Loading…
Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated with Gas- and Water-Atomized 304L Stainless Steel Powder in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process
The use of gas-atomized powder as the feedstock material for the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process is common in the additive manufacturing (AM) community. Although gas-atomization produces powder with high sphericity, its relatively expensive production cost is a downside for application in AM...
Saved in:
Published in: | JOM (1989) 2022-03, Vol.74 (3), p.1088-1095 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-754ec1da82aa584cfaf0a5f66bcbf5821987319f16bbca8bdf9965606ef9ca423 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-754ec1da82aa584cfaf0a5f66bcbf5821987319f16bbca8bdf9965606ef9ca423 |
container_end_page | 1095 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1088 |
container_title | JOM (1989) |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Sehhat, M. Hossein Sutton, Austin T. Hung, Chia-Hung Newkirk, Joseph W. Leu, Ming C. |
description | The use of gas-atomized powder as the feedstock material for the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process is common in the additive manufacturing (AM) community. Although gas-atomization produces powder with high sphericity, its relatively expensive production cost is a downside for application in AM processes. Water atomization of powder may overcome this limitation due to its low cost relative to the gas-atomization process. In this work, gas- and water-atomized 304L stainless steel powders were morphologically characterized through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The water-atomized powder had a wider particle size distribution and exhibited less sphericity. Measuring powder flowability using the Revolution Powder Analyzer (RPA) indicated that the water-atomized powder had less flowability than the gas-atomized powder. Through examining the mechanical properties of LPBF fabricated parts using tensile tests, the gas-atomized powder had significantly higher yield tensile strength and elongation than the water-atomized powder; however, their ultimate tensile strengths were not significantly different. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11837-021-05029-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2635273240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2635273240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-754ec1da82aa584cfaf0a5f66bcbf5821987319f16bbca8bdf9965606ef9ca423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9OGzEQxlcVSITQF-jJUs8u_rvrPQbUAFKqIgHiaM16bWIUdoPtEJVH4WmZEKTeOHk83_y-sfxV1Q_OfnHGmtPMuZENZYJTpploafOtmnCtJOVG8wOsmWqoMtIcVcc5PzKEVMsn1dvV8OJziQ9Q4jiQMZA_3i1hiA5W5DqNa59K9HknXEMqmcyhSygW35NtLEtyAZkSGHpyj71EZ2V8iq8oSqYW5KZAHFY-Z6y8R8Nx2_tE4kDK0pMFZLx89s6QmW_y7hG41iFzUh0GWGX__fOcVnfz37fnl3Tx9-LqfLagTtay0EYr73gPRgBoo1yAwECHuu5cF7QRvDWN5G3gddc5MF0f2rbWNat9aB0oIafVz73vOo3PG_wM-zhu0oArrailFo0UiuGU2E-5NOacfLDrFJ8g_bOc2V0Gdp-BxQzsRwa2QUjuoYzDw4NP_62_oN4BWyKLPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2635273240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated with Gas- and Water-Atomized 304L Stainless Steel Powder in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Sehhat, M. Hossein ; Sutton, Austin T. ; Hung, Chia-Hung ; Newkirk, Joseph W. ; Leu, Ming C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sehhat, M. Hossein ; Sutton, Austin T. ; Hung, Chia-Hung ; Newkirk, Joseph W. ; Leu, Ming C.</creatorcontrib><description>The use of gas-atomized powder as the feedstock material for the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process is common in the additive manufacturing (AM) community. Although gas-atomization produces powder with high sphericity, its relatively expensive production cost is a downside for application in AM processes. Water atomization of powder may overcome this limitation due to its low cost relative to the gas-atomization process. In this work, gas- and water-atomized 304L stainless steel powders were morphologically characterized through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The water-atomized powder had a wider particle size distribution and exhibited less sphericity. Measuring powder flowability using the Revolution Powder Analyzer (RPA) indicated that the water-atomized powder had less flowability than the gas-atomized powder. Through examining the mechanical properties of LPBF fabricated parts using tensile tests, the gas-atomized powder had significantly higher yield tensile strength and elongation than the water-atomized powder; however, their ultimate tensile strengths were not significantly different.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-1851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11837-021-05029-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Additive manufacturing ; Atomizing ; Austenitic stainless steels ; Chemistry/Food Science ; Digital cameras ; Earth Sciences ; Elongation ; Engineering ; Environment ; Geometry ; Investigations ; Lasers ; Mechanical properties ; Metal powders ; Morphology ; Particle size ; Particle size distribution ; Physics ; Powder beds ; Production costs ; Raw materials ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Solid Freeform Fabrication 2021 ; Stainless steel ; Tensile strength ; Tensile tests ; Water</subject><ispartof>JOM (1989), 2022-03, Vol.74 (3), p.1088-1095</ispartof><rights>The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2021</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Mar 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-754ec1da82aa584cfaf0a5f66bcbf5821987319f16bbca8bdf9965606ef9ca423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-754ec1da82aa584cfaf0a5f66bcbf5821987319f16bbca8bdf9965606ef9ca423</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7013-1642</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sehhat, M. Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Austin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hung, Chia-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newkirk, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leu, Ming C.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated with Gas- and Water-Atomized 304L Stainless Steel Powder in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process</title><title>JOM (1989)</title><addtitle>JOM</addtitle><description>The use of gas-atomized powder as the feedstock material for the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process is common in the additive manufacturing (AM) community. Although gas-atomization produces powder with high sphericity, its relatively expensive production cost is a downside for application in AM processes. Water atomization of powder may overcome this limitation due to its low cost relative to the gas-atomization process. In this work, gas- and water-atomized 304L stainless steel powders were morphologically characterized through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The water-atomized powder had a wider particle size distribution and exhibited less sphericity. Measuring powder flowability using the Revolution Powder Analyzer (RPA) indicated that the water-atomized powder had less flowability than the gas-atomized powder. Through examining the mechanical properties of LPBF fabricated parts using tensile tests, the gas-atomized powder had significantly higher yield tensile strength and elongation than the water-atomized powder; however, their ultimate tensile strengths were not significantly different.</description><subject>Additive manufacturing</subject><subject>Atomizing</subject><subject>Austenitic stainless steels</subject><subject>Chemistry/Food Science</subject><subject>Digital cameras</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Elongation</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Metal powders</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Particle size distribution</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Powder beds</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Solid Freeform Fabrication 2021</subject><subject>Stainless steel</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Tensile tests</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>1047-4838</issn><issn>1543-1851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9OGzEQxlcVSITQF-jJUs8u_rvrPQbUAFKqIgHiaM16bWIUdoPtEJVH4WmZEKTeOHk83_y-sfxV1Q_OfnHGmtPMuZENZYJTpploafOtmnCtJOVG8wOsmWqoMtIcVcc5PzKEVMsn1dvV8OJziQ9Q4jiQMZA_3i1hiA5W5DqNa59K9HknXEMqmcyhSygW35NtLEtyAZkSGHpyj71EZ2V8iq8oSqYW5KZAHFY-Z6y8R8Nx2_tE4kDK0pMFZLx89s6QmW_y7hG41iFzUh0GWGX__fOcVnfz37fnl3Tx9-LqfLagTtay0EYr73gPRgBoo1yAwECHuu5cF7QRvDWN5G3gddc5MF0f2rbWNat9aB0oIafVz73vOo3PG_wM-zhu0oArrailFo0UiuGU2E-5NOacfLDrFJ8g_bOc2V0Gdp-BxQzsRwa2QUjuoYzDw4NP_62_oN4BWyKLPQ</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Sehhat, M. Hossein</creator><creator>Sutton, Austin T.</creator><creator>Hung, Chia-Hung</creator><creator>Newkirk, Joseph W.</creator><creator>Leu, Ming C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7013-1642</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated with Gas- and Water-Atomized 304L Stainless Steel Powder in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process</title><author>Sehhat, M. Hossein ; Sutton, Austin T. ; Hung, Chia-Hung ; Newkirk, Joseph W. ; Leu, Ming C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-754ec1da82aa584cfaf0a5f66bcbf5821987319f16bbca8bdf9965606ef9ca423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Additive manufacturing</topic><topic>Atomizing</topic><topic>Austenitic stainless steels</topic><topic>Chemistry/Food Science</topic><topic>Digital cameras</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Elongation</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Metal powders</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Particle size distribution</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Powder beds</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Solid Freeform Fabrication 2021</topic><topic>Stainless steel</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Tensile tests</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sehhat, M. Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Austin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hung, Chia-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newkirk, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leu, Ming C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>JOM (1989)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sehhat, M. Hossein</au><au>Sutton, Austin T.</au><au>Hung, Chia-Hung</au><au>Newkirk, Joseph W.</au><au>Leu, Ming C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated with Gas- and Water-Atomized 304L Stainless Steel Powder in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process</atitle><jtitle>JOM (1989)</jtitle><stitle>JOM</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1088</spage><epage>1095</epage><pages>1088-1095</pages><issn>1047-4838</issn><eissn>1543-1851</eissn><abstract>The use of gas-atomized powder as the feedstock material for the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process is common in the additive manufacturing (AM) community. Although gas-atomization produces powder with high sphericity, its relatively expensive production cost is a downside for application in AM processes. Water atomization of powder may overcome this limitation due to its low cost relative to the gas-atomization process. In this work, gas- and water-atomized 304L stainless steel powders were morphologically characterized through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The water-atomized powder had a wider particle size distribution and exhibited less sphericity. Measuring powder flowability using the Revolution Powder Analyzer (RPA) indicated that the water-atomized powder had less flowability than the gas-atomized powder. Through examining the mechanical properties of LPBF fabricated parts using tensile tests, the gas-atomized powder had significantly higher yield tensile strength and elongation than the water-atomized powder; however, their ultimate tensile strengths were not significantly different.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11837-021-05029-7</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7013-1642</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1047-4838 |
ispartof | JOM (1989), 2022-03, Vol.74 (3), p.1088-1095 |
issn | 1047-4838 1543-1851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2635273240 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Additive manufacturing Atomizing Austenitic stainless steels Chemistry/Food Science Digital cameras Earth Sciences Elongation Engineering Environment Geometry Investigations Lasers Mechanical properties Metal powders Morphology Particle size Particle size distribution Physics Powder beds Production costs Raw materials Scanning electron microscopy Solid Freeform Fabrication 2021 Stainless steel Tensile strength Tensile tests Water |
title | Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated with Gas- and Water-Atomized 304L Stainless Steel Powder in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A46%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20Mechanical%20Properties%20of%20Parts%20Fabricated%20with%20Gas-%20and%20Water-Atomized%20304L%20Stainless%20Steel%20Powder%20in%20the%20Laser%20Powder%20Bed%20Fusion%20Process&rft.jtitle=JOM%20(1989)&rft.au=Sehhat,%20M.%20Hossein&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1088&rft.epage=1095&rft.pages=1088-1095&rft.issn=1047-4838&rft.eissn=1543-1851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11837-021-05029-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2635273240%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-754ec1da82aa584cfaf0a5f66bcbf5821987319f16bbca8bdf9965606ef9ca423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2635273240&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |