"The Hultqvist doctrine" - Swedish security and defence policy after the Russian annexation of Crimea

This article analyses how Sweden has adapted to the worsened security situation in its vicinity following Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea and war in Eastern Ukraine. The paper builds on security policy research focused on neoclassic realism and small state strategies in order to explore h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Defence studies 2022-01, Vol.22 (1), p.35-59
Main Author: Wieslander, Anna
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
alliance theory
Annexation
Baltic sea
Foreign policy
Hultqvist
isolation
military non-alignment
Military policy
National security
NATO
Neoclassic realism
neutrality
partnership
Policy analysis
Political Science
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)
Realism
Samhällsvetenskap
Security
security integration
small states
Social Sciences
Statsvetenskap
Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)
Sweden
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article analyses how Sweden has adapted to the worsened security situation in its vicinity following Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea and war in Eastern Ukraine. The paper builds on security policy research focused on neoclassic realism and small state strategies in order to explore how the, broadly unknown, security policy from 2009 has been implemented in practice since 2014, through what observers call the "Hultqvist doctrine." The aim is to bring clarity to how the Hultqvist doctrine best can be understood - as a non-aligned or an integration policy? - and how the strategy relates to both systemic forces and domestic circumstances. The paper addresses the puzzle posed by structural realism, that the systemic forces would work to encourage Sweden to align in face of the threat that emerged in 2014. Still, Sweden has resisted NATO membership. To this end, I construct and apply an analytical framework that not only reveals the degree of novelty in the doctrine, but also allows for an evaluation of integration in three dimensions - openness, inclusiveness and comprehensiveness - in combination with a screening dimension. Following neoclassical realism, the study furthermore identifies domestic conditions that hinder policy flexibility.
ISSN:1470-2436
1743-9698
DOI:10.1080/14702436.2021.1955619