The CAT Effect: Exploring the Impact of Casual Affective Triggers on Online Surveys' Response Rates

We explore the impact of Casual Affective Triggers (CAT) on response rates of online surveys. As CAT, we refer to objects that can be included in survey participation invitations and trigger participants' affect. The hypothesis is that participants who receive CAT-enriched invitations are more...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2022-03
Main Authors: Irene-Angelica Chounta, Nolte, Alexander
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cats
Response bias
Response rates
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We explore the impact of Casual Affective Triggers (CAT) on response rates of online surveys. As CAT, we refer to objects that can be included in survey participation invitations and trigger participants' affect. The hypothesis is that participants who receive CAT-enriched invitations are more likely to respond to a survey. We conducted a study where the control condition received invitations without affective triggers, and the experimental condition received CAT-enriched invitations. We differentiated the triggers within the experimental condition: one-third of the population received a personalized invitation, one-third received a picture of the surveyor's cat, and one-third received both. We followed up with a survey to validate our findings. Our results suggest that CATs have a positive impact on response rates. We did not find CATs to induce response bias.
ISSN:2331-8422
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2203.04211