Loading…

Does spatial sorting explain leading edge personality types in a spider’s non‐native range?

Expanding populations are often characterized by phenotypic shifts across the range. Processes like spatial sorting predict that phenotypes may be distributed along a range based on dispersal ability, where the most dispersive individuals are found at the leading edges and the least dispersive remai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ethology 2022-04, Vol.128 (4), p.317-330
Main Authors: Chuang, Angela, Riechert, Susan E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3325-a88aa34d48596a0144bd28e051c8431e7ff674e301fe6a3f6428eca926e90e803
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3325-a88aa34d48596a0144bd28e051c8431e7ff674e301fe6a3f6428eca926e90e803
container_end_page 330
container_issue 4
container_start_page 317
container_title Ethology
container_volume 128
creator Chuang, Angela
Riechert, Susan E.
description Expanding populations are often characterized by phenotypic shifts across the range. Processes like spatial sorting predict that phenotypes may be distributed along a range based on dispersal ability, where the most dispersive individuals are found at the leading edges and the least dispersive remain at the population core. Thus, traits correlated to dispersal may also become spatially distributed in the same pattern. Cyrtophora citricola is an orb‐web spider with two expanding populations originating from the same core in its non‐native Florida range. Since spiders at the leading edges were previously found to differ in various personality traits from those at the core, we measured dispersal latency and likelihood in laboratory‐raised spiderlings to determine whether spatial sorting can account for these patterns. Only one of the two populations showed evidence of spatial sorting, suggesting this phenomenon is likely context dependent and is not always generalizable to expanding populations. Spiders from the leading edge of the eastern population were more dispersive than those at the core, although western spiders were the least dispersive of the three populations. Dispersal likelihood was correlated with the activity and exploratory tendencies of individuals. Population‐level differences we had previously observed for foraging aggression and activity were not found in the captive‐raised spiders, suggesting that they represent plastic responses to environmental conditions instead of being a result of dispersal‐correlated trait evolution. However, mean population‐level differences in exploration and boldness were maintained in captivity, suggesting that these behaviors have a heritable component. Overall, the eastern spiders were characterized as being bolder, whereas the western spiders were the least bold and exploratory. While this study provides evidence of spatial sorting of more dispersive, exploratory, and active individuals in the eastern population, the divergence in risk‐taking behaviors between the two populations highlights the potential context dependency in spatial sorting and the importance of understanding the interactions between natural and spatial selection. Common garden‐raised Cyrtophora citricola spiders were found to be progressively more dispersive towards their eastern population range front, but not so for the expanding western population. Dispersiveness was positively correlated to exploratory latency and total activity, suggest
doi_str_mv 10.1111/eth.13265
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2636245500</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2636245500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3325-a88aa34d48596a0144bd28e051c8431e7ff674e301fe6a3f6428eca926e90e803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EEqUw8AaWmBjS2rHjJBNCpVCkSixlto7kElyFJNgpkK2PwMrr9UlwG1ZuOf267_91-gm55GzC_Uyxe51wEaroiIy4FGnABGfHZMR4nAZccXFKzpxbM69FLEZE3zXoqGuhM1BR19jO1CXFr7YCU9MKIT_ovETaonVNDZXpetr1rbd5ArzX5Gh32x9H66bebb9rn_WB1EJd4s05OSmgcnjxt8fk-X6-mi2C5dPD4-x2GWRChFEASQIgZC6TKFXAuJQveZggi3iWSMExLgoVSxSMF6hAFEr6awZpqDBlmDAxJldDbmub9w26Tq-bjfXfOh0qoUIZRWxPXQ9UZhvnLBa6teYNbK850_v-tO9PH_rz7HRgP02F_f-gnq8Wg-MXtqpzdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2636245500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does spatial sorting explain leading edge personality types in a spider’s non‐native range?</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Chuang, Angela ; Riechert, Susan E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Angela ; Riechert, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><description>Expanding populations are often characterized by phenotypic shifts across the range. Processes like spatial sorting predict that phenotypes may be distributed along a range based on dispersal ability, where the most dispersive individuals are found at the leading edges and the least dispersive remain at the population core. Thus, traits correlated to dispersal may also become spatially distributed in the same pattern. Cyrtophora citricola is an orb‐web spider with two expanding populations originating from the same core in its non‐native Florida range. Since spiders at the leading edges were previously found to differ in various personality traits from those at the core, we measured dispersal latency and likelihood in laboratory‐raised spiderlings to determine whether spatial sorting can account for these patterns. Only one of the two populations showed evidence of spatial sorting, suggesting this phenomenon is likely context dependent and is not always generalizable to expanding populations. Spiders from the leading edge of the eastern population were more dispersive than those at the core, although western spiders were the least dispersive of the three populations. Dispersal likelihood was correlated with the activity and exploratory tendencies of individuals. Population‐level differences we had previously observed for foraging aggression and activity were not found in the captive‐raised spiders, suggesting that they represent plastic responses to environmental conditions instead of being a result of dispersal‐correlated trait evolution. However, mean population‐level differences in exploration and boldness were maintained in captivity, suggesting that these behaviors have a heritable component. Overall, the eastern spiders were characterized as being bolder, whereas the western spiders were the least bold and exploratory. While this study provides evidence of spatial sorting of more dispersive, exploratory, and active individuals in the eastern population, the divergence in risk‐taking behaviors between the two populations highlights the potential context dependency in spatial sorting and the importance of understanding the interactions between natural and spatial selection. Common garden‐raised Cyrtophora citricola spiders were found to be progressively more dispersive towards their eastern population range front, but not so for the expanding western population. Dispersiveness was positively correlated to exploratory latency and total activity, suggesting that spatial sorting may be occurring in the eastern population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-1613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0310</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/eth.13265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hamburg: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>behavioral syndrome ; Captivity ; common garden ; Context ; Correlation ; Cyrtophora citricola ; Dispersal ; Dispersion ; Divergence ; Environmental conditions ; Exploratory behavior ; Florida ; Home range ; invasion ; Latency ; Leading edges ; Personality ; Phenotypes ; phenotypic plasticity ; Population ; Populations ; range expansion ; Risk taking ; spatial selection ; Spiders</subject><ispartof>Ethology, 2022-04, Vol.128 (4), p.317-330</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley‐VCH GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3325-a88aa34d48596a0144bd28e051c8431e7ff674e301fe6a3f6428eca926e90e803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3325-a88aa34d48596a0144bd28e051c8431e7ff674e301fe6a3f6428eca926e90e803</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6847-5115</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riechert, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><title>Does spatial sorting explain leading edge personality types in a spider’s non‐native range?</title><title>Ethology</title><description>Expanding populations are often characterized by phenotypic shifts across the range. Processes like spatial sorting predict that phenotypes may be distributed along a range based on dispersal ability, where the most dispersive individuals are found at the leading edges and the least dispersive remain at the population core. Thus, traits correlated to dispersal may also become spatially distributed in the same pattern. Cyrtophora citricola is an orb‐web spider with two expanding populations originating from the same core in its non‐native Florida range. Since spiders at the leading edges were previously found to differ in various personality traits from those at the core, we measured dispersal latency and likelihood in laboratory‐raised spiderlings to determine whether spatial sorting can account for these patterns. Only one of the two populations showed evidence of spatial sorting, suggesting this phenomenon is likely context dependent and is not always generalizable to expanding populations. Spiders from the leading edge of the eastern population were more dispersive than those at the core, although western spiders were the least dispersive of the three populations. Dispersal likelihood was correlated with the activity and exploratory tendencies of individuals. Population‐level differences we had previously observed for foraging aggression and activity were not found in the captive‐raised spiders, suggesting that they represent plastic responses to environmental conditions instead of being a result of dispersal‐correlated trait evolution. However, mean population‐level differences in exploration and boldness were maintained in captivity, suggesting that these behaviors have a heritable component. Overall, the eastern spiders were characterized as being bolder, whereas the western spiders were the least bold and exploratory. While this study provides evidence of spatial sorting of more dispersive, exploratory, and active individuals in the eastern population, the divergence in risk‐taking behaviors between the two populations highlights the potential context dependency in spatial sorting and the importance of understanding the interactions between natural and spatial selection. Common garden‐raised Cyrtophora citricola spiders were found to be progressively more dispersive towards their eastern population range front, but not so for the expanding western population. Dispersiveness was positively correlated to exploratory latency and total activity, suggesting that spatial sorting may be occurring in the eastern population.</description><subject>behavioral syndrome</subject><subject>Captivity</subject><subject>common garden</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Cyrtophora citricola</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Exploratory behavior</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Home range</subject><subject>invasion</subject><subject>Latency</subject><subject>Leading edges</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>phenotypic plasticity</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>range expansion</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>spatial selection</subject><subject>Spiders</subject><issn>0179-1613</issn><issn>1439-0310</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EEqUw8AaWmBjS2rHjJBNCpVCkSixlto7kElyFJNgpkK2PwMrr9UlwG1ZuOf267_91-gm55GzC_Uyxe51wEaroiIy4FGnABGfHZMR4nAZccXFKzpxbM69FLEZE3zXoqGuhM1BR19jO1CXFr7YCU9MKIT_ovETaonVNDZXpetr1rbd5ArzX5Gh32x9H66bebb9rn_WB1EJd4s05OSmgcnjxt8fk-X6-mi2C5dPD4-x2GWRChFEASQIgZC6TKFXAuJQveZggi3iWSMExLgoVSxSMF6hAFEr6awZpqDBlmDAxJldDbmub9w26Tq-bjfXfOh0qoUIZRWxPXQ9UZhvnLBa6teYNbK850_v-tO9PH_rz7HRgP02F_f-gnq8Wg-MXtqpzdw</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Chuang, Angela</creator><creator>Riechert, Susan E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6847-5115</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Does spatial sorting explain leading edge personality types in a spider’s non‐native range?</title><author>Chuang, Angela ; Riechert, Susan E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3325-a88aa34d48596a0144bd28e051c8431e7ff674e301fe6a3f6428eca926e90e803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>behavioral syndrome</topic><topic>Captivity</topic><topic>common garden</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Cyrtophora citricola</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Exploratory behavior</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Home range</topic><topic>invasion</topic><topic>Latency</topic><topic>Leading edges</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>phenotypic plasticity</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>range expansion</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>spatial selection</topic><topic>Spiders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riechert, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ethology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chuang, Angela</au><au>Riechert, Susan E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does spatial sorting explain leading edge personality types in a spider’s non‐native range?</atitle><jtitle>Ethology</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>317-330</pages><issn>0179-1613</issn><eissn>1439-0310</eissn><abstract>Expanding populations are often characterized by phenotypic shifts across the range. Processes like spatial sorting predict that phenotypes may be distributed along a range based on dispersal ability, where the most dispersive individuals are found at the leading edges and the least dispersive remain at the population core. Thus, traits correlated to dispersal may also become spatially distributed in the same pattern. Cyrtophora citricola is an orb‐web spider with two expanding populations originating from the same core in its non‐native Florida range. Since spiders at the leading edges were previously found to differ in various personality traits from those at the core, we measured dispersal latency and likelihood in laboratory‐raised spiderlings to determine whether spatial sorting can account for these patterns. Only one of the two populations showed evidence of spatial sorting, suggesting this phenomenon is likely context dependent and is not always generalizable to expanding populations. Spiders from the leading edge of the eastern population were more dispersive than those at the core, although western spiders were the least dispersive of the three populations. Dispersal likelihood was correlated with the activity and exploratory tendencies of individuals. Population‐level differences we had previously observed for foraging aggression and activity were not found in the captive‐raised spiders, suggesting that they represent plastic responses to environmental conditions instead of being a result of dispersal‐correlated trait evolution. However, mean population‐level differences in exploration and boldness were maintained in captivity, suggesting that these behaviors have a heritable component. Overall, the eastern spiders were characterized as being bolder, whereas the western spiders were the least bold and exploratory. While this study provides evidence of spatial sorting of more dispersive, exploratory, and active individuals in the eastern population, the divergence in risk‐taking behaviors between the two populations highlights the potential context dependency in spatial sorting and the importance of understanding the interactions between natural and spatial selection. Common garden‐raised Cyrtophora citricola spiders were found to be progressively more dispersive towards their eastern population range front, but not so for the expanding western population. Dispersiveness was positively correlated to exploratory latency and total activity, suggesting that spatial sorting may be occurring in the eastern population.</abstract><cop>Hamburg</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/eth.13265</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6847-5115</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0179-1613
ispartof Ethology, 2022-04, Vol.128 (4), p.317-330
issn 0179-1613
1439-0310
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2636245500
source Wiley
subjects behavioral syndrome
Captivity
common garden
Context
Correlation
Cyrtophora citricola
Dispersal
Dispersion
Divergence
Environmental conditions
Exploratory behavior
Florida
Home range
invasion
Latency
Leading edges
Personality
Phenotypes
phenotypic plasticity
Population
Populations
range expansion
Risk taking
spatial selection
Spiders
title Does spatial sorting explain leading edge personality types in a spider’s non‐native range?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A02%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20spatial%20sorting%20explain%20leading%20edge%20personality%20types%20in%20a%20spider%E2%80%99s%20non%E2%80%90native%20range?&rft.jtitle=Ethology&rft.au=Chuang,%20Angela&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=317-330&rft.issn=0179-1613&rft.eissn=1439-0310&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/eth.13265&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2636245500%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3325-a88aa34d48596a0144bd28e051c8431e7ff674e301fe6a3f6428eca926e90e803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2636245500&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true