Loading…
The Efficacy of Comprehension and Vocabulary Focused Professional Development on English Learners' Literacy
This study reports the effects of a distributed professional development model emphasizing reading comprehension and vocabulary practices in social studies on the content knowledge, vocabulary, and reading comprehension outcomes of upper elementary students identified as English learners (ELs). Scho...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of educational psychology 2022-02, Vol.114 (2), p.257-272 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-f2c1215bbaf4853f79a66e173951bb14777a189d8158e9b58f9f3785b0e731103 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 272 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 257 |
container_title | Journal of educational psychology |
container_volume | 114 |
creator | Vaughn, Sharon Swanson, Elizabeth Fall, Anna-Maria Roberts, Greg Capin, Philip Stevens, Elizabeth A. Stewart, Alicia A. |
description | This study reports the effects of a distributed professional development model emphasizing reading comprehension and vocabulary practices in social studies on the content knowledge, vocabulary, and reading comprehension outcomes of upper elementary students identified as English learners (ELs). Schools were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: researcher-supported professional development (PD), school-supported PD, or business as usual (BAU; typical instruction). Findings from a prior randomized control trial revealed significant effects for both treatment conditions when compared with the BAU group for content knowledge, vocabulary learning and reading comprehension in content (Capin et al., 2020). This analysis addressed three related follow-up questions: (a) Does treatment affect ELs and non-ELs differently? (b) Does treatment affect students differently depending on the school-wide percentage of ELs? (c) Does treatment affect EL students differently from non ELs depending on the school-wide percentage of ELs? Findings revealed that ELs in treatment conditions outperformed ELs in the BAU condition and school level percentage of ELs had an impact on EL vocabulary performance.
Educational Impact and Implications StatementThis study demonstrates that a distributed professional development model focused on developing fourth-grade teachers' use of integrated vocabulary and reading comprehension practices within social studies instruction significantly improves English learners' (ELs) and non-ELs' performance on measures of social studies knowledge and vocabulary. The study also reported that the effects of professional development on the performance of ELs and non-ELs varied on a general measure of vocabulary based on the school-wide proportion of ELs. These findings suggest that professional development for teachers focused on evidence-based practices for content-area vocabulary and reading comprehension demonstrates positive impact for students though the impact may vary for ELs and non-ELs based on the proportion of ELs at their school site. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/edu0000684 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2637182852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED618777</ericid><sourcerecordid>2637182852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-f2c1215bbaf4853f79a66e173951bb14777a189d8158e9b58f9f3785b0e731103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXzx4CHgRxdSfpJtmj1PoBBT2o15BNJ3Z1u1mTXaH_3pSK3sxlCPPMy8tDyDHkl5BzeYWLIU9PqMkOGUHJy4yBFLtklOeMZbkQfJ8cxPieGJ4-I_LxvEQ6c662xq6pd3TqV13AJbax9i017YK-emuqoTFhTW-9HSIu6FPwDuOGMA29wS9sfLfCtqfpZNa-NXVc0jma0GKIZ3Re9xhS_CHZc6aJePQzx-TldvY8vc_mj3cP0-t5ZriCPnPMAoOiqoybqII7WRohECQvC6gqmEgpDahyoaBQWFaFcqXjUhVVjpJD0jAmp9vcLvjPAWOv3_0QUtWomeASFFMF-5cqSiEkcNhQ51vKBh9jQKe7UK-SCw253ijXf8oTfLKFMdT2F5zdCFCpdFpfbNemM7qLa2tCX9sGox1CSPY2URpgollqIPk3x7OLtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2596671312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Efficacy of Comprehension and Vocabulary Focused Professional Development on English Learners' Literacy</title><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Vaughn, Sharon ; Swanson, Elizabeth ; Fall, Anna-Maria ; Roberts, Greg ; Capin, Philip ; Stevens, Elizabeth A. ; Stewart, Alicia A.</creator><contributor>Kendeou, Panayiota</contributor><creatorcontrib>Vaughn, Sharon ; Swanson, Elizabeth ; Fall, Anna-Maria ; Roberts, Greg ; Capin, Philip ; Stevens, Elizabeth A. ; Stewart, Alicia A. ; Kendeou, Panayiota</creatorcontrib><description>This study reports the effects of a distributed professional development model emphasizing reading comprehension and vocabulary practices in social studies on the content knowledge, vocabulary, and reading comprehension outcomes of upper elementary students identified as English learners (ELs). Schools were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: researcher-supported professional development (PD), school-supported PD, or business as usual (BAU; typical instruction). Findings from a prior randomized control trial revealed significant effects for both treatment conditions when compared with the BAU group for content knowledge, vocabulary learning and reading comprehension in content (Capin et al., 2020). This analysis addressed three related follow-up questions: (a) Does treatment affect ELs and non-ELs differently? (b) Does treatment affect students differently depending on the school-wide percentage of ELs? (c) Does treatment affect EL students differently from non ELs depending on the school-wide percentage of ELs? Findings revealed that ELs in treatment conditions outperformed ELs in the BAU condition and school level percentage of ELs had an impact on EL vocabulary performance.
Educational Impact and Implications StatementThis study demonstrates that a distributed professional development model focused on developing fourth-grade teachers' use of integrated vocabulary and reading comprehension practices within social studies instruction significantly improves English learners' (ELs) and non-ELs' performance on measures of social studies knowledge and vocabulary. The study also reported that the effects of professional development on the performance of ELs and non-ELs varied on a general measure of vocabulary based on the school-wide proportion of ELs. These findings suggest that professional development for teachers focused on evidence-based practices for content-area vocabulary and reading comprehension demonstrates positive impact for students though the impact may vary for ELs and non-ELs based on the proportion of ELs at their school site.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/edu0000684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Cognitive ability ; Elementary School Students ; Elementary School Teachers ; English as a second language ; English as a second language learning ; English as Second Language ; English Language Learners ; Faculty Development ; Female ; Fidelity ; Grade 4 ; Human ; Knowledge Level ; Learning outcomes ; Literacy ; Male ; Professional Development ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Implementation ; Reading ; Reading Comprehension ; Second language learning ; Social Studies ; Teacher Competencies ; Teaching ; Urban Schools ; Vocabulary ; Vocabulary Development ; Vocabulary learning</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational psychology, 2022-02, Vol.114 (2), p.257-272</ispartof><rights>2021 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2021, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-f2c1215bbaf4853f79a66e173951bb14777a189d8158e9b58f9f3785b0e731103</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-6333-7442 ; 0000-0002-8412-1111 ; 0000-0001-8305-5549 ; 0000-0002-6257-6684 ; 0000-0002-2716-4078 ; 0000-0003-4955-9879 ; 0000-0001-6770-5046</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,31248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED618777$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kendeou, Panayiota</contributor><creatorcontrib>Vaughn, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fall, Anna-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capin, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Alicia A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Efficacy of Comprehension and Vocabulary Focused Professional Development on English Learners' Literacy</title><title>Journal of educational psychology</title><description>This study reports the effects of a distributed professional development model emphasizing reading comprehension and vocabulary practices in social studies on the content knowledge, vocabulary, and reading comprehension outcomes of upper elementary students identified as English learners (ELs). Schools were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: researcher-supported professional development (PD), school-supported PD, or business as usual (BAU; typical instruction). Findings from a prior randomized control trial revealed significant effects for both treatment conditions when compared with the BAU group for content knowledge, vocabulary learning and reading comprehension in content (Capin et al., 2020). This analysis addressed three related follow-up questions: (a) Does treatment affect ELs and non-ELs differently? (b) Does treatment affect students differently depending on the school-wide percentage of ELs? (c) Does treatment affect EL students differently from non ELs depending on the school-wide percentage of ELs? Findings revealed that ELs in treatment conditions outperformed ELs in the BAU condition and school level percentage of ELs had an impact on EL vocabulary performance.
Educational Impact and Implications StatementThis study demonstrates that a distributed professional development model focused on developing fourth-grade teachers' use of integrated vocabulary and reading comprehension practices within social studies instruction significantly improves English learners' (ELs) and non-ELs' performance on measures of social studies knowledge and vocabulary. The study also reported that the effects of professional development on the performance of ELs and non-ELs varied on a general measure of vocabulary based on the school-wide proportion of ELs. These findings suggest that professional development for teachers focused on evidence-based practices for content-area vocabulary and reading comprehension demonstrates positive impact for students though the impact may vary for ELs and non-ELs based on the proportion of ELs at their school site.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Elementary School Teachers</subject><subject>English as a second language</subject><subject>English as a second language learning</subject><subject>English as Second Language</subject><subject>English Language Learners</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Grade 4</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Learning outcomes</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Professional Development</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Second language learning</subject><subject>Social Studies</subject><subject>Teacher Competencies</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Urban Schools</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><subject>Vocabulary learning</subject><issn>0022-0663</issn><issn>1939-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXzx4CHgRxdSfpJtmj1PoBBT2o15BNJ3Z1u1mTXaH_3pSK3sxlCPPMy8tDyDHkl5BzeYWLIU9PqMkOGUHJy4yBFLtklOeMZbkQfJ8cxPieGJ4-I_LxvEQ6c662xq6pd3TqV13AJbax9i017YK-emuqoTFhTW-9HSIu6FPwDuOGMA29wS9sfLfCtqfpZNa-NXVc0jma0GKIZ3Re9xhS_CHZc6aJePQzx-TldvY8vc_mj3cP0-t5ZriCPnPMAoOiqoybqII7WRohECQvC6gqmEgpDahyoaBQWFaFcqXjUhVVjpJD0jAmp9vcLvjPAWOv3_0QUtWomeASFFMF-5cqSiEkcNhQ51vKBh9jQKe7UK-SCw253ijXf8oTfLKFMdT2F5zdCFCpdFpfbNemM7qLa2tCX9sGox1CSPY2URpgollqIPk3x7OLtQ</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Vaughn, Sharon</creator><creator>Swanson, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Fall, Anna-Maria</creator><creator>Roberts, Greg</creator><creator>Capin, Philip</creator><creator>Stevens, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Stewart, Alicia A.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6333-7442</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8412-1111</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8305-5549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6257-6684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2716-4078</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4955-9879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6770-5046</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>The Efficacy of Comprehension and Vocabulary Focused Professional Development on English Learners' Literacy</title><author>Vaughn, Sharon ; Swanson, Elizabeth ; Fall, Anna-Maria ; Roberts, Greg ; Capin, Philip ; Stevens, Elizabeth A. ; Stewart, Alicia A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-f2c1215bbaf4853f79a66e173951bb14777a189d8158e9b58f9f3785b0e731103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Elementary School Teachers</topic><topic>English as a second language</topic><topic>English as a second language learning</topic><topic>English as Second Language</topic><topic>English Language Learners</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Grade 4</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Learning outcomes</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Professional Development</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Second language learning</topic><topic>Social Studies</topic><topic>Teacher Competencies</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Urban Schools</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><topic>Vocabulary learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaughn, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fall, Anna-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capin, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Alicia A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaughn, Sharon</au><au>Swanson, Elizabeth</au><au>Fall, Anna-Maria</au><au>Roberts, Greg</au><au>Capin, Philip</au><au>Stevens, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Stewart, Alicia A.</au><au>Kendeou, Panayiota</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>ED618777</ericid><atitle>The Efficacy of Comprehension and Vocabulary Focused Professional Development on English Learners' Literacy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>257-272</pages><issn>0022-0663</issn><eissn>1939-2176</eissn><abstract>This study reports the effects of a distributed professional development model emphasizing reading comprehension and vocabulary practices in social studies on the content knowledge, vocabulary, and reading comprehension outcomes of upper elementary students identified as English learners (ELs). Schools were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: researcher-supported professional development (PD), school-supported PD, or business as usual (BAU; typical instruction). Findings from a prior randomized control trial revealed significant effects for both treatment conditions when compared with the BAU group for content knowledge, vocabulary learning and reading comprehension in content (Capin et al., 2020). This analysis addressed three related follow-up questions: (a) Does treatment affect ELs and non-ELs differently? (b) Does treatment affect students differently depending on the school-wide percentage of ELs? (c) Does treatment affect EL students differently from non ELs depending on the school-wide percentage of ELs? Findings revealed that ELs in treatment conditions outperformed ELs in the BAU condition and school level percentage of ELs had an impact on EL vocabulary performance.
Educational Impact and Implications StatementThis study demonstrates that a distributed professional development model focused on developing fourth-grade teachers' use of integrated vocabulary and reading comprehension practices within social studies instruction significantly improves English learners' (ELs) and non-ELs' performance on measures of social studies knowledge and vocabulary. The study also reported that the effects of professional development on the performance of ELs and non-ELs varied on a general measure of vocabulary based on the school-wide proportion of ELs. These findings suggest that professional development for teachers focused on evidence-based practices for content-area vocabulary and reading comprehension demonstrates positive impact for students though the impact may vary for ELs and non-ELs based on the proportion of ELs at their school site.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/edu0000684</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6333-7442</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8412-1111</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8305-5549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6257-6684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2716-4078</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4955-9879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6770-5046</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0663 |
ispartof | Journal of educational psychology, 2022-02, Vol.114 (2), p.257-272 |
issn | 0022-0663 1939-2176 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2637182852 |
source | ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Academic Achievement Cognitive ability Elementary School Students Elementary School Teachers English as a second language English as a second language learning English as Second Language English Language Learners Faculty Development Female Fidelity Grade 4 Human Knowledge Level Learning outcomes Literacy Male Professional Development Program Effectiveness Program Implementation Reading Reading Comprehension Second language learning Social Studies Teacher Competencies Teaching Urban Schools Vocabulary Vocabulary Development Vocabulary learning |
title | The Efficacy of Comprehension and Vocabulary Focused Professional Development on English Learners' Literacy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T05%3A36%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Efficacy%20of%20Comprehension%20and%20Vocabulary%20Focused%20Professional%20Development%20on%20English%20Learners'%20Literacy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Vaughn,%20Sharon&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=257-272&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.eissn=1939-2176&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/edu0000684&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2637182852%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-f2c1215bbaf4853f79a66e173951bb14777a189d8158e9b58f9f3785b0e731103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2596671312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED618777&rfr_iscdi=true |