Loading…
Marker trajectory assessment in optical cone beam computed tomography scanner geometry
Measured trajectories of markers on vessel wall and beads on a plumb are compared with calculated trajectories for transmission images obtained with Vista16™ optical cone beam scanner. Effective pixel size was 0.11 mm. An algorithm was developed to measure trajectories for the plumb line phantom and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of physics. Conference series 2022-01, Vol.2167 (1), p.12015 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-a8291fc287be3b4d70f2b7757e97ba6de9c229d445fe7da2650b026ff5f61d243 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 12015 |
container_title | Journal of physics. Conference series |
container_volume | 2167 |
creator | Marks, Gareth Jaryd, Christie Jordan, Kevin |
description | Measured trajectories of markers on vessel wall and beads on a plumb are compared with calculated trajectories for transmission images obtained with Vista16™ optical cone beam scanner. Effective pixel size was 0.11 mm. An algorithm was developed to measure trajectories for the plumb line phantom and a semi-automatic version was required for the gel filled vessels due to overlap of markers and seam projections at maximum lateral positions. It was found that for 15 cm diameter vessels, the vessel edge was not visible due to divergence in cone beam geometry. Accounting for this effect was necessary in order to remove artefacts from calculated vessel trajectory. Displacement differences were found to be less than 0.1 mm for the plumb line, 0.3 mm for a beads and 1 mm for markers on gel filled vessel. Minimization of the vessel marker trajectory deviation will provide a more accurate approach to refractive index optimization. No optical aberrations were detected from the trajectory analysis and manufacturer scanner alignment and geometrical calibrations were independently verified. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1742-6596/2167/1/012015 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2635869951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2635869951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-a8291fc287be3b4d70f2b7757e97ba6de9c229d445fe7da2650b026ff5f61d243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BgPehNokbZLmKIufrCj4cQ1pmqxdt01Nsof-e1sqK4LgXGZgnnkHHgBOMbrAqChSzHOSMCpYSjDjKU4RJgjTPTDbbfZ3c1EcgqMQ1ghlQ_EZeHtQ_sN4GL1aGx2d76EKwYTQmDbCuoWui7VWG6hda2BpVDNMTbeNpoLRNW7lVffew6BV2w4xK-MaE31_DA6s2gRz8t3n4PX66mVxmywfb-4Wl8tEZ1TERBVEYKtJwUuTlXnFkSUl55QbwUvFKiM0IaLKc2oNrxRhFJWIMGupZbgieTYHZ1Nu593n1oQo127r2-GlJCyjBROC4oHiE6W9C8EbKztfN8r3EiM5SpSjHjmqkqNEieUkcbg8ny5r1_1E3z8tnn-DsqvsAGd_wP-9-AIimIKx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2635869951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Marker trajectory assessment in optical cone beam computed tomography scanner geometry</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Marks, Gareth ; Jaryd, Christie ; Jordan, Kevin</creator><creatorcontrib>Marks, Gareth ; Jaryd, Christie ; Jordan, Kevin</creatorcontrib><description>Measured trajectories of markers on vessel wall and beads on a plumb are compared with calculated trajectories for transmission images obtained with Vista16™ optical cone beam scanner. Effective pixel size was 0.11 mm. An algorithm was developed to measure trajectories for the plumb line phantom and a semi-automatic version was required for the gel filled vessels due to overlap of markers and seam projections at maximum lateral positions. It was found that for 15 cm diameter vessels, the vessel edge was not visible due to divergence in cone beam geometry. Accounting for this effect was necessary in order to remove artefacts from calculated vessel trajectory. Displacement differences were found to be less than 0.1 mm for the plumb line, 0.3 mm for a beads and 1 mm for markers on gel filled vessel. Minimization of the vessel marker trajectory deviation will provide a more accurate approach to refractive index optimization. No optical aberrations were detected from the trajectory analysis and manufacturer scanner alignment and geometrical calibrations were independently verified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6588</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2167/1/012015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Beads ; Computed tomography ; Diameters ; Image transmission ; Markers ; Mathematical analysis ; Optical scanners ; Optimization ; Physics ; Refractivity ; Scanners ; Trajectory analysis ; Trajectory measurement ; Vessels</subject><ispartof>Journal of physics. Conference series, 2022-01, Vol.2167 (1), p.12015</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-a8291fc287be3b4d70f2b7757e97ba6de9c229d445fe7da2650b026ff5f61d243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2635869951?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marks, Gareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaryd, Christie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Kevin</creatorcontrib><title>Marker trajectory assessment in optical cone beam computed tomography scanner geometry</title><title>Journal of physics. Conference series</title><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><description>Measured trajectories of markers on vessel wall and beads on a plumb are compared with calculated trajectories for transmission images obtained with Vista16™ optical cone beam scanner. Effective pixel size was 0.11 mm. An algorithm was developed to measure trajectories for the plumb line phantom and a semi-automatic version was required for the gel filled vessels due to overlap of markers and seam projections at maximum lateral positions. It was found that for 15 cm diameter vessels, the vessel edge was not visible due to divergence in cone beam geometry. Accounting for this effect was necessary in order to remove artefacts from calculated vessel trajectory. Displacement differences were found to be less than 0.1 mm for the plumb line, 0.3 mm for a beads and 1 mm for markers on gel filled vessel. Minimization of the vessel marker trajectory deviation will provide a more accurate approach to refractive index optimization. No optical aberrations were detected from the trajectory analysis and manufacturer scanner alignment and geometrical calibrations were independently verified.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Beads</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Image transmission</subject><subject>Markers</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Optical scanners</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Refractivity</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Trajectory analysis</subject><subject>Trajectory measurement</subject><subject>Vessels</subject><issn>1742-6588</issn><issn>1742-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BgPehNokbZLmKIufrCj4cQ1pmqxdt01Nsof-e1sqK4LgXGZgnnkHHgBOMbrAqChSzHOSMCpYSjDjKU4RJgjTPTDbbfZ3c1EcgqMQ1ghlQ_EZeHtQ_sN4GL1aGx2d76EKwYTQmDbCuoWui7VWG6hda2BpVDNMTbeNpoLRNW7lVffew6BV2w4xK-MaE31_DA6s2gRz8t3n4PX66mVxmywfb-4Wl8tEZ1TERBVEYKtJwUuTlXnFkSUl55QbwUvFKiM0IaLKc2oNrxRhFJWIMGupZbgieTYHZ1Nu593n1oQo127r2-GlJCyjBROC4oHiE6W9C8EbKztfN8r3EiM5SpSjHjmqkqNEieUkcbg8ny5r1_1E3z8tnn-DsqvsAGd_wP-9-AIimIKx</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Marks, Gareth</creator><creator>Jaryd, Christie</creator><creator>Jordan, Kevin</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Marker trajectory assessment in optical cone beam computed tomography scanner geometry</title><author>Marks, Gareth ; Jaryd, Christie ; Jordan, Kevin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-a8291fc287be3b4d70f2b7757e97ba6de9c229d445fe7da2650b026ff5f61d243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Beads</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Image transmission</topic><topic>Markers</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Optical scanners</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Refractivity</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Trajectory analysis</topic><topic>Trajectory measurement</topic><topic>Vessels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marks, Gareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaryd, Christie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Kevin</creatorcontrib><collection>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marks, Gareth</au><au>Jaryd, Christie</au><au>Jordan, Kevin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Marker trajectory assessment in optical cone beam computed tomography scanner geometry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2167</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12015</spage><pages>12015-</pages><issn>1742-6588</issn><eissn>1742-6596</eissn><abstract>Measured trajectories of markers on vessel wall and beads on a plumb are compared with calculated trajectories for transmission images obtained with Vista16™ optical cone beam scanner. Effective pixel size was 0.11 mm. An algorithm was developed to measure trajectories for the plumb line phantom and a semi-automatic version was required for the gel filled vessels due to overlap of markers and seam projections at maximum lateral positions. It was found that for 15 cm diameter vessels, the vessel edge was not visible due to divergence in cone beam geometry. Accounting for this effect was necessary in order to remove artefacts from calculated vessel trajectory. Displacement differences were found to be less than 0.1 mm for the plumb line, 0.3 mm for a beads and 1 mm for markers on gel filled vessel. Minimization of the vessel marker trajectory deviation will provide a more accurate approach to refractive index optimization. No optical aberrations were detected from the trajectory analysis and manufacturer scanner alignment and geometrical calibrations were independently verified.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1742-6596/2167/1/012015</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-6588 |
ispartof | Journal of physics. Conference series, 2022-01, Vol.2167 (1), p.12015 |
issn | 1742-6588 1742-6596 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2635869951 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Algorithms Beads Computed tomography Diameters Image transmission Markers Mathematical analysis Optical scanners Optimization Physics Refractivity Scanners Trajectory analysis Trajectory measurement Vessels |
title | Marker trajectory assessment in optical cone beam computed tomography scanner geometry |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T07%3A06%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Marker%20trajectory%20assessment%20in%20optical%20cone%20beam%20computed%20tomography%20scanner%20geometry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physics.%20Conference%20series&rft.au=Marks,%20Gareth&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=2167&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12015&rft.pages=12015-&rft.issn=1742-6588&rft.eissn=1742-6596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1742-6596/2167/1/012015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2635869951%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-a8291fc287be3b4d70f2b7757e97ba6de9c229d445fe7da2650b026ff5f61d243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2635869951&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |