Loading…
Use of Social Networking Sites among Greek Deaf People: Communication Accessibility or Preferences?
While societies have become increasingly dependent on both internet- and information technology-based knowledge retrieval and applications and as social media has become an inextricable aspect of most people’s daily lives, a keen interest has emerged regarding the impact that these technologies have...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sign language studies 2021-01, Vol.21 (2), p.181-207 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-d2916a0f28c1a83fe1aea65d8f82844fab79ca58f54e8b3602653130654a05f13 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 207 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 181 |
container_title | Sign language studies |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | MARTZOS, THEODOROS G. DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA OKALIDOU, ARETI |
description | While societies have become increasingly dependent on both internet- and information technology-based knowledge retrieval and applications and as social media has become an inextricable aspect of most people’s daily lives, a keen interest has emerged regarding the impact that these technologies have on Deaf people’s lives. This article describes an original preliminary investigation of how these technologies affect Greek Deaf people’s lives—we intended to collect preliminary data on which future studies can be based. The collected data can be considered an early indication of the Greek Deaf community’s generic attitude toward social media. The data also indicate that the use of social networking sites (SNSs) is altering the concept of the Greek Deaf community. It investigates—for the first time—the utilization frequency of most known SNSs (such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, Google+, and LinkedIn) by Greek Deaf adults, the daily amount of hours they spend surfing these sites, and their hardware technology preferences. Additionally, this research records the views of Greek Deaf adults regarding the purpose of social media utilization. The researchers compare their responses with those of hearing people, and they then conclude whether the results coincide or not. A questionnaire was filled out electronically by 49 Deaf people (24 males/25 females) and 229 hearing people (30 males/199 females) from across Greece via the Google.docs application. The gestural, visual–spatial modality of Greek Sign Language, as well as the Greek Deaf community’s adjustment to the technology era, is mirrored in the responses of both Deaf and hearing participants. Hearing people use both Facebook (p = .021) and YouTube (p = .000) at a greater rate, while Deaf people significantly prefer Instagram (p = .006). Additionally, Deaf participants preferred to use desktop computers (p = .004), indicating introversion, while hearing participants preferred laptop computers (p = .002) for surfing social media. Lastly, the Deaf participants significantly used SNSs for gathering information, communicating, being entertained, and socializing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/sls.2020.0033 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2624997219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1284175</ericid><jstor_id>27088500</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27088500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-d2916a0f28c1a83fe1aea65d8f82844fab79ca58f54e8b3602653130654a05f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LAzEURYMoWKtLl8KA66kvn5NZStWqFBVq1yGdvshMp01Npoj_3gyVdpUHOe_e5BByTWFEueR3sY0jBgxGAJyfkAGVnOeKKX5KBsCB5VQU8pxcxNgAQCmKckDUPGLmXTbzVW3b7A27Hx9W9eYrm9UdxsyufZonAXGVPaB12Qf6bYuX5MzZNuLV_zkk86fHz_FzPn2fvIzvp3nFpejyJSupsuCYrqjV3CG1aJVcaqeZFsLZRVFWVmonBeoFV8CU5JSDksKCdJQPye0-dxv89w5jZxq_C5tUaZhioiwLRstE5XuqCj7GgM5sQ7224ddQML0aE_uFpMb0ahJ_s-cx1NWBfXyl6VG0kOleHFobrLr1LuKxuNCQfmVmvd7ebp8LIPUxtomdD4dcVoDWMhX_Adzhd38</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2624997219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Social Networking Sites among Greek Deaf People: Communication Accessibility or Preferences?</title><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>MARTZOS, THEODOROS G. ; DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA ; OKALIDOU, ARETI</creator><creatorcontrib>MARTZOS, THEODOROS G. ; DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA ; OKALIDOU, ARETI</creatorcontrib><description>While societies have become increasingly dependent on both internet- and information technology-based knowledge retrieval and applications and as social media has become an inextricable aspect of most people’s daily lives, a keen interest has emerged regarding the impact that these technologies have on Deaf people’s lives. This article describes an original preliminary investigation of how these technologies affect Greek Deaf people’s lives—we intended to collect preliminary data on which future studies can be based. The collected data can be considered an early indication of the Greek Deaf community’s generic attitude toward social media. The data also indicate that the use of social networking sites (SNSs) is altering the concept of the Greek Deaf community. It investigates—for the first time—the utilization frequency of most known SNSs (such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, Google+, and LinkedIn) by Greek Deaf adults, the daily amount of hours they spend surfing these sites, and their hardware technology preferences. Additionally, this research records the views of Greek Deaf adults regarding the purpose of social media utilization. The researchers compare their responses with those of hearing people, and they then conclude whether the results coincide or not. A questionnaire was filled out electronically by 49 Deaf people (24 males/25 females) and 229 hearing people (30 males/199 females) from across Greece via the Google.docs application. The gestural, visual–spatial modality of Greek Sign Language, as well as the Greek Deaf community’s adjustment to the technology era, is mirrored in the responses of both Deaf and hearing participants. Hearing people use both Facebook (p = .021) and YouTube (p = .000) at a greater rate, while Deaf people significantly prefer Instagram (p = .006). Additionally, Deaf participants preferred to use desktop computers (p = .004), indicating introversion, while hearing participants preferred laptop computers (p = .002) for surfing social media. Lastly, the Deaf participants significantly used SNSs for gathering information, communicating, being entertained, and socializing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-1475</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1533-6263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-6263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/sls.2020.0033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Gallaudet University Press</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Adults ; Captions ; Communication ; Communication (Thought Transfer) ; Community Relations ; Comparative Analysis ; Computers ; Deafness ; Extraversion Introversion ; Foreign Countries ; Governance ; Greek ; Hearing (Physiology) ; Hearing loss ; Information Seeking ; Information Technology ; Internet ; Laptop Computers ; Literature Reviews ; Oral Language ; Participant Characteristics ; Photography ; Politics ; Preferences ; Sign Language ; Social Adjustment ; Social factors ; Social Media ; Social Networks ; Social research ; Time Management ; Video Technology ; Virtual communities</subject><ispartof>Sign language studies, 2021-01, Vol.21 (2), p.181-207</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Gallaudet University.</rights><rights>Copyright Gallaudet University Press Winter 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-d2916a0f28c1a83fe1aea65d8f82844fab79ca58f54e8b3602653130654a05f13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2624997219/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2624997219?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12851,12861,21378,21382,21394,27924,27925,31269,33611,33877,33911,34775,43733,43880,43896,44200,58238,58471,62661,62662,62677,74196,74221,74397,74413,74728</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1284175$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MARTZOS, THEODOROS G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OKALIDOU, ARETI</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Social Networking Sites among Greek Deaf People: Communication Accessibility or Preferences?</title><title>Sign language studies</title><description>While societies have become increasingly dependent on both internet- and information technology-based knowledge retrieval and applications and as social media has become an inextricable aspect of most people’s daily lives, a keen interest has emerged regarding the impact that these technologies have on Deaf people’s lives. This article describes an original preliminary investigation of how these technologies affect Greek Deaf people’s lives—we intended to collect preliminary data on which future studies can be based. The collected data can be considered an early indication of the Greek Deaf community’s generic attitude toward social media. The data also indicate that the use of social networking sites (SNSs) is altering the concept of the Greek Deaf community. It investigates—for the first time—the utilization frequency of most known SNSs (such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, Google+, and LinkedIn) by Greek Deaf adults, the daily amount of hours they spend surfing these sites, and their hardware technology preferences. Additionally, this research records the views of Greek Deaf adults regarding the purpose of social media utilization. The researchers compare their responses with those of hearing people, and they then conclude whether the results coincide or not. A questionnaire was filled out electronically by 49 Deaf people (24 males/25 females) and 229 hearing people (30 males/199 females) from across Greece via the Google.docs application. The gestural, visual–spatial modality of Greek Sign Language, as well as the Greek Deaf community’s adjustment to the technology era, is mirrored in the responses of both Deaf and hearing participants. Hearing people use both Facebook (p = .021) and YouTube (p = .000) at a greater rate, while Deaf people significantly prefer Instagram (p = .006). Additionally, Deaf participants preferred to use desktop computers (p = .004), indicating introversion, while hearing participants preferred laptop computers (p = .002) for surfing social media. Lastly, the Deaf participants significantly used SNSs for gathering information, communicating, being entertained, and socializing.</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Captions</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication (Thought Transfer)</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Deafness</subject><subject>Extraversion Introversion</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Greek</subject><subject>Hearing (Physiology)</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Information Seeking</subject><subject>Information Technology</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Laptop Computers</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Participant Characteristics</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Sign Language</subject><subject>Social Adjustment</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social Networks</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Time Management</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><subject>Virtual communities</subject><issn>0302-1475</issn><issn>1533-6263</issn><issn>1533-6263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1LAzEURYMoWKtLl8KA66kvn5NZStWqFBVq1yGdvshMp01Npoj_3gyVdpUHOe_e5BByTWFEueR3sY0jBgxGAJyfkAGVnOeKKX5KBsCB5VQU8pxcxNgAQCmKckDUPGLmXTbzVW3b7A27Hx9W9eYrm9UdxsyufZonAXGVPaB12Qf6bYuX5MzZNuLV_zkk86fHz_FzPn2fvIzvp3nFpejyJSupsuCYrqjV3CG1aJVcaqeZFsLZRVFWVmonBeoFV8CU5JSDksKCdJQPye0-dxv89w5jZxq_C5tUaZhioiwLRstE5XuqCj7GgM5sQ7224ddQML0aE_uFpMb0ahJ_s-cx1NWBfXyl6VG0kOleHFobrLr1LuKxuNCQfmVmvd7ebp8LIPUxtomdD4dcVoDWMhX_Adzhd38</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>MARTZOS, THEODOROS G.</creator><creator>DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA</creator><creator>OKALIDOU, ARETI</creator><general>Gallaudet University Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Use of Social Networking Sites among Greek Deaf People</title><author>MARTZOS, THEODOROS G. ; DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA ; OKALIDOU, ARETI</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-d2916a0f28c1a83fe1aea65d8f82844fab79ca58f54e8b3602653130654a05f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Captions</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication (Thought Transfer)</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Deafness</topic><topic>Extraversion Introversion</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Greek</topic><topic>Hearing (Physiology)</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Information Seeking</topic><topic>Information Technology</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Laptop Computers</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Participant Characteristics</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Sign Language</topic><topic>Social Adjustment</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social Networks</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Time Management</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><topic>Virtual communities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MARTZOS, THEODOROS G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OKALIDOU, ARETI</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Sign language studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MARTZOS, THEODOROS G.</au><au>DINOPOULOU, PELAGIA</au><au>OKALIDOU, ARETI</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1284175</ericid><atitle>Use of Social Networking Sites among Greek Deaf People: Communication Accessibility or Preferences?</atitle><jtitle>Sign language studies</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>181-207</pages><issn>0302-1475</issn><issn>1533-6263</issn><eissn>1533-6263</eissn><abstract>While societies have become increasingly dependent on both internet- and information technology-based knowledge retrieval and applications and as social media has become an inextricable aspect of most people’s daily lives, a keen interest has emerged regarding the impact that these technologies have on Deaf people’s lives. This article describes an original preliminary investigation of how these technologies affect Greek Deaf people’s lives—we intended to collect preliminary data on which future studies can be based. The collected data can be considered an early indication of the Greek Deaf community’s generic attitude toward social media. The data also indicate that the use of social networking sites (SNSs) is altering the concept of the Greek Deaf community. It investigates—for the first time—the utilization frequency of most known SNSs (such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, Google+, and LinkedIn) by Greek Deaf adults, the daily amount of hours they spend surfing these sites, and their hardware technology preferences. Additionally, this research records the views of Greek Deaf adults regarding the purpose of social media utilization. The researchers compare their responses with those of hearing people, and they then conclude whether the results coincide or not. A questionnaire was filled out electronically by 49 Deaf people (24 males/25 females) and 229 hearing people (30 males/199 females) from across Greece via the Google.docs application. The gestural, visual–spatial modality of Greek Sign Language, as well as the Greek Deaf community’s adjustment to the technology era, is mirrored in the responses of both Deaf and hearing participants. Hearing people use both Facebook (p = .021) and YouTube (p = .000) at a greater rate, while Deaf people significantly prefer Instagram (p = .006). Additionally, Deaf participants preferred to use desktop computers (p = .004), indicating introversion, while hearing participants preferred laptop computers (p = .002) for surfing social media. Lastly, the Deaf participants significantly used SNSs for gathering information, communicating, being entertained, and socializing.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Gallaudet University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/sls.2020.0033</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0302-1475 |
ispartof | Sign language studies, 2021-01, Vol.21 (2), p.181-207 |
issn | 0302-1475 1533-6263 1533-6263 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2624997219 |
source | Art, Design and Architecture Collection; Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Linguistics Collection; ProQuest One Literature; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); JSTOR; Education Collection |
subjects | Access to information Adults Captions Communication Communication (Thought Transfer) Community Relations Comparative Analysis Computers Deafness Extraversion Introversion Foreign Countries Governance Greek Hearing (Physiology) Hearing loss Information Seeking Information Technology Internet Laptop Computers Literature Reviews Oral Language Participant Characteristics Photography Politics Preferences Sign Language Social Adjustment Social factors Social Media Social Networks Social research Time Management Video Technology Virtual communities |
title | Use of Social Networking Sites among Greek Deaf People: Communication Accessibility or Preferences? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A55%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Social%20Networking%20Sites%20among%20Greek%20Deaf%20People:%20Communication%20Accessibility%20or%20Preferences?&rft.jtitle=Sign%20language%20studies&rft.au=MARTZOS,%20THEODOROS%20G.&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=181-207&rft.issn=0302-1475&rft.eissn=1533-6263&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/sls.2020.0033&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27088500%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-d2916a0f28c1a83fe1aea65d8f82844fab79ca58f54e8b3602653130654a05f13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2624997219&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1284175&rft_jstor_id=27088500&rfr_iscdi=true |