Loading…
The dynamic impact of urbanization, structural transformation, and technological innovation on ecological footprint and PM2.5: evidence from newly industrialized countries
The rapid increases in ecological footprint and air pollution have followed the fast expansion of the global economy. Urbanization has aggravated environmental strain because of population surge, but the development in the degree of technological innovation would counter balance this negative effect...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environment, development and sustainability development and sustainability, 2022-03, Vol.24 (3), p.4244-4277 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3167f10330eb0f5681d1732dcab6ddb015b1a6cbe82ab0156d5cc4b8ac1c10083 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3167f10330eb0f5681d1732dcab6ddb015b1a6cbe82ab0156d5cc4b8ac1c10083 |
container_end_page | 4277 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 4244 |
container_title | Environment, development and sustainability |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Sahoo, Malayaranjan Sethi, Narayan |
description | The rapid increases in ecological footprint and air pollution have followed the fast expansion of the global economy. Urbanization has aggravated environmental strain because of population surge, but the development in the degree of technological innovation would counter balance this negative effect. Hence, in this paper we examine the dynamic impact of urbanization, economic structure, technological innovation and population density on ecological footprint and air quality (PM2.5) in Newly Industrialized Countries (NICs) from 1990 to 2017. The study uses other variables like population density, energy consumption, and life expectancy to find out the long-run relationship among variables. We apply Westerlund co-integration, Mean Group (MG) and Pooled Mean Group (PMG) technique to ascertain the long-run and short-run associations among the variables. For robustness check, we use Augmented Mean Group (AMG) and Common Correlated Mean Group (CCEMG) approach. This study would be the first study in case 10 NICs considered the determinants of ecological footprint and PM2.5. The results reveal that economic growth increases ecological footprint in NICs in long run. Similarly, coefficient of industrialization is positive and significantly related to ecological footprint. However, the service sector shows a negative relation with ecological footprint in NICs. It means service sector helps to improve the environmental quality in long run. Population density, urbanization, energy consumption and life expectancy indicate a positive effect on ecological footprint. Further, in case of PM2.5, the results suggest that economic growth and industrial sectors have high magnitude effects on the PM2.5 than the other variables. The service sector reduces PM2.5, whereas the coefficient value is not significant, but agriculture sector positively influences PM2.5 in NICs. Similarly, population density and urbanization contribution to PM2.5 are positive and significant. Hence, these NICs countries should focus more on the investment in the renewable energy sector and make stringent environmental policy for protecting the nations from environmental issues. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10668-021-01614-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2630419550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2630419550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3167f10330eb0f5681d1732dcab6ddb015b1a6cbe82ab0156d5cc4b8ac1c10083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UclKBDEQbUTB9Qc8Bbzamkom6R5vMriBogcFbyGdpGci3cmYpJXxl_xJMwt6EwKV4i1F1SuKY8BngHF1HgFzXpeYQImBw6istoo9YBUtybhi2_lP66pkNXvdLfZjfMOY4DHhe8X388wgvXCytwrZfi5VQr5FQ2iks18yWe9OUUxhUGkIskMpSBdbH_oNJJ1GyaiZ852fWpUZ1jn_sUJRfkb9Aq33aR6sSyvR0wM5YxfIfFhtnDKoDb5Hznx2i-yghzzSys5-GY2UH1zuTDwsdlrZRXO0qQfFy_XV8-S2vH-8uZtc3peKwjiVFHjVAqYUmwa3jNegoaJEK9lwrRsMrAHJVWNqIpcd10ypUVNLBSofs6YHxcnadx78-2BiEm9-CC6PFIRTPIIxYzizyJqlgo8xmFbk5XoZFgKwWIYi1qGIHIpYhSKqLKJrUVxeYmrCn_U_qh8UE5RD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2630419550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The dynamic impact of urbanization, structural transformation, and technological innovation on ecological footprint and PM2.5: evidence from newly industrialized countries</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Sahoo, Malayaranjan ; Sethi, Narayan</creator><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Malayaranjan ; Sethi, Narayan</creatorcontrib><description>The rapid increases in ecological footprint and air pollution have followed the fast expansion of the global economy. Urbanization has aggravated environmental strain because of population surge, but the development in the degree of technological innovation would counter balance this negative effect. Hence, in this paper we examine the dynamic impact of urbanization, economic structure, technological innovation and population density on ecological footprint and air quality (PM2.5) in Newly Industrialized Countries (NICs) from 1990 to 2017. The study uses other variables like population density, energy consumption, and life expectancy to find out the long-run relationship among variables. We apply Westerlund co-integration, Mean Group (MG) and Pooled Mean Group (PMG) technique to ascertain the long-run and short-run associations among the variables. For robustness check, we use Augmented Mean Group (AMG) and Common Correlated Mean Group (CCEMG) approach. This study would be the first study in case 10 NICs considered the determinants of ecological footprint and PM2.5. The results reveal that economic growth increases ecological footprint in NICs in long run. Similarly, coefficient of industrialization is positive and significantly related to ecological footprint. However, the service sector shows a negative relation with ecological footprint in NICs. It means service sector helps to improve the environmental quality in long run. Population density, urbanization, energy consumption and life expectancy indicate a positive effect on ecological footprint. Further, in case of PM2.5, the results suggest that economic growth and industrial sectors have high magnitude effects on the PM2.5 than the other variables. The service sector reduces PM2.5, whereas the coefficient value is not significant, but agriculture sector positively influences PM2.5 in NICs. Similarly, population density and urbanization contribution to PM2.5 are positive and significant. Hence, these NICs countries should focus more on the investment in the renewable energy sector and make stringent environmental policy for protecting the nations from environmental issues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-585X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01614-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Air quality ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecological effects ; Ecological footprint ; Ecology ; Economic development ; Economic Geology ; Economic Growth ; Economic structure ; Economics ; Energy consumption ; Energy industry ; Environment ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Management ; Environmental policy ; Environmental quality ; Footprint analysis ; Global economy ; Impact analysis ; Industrialization ; Innovations ; Life expectancy ; Life span ; NICs ; Outdoor air quality ; Particulate matter ; Population density ; Renewable energy ; Robustness ; Service industries ; Sustainable Development ; Technological change ; Transformation ; Urbanization ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Environment, development and sustainability, 2022-03, Vol.24 (3), p.4244-4277</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3167f10330eb0f5681d1732dcab6ddb015b1a6cbe82ab0156d5cc4b8ac1c10083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3167f10330eb0f5681d1732dcab6ddb015b1a6cbe82ab0156d5cc4b8ac1c10083</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6651-6195 ; 0000-0003-4298-4928</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2630419550/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2630419550?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,36060,44363,74767</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Malayaranjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sethi, Narayan</creatorcontrib><title>The dynamic impact of urbanization, structural transformation, and technological innovation on ecological footprint and PM2.5: evidence from newly industrialized countries</title><title>Environment, development and sustainability</title><addtitle>Environ Dev Sustain</addtitle><description>The rapid increases in ecological footprint and air pollution have followed the fast expansion of the global economy. Urbanization has aggravated environmental strain because of population surge, but the development in the degree of technological innovation would counter balance this negative effect. Hence, in this paper we examine the dynamic impact of urbanization, economic structure, technological innovation and population density on ecological footprint and air quality (PM2.5) in Newly Industrialized Countries (NICs) from 1990 to 2017. The study uses other variables like population density, energy consumption, and life expectancy to find out the long-run relationship among variables. We apply Westerlund co-integration, Mean Group (MG) and Pooled Mean Group (PMG) technique to ascertain the long-run and short-run associations among the variables. For robustness check, we use Augmented Mean Group (AMG) and Common Correlated Mean Group (CCEMG) approach. This study would be the first study in case 10 NICs considered the determinants of ecological footprint and PM2.5. The results reveal that economic growth increases ecological footprint in NICs in long run. Similarly, coefficient of industrialization is positive and significantly related to ecological footprint. However, the service sector shows a negative relation with ecological footprint in NICs. It means service sector helps to improve the environmental quality in long run. Population density, urbanization, energy consumption and life expectancy indicate a positive effect on ecological footprint. Further, in case of PM2.5, the results suggest that economic growth and industrial sectors have high magnitude effects on the PM2.5 than the other variables. The service sector reduces PM2.5, whereas the coefficient value is not significant, but agriculture sector positively influences PM2.5 in NICs. Similarly, population density and urbanization contribution to PM2.5 are positive and significant. Hence, these NICs countries should focus more on the investment in the renewable energy sector and make stringent environmental policy for protecting the nations from environmental issues.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological footprint</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic Geology</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Economic structure</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Footprint analysis</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Industrialization</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Life expectancy</subject><subject>Life span</subject><subject>NICs</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Particulate matter</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Service industries</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1387-585X</issn><issn>1573-2975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UclKBDEQbUTB9Qc8Bbzamkom6R5vMriBogcFbyGdpGci3cmYpJXxl_xJMwt6EwKV4i1F1SuKY8BngHF1HgFzXpeYQImBw6istoo9YBUtybhi2_lP66pkNXvdLfZjfMOY4DHhe8X388wgvXCytwrZfi5VQr5FQ2iks18yWe9OUUxhUGkIskMpSBdbH_oNJJ1GyaiZ852fWpUZ1jn_sUJRfkb9Aq33aR6sSyvR0wM5YxfIfFhtnDKoDb5Hznx2i-yghzzSys5-GY2UH1zuTDwsdlrZRXO0qQfFy_XV8-S2vH-8uZtc3peKwjiVFHjVAqYUmwa3jNegoaJEK9lwrRsMrAHJVWNqIpcd10ypUVNLBSofs6YHxcnadx78-2BiEm9-CC6PFIRTPIIxYzizyJqlgo8xmFbk5XoZFgKwWIYi1qGIHIpYhSKqLKJrUVxeYmrCn_U_qh8UE5RD</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Sahoo, Malayaranjan</creator><creator>Sethi, Narayan</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6651-6195</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4298-4928</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>The dynamic impact of urbanization, structural transformation, and technological innovation on ecological footprint and PM2.5: evidence from newly industrialized countries</title><author>Sahoo, Malayaranjan ; Sethi, Narayan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3167f10330eb0f5681d1732dcab6ddb015b1a6cbe82ab0156d5cc4b8ac1c10083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological footprint</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic Geology</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Economic structure</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Footprint analysis</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Industrialization</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Life expectancy</topic><topic>Life span</topic><topic>NICs</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Particulate matter</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Service industries</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Malayaranjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sethi, Narayan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sahoo, Malayaranjan</au><au>Sethi, Narayan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The dynamic impact of urbanization, structural transformation, and technological innovation on ecological footprint and PM2.5: evidence from newly industrialized countries</atitle><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle><stitle>Environ Dev Sustain</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>4244</spage><epage>4277</epage><pages>4244-4277</pages><issn>1387-585X</issn><eissn>1573-2975</eissn><abstract>The rapid increases in ecological footprint and air pollution have followed the fast expansion of the global economy. Urbanization has aggravated environmental strain because of population surge, but the development in the degree of technological innovation would counter balance this negative effect. Hence, in this paper we examine the dynamic impact of urbanization, economic structure, technological innovation and population density on ecological footprint and air quality (PM2.5) in Newly Industrialized Countries (NICs) from 1990 to 2017. The study uses other variables like population density, energy consumption, and life expectancy to find out the long-run relationship among variables. We apply Westerlund co-integration, Mean Group (MG) and Pooled Mean Group (PMG) technique to ascertain the long-run and short-run associations among the variables. For robustness check, we use Augmented Mean Group (AMG) and Common Correlated Mean Group (CCEMG) approach. This study would be the first study in case 10 NICs considered the determinants of ecological footprint and PM2.5. The results reveal that economic growth increases ecological footprint in NICs in long run. Similarly, coefficient of industrialization is positive and significantly related to ecological footprint. However, the service sector shows a negative relation with ecological footprint in NICs. It means service sector helps to improve the environmental quality in long run. Population density, urbanization, energy consumption and life expectancy indicate a positive effect on ecological footprint. Further, in case of PM2.5, the results suggest that economic growth and industrial sectors have high magnitude effects on the PM2.5 than the other variables. The service sector reduces PM2.5, whereas the coefficient value is not significant, but agriculture sector positively influences PM2.5 in NICs. Similarly, population density and urbanization contribution to PM2.5 are positive and significant. Hence, these NICs countries should focus more on the investment in the renewable energy sector and make stringent environmental policy for protecting the nations from environmental issues.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10668-021-01614-7</doi><tpages>34</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6651-6195</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4298-4928</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1387-585X |
ispartof | Environment, development and sustainability, 2022-03, Vol.24 (3), p.4244-4277 |
issn | 1387-585X 1573-2975 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2630419550 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate) |
subjects | Air pollution Air quality Earth and Environmental Science Ecological effects Ecological footprint Ecology Economic development Economic Geology Economic Growth Economic structure Economics Energy consumption Energy industry Environment Environmental Economics Environmental Management Environmental policy Environmental quality Footprint analysis Global economy Impact analysis Industrialization Innovations Life expectancy Life span NICs Outdoor air quality Particulate matter Population density Renewable energy Robustness Service industries Sustainable Development Technological change Transformation Urbanization Variables |
title | The dynamic impact of urbanization, structural transformation, and technological innovation on ecological footprint and PM2.5: evidence from newly industrialized countries |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A13%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20dynamic%20impact%20of%20urbanization,%20structural%20transformation,%20and%20technological%20innovation%20on%20ecological%20footprint%20and%20PM2.5:%20evidence%20from%20newly%20industrialized%20countries&rft.jtitle=Environment,%20development%20and%20sustainability&rft.au=Sahoo,%20Malayaranjan&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=4244&rft.epage=4277&rft.pages=4244-4277&rft.issn=1387-585X&rft.eissn=1573-2975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10668-021-01614-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2630419550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3167f10330eb0f5681d1732dcab6ddb015b1a6cbe82ab0156d5cc4b8ac1c10083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2630419550&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |