Loading…

Rigor With or Without Templates? The Pursuit of Methodological Rigor in Qualitative Research

The domain of qualitative research is replete with templates, standard protocols for the analysis of qualitative data. The use of such templates has sometimes been considered as automatically enhancing the rigor of qualitative research. In this article, we challenge the view that in the context of q...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Organizational research methods 2022-04, Vol.25 (2), p.239-261
Main Authors: Harley, Bill, Cornelissen, Joep
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-123b1e94bf18acba81c67dea4c22e91b0f4ac87c1ac0cec3c75049647e6c48c53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-123b1e94bf18acba81c67dea4c22e91b0f4ac87c1ac0cec3c75049647e6c48c53
container_end_page 261
container_issue 2
container_start_page 239
container_title Organizational research methods
container_volume 25
creator Harley, Bill
Cornelissen, Joep
description The domain of qualitative research is replete with templates, standard protocols for the analysis of qualitative data. The use of such templates has sometimes been considered as automatically enhancing the rigor of qualitative research. In this article, we challenge the view that in the context of qualitative research, rigor is tied into the application of established protocols. Instead, we argue that rigor emanates from the way in which researchers engage in a deliberate reasoning process of inferring theoretical claims from their data. Such reasoning exists outside of templates, although it may make use of templates. Framing rigor as an emergent quality of reasoning, we distill the main processes through which qualitative researchers derive inferences from data and provide criteria for reflecting on the rigor with which they do so. We then extend these criteria into a set of practical recommendations through the presentation of examples and the framing of questions to focus researchers’ thinking on the application of the criteria. In doing so, we aim to help qualitative researchers to conduct research that leads to rigorously derived theoretical insights without having to resort to templates to attempt to do so.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1094428120937786
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2637951274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1094428120937786</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2637951274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-123b1e94bf18acba81c67dea4c22e91b0f4ac87c1ac0cec3c75049647e6c48c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1LwzAUxYMoOKfvPgZ8ruamadM-iQy_YKKOiS9CSe9ut4xumUkq-N_bsYEg-HQunN85Fw5j5yAuAbS-AlEqJQuQoky1LvIDNoAsk4lWMjvs795Otv4xOwlhKQSkMisH7GNi587zdxsXfK-ui3xKq01rIoVrPl0Qf-l86GzkruFP1BMz17q5RdPyXdyu-WtnWhtNtF_EJxTIeFycsqPGtIHO9jpkb3e309FDMn6-fxzdjBNM8zwmINMaqFR1A4XB2hSAuZ6RUSgllVCLRhksNIJBgYQp6kyoMleaclQFZumQXex6N959dhRitXSdX_cvK5mnusxAatVTYkehdyF4aqqNtyvjvysQ1XbD6u-GfSTZRYKZ02_pv_wP7VpxVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2637951274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rigor With or Without Templates? The Pursuit of Methodological Rigor in Qualitative Research</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Harley, Bill ; Cornelissen, Joep</creator><creatorcontrib>Harley, Bill ; Cornelissen, Joep</creatorcontrib><description>The domain of qualitative research is replete with templates, standard protocols for the analysis of qualitative data. The use of such templates has sometimes been considered as automatically enhancing the rigor of qualitative research. In this article, we challenge the view that in the context of qualitative research, rigor is tied into the application of established protocols. Instead, we argue that rigor emanates from the way in which researchers engage in a deliberate reasoning process of inferring theoretical claims from their data. Such reasoning exists outside of templates, although it may make use of templates. Framing rigor as an emergent quality of reasoning, we distill the main processes through which qualitative researchers derive inferences from data and provide criteria for reflecting on the rigor with which they do so. We then extend these criteria into a set of practical recommendations through the presentation of examples and the framing of questions to focus researchers’ thinking on the application of the criteria. In doing so, we aim to help qualitative researchers to conduct research that leads to rigorously derived theoretical insights without having to resort to templates to attempt to do so.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-4281</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7425</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1094428120937786</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Criteria ; Framing ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative research ; Reasoning</subject><ispartof>Organizational research methods, 2022-04, Vol.25 (2), p.239-261</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-123b1e94bf18acba81c67dea4c22e91b0f4ac87c1ac0cec3c75049647e6c48c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-123b1e94bf18acba81c67dea4c22e91b0f4ac87c1ac0cec3c75049647e6c48c53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6728-1052</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79236</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harley, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelissen, Joep</creatorcontrib><title>Rigor With or Without Templates? The Pursuit of Methodological Rigor in Qualitative Research</title><title>Organizational research methods</title><description>The domain of qualitative research is replete with templates, standard protocols for the analysis of qualitative data. The use of such templates has sometimes been considered as automatically enhancing the rigor of qualitative research. In this article, we challenge the view that in the context of qualitative research, rigor is tied into the application of established protocols. Instead, we argue that rigor emanates from the way in which researchers engage in a deliberate reasoning process of inferring theoretical claims from their data. Such reasoning exists outside of templates, although it may make use of templates. Framing rigor as an emergent quality of reasoning, we distill the main processes through which qualitative researchers derive inferences from data and provide criteria for reflecting on the rigor with which they do so. We then extend these criteria into a set of practical recommendations through the presentation of examples and the framing of questions to focus researchers’ thinking on the application of the criteria. In doing so, we aim to help qualitative researchers to conduct research that leads to rigorously derived theoretical insights without having to resort to templates to attempt to do so.</description><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Framing</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><issn>1094-4281</issn><issn>1552-7425</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kN1LwzAUxYMoOKfvPgZ8ruamadM-iQy_YKKOiS9CSe9ut4xumUkq-N_bsYEg-HQunN85Fw5j5yAuAbS-AlEqJQuQoky1LvIDNoAsk4lWMjvs795Otv4xOwlhKQSkMisH7GNi587zdxsXfK-ui3xKq01rIoVrPl0Qf-l86GzkruFP1BMz17q5RdPyXdyu-WtnWhtNtF_EJxTIeFycsqPGtIHO9jpkb3e309FDMn6-fxzdjBNM8zwmINMaqFR1A4XB2hSAuZ6RUSgllVCLRhksNIJBgYQp6kyoMleaclQFZumQXex6N959dhRitXSdX_cvK5mnusxAatVTYkehdyF4aqqNtyvjvysQ1XbD6u-GfSTZRYKZ02_pv_wP7VpxVQ</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Harley, Bill</creator><creator>Cornelissen, Joep</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6728-1052</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Rigor With or Without Templates? The Pursuit of Methodological Rigor in Qualitative Research</title><author>Harley, Bill ; Cornelissen, Joep</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-123b1e94bf18acba81c67dea4c22e91b0f4ac87c1ac0cec3c75049647e6c48c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Framing</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harley, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelissen, Joep</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Organizational research methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harley, Bill</au><au>Cornelissen, Joep</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rigor With or Without Templates? The Pursuit of Methodological Rigor in Qualitative Research</atitle><jtitle>Organizational research methods</jtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>239-261</pages><issn>1094-4281</issn><eissn>1552-7425</eissn><abstract>The domain of qualitative research is replete with templates, standard protocols for the analysis of qualitative data. The use of such templates has sometimes been considered as automatically enhancing the rigor of qualitative research. In this article, we challenge the view that in the context of qualitative research, rigor is tied into the application of established protocols. Instead, we argue that rigor emanates from the way in which researchers engage in a deliberate reasoning process of inferring theoretical claims from their data. Such reasoning exists outside of templates, although it may make use of templates. Framing rigor as an emergent quality of reasoning, we distill the main processes through which qualitative researchers derive inferences from data and provide criteria for reflecting on the rigor with which they do so. We then extend these criteria into a set of practical recommendations through the presentation of examples and the framing of questions to focus researchers’ thinking on the application of the criteria. In doing so, we aim to help qualitative researchers to conduct research that leads to rigorously derived theoretical insights without having to resort to templates to attempt to do so.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1094428120937786</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6728-1052</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1094-4281
ispartof Organizational research methods, 2022-04, Vol.25 (2), p.239-261
issn 1094-4281
1552-7425
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2637951274
source Business Source Ultimate; Sage Journals Online
subjects Criteria
Framing
Qualitative analysis
Qualitative research
Reasoning
title Rigor With or Without Templates? The Pursuit of Methodological Rigor in Qualitative Research
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A39%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rigor%20With%20or%20Without%20Templates?%20The%20Pursuit%20of%20Methodological%20Rigor%20in%20Qualitative%20Research&rft.jtitle=Organizational%20research%20methods&rft.au=Harley,%20Bill&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=239-261&rft.issn=1094-4281&rft.eissn=1552-7425&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1094428120937786&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2637951274%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-123b1e94bf18acba81c67dea4c22e91b0f4ac87c1ac0cec3c75049647e6c48c53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2637951274&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1094428120937786&rfr_iscdi=true