Literature; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); JSTOR; Education Collection
subjects Access to information
Adults
Captions
Communication
Communication (Thought Transfer)
Community Relations
Comparative Analysis
Computers
Deafness
Extraversion Introversion
Foreign Countries
Governance
Greek
Hearing (Physiology)
Hearing loss
Information Seeking
Information Technology
Internet
Laptop Computers
Literature Reviews
Oral Language
Participant Characteristics
Photography
Politics
Preferences
Sign Language
Social Adjustment
Social factors
Social Media
Social Networks
Social research
Time Management
Video Technology
Virtual communities
title Use of Social Networking Sites among Greek Deaf People: Communication Accessibility or Preferences?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A55%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Social%20Networking%20Sites%20among%20Greek%20Deaf%20People:%20Communication%20Accessibility%20or%20Preferences?&rft.jtitle=Sign%20language%20studies&rft.au=MARTZOS,%20THEODOROS%20G.&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=181-207&rft.issn=0302-1475&rft.eissn=1533-6263&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/sls.2020.0033&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27088500%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-d2916a0f28c1a83fe1aea65d8f82844fab79ca58f54e8b3602653130654a05f13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2624997219&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1284175&rft_jstor_id=27088500&rfr_iscdi=true