Loading…

Robot application and occupational injuries: Are robots necessarily safer?

•Robot application increases the rate of occupational injuries in developing countries.•Robot application does not have a persistent impact on occupational injuries.•Local governments can reduce the effect of robot application by strengthening safety regulations.•Robot application imposes a burden o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Safety science 2022-03, Vol.147, p.105623, Article 105623
Main Authors: Yang, Siying, Zhong, Yifan, Feng, Dawei, Li, Rita Yi Man, Shao, Xue-Feng, Liu, Wei
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-86d4fc67eda011fe3bb968eda6688c50b8f40602fa2eda2ec0d2db01ed3492c33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-86d4fc67eda011fe3bb968eda6688c50b8f40602fa2eda2ec0d2db01ed3492c33
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105623
container_title Safety science
container_volume 147
creator Yang, Siying
Zhong, Yifan
Feng, Dawei
Li, Rita Yi Man
Shao, Xue-Feng
Liu, Wei
description •Robot application increases the rate of occupational injuries in developing countries.•Robot application does not have a persistent impact on occupational injuries.•Local governments can reduce the effect of robot application by strengthening safety regulations.•Robot application imposes a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments. Recent research argues that robots could replace workers in dangerous work environments to reduce occupational injuries. However, robot development and usage in most developing countries remain at an infant stage, robots may increase the likelihood of occupational injuries due to conditions such as limited human capital and defects. By using a city-level dataset based on the Guangdong Province in China, we find that robot application is associated with an increase in the rate of occupational injuries in the first two years, and then exhibits nonsignificant and even negative effects afterwards. We also find that local governments can reduce or even eliminate the effect of robot application on occupational injuries by strengthening safety regulations. In addition, although local governments are keen on pushing robot application and industrial intelligence, the wide application of robots may impose a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments due to occupational injuries. This study extends our knowledge by challenging the traditional view that robot application can reduce the rate of occupational injuries, and also provides suggestions on the safety regulations of developing countries at the early stage of industrial intelligence.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105623
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2638771798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S092575352100463X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2638771798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-86d4fc67eda011fe3bb968eda6688c50b8f40602fa2eda2ec0d2db01ed3492c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcB1x3zaNNUBBkGnwwIouuQJreQUpuatML8e1Pr2tXlHM53ORyELinZUELFdbuJ0bgNI4wmoxCMH6EVlWWVUZKzY7QiFSuysuDFKTqLsSWEUC7oCr28-dqPWA9D54wene-x7i32xkzDr9Qddn07BQfxBm8D4DADEfdgIEYdXHfAUTcQ7s7RSaO7CBd_d40-Hu7fd0_Z_vXxebfdZ4ZX-ZhJYfPGiBKsJpQ2wOu6EjIpIaQ0BallkxNBWKNZMhkYYpmtCQXL84oZztfoavk7BP81QRxV66eQikbFBJdlSctKphRbUib4GAM0agjuU4eDokTNm6lWzZupeTO1bJag2wWC1P_bQVApAb0B6wKYUVnv_sN_AKbjdeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2638771798</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robot application and occupational injuries: Are robots necessarily safer?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Yang, Siying ; Zhong, Yifan ; Feng, Dawei ; Li, Rita Yi Man ; Shao, Xue-Feng ; Liu, Wei</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Siying ; Zhong, Yifan ; Feng, Dawei ; Li, Rita Yi Man ; Shao, Xue-Feng ; Liu, Wei</creatorcontrib><description>•Robot application increases the rate of occupational injuries in developing countries.•Robot application does not have a persistent impact on occupational injuries.•Local governments can reduce the effect of robot application by strengthening safety regulations.•Robot application imposes a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments. Recent research argues that robots could replace workers in dangerous work environments to reduce occupational injuries. However, robot development and usage in most developing countries remain at an infant stage, robots may increase the likelihood of occupational injuries due to conditions such as limited human capital and defects. By using a city-level dataset based on the Guangdong Province in China, we find that robot application is associated with an increase in the rate of occupational injuries in the first two years, and then exhibits nonsignificant and even negative effects afterwards. We also find that local governments can reduce or even eliminate the effect of robot application on occupational injuries by strengthening safety regulations. In addition, although local governments are keen on pushing robot application and industrial intelligence, the wide application of robots may impose a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments due to occupational injuries. This study extends our knowledge by challenging the traditional view that robot application can reduce the rate of occupational injuries, and also provides suggestions on the safety regulations of developing countries at the early stage of industrial intelligence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-7535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105623</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Developing countries ; Human capital ; Industrial intelligence ; Injuries ; Injury prevention ; Intelligence ; LDCs ; Local government ; Occupational accidents ; Occupational health ; Occupational injuries ; Occupational safety ; Public health ; Public health expenditure ; Regulations ; Robot ; Robots ; Safety ; Safety regulation ; Safety regulations</subject><ispartof>Safety science, 2022-03, Vol.147, p.105623, Article 105623</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Mar 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-86d4fc67eda011fe3bb968eda6688c50b8f40602fa2eda2ec0d2db01ed3492c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-86d4fc67eda011fe3bb968eda6688c50b8f40602fa2eda2ec0d2db01ed3492c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Siying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Dawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Rita Yi Man</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Xue-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wei</creatorcontrib><title>Robot application and occupational injuries: Are robots necessarily safer?</title><title>Safety science</title><description>•Robot application increases the rate of occupational injuries in developing countries.•Robot application does not have a persistent impact on occupational injuries.•Local governments can reduce the effect of robot application by strengthening safety regulations.•Robot application imposes a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments. Recent research argues that robots could replace workers in dangerous work environments to reduce occupational injuries. However, robot development and usage in most developing countries remain at an infant stage, robots may increase the likelihood of occupational injuries due to conditions such as limited human capital and defects. By using a city-level dataset based on the Guangdong Province in China, we find that robot application is associated with an increase in the rate of occupational injuries in the first two years, and then exhibits nonsignificant and even negative effects afterwards. We also find that local governments can reduce or even eliminate the effect of robot application on occupational injuries by strengthening safety regulations. In addition, although local governments are keen on pushing robot application and industrial intelligence, the wide application of robots may impose a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments due to occupational injuries. This study extends our knowledge by challenging the traditional view that robot application can reduce the rate of occupational injuries, and also provides suggestions on the safety regulations of developing countries at the early stage of industrial intelligence.</description><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Industrial intelligence</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Occupational accidents</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational injuries</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health expenditure</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Robot</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety regulation</subject><subject>Safety regulations</subject><issn>0925-7535</issn><issn>1879-1042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcB1x3zaNNUBBkGnwwIouuQJreQUpuatML8e1Pr2tXlHM53ORyELinZUELFdbuJ0bgNI4wmoxCMH6EVlWWVUZKzY7QiFSuysuDFKTqLsSWEUC7oCr28-dqPWA9D54wene-x7i32xkzDr9Qddn07BQfxBm8D4DADEfdgIEYdXHfAUTcQ7s7RSaO7CBd_d40-Hu7fd0_Z_vXxebfdZ4ZX-ZhJYfPGiBKsJpQ2wOu6EjIpIaQ0BallkxNBWKNZMhkYYpmtCQXL84oZztfoavk7BP81QRxV66eQikbFBJdlSctKphRbUib4GAM0agjuU4eDokTNm6lWzZupeTO1bJag2wWC1P_bQVApAb0B6wKYUVnv_sN_AKbjdeg</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Yang, Siying</creator><creator>Zhong, Yifan</creator><creator>Feng, Dawei</creator><creator>Li, Rita Yi Man</creator><creator>Shao, Xue-Feng</creator><creator>Liu, Wei</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Robot application and occupational injuries: Are robots necessarily safer?</title><author>Yang, Siying ; Zhong, Yifan ; Feng, Dawei ; Li, Rita Yi Man ; Shao, Xue-Feng ; Liu, Wei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-86d4fc67eda011fe3bb968eda6688c50b8f40602fa2eda2ec0d2db01ed3492c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Industrial intelligence</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Occupational accidents</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational injuries</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health expenditure</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Robot</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety regulation</topic><topic>Safety regulations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Siying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Dawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Rita Yi Man</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Xue-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wei</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Siying</au><au>Zhong, Yifan</au><au>Feng, Dawei</au><au>Li, Rita Yi Man</au><au>Shao, Xue-Feng</au><au>Liu, Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robot application and occupational injuries: Are robots necessarily safer?</atitle><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>147</volume><spage>105623</spage><pages>105623-</pages><artnum>105623</artnum><issn>0925-7535</issn><eissn>1879-1042</eissn><abstract>•Robot application increases the rate of occupational injuries in developing countries.•Robot application does not have a persistent impact on occupational injuries.•Local governments can reduce the effect of robot application by strengthening safety regulations.•Robot application imposes a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments. Recent research argues that robots could replace workers in dangerous work environments to reduce occupational injuries. However, robot development and usage in most developing countries remain at an infant stage, robots may increase the likelihood of occupational injuries due to conditions such as limited human capital and defects. By using a city-level dataset based on the Guangdong Province in China, we find that robot application is associated with an increase in the rate of occupational injuries in the first two years, and then exhibits nonsignificant and even negative effects afterwards. We also find that local governments can reduce or even eliminate the effect of robot application on occupational injuries by strengthening safety regulations. In addition, although local governments are keen on pushing robot application and industrial intelligence, the wide application of robots may impose a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments due to occupational injuries. This study extends our knowledge by challenging the traditional view that robot application can reduce the rate of occupational injuries, and also provides suggestions on the safety regulations of developing countries at the early stage of industrial intelligence.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105623</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-7535
ispartof Safety science, 2022-03, Vol.147, p.105623, Article 105623
issn 0925-7535
1879-1042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2638771798
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Developing countries
Human capital
Industrial intelligence
Injuries
Injury prevention
Intelligence
LDCs
Local government
Occupational accidents
Occupational health
Occupational injuries
Occupational safety
Public health
Public health expenditure
Regulations
Robot
Robots
Safety
Safety regulation
Safety regulations
title Robot application and occupational injuries: Are robots necessarily safer?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A01%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robot%20application%20and%20occupational%20injuries:%20Are%20robots%20necessarily%20safer?&rft.jtitle=Safety%20science&rft.au=Yang,%20Siying&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=147&rft.spage=105623&rft.pages=105623-&rft.artnum=105623&rft.issn=0925-7535&rft.eissn=1879-1042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105623&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2638771798%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-86d4fc67eda011fe3bb968eda6688c50b8f40602fa2eda2ec0d2db01ed3492c33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2638771798&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true