Loading…
A Pilot Programme to Facilitate the Use of Mental Health Treatment Requirements: Professional Stakeholders’ Experiences
Mental Health Treatment Requirements (MHTRs) have been available in England and Wales since 2005 but are rarely used, despite high rates of mental health problems amongst offenders. In 2018, a new protocol to facilitate the use of MHTRs was piloted in five sites in England. Aims: Understanding the e...
Saved in:
Published in: | The British journal of social work 2021-04, Vol.51 (3), p.1041-1059 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ac25088719dbae3bc58a7257f46d1842fc7e639b43770302c532fb18644662793 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ac25088719dbae3bc58a7257f46d1842fc7e639b43770302c532fb18644662793 |
container_end_page | 1059 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1041 |
container_title | The British journal of social work |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Molyneaux, Emma Vera San Juan, Norha Brown, Penelope Lloyd-Evans, Bryn Oram, Sian |
description | Mental Health Treatment Requirements (MHTRs) have been available in England and Wales since 2005 but are rarely used, despite high rates of mental health problems amongst offenders. In 2018, a new protocol to facilitate the use of MHTRs was piloted in five sites in England. Aims: Understanding the experiences of professional stakeholders and identify barriers to use MHTRs. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with thirty-eight professional stakeholders and thematic analysis applied. Results: Interviewees were positive about the content and implementation of the new protocol. Interviewees described key benefits as increasing options in community sentencing, addressing a gap in service provision and facilitating offenders’ access to other services. Challenges described, included multi-agency working, sustainability of funding and the range and complexity of needs of offenders receiving MHTRs and the variation in their motivation to engage. Success factors described were having a strong steering group, staff dedicated to the project and being able to provide a broad range of support to meet offender needs. Conclusion: The MHTR pilot protocol was generally well-received and appeared to address previous barriers to the use of MHTRs. Future work is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of MHTRs and the experience of offenders who receive them. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/bjsw/bcaa111 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2638558469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/bjsw/bcaa111</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2638558469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ac25088719dbae3bc58a7257f46d1842fc7e639b43770302c532fb18644662793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AURgdRsFZ3PsCACzfGzk8yk7gr0lqhYtEW3IXJ9MamJp10ZoJ252v4ej6JCe3a1b334_BxOQhdUnJLScIH2dp9DjKtFKX0CPVoKOKACf52jHqEhFHAKWGn6My5NSFERoT20G6IZ0VpPJ5Z825VVQH2Bo-VLsrCK99eK8ALB9jk-Ak2XpV4Aqr0Kzy3oHzVRvgFtk1hodvdXVeUg3OF2bTsq1cfsDLlEqz7_f7Bo68abAEbDe4cneSqdHBxmH20GI_m95Ng-vzweD-cBppz7gOlWUTiWNJkmSngmY5iJVkk81AsaRyyXEsQPMlCLiXhhOmIszyjsQhDIZhMeB9d7Xtra7YNOJ-uTWPb51zauomjKA5FR93sKW2NcxbytLZFpewupSTt5Kad3PQgt8Wv97hp6v_JP4WXfT8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2638558469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Pilot Programme to Facilitate the Use of Mental Health Treatment Requirements: Professional Stakeholders’ Experiences</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Molyneaux, Emma ; Vera San Juan, Norha ; Brown, Penelope ; Lloyd-Evans, Bryn ; Oram, Sian</creator><creatorcontrib>Molyneaux, Emma ; Vera San Juan, Norha ; Brown, Penelope ; Lloyd-Evans, Bryn ; Oram, Sian</creatorcontrib><description>Mental Health Treatment Requirements (MHTRs) have been available in England and Wales since 2005 but are rarely used, despite high rates of mental health problems amongst offenders. In 2018, a new protocol to facilitate the use of MHTRs was piloted in five sites in England. Aims: Understanding the experiences of professional stakeholders and identify barriers to use MHTRs. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with thirty-eight professional stakeholders and thematic analysis applied. Results: Interviewees were positive about the content and implementation of the new protocol. Interviewees described key benefits as increasing options in community sentencing, addressing a gap in service provision and facilitating offenders’ access to other services. Challenges described, included multi-agency working, sustainability of funding and the range and complexity of needs of offenders receiving MHTRs and the variation in their motivation to engage. Success factors described were having a strong steering group, staff dedicated to the project and being able to provide a broad range of support to meet offender needs. Conclusion: The MHTR pilot protocol was generally well-received and appeared to address previous barriers to the use of MHTRs. Future work is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of MHTRs and the experience of offenders who receive them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-3102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcaa111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Criminal sentences ; Health problems ; Interest groups ; Interviews ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Mental health services ; Motivation ; Offenders ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>The British journal of social work, 2021-04, Vol.51 (3), p.1041-1059</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ac25088719dbae3bc58a7257f46d1842fc7e639b43770302c532fb18644662793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ac25088719dbae3bc58a7257f46d1842fc7e639b43770302c532fb18644662793</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8677-7341</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Molyneaux, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vera San Juan, Norha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Penelope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd-Evans, Bryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oram, Sian</creatorcontrib><title>A Pilot Programme to Facilitate the Use of Mental Health Treatment Requirements: Professional Stakeholders’ Experiences</title><title>The British journal of social work</title><description>Mental Health Treatment Requirements (MHTRs) have been available in England and Wales since 2005 but are rarely used, despite high rates of mental health problems amongst offenders. In 2018, a new protocol to facilitate the use of MHTRs was piloted in five sites in England. Aims: Understanding the experiences of professional stakeholders and identify barriers to use MHTRs. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with thirty-eight professional stakeholders and thematic analysis applied. Results: Interviewees were positive about the content and implementation of the new protocol. Interviewees described key benefits as increasing options in community sentencing, addressing a gap in service provision and facilitating offenders’ access to other services. Challenges described, included multi-agency working, sustainability of funding and the range and complexity of needs of offenders receiving MHTRs and the variation in their motivation to engage. Success factors described were having a strong steering group, staff dedicated to the project and being able to provide a broad range of support to meet offender needs. Conclusion: The MHTR pilot protocol was generally well-received and appeared to address previous barriers to the use of MHTRs. Future work is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of MHTRs and the experience of offenders who receive them.</description><subject>Criminal sentences</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental health services</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Offenders</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>0045-3102</issn><issn>1468-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AURgdRsFZ3PsCACzfGzk8yk7gr0lqhYtEW3IXJ9MamJp10ZoJ252v4ej6JCe3a1b334_BxOQhdUnJLScIH2dp9DjKtFKX0CPVoKOKACf52jHqEhFHAKWGn6My5NSFERoT20G6IZ0VpPJ5Z825VVQH2Bo-VLsrCK99eK8ALB9jk-Ak2XpV4Aqr0Kzy3oHzVRvgFtk1hodvdXVeUg3OF2bTsq1cfsDLlEqz7_f7Bo68abAEbDe4cneSqdHBxmH20GI_m95Ng-vzweD-cBppz7gOlWUTiWNJkmSngmY5iJVkk81AsaRyyXEsQPMlCLiXhhOmIszyjsQhDIZhMeB9d7Xtra7YNOJ-uTWPb51zauomjKA5FR93sKW2NcxbytLZFpewupSTt5Kad3PQgt8Wv97hp6v_JP4WXfT8</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Molyneaux, Emma</creator><creator>Vera San Juan, Norha</creator><creator>Brown, Penelope</creator><creator>Lloyd-Evans, Bryn</creator><creator>Oram, Sian</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8677-7341</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>A Pilot Programme to Facilitate the Use of Mental Health Treatment Requirements: Professional Stakeholders’ Experiences</title><author>Molyneaux, Emma ; Vera San Juan, Norha ; Brown, Penelope ; Lloyd-Evans, Bryn ; Oram, Sian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ac25088719dbae3bc58a7257f46d1842fc7e639b43770302c532fb18644662793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Criminal sentences</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental health services</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Offenders</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Molyneaux, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vera San Juan, Norha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Penelope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd-Evans, Bryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oram, Sian</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Molyneaux, Emma</au><au>Vera San Juan, Norha</au><au>Brown, Penelope</au><au>Lloyd-Evans, Bryn</au><au>Oram, Sian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Pilot Programme to Facilitate the Use of Mental Health Treatment Requirements: Professional Stakeholders’ Experiences</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1041</spage><epage>1059</epage><pages>1041-1059</pages><issn>0045-3102</issn><eissn>1468-263X</eissn><abstract>Mental Health Treatment Requirements (MHTRs) have been available in England and Wales since 2005 but are rarely used, despite high rates of mental health problems amongst offenders. In 2018, a new protocol to facilitate the use of MHTRs was piloted in five sites in England. Aims: Understanding the experiences of professional stakeholders and identify barriers to use MHTRs. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with thirty-eight professional stakeholders and thematic analysis applied. Results: Interviewees were positive about the content and implementation of the new protocol. Interviewees described key benefits as increasing options in community sentencing, addressing a gap in service provision and facilitating offenders’ access to other services. Challenges described, included multi-agency working, sustainability of funding and the range and complexity of needs of offenders receiving MHTRs and the variation in their motivation to engage. Success factors described were having a strong steering group, staff dedicated to the project and being able to provide a broad range of support to meet offender needs. Conclusion: The MHTR pilot protocol was generally well-received and appeared to address previous barriers to the use of MHTRs. Future work is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of MHTRs and the experience of offenders who receive them.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/bjsw/bcaa111</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8677-7341</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-3102 |
ispartof | The British journal of social work, 2021-04, Vol.51 (3), p.1041-1059 |
issn | 0045-3102 1468-263X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2638558469 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Oxford Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Criminal sentences Health problems Interest groups Interviews Mental disorders Mental health Mental health services Motivation Offenders Stakeholders |
title | A Pilot Programme to Facilitate the Use of Mental Health Treatment Requirements: Professional Stakeholders’ Experiences |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A00%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Pilot%20Programme%20to%20Facilitate%20the%20Use%20of%20Mental%20Health%20Treatment%20Requirements:%20Professional%20Stakeholders%E2%80%99%20Experiences&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20social%20work&rft.au=Molyneaux,%20Emma&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1041&rft.epage=1059&rft.pages=1041-1059&rft.issn=0045-3102&rft.eissn=1468-263X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa111&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2638558469%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ac25088719dbae3bc58a7257f46d1842fc7e639b43770302c532fb18644662793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2638558469&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bjsw/bcaa111&rfr_iscdi=true |