Loading…

Behavioral responses of male elk to hunting risk

Prey respond to predation risk with a range of behavioral tactics that can vary based on space use and hunting mode of the predator. Unlike other predators, human hunters are often more spatially and temporally restricted, which creates a period of short‐duration, high‐intensity predation risk for p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of wildlife management 2022-04, Vol.86 (3), p.n/a
Main Authors: Smith, Joshua B., Spitz, Derek B., Brown, Casey L., Wisdom, Michael J., Rowland, Mary M., Forrester, Tavis D., Johnson, Bruce K., Clark, Darren A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3374-d2045ad630dd877af8df08e451c492ec9a673be59355a155a81be7114a2f1f153
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3374-d2045ad630dd877af8df08e451c492ec9a673be59355a155a81be7114a2f1f153
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 3
container_start_page
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 86
creator Smith, Joshua B.
Spitz, Derek B.
Brown, Casey L.
Wisdom, Michael J.
Rowland, Mary M.
Forrester, Tavis D.
Johnson, Bruce K.
Clark, Darren A.
description Prey respond to predation risk with a range of behavioral tactics that can vary based on space use and hunting mode of the predator. Unlike other predators, human hunters are often more spatially and temporally restricted, which creates a period of short‐duration, high‐intensity predation risk for prey. Consequently, identifying the roles different hunting modes (i.e., archery and rifle), hunts for targeted and non‐targeted species, and landscape features play in altering spatial and temporal responses of prey to predation risk by humans is important for effective management of harvested populations. From 2009 to 2016, we used a large‐scale experiment including 50 animal‐years of location data from 38 unique male elk (Cervus canadensis) to quantify changes in movement and resource selection in response to hunters during 3 separate 5‐day controlled hunts for antlered males (elk archery, deer [Odocoileus spp.] rifle, and elk rifle) at the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range in northeast Oregon, USA. We evaluated competing hypotheses regarding elk responses to varying levels of prey risk posed by the different hunt types. We predicted that the strength of elk behavioral responses would increase with perceived hunter lethality (i.e., weak response to elk archery but similar response to elk and deer rifle hunts) and that prey response would be closely associated with hunter activity within the diel cycle (greater during diurnal than nocturnal hours) and across hunting seasons. Elk responses were strongest during diurnal hours when hunters were active on the landscape and were generally more pronounced during both rifle hunts than during the archery hunt (supporting our perceived lethality hypothesis). Male elk avoided open roads across all periods except during nocturnal hours of the breeding season and alternated between avoidance of areas with high canopy cover during nocturnal hours and selection during diurnal hours. In combination these patterns led to distinct distributional changes of male elk from pre‐hunt to hunt periods. Patterns of male elk selection highlight the importance of managing for heterogeneous landscapes to meet a variety of habitat, harvest, hunter satisfaction, and escapement objectives. Our results illustrate male elk exhibit strong changes in resource selection and movement rates based on real (elk archery, elk rifle) and perceived (deer rifle) hunting risk yet vary across the diel cycle. Patterns of selection we observed highlight t
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jwmg.22174
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2636344125</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2636344125</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3374-d2045ad630dd877af8df08e451c492ec9a673be59355a155a81be7114a2f1f153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqWw8AsssSGl-PwRJyNUUEBFLCDYLDc5t2nTuNgpVf89KWFmON1wz72v9BByCWwEjPGb5W49H3EOWh6RAeRCJzwDfUwG3ZEnSsLnKTmLccmYAMjSAWF3uLDflQ-2pgHjxjcRI_WOrm2NFOsVbT1dbJu2auY0VHF1Tk6crSNe_O0heX-4fxs_JtPXydP4dpoUQmiZlJxJZctUsLLMtLYuKx3LUCooZM6xyG2qxQxVLpSy0E0GM9QA0nIHDpQYkqs-dxP81xZja5Z-G5qu0vBUpEJK4AfquqeK4GMM6MwmVGsb9gaYORgxByPm10gHQw_vqhr3_5Dm-eNl0v_8AI3wYc0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2636344125</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavioral responses of male elk to hunting risk</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Smith, Joshua B. ; Spitz, Derek B. ; Brown, Casey L. ; Wisdom, Michael J. ; Rowland, Mary M. ; Forrester, Tavis D. ; Johnson, Bruce K. ; Clark, Darren A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua B. ; Spitz, Derek B. ; Brown, Casey L. ; Wisdom, Michael J. ; Rowland, Mary M. ; Forrester, Tavis D. ; Johnson, Bruce K. ; Clark, Darren A.</creatorcontrib><description>Prey respond to predation risk with a range of behavioral tactics that can vary based on space use and hunting mode of the predator. Unlike other predators, human hunters are often more spatially and temporally restricted, which creates a period of short‐duration, high‐intensity predation risk for prey. Consequently, identifying the roles different hunting modes (i.e., archery and rifle), hunts for targeted and non‐targeted species, and landscape features play in altering spatial and temporal responses of prey to predation risk by humans is important for effective management of harvested populations. From 2009 to 2016, we used a large‐scale experiment including 50 animal‐years of location data from 38 unique male elk (Cervus canadensis) to quantify changes in movement and resource selection in response to hunters during 3 separate 5‐day controlled hunts for antlered males (elk archery, deer [Odocoileus spp.] rifle, and elk rifle) at the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range in northeast Oregon, USA. We evaluated competing hypotheses regarding elk responses to varying levels of prey risk posed by the different hunt types. We predicted that the strength of elk behavioral responses would increase with perceived hunter lethality (i.e., weak response to elk archery but similar response to elk and deer rifle hunts) and that prey response would be closely associated with hunter activity within the diel cycle (greater during diurnal than nocturnal hours) and across hunting seasons. Elk responses were strongest during diurnal hours when hunters were active on the landscape and were generally more pronounced during both rifle hunts than during the archery hunt (supporting our perceived lethality hypothesis). Male elk avoided open roads across all periods except during nocturnal hours of the breeding season and alternated between avoidance of areas with high canopy cover during nocturnal hours and selection during diurnal hours. In combination these patterns led to distinct distributional changes of male elk from pre‐hunt to hunt periods. Patterns of male elk selection highlight the importance of managing for heterogeneous landscapes to meet a variety of habitat, harvest, hunter satisfaction, and escapement objectives. Our results illustrate male elk exhibit strong changes in resource selection and movement rates based on real (elk archery, elk rifle) and perceived (deer rifle) hunting risk yet vary across the diel cycle. Patterns of selection we observed highlight the need to manage for heterogeneous landscapes to ensure elk have adequate foraging opportunities and secure habitats to meet daily requirements during hunting seasons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>animal movements ; anti‐predator behavior ; Archery ; Breeding seasons ; Cervus canadensis ; Cervus elaphus ; Deer ; Diurnal ; Elk ; human‐wildlife interactions ; Hunting ; hunting risk ; Hypotheses ; Lethality ; Males ; movement rates ; Nocturnal ; Predation ; predation risk ; Predators ; Prey ; resource selection ; Risk ; Tactics</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2022-04, Vol.86 (3), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wildlife Society.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3374-d2045ad630dd877af8df08e451c492ec9a673be59355a155a81be7114a2f1f153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3374-d2045ad630dd877af8df08e451c492ec9a673be59355a155a81be7114a2f1f153</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1282-3886 ; 0000-0002-8738-9826 ; 0000-0001-5766-8683 ; 0000-0001-6762-4115 ; 0000-0002-3901-7286 ; 0000-0003-2255-1770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitz, Derek B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Casey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisdom, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowland, Mary M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, Tavis D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Bruce K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Darren A.</creatorcontrib><title>Behavioral responses of male elk to hunting risk</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Prey respond to predation risk with a range of behavioral tactics that can vary based on space use and hunting mode of the predator. Unlike other predators, human hunters are often more spatially and temporally restricted, which creates a period of short‐duration, high‐intensity predation risk for prey. Consequently, identifying the roles different hunting modes (i.e., archery and rifle), hunts for targeted and non‐targeted species, and landscape features play in altering spatial and temporal responses of prey to predation risk by humans is important for effective management of harvested populations. From 2009 to 2016, we used a large‐scale experiment including 50 animal‐years of location data from 38 unique male elk (Cervus canadensis) to quantify changes in movement and resource selection in response to hunters during 3 separate 5‐day controlled hunts for antlered males (elk archery, deer [Odocoileus spp.] rifle, and elk rifle) at the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range in northeast Oregon, USA. We evaluated competing hypotheses regarding elk responses to varying levels of prey risk posed by the different hunt types. We predicted that the strength of elk behavioral responses would increase with perceived hunter lethality (i.e., weak response to elk archery but similar response to elk and deer rifle hunts) and that prey response would be closely associated with hunter activity within the diel cycle (greater during diurnal than nocturnal hours) and across hunting seasons. Elk responses were strongest during diurnal hours when hunters were active on the landscape and were generally more pronounced during both rifle hunts than during the archery hunt (supporting our perceived lethality hypothesis). Male elk avoided open roads across all periods except during nocturnal hours of the breeding season and alternated between avoidance of areas with high canopy cover during nocturnal hours and selection during diurnal hours. In combination these patterns led to distinct distributional changes of male elk from pre‐hunt to hunt periods. Patterns of male elk selection highlight the importance of managing for heterogeneous landscapes to meet a variety of habitat, harvest, hunter satisfaction, and escapement objectives. Our results illustrate male elk exhibit strong changes in resource selection and movement rates based on real (elk archery, elk rifle) and perceived (deer rifle) hunting risk yet vary across the diel cycle. Patterns of selection we observed highlight the need to manage for heterogeneous landscapes to ensure elk have adequate foraging opportunities and secure habitats to meet daily requirements during hunting seasons.</description><subject>animal movements</subject><subject>anti‐predator behavior</subject><subject>Archery</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>Cervus canadensis</subject><subject>Cervus elaphus</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Diurnal</subject><subject>Elk</subject><subject>human‐wildlife interactions</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>hunting risk</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Lethality</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>movement rates</subject><subject>Nocturnal</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>predation risk</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>resource selection</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Tactics</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqWw8AsssSGl-PwRJyNUUEBFLCDYLDc5t2nTuNgpVf89KWFmON1wz72v9BByCWwEjPGb5W49H3EOWh6RAeRCJzwDfUwG3ZEnSsLnKTmLccmYAMjSAWF3uLDflQ-2pgHjxjcRI_WOrm2NFOsVbT1dbJu2auY0VHF1Tk6crSNe_O0heX-4fxs_JtPXydP4dpoUQmiZlJxJZctUsLLMtLYuKx3LUCooZM6xyG2qxQxVLpSy0E0GM9QA0nIHDpQYkqs-dxP81xZja5Z-G5qu0vBUpEJK4AfquqeK4GMM6MwmVGsb9gaYORgxByPm10gHQw_vqhr3_5Dm-eNl0v_8AI3wYc0</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Smith, Joshua B.</creator><creator>Spitz, Derek B.</creator><creator>Brown, Casey L.</creator><creator>Wisdom, Michael J.</creator><creator>Rowland, Mary M.</creator><creator>Forrester, Tavis D.</creator><creator>Johnson, Bruce K.</creator><creator>Clark, Darren A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1282-3886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8738-9826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5766-8683</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6762-4115</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3901-7286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2255-1770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Behavioral responses of male elk to hunting risk</title><author>Smith, Joshua B. ; Spitz, Derek B. ; Brown, Casey L. ; Wisdom, Michael J. ; Rowland, Mary M. ; Forrester, Tavis D. ; Johnson, Bruce K. ; Clark, Darren A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3374-d2045ad630dd877af8df08e451c492ec9a673be59355a155a81be7114a2f1f153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>animal movements</topic><topic>anti‐predator behavior</topic><topic>Archery</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>Cervus canadensis</topic><topic>Cervus elaphus</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Diurnal</topic><topic>Elk</topic><topic>human‐wildlife interactions</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>hunting risk</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Lethality</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>movement rates</topic><topic>Nocturnal</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>predation risk</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>resource selection</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Tactics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitz, Derek B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Casey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisdom, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowland, Mary M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, Tavis D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Bruce K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Darren A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Titles (Open access)</collection><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Joshua B.</au><au>Spitz, Derek B.</au><au>Brown, Casey L.</au><au>Wisdom, Michael J.</au><au>Rowland, Mary M.</au><au>Forrester, Tavis D.</au><au>Johnson, Bruce K.</au><au>Clark, Darren A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavioral responses of male elk to hunting risk</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>3</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Prey respond to predation risk with a range of behavioral tactics that can vary based on space use and hunting mode of the predator. Unlike other predators, human hunters are often more spatially and temporally restricted, which creates a period of short‐duration, high‐intensity predation risk for prey. Consequently, identifying the roles different hunting modes (i.e., archery and rifle), hunts for targeted and non‐targeted species, and landscape features play in altering spatial and temporal responses of prey to predation risk by humans is important for effective management of harvested populations. From 2009 to 2016, we used a large‐scale experiment including 50 animal‐years of location data from 38 unique male elk (Cervus canadensis) to quantify changes in movement and resource selection in response to hunters during 3 separate 5‐day controlled hunts for antlered males (elk archery, deer [Odocoileus spp.] rifle, and elk rifle) at the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range in northeast Oregon, USA. We evaluated competing hypotheses regarding elk responses to varying levels of prey risk posed by the different hunt types. We predicted that the strength of elk behavioral responses would increase with perceived hunter lethality (i.e., weak response to elk archery but similar response to elk and deer rifle hunts) and that prey response would be closely associated with hunter activity within the diel cycle (greater during diurnal than nocturnal hours) and across hunting seasons. Elk responses were strongest during diurnal hours when hunters were active on the landscape and were generally more pronounced during both rifle hunts than during the archery hunt (supporting our perceived lethality hypothesis). Male elk avoided open roads across all periods except during nocturnal hours of the breeding season and alternated between avoidance of areas with high canopy cover during nocturnal hours and selection during diurnal hours. In combination these patterns led to distinct distributional changes of male elk from pre‐hunt to hunt periods. Patterns of male elk selection highlight the importance of managing for heterogeneous landscapes to meet a variety of habitat, harvest, hunter satisfaction, and escapement objectives. Our results illustrate male elk exhibit strong changes in resource selection and movement rates based on real (elk archery, elk rifle) and perceived (deer rifle) hunting risk yet vary across the diel cycle. Patterns of selection we observed highlight the need to manage for heterogeneous landscapes to ensure elk have adequate foraging opportunities and secure habitats to meet daily requirements during hunting seasons.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.22174</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1282-3886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8738-9826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5766-8683</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6762-4115</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3901-7286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2255-1770</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2022-04, Vol.86 (3), p.n/a
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2636344125
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects animal movements
anti‐predator behavior
Archery
Breeding seasons
Cervus canadensis
Cervus elaphus
Deer
Diurnal
Elk
human‐wildlife interactions
Hunting
hunting risk
Hypotheses
Lethality
Males
movement rates
Nocturnal
Predation
predation risk
Predators
Prey
resource selection
Risk
Tactics
title Behavioral responses of male elk to hunting risk
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A26%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavioral%20responses%20of%20male%20elk%20to%20hunting%20risk&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Smith,%20Joshua%20B.&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=3&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.22174&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2636344125%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3374-d2045ad630dd877af8df08e451c492ec9a673be59355a155a81be7114a2f1f153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2636344125&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true