Loading…

A Pilot Programme to Facilitate the Use of Mental Health Treatment Requirements: Professional Stakeholders’ Experiences

Mental Health Treatment Requirements (MHTRs) have been available in England and Wales since 2005 but are rarely used, despite high rates of mental health problems amongst offenders. In 2018, a new protocol to facilitate the use of MHTRs was piloted in five sites in England. Aims: Understanding the e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The British journal of social work 2021-04, Vol.51 (3), p.1041-1059
Main Authors: Molyneaux, Emma, Vera San Juan, Norha, Brown, Penelope, Lloyd-Evans, Bryn, Oram, Sian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ac25088719dbae3bc58a7257f46d1842fc7e639b43770302c532fb18644662793
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ac25088719dbae3bc58a7257f46d1842fc7e639b43770302c532fb18644662793
container_end_page 1059
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1041
container_title The British journal of social work
container_volume 51
creator Molyneaux, Emma
Vera San Juan, Norha
Brown, Penelope
Lloyd-Evans, Bryn
Oram, Sian
description Mental Health Treatment Requirements (MHTRs) have been available in England and Wales since 2005 but are rarely used, despite high rates of mental health problems amongst offenders. In 2018, a new protocol to facilitate the use of MHTRs was piloted in five sites in England. Aims: Understanding the experiences of professional stakeholders and identify barriers to use MHTRs. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with thirty-eight professional stakeholders and thematic analysis applied. Results: Interviewees were positive about the content and implementation of the new protocol. Interviewees described key benefits as increasing options in community sentencing, addressing a gap in service provision and facilitating offenders’ access to other services. Challenges described, included multi-agency working, sustainability of funding and the range and complexity of needs of offenders receiving MHTRs and the variation in their motivation to engage. Success factors described were having a strong steering group, staff dedicated to the project and being able to provide a broad range of support to meet offender needs. Conclusion: The MHTR pilot protocol was generally well-received and appeared to address previous barriers to the use of MHTRs. Future work is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of MHTRs and the experience of offenders who receive them.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bjsw/bcaa111
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2638558469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/bjsw/bcaa111</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2638558469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ac25088719dbae3bc58a7257f46d1842fc7e639b43770302c532fb18644662793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AURgdRsFZ3PsCACzfGzk8yk7gr0lqhYtEW3IXJ9MamJp10ZoJ252v4ej6JCe3a1b334_BxOQhdUnJLScIH2dp9DjKtFKX0CPVoKOKACf52jHqEhFHAKWGn6My5NSFERoT20G6IZ0VpPJ5Z825VVQH2Bo-VLsrCK99eK8ALB9jk-Ak2XpV4Aqr0Kzy3oHzVRvgFtk1hodvdXVeUg3OF2bTsq1cfsDLlEqz7_f7Bo68abAEbDe4cneSqdHBxmH20GI_m95Ng-vzweD-cBppz7gOlWUTiWNJkmSngmY5iJVkk81AsaRyyXEsQPMlCLiXhhOmIszyjsQhDIZhMeB9d7Xtra7YNOJ-uTWPb51zauomjKA5FR93sKW2NcxbytLZFpewupSTt5Kad3PQgt8Wv97hp6v_JP4WXfT8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2638558469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Pilot Programme to Facilitate the Use of Mental Health Treatment Requirements: Professional Stakeholders’ Experiences</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Molyneaux, Emma ; Vera San Juan, Norha ; Brown, Penelope ; Lloyd-Evans, Bryn ; Oram, Sian</creator><creatorcontrib>Molyneaux, Emma ; Vera San Juan, Norha ; Brown, Penelope ; Lloyd-Evans, Bryn ; Oram, Sian</creatorcontrib><description>Mental Health Treatment Requirements (MHTRs) have been available in England and Wales since 2005 but are rarely used, despite high rates of mental health problems amongst offenders. In 2018, a new protocol to facilitate the use of MHTRs was piloted in five sites in England. Aims: Understanding the experiences of professional stakeholders and identify barriers to use MHTRs. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with thirty-eight professional stakeholders and thematic analysis applied. Results: Interviewees were positive about the content and implementation of the new protocol. Interviewees described key benefits as increasing options in community sentencing, addressing a gap in service provision and facilitating offenders’ access to other services. Challenges described, included multi-agency working, sustainability of funding and the range and complexity of needs of offenders receiving MHTRs and the variation in their motivation to engage. Success factors described were having a strong steering group, staff dedicated to the project and being able to provide a broad range of support to meet offender needs. Conclusion: The MHTR pilot protocol was generally well-received and appeared to address previous barriers to the use of MHTRs. Future work is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of MHTRs and the experience of offenders who receive them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-3102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcaa111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Criminal sentences ; Health problems ; Interest groups ; Interviews ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Mental health services ; Motivation ; Offenders ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>The British journal of social work, 2021-04, Vol.51 (3), p.1041-1059</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ac25088719dbae3bc58a7257f46d1842fc7e639b43770302c532fb18644662793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ac25088719dbae3bc58a7257f46d1842fc7e639b43770302c532fb18644662793</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8677-7341</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Molyneaux, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vera San Juan, Norha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Penelope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd-Evans, Bryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oram, Sian</creatorcontrib><title>A Pilot Programme to Facilitate the Use of Mental Health Treatment Requirements: Professional Stakeholders’ Experiences</title><title>The British journal of social work</title><description>Mental Health Treatment Requirements (MHTRs) have been available in England and Wales since 2005 but are rarely used, despite high rates of mental health problems amongst offenders. In 2018, a new protocol to facilitate the use of MHTRs was piloted in five sites in England. Aims: Understanding the experiences of professional stakeholders and identify barriers to use MHTRs. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with thirty-eight professional stakeholders and thematic analysis applied. Results: Interviewees were positive about the content and implementation of the new protocol. Interviewees described key benefits as increasing options in community sentencing, addressing a gap in service provision and facilitating offenders’ access to other services. Challenges described, included multi-agency working, sustainability of funding and the range and complexity of needs of offenders receiving MHTRs and the variation in their motivation to engage. Success factors described were having a strong steering group, staff dedicated to the project and being able to provide a broad range of support to meet offender needs. Conclusion: The MHTR pilot protocol was generally well-received and appeared to address previous barriers to the use of MHTRs. Future work is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of MHTRs and the experience of offenders who receive them.</description><subject>Criminal sentences</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental health services</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Offenders</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>0045-3102</issn><issn>1468-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AURgdRsFZ3PsCACzfGzk8yk7gr0lqhYtEW3IXJ9MamJp10ZoJ252v4ej6JCe3a1b334_BxOQhdUnJLScIH2dp9DjKtFKX0CPVoKOKACf52jHqEhFHAKWGn6My5NSFERoT20G6IZ0VpPJ5Z825VVQH2Bo-VLsrCK99eK8ALB9jk-Ak2XpV4Aqr0Kzy3oHzVRvgFtk1hodvdXVeUg3OF2bTsq1cfsDLlEqz7_f7Bo68abAEbDe4cneSqdHBxmH20GI_m95Ng-vzweD-cBppz7gOlWUTiWNJkmSngmY5iJVkk81AsaRyyXEsQPMlCLiXhhOmIszyjsQhDIZhMeB9d7Xtra7YNOJ-uTWPb51zauomjKA5FR93sKW2NcxbytLZFpewupSTt5Kad3PQgt8Wv97hp6v_JP4WXfT8</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Molyneaux, Emma</creator><creator>Vera San Juan, Norha</creator><creator>Brown, Penelope</creator><creator>Lloyd-Evans, Bryn</creator><creator>Oram, Sian</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8677-7341</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>A Pilot Programme to Facilitate the Use of Mental Health Treatment Requirements: Professional Stakeholders’ Experiences</title><author>Molyneaux, Emma ; Vera San Juan, Norha ; Brown, Penelope ; Lloyd-Evans, Bryn ; Oram, Sian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ac25088719dbae3bc58a7257f46d1842fc7e639b43770302c532fb18644662793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Criminal sentences</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental health services</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Offenders</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Molyneaux, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vera San Juan, Norha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Penelope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd-Evans, Bryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oram, Sian</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Molyneaux, Emma</au><au>Vera San Juan, Norha</au><au>Brown, Penelope</au><au>Lloyd-Evans, Bryn</au><au>Oram, Sian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Pilot Programme to Facilitate the Use of Mental Health Treatment Requirements: Professional Stakeholders’ Experiences</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1041</spage><epage>1059</epage><pages>1041-1059</pages><issn>0045-3102</issn><eissn>1468-263X</eissn><abstract>Mental Health Treatment Requirements (MHTRs) have been available in England and Wales since 2005 but are rarely used, despite high rates of mental health problems amongst offenders. In 2018, a new protocol to facilitate the use of MHTRs was piloted in five sites in England. Aims: Understanding the experiences of professional stakeholders and identify barriers to use MHTRs. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with thirty-eight professional stakeholders and thematic analysis applied. Results: Interviewees were positive about the content and implementation of the new protocol. Interviewees described key benefits as increasing options in community sentencing, addressing a gap in service provision and facilitating offenders’ access to other services. Challenges described, included multi-agency working, sustainability of funding and the range and complexity of needs of offenders receiving MHTRs and the variation in their motivation to engage. Success factors described were having a strong steering group, staff dedicated to the project and being able to provide a broad range of support to meet offender needs. Conclusion: The MHTR pilot protocol was generally well-received and appeared to address previous barriers to the use of MHTRs. Future work is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of MHTRs and the experience of offenders who receive them.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/bjsw/bcaa111</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8677-7341</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-3102
ispartof The British journal of social work, 2021-04, Vol.51 (3), p.1041-1059
issn 0045-3102
1468-263X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2638558469
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Oxford Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Criminal sentences
Health problems
Interest groups
Interviews
Mental disorders
Mental health
Mental health services
Motivation
Offenders
Stakeholders
title A Pilot Programme to Facilitate the Use of Mental Health Treatment Requirements: Professional Stakeholders’ Experiences
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A00%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Pilot%20Programme%20to%20Facilitate%20the%20Use%20of%20Mental%20Health%20Treatment%20Requirements:%20Professional%20Stakeholders%E2%80%99%20Experiences&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20social%20work&rft.au=Molyneaux,%20Emma&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1041&rft.epage=1059&rft.pages=1041-1059&rft.issn=0045-3102&rft.eissn=1468-263X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa111&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2638558469%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ac25088719dbae3bc58a7257f46d1842fc7e639b43770302c532fb18644662793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2638558469&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bjsw/bcaa111&rfr_iscdi=true