Loading…

Differences in above-ground resource acquisition and niche overlap between a model invader (Phragmites australis) and resident plant species: measuring the role of fitness and niche differences in the field

Identifying the mechanisms that result in a “high impact” invasive species can be difficult. Coexistence theory suggests that detrimental invasive species can be better predicted by incorporating both niche differences and fitness differences than examining niche overlap alone. Specifically, detrime...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biological invasions 2022-03, Vol.24 (3), p.649-682
Main Authors: Robichaud, C. D., Rooney, R. C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-cdca0b91edcb52490a19ff80a0d52791a6160f5be7b2eefcf71617c45c5d970f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-cdca0b91edcb52490a19ff80a0d52791a6160f5be7b2eefcf71617c45c5d970f3
container_end_page 682
container_issue 3
container_start_page 649
container_title Biological invasions
container_volume 24
creator Robichaud, C. D.
Rooney, R. C.
description Identifying the mechanisms that result in a “high impact” invasive species can be difficult. Coexistence theory suggests that detrimental invasive species can be better predicted by incorporating both niche differences and fitness differences than examining niche overlap alone. Specifically, detrimental invasive species should take up shared limited resources more efficiently than their neighbouring resident species. While there is clear evidence that invasive Phragmites australis is successfully displacing resident species, there remains few field studies that attempt to quantify the niche overlap and fitness difference between P. australis and the species it is displacing in the field. We measured differences in photosynthetic performance (carbon assimilation rate, δ 13 C, photosynthetic water use efficiency, biomass, light compensation point, light saturation point), canopy height and interception of photosynthetically active radiation, and niche overlap between P. australis and three resident freshwater wetland species ( Calamagrostis canadensis , Carex aquatilis , and Typha spp.) growing with or without aboveground interspecific competition . Invasive P. australis intercepted more photosynthetically active radiation, had higher photosynthetic water use efficiency, a higher average light saturation point, and had a larger niche region compared to resident species. Resident plant species showed a significant decrease in photosynthetic performance when growing in competition with P. australis and had a high probability of overlap onto the niche space of P. australis. These results provide evidence that the ability of P. australis to reduce the availability of a required resource and more efficiently use it over the growing season, while exhibiting high niche overlap with resident species, likely contributes directly to its success in North American freshwater wetlands.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10530-021-02674-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2628212521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2628212521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-cdca0b91edcb52490a19ff80a0d52791a6160f5be7b2eefcf71617c45c5d970f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctO3DAUjRCVeJQfYGWJTbtIsZ3YnnSHeLSVkNpFWVuOfT0YZZLg64D6k3xT7zCVSjdd2L7SPQ_rnKo6FfyT4Nyco-Cq4TWXgo42ba33qkOhTFOLVrf7NDcrUzeqNQfVEeID57wzXB1WL1cpRsgwekCWRub66QnqdZ6WMbAMOC3ZA3P-cUmYSpoIQYsx-XtghMyDm1kP5RmANmwzBRhI5skFyOzDj_vs1ptUSNotWLIbEn58FSDlFGAsbB4c3TiDT4Cf2QYcLjmNa1bIIE8DuUQWUxkB8Y11-PfXW3BMMIT31bvoBoSTP-9xdXdz_fPya337_cu3y4vb2je6KbUP3vG-ExB8r2TbcSe6GFfc8aCk6YTTQvOoejC9BIg-GqGF8a3yKlBusTmuzna6c54eF8BiHyipkSyt1HIlhVRSEEruUD5PiBminXPauPzLCm63vdldb5Z6s6-9WU2kZkfCeRsE5L_S_2H9BhkyoIY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2628212521</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in above-ground resource acquisition and niche overlap between a model invader (Phragmites australis) and resident plant species: measuring the role of fitness and niche differences in the field</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Robichaud, C. D. ; Rooney, R. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Robichaud, C. D. ; Rooney, R. C.</creatorcontrib><description>Identifying the mechanisms that result in a “high impact” invasive species can be difficult. Coexistence theory suggests that detrimental invasive species can be better predicted by incorporating both niche differences and fitness differences than examining niche overlap alone. Specifically, detrimental invasive species should take up shared limited resources more efficiently than their neighbouring resident species. While there is clear evidence that invasive Phragmites australis is successfully displacing resident species, there remains few field studies that attempt to quantify the niche overlap and fitness difference between P. australis and the species it is displacing in the field. We measured differences in photosynthetic performance (carbon assimilation rate, δ 13 C, photosynthetic water use efficiency, biomass, light compensation point, light saturation point), canopy height and interception of photosynthetically active radiation, and niche overlap between P. australis and three resident freshwater wetland species ( Calamagrostis canadensis , Carex aquatilis , and Typha spp.) growing with or without aboveground interspecific competition . Invasive P. australis intercepted more photosynthetically active radiation, had higher photosynthetic water use efficiency, a higher average light saturation point, and had a larger niche region compared to resident species. Resident plant species showed a significant decrease in photosynthetic performance when growing in competition with P. australis and had a high probability of overlap onto the niche space of P. australis. These results provide evidence that the ability of P. australis to reduce the availability of a required resource and more efficiently use it over the growing season, while exhibiting high niche overlap with resident species, likely contributes directly to its success in North American freshwater wetlands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10530-021-02674-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Aquatic plants ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Coexistence ; Competition ; Developmental Biology ; Ecology ; Fitness ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Growing season ; Herbivores ; Interception ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; Life Sciences ; Niche overlap ; Niches ; Nonnative species ; Original Paper ; Photosynthesis ; Phragmites australis ; Plant Sciences ; Plant species ; Radiation ; Saturation ; Water use ; Water use efficiency ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Biological invasions, 2022-03, Vol.24 (3), p.649-682</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-cdca0b91edcb52490a19ff80a0d52791a6160f5be7b2eefcf71617c45c5d970f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-cdca0b91edcb52490a19ff80a0d52791a6160f5be7b2eefcf71617c45c5d970f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3956-7210 ; 0000-0001-9538-2811</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robichaud, C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooney, R. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in above-ground resource acquisition and niche overlap between a model invader (Phragmites australis) and resident plant species: measuring the role of fitness and niche differences in the field</title><title>Biological invasions</title><addtitle>Biol Invasions</addtitle><description>Identifying the mechanisms that result in a “high impact” invasive species can be difficult. Coexistence theory suggests that detrimental invasive species can be better predicted by incorporating both niche differences and fitness differences than examining niche overlap alone. Specifically, detrimental invasive species should take up shared limited resources more efficiently than their neighbouring resident species. While there is clear evidence that invasive Phragmites australis is successfully displacing resident species, there remains few field studies that attempt to quantify the niche overlap and fitness difference between P. australis and the species it is displacing in the field. We measured differences in photosynthetic performance (carbon assimilation rate, δ 13 C, photosynthetic water use efficiency, biomass, light compensation point, light saturation point), canopy height and interception of photosynthetically active radiation, and niche overlap between P. australis and three resident freshwater wetland species ( Calamagrostis canadensis , Carex aquatilis , and Typha spp.) growing with or without aboveground interspecific competition . Invasive P. australis intercepted more photosynthetically active radiation, had higher photosynthetic water use efficiency, a higher average light saturation point, and had a larger niche region compared to resident species. Resident plant species showed a significant decrease in photosynthetic performance when growing in competition with P. australis and had a high probability of overlap onto the niche space of P. australis. These results provide evidence that the ability of P. australis to reduce the availability of a required resource and more efficiently use it over the growing season, while exhibiting high niche overlap with resident species, likely contributes directly to its success in North American freshwater wetlands.</description><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Interception</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Niche overlap</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Phragmites australis</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Saturation</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Water use efficiency</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1387-3547</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UctO3DAUjRCVeJQfYGWJTbtIsZ3YnnSHeLSVkNpFWVuOfT0YZZLg64D6k3xT7zCVSjdd2L7SPQ_rnKo6FfyT4Nyco-Cq4TWXgo42ba33qkOhTFOLVrf7NDcrUzeqNQfVEeID57wzXB1WL1cpRsgwekCWRub66QnqdZ6WMbAMOC3ZA3P-cUmYSpoIQYsx-XtghMyDm1kP5RmANmwzBRhI5skFyOzDj_vs1ptUSNotWLIbEn58FSDlFGAsbB4c3TiDT4Cf2QYcLjmNa1bIIE8DuUQWUxkB8Y11-PfXW3BMMIT31bvoBoSTP-9xdXdz_fPya337_cu3y4vb2je6KbUP3vG-ExB8r2TbcSe6GFfc8aCk6YTTQvOoejC9BIg-GqGF8a3yKlBusTmuzna6c54eF8BiHyipkSyt1HIlhVRSEEruUD5PiBminXPauPzLCm63vdldb5Z6s6-9WU2kZkfCeRsE5L_S_2H9BhkyoIY</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Robichaud, C. D.</creator><creator>Rooney, R. C.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3956-7210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9538-2811</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Differences in above-ground resource acquisition and niche overlap between a model invader (Phragmites australis) and resident plant species: measuring the role of fitness and niche differences in the field</title><author>Robichaud, C. D. ; Rooney, R. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-cdca0b91edcb52490a19ff80a0d52791a6160f5be7b2eefcf71617c45c5d970f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Interception</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Niche overlap</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Phragmites australis</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Saturation</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Water use efficiency</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robichaud, C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooney, R. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robichaud, C. D.</au><au>Rooney, R. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in above-ground resource acquisition and niche overlap between a model invader (Phragmites australis) and resident plant species: measuring the role of fitness and niche differences in the field</atitle><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle><stitle>Biol Invasions</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>682</epage><pages>649-682</pages><issn>1387-3547</issn><eissn>1573-1464</eissn><abstract>Identifying the mechanisms that result in a “high impact” invasive species can be difficult. Coexistence theory suggests that detrimental invasive species can be better predicted by incorporating both niche differences and fitness differences than examining niche overlap alone. Specifically, detrimental invasive species should take up shared limited resources more efficiently than their neighbouring resident species. While there is clear evidence that invasive Phragmites australis is successfully displacing resident species, there remains few field studies that attempt to quantify the niche overlap and fitness difference between P. australis and the species it is displacing in the field. We measured differences in photosynthetic performance (carbon assimilation rate, δ 13 C, photosynthetic water use efficiency, biomass, light compensation point, light saturation point), canopy height and interception of photosynthetically active radiation, and niche overlap between P. australis and three resident freshwater wetland species ( Calamagrostis canadensis , Carex aquatilis , and Typha spp.) growing with or without aboveground interspecific competition . Invasive P. australis intercepted more photosynthetically active radiation, had higher photosynthetic water use efficiency, a higher average light saturation point, and had a larger niche region compared to resident species. Resident plant species showed a significant decrease in photosynthetic performance when growing in competition with P. australis and had a high probability of overlap onto the niche space of P. australis. These results provide evidence that the ability of P. australis to reduce the availability of a required resource and more efficiently use it over the growing season, while exhibiting high niche overlap with resident species, likely contributes directly to its success in North American freshwater wetlands.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10530-021-02674-6</doi><tpages>34</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3956-7210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9538-2811</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1387-3547
ispartof Biological invasions, 2022-03, Vol.24 (3), p.649-682
issn 1387-3547
1573-1464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2628212521
source Springer Nature
subjects Aquatic plants
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Coexistence
Competition
Developmental Biology
Ecology
Fitness
Flowers & plants
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Growing season
Herbivores
Interception
Introduced species
Invasive species
Life Sciences
Niche overlap
Niches
Nonnative species
Original Paper
Photosynthesis
Phragmites australis
Plant Sciences
Plant species
Radiation
Saturation
Water use
Water use efficiency
Wetlands
title Differences in above-ground resource acquisition and niche overlap between a model invader (Phragmites australis) and resident plant species: measuring the role of fitness and niche differences in the field
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T02%3A46%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20above-ground%20resource%20acquisition%20and%20niche%20overlap%20between%20a%20model%20invader%20(Phragmites%20australis)%20and%20resident%20plant%20species:%20measuring%20the%20role%20of%20fitness%20and%20niche%20differences%20in%20the%20field&rft.jtitle=Biological%20invasions&rft.au=Robichaud,%20C.%20D.&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=682&rft.pages=649-682&rft.issn=1387-3547&rft.eissn=1573-1464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10530-021-02674-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2628212521%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-cdca0b91edcb52490a19ff80a0d52791a6160f5be7b2eefcf71617c45c5d970f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2628212521&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true