Loading…

Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated with Gas- and Water-Atomized 304L Stainless Steel Powder in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process

The use of gas-atomized powder as the feedstock material for the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process is common in the additive manufacturing (AM) community. Although gas-atomization produces powder with high sphericity, its relatively expensive production cost is a downside for application in AM...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JOM (1989) 2022-03, Vol.74 (3), p.1088-1095
Main Authors: Sehhat, M. Hossein, Sutton, Austin T., Hung, Chia-Hung, Newkirk, Joseph W., Leu, Ming C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-754ec1da82aa584cfaf0a5f66bcbf5821987319f16bbca8bdf9965606ef9ca423
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-754ec1da82aa584cfaf0a5f66bcbf5821987319f16bbca8bdf9965606ef9ca423
container_end_page 1095
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1088
container_title JOM (1989)
container_volume 74
creator Sehhat, M. Hossein
Sutton, Austin T.
Hung, Chia-Hung
Newkirk, Joseph W.
Leu, Ming C.
description The use of gas-atomized powder as the feedstock material for the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process is common in the additive manufacturing (AM) community. Although gas-atomization produces powder with high sphericity, its relatively expensive production cost is a downside for application in AM processes. Water atomization of powder may overcome this limitation due to its low cost relative to the gas-atomization process. In this work, gas- and water-atomized 304L stainless steel powders were morphologically characterized through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The water-atomized powder had a wider particle size distribution and exhibited less sphericity. Measuring powder flowability using the Revolution Powder Analyzer (RPA) indicated that the water-atomized powder had less flowability than the gas-atomized powder. Through examining the mechanical properties of LPBF fabricated parts using tensile tests, the gas-atomized powder had significantly higher yield tensile strength and elongation than the water-atomized powder; however, their ultimate tensile strengths were not significantly different.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11837-021-05029-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2635273240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2635273240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-754ec1da82aa584cfaf0a5f66bcbf5821987319f16bbca8bdf9965606ef9ca423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9OGzEQxlcVSITQF-jJUs8u_rvrPQbUAFKqIgHiaM16bWIUdoPtEJVH4WmZEKTeOHk83_y-sfxV1Q_OfnHGmtPMuZENZYJTpploafOtmnCtJOVG8wOsmWqoMtIcVcc5PzKEVMsn1dvV8OJziQ9Q4jiQMZA_3i1hiA5W5DqNa59K9HknXEMqmcyhSygW35NtLEtyAZkSGHpyj71EZ2V8iq8oSqYW5KZAHFY-Z6y8R8Nx2_tE4kDK0pMFZLx89s6QmW_y7hG41iFzUh0GWGX__fOcVnfz37fnl3Tx9-LqfLagTtay0EYr73gPRgBoo1yAwECHuu5cF7QRvDWN5G3gddc5MF0f2rbWNat9aB0oIafVz73vOo3PG_wM-zhu0oArrailFo0UiuGU2E-5NOacfLDrFJ8g_bOc2V0Gdp-BxQzsRwa2QUjuoYzDw4NP_62_oN4BWyKLPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2635273240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated with Gas- and Water-Atomized 304L Stainless Steel Powder in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Sehhat, M. Hossein ; Sutton, Austin T. ; Hung, Chia-Hung ; Newkirk, Joseph W. ; Leu, Ming C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sehhat, M. Hossein ; Sutton, Austin T. ; Hung, Chia-Hung ; Newkirk, Joseph W. ; Leu, Ming C.</creatorcontrib><description>The use of gas-atomized powder as the feedstock material for the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process is common in the additive manufacturing (AM) community. Although gas-atomization produces powder with high sphericity, its relatively expensive production cost is a downside for application in AM processes. Water atomization of powder may overcome this limitation due to its low cost relative to the gas-atomization process. In this work, gas- and water-atomized 304L stainless steel powders were morphologically characterized through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The water-atomized powder had a wider particle size distribution and exhibited less sphericity. Measuring powder flowability using the Revolution Powder Analyzer (RPA) indicated that the water-atomized powder had less flowability than the gas-atomized powder. Through examining the mechanical properties of LPBF fabricated parts using tensile tests, the gas-atomized powder had significantly higher yield tensile strength and elongation than the water-atomized powder; however, their ultimate tensile strengths were not significantly different.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-1851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11837-021-05029-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Additive manufacturing ; Atomizing ; Austenitic stainless steels ; Chemistry/Food Science ; Digital cameras ; Earth Sciences ; Elongation ; Engineering ; Environment ; Geometry ; Investigations ; Lasers ; Mechanical properties ; Metal powders ; Morphology ; Particle size ; Particle size distribution ; Physics ; Powder beds ; Production costs ; Raw materials ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Solid Freeform Fabrication 2021 ; Stainless steel ; Tensile strength ; Tensile tests ; Water</subject><ispartof>JOM (1989), 2022-03, Vol.74 (3), p.1088-1095</ispartof><rights>The Minerals, Metals &amp; Materials Society 2021</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Mar 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-754ec1da82aa584cfaf0a5f66bcbf5821987319f16bbca8bdf9965606ef9ca423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-754ec1da82aa584cfaf0a5f66bcbf5821987319f16bbca8bdf9965606ef9ca423</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7013-1642</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sehhat, M. Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Austin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hung, Chia-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newkirk, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leu, Ming C.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated with Gas- and Water-Atomized 304L Stainless Steel Powder in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process</title><title>JOM (1989)</title><addtitle>JOM</addtitle><description>The use of gas-atomized powder as the feedstock material for the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process is common in the additive manufacturing (AM) community. Although gas-atomization produces powder with high sphericity, its relatively expensive production cost is a downside for application in AM processes. Water atomization of powder may overcome this limitation due to its low cost relative to the gas-atomization process. In this work, gas- and water-atomized 304L stainless steel powders were morphologically characterized through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The water-atomized powder had a wider particle size distribution and exhibited less sphericity. Measuring powder flowability using the Revolution Powder Analyzer (RPA) indicated that the water-atomized powder had less flowability than the gas-atomized powder. Through examining the mechanical properties of LPBF fabricated parts using tensile tests, the gas-atomized powder had significantly higher yield tensile strength and elongation than the water-atomized powder; however, their ultimate tensile strengths were not significantly different.</description><subject>Additive manufacturing</subject><subject>Atomizing</subject><subject>Austenitic stainless steels</subject><subject>Chemistry/Food Science</subject><subject>Digital cameras</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Elongation</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Metal powders</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Particle size distribution</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Powder beds</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Solid Freeform Fabrication 2021</subject><subject>Stainless steel</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Tensile tests</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>1047-4838</issn><issn>1543-1851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9OGzEQxlcVSITQF-jJUs8u_rvrPQbUAFKqIgHiaM16bWIUdoPtEJVH4WmZEKTeOHk83_y-sfxV1Q_OfnHGmtPMuZENZYJTpploafOtmnCtJOVG8wOsmWqoMtIcVcc5PzKEVMsn1dvV8OJziQ9Q4jiQMZA_3i1hiA5W5DqNa59K9HknXEMqmcyhSygW35NtLEtyAZkSGHpyj71EZ2V8iq8oSqYW5KZAHFY-Z6y8R8Nx2_tE4kDK0pMFZLx89s6QmW_y7hG41iFzUh0GWGX__fOcVnfz37fnl3Tx9-LqfLagTtay0EYr73gPRgBoo1yAwECHuu5cF7QRvDWN5G3gddc5MF0f2rbWNat9aB0oIafVz73vOo3PG_wM-zhu0oArrailFo0UiuGU2E-5NOacfLDrFJ8g_bOc2V0Gdp-BxQzsRwa2QUjuoYzDw4NP_62_oN4BWyKLPQ</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Sehhat, M. Hossein</creator><creator>Sutton, Austin T.</creator><creator>Hung, Chia-Hung</creator><creator>Newkirk, Joseph W.</creator><creator>Leu, Ming C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7013-1642</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated with Gas- and Water-Atomized 304L Stainless Steel Powder in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process</title><author>Sehhat, M. Hossein ; Sutton, Austin T. ; Hung, Chia-Hung ; Newkirk, Joseph W. ; Leu, Ming C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-754ec1da82aa584cfaf0a5f66bcbf5821987319f16bbca8bdf9965606ef9ca423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Additive manufacturing</topic><topic>Atomizing</topic><topic>Austenitic stainless steels</topic><topic>Chemistry/Food Science</topic><topic>Digital cameras</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Elongation</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Metal powders</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Particle size distribution</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Powder beds</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Solid Freeform Fabrication 2021</topic><topic>Stainless steel</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Tensile tests</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sehhat, M. Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Austin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hung, Chia-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newkirk, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leu, Ming C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>JOM (1989)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sehhat, M. Hossein</au><au>Sutton, Austin T.</au><au>Hung, Chia-Hung</au><au>Newkirk, Joseph W.</au><au>Leu, Ming C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated with Gas- and Water-Atomized 304L Stainless Steel Powder in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process</atitle><jtitle>JOM (1989)</jtitle><stitle>JOM</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1088</spage><epage>1095</epage><pages>1088-1095</pages><issn>1047-4838</issn><eissn>1543-1851</eissn><abstract>The use of gas-atomized powder as the feedstock material for the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process is common in the additive manufacturing (AM) community. Although gas-atomization produces powder with high sphericity, its relatively expensive production cost is a downside for application in AM processes. Water atomization of powder may overcome this limitation due to its low cost relative to the gas-atomization process. In this work, gas- and water-atomized 304L stainless steel powders were morphologically characterized through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The water-atomized powder had a wider particle size distribution and exhibited less sphericity. Measuring powder flowability using the Revolution Powder Analyzer (RPA) indicated that the water-atomized powder had less flowability than the gas-atomized powder. Through examining the mechanical properties of LPBF fabricated parts using tensile tests, the gas-atomized powder had significantly higher yield tensile strength and elongation than the water-atomized powder; however, their ultimate tensile strengths were not significantly different.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11837-021-05029-7</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7013-1642</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1047-4838
ispartof JOM (1989), 2022-03, Vol.74 (3), p.1088-1095
issn 1047-4838
1543-1851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2635273240
source Springer Nature
subjects Additive manufacturing
Atomizing
Austenitic stainless steels
Chemistry/Food Science
Digital cameras
Earth Sciences
Elongation
Engineering
Environment
Geometry
Investigations
Lasers
Mechanical properties
Metal powders
Morphology
Particle size
Particle size distribution
Physics
Powder beds
Production costs
Raw materials
Scanning electron microscopy
Solid Freeform Fabrication 2021
Stainless steel
Tensile strength
Tensile tests
Water
title Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated with Gas- and Water-Atomized 304L Stainless Steel Powder in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A46%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20Mechanical%20Properties%20of%20Parts%20Fabricated%20with%20Gas-%20and%20Water-Atomized%20304L%20Stainless%20Steel%20Powder%20in%20the%20Laser%20Powder%20Bed%20Fusion%20Process&rft.jtitle=JOM%20(1989)&rft.au=Sehhat,%20M.%20Hossein&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1088&rft.epage=1095&rft.pages=1088-1095&rft.issn=1047-4838&rft.eissn=1543-1851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11837-021-05029-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2635273240%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-754ec1da82aa584cfaf0a5f66bcbf5821987319f16bbca8bdf9965606ef9ca423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2635273240&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true