Loading…
Robot application and occupational injuries: Are robots necessarily safer?
•Robot application increases the rate of occupational injuries in developing countries.•Robot application does not have a persistent impact on occupational injuries.•Local governments can reduce the effect of robot application by strengthening safety regulations.•Robot application imposes a burden o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Safety science 2022-03, Vol.147, p.105623, Article 105623 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-86d4fc67eda011fe3bb968eda6688c50b8f40602fa2eda2ec0d2db01ed3492c33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-86d4fc67eda011fe3bb968eda6688c50b8f40602fa2eda2ec0d2db01ed3492c33 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 105623 |
container_title | Safety science |
container_volume | 147 |
creator | Yang, Siying Zhong, Yifan Feng, Dawei Li, Rita Yi Man Shao, Xue-Feng Liu, Wei |
description | •Robot application increases the rate of occupational injuries in developing countries.•Robot application does not have a persistent impact on occupational injuries.•Local governments can reduce the effect of robot application by strengthening safety regulations.•Robot application imposes a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments.
Recent research argues that robots could replace workers in dangerous work environments to reduce occupational injuries. However, robot development and usage in most developing countries remain at an infant stage, robots may increase the likelihood of occupational injuries due to conditions such as limited human capital and defects. By using a city-level dataset based on the Guangdong Province in China, we find that robot application is associated with an increase in the rate of occupational injuries in the first two years, and then exhibits nonsignificant and even negative effects afterwards. We also find that local governments can reduce or even eliminate the effect of robot application on occupational injuries by strengthening safety regulations. In addition, although local governments are keen on pushing robot application and industrial intelligence, the wide application of robots may impose a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments due to occupational injuries. This study extends our knowledge by challenging the traditional view that robot application can reduce the rate of occupational injuries, and also provides suggestions on the safety regulations of developing countries at the early stage of industrial intelligence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105623 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2638771798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S092575352100463X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2638771798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-86d4fc67eda011fe3bb968eda6688c50b8f40602fa2eda2ec0d2db01ed3492c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcB1x3zaNNUBBkGnwwIouuQJreQUpuatML8e1Pr2tXlHM53ORyELinZUELFdbuJ0bgNI4wmoxCMH6EVlWWVUZKzY7QiFSuysuDFKTqLsSWEUC7oCr28-dqPWA9D54wene-x7i32xkzDr9Qddn07BQfxBm8D4DADEfdgIEYdXHfAUTcQ7s7RSaO7CBd_d40-Hu7fd0_Z_vXxebfdZ4ZX-ZhJYfPGiBKsJpQ2wOu6EjIpIaQ0BallkxNBWKNZMhkYYpmtCQXL84oZztfoavk7BP81QRxV66eQikbFBJdlSctKphRbUib4GAM0agjuU4eDokTNm6lWzZupeTO1bJag2wWC1P_bQVApAb0B6wKYUVnv_sN_AKbjdeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2638771798</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robot application and occupational injuries: Are robots necessarily safer?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Yang, Siying ; Zhong, Yifan ; Feng, Dawei ; Li, Rita Yi Man ; Shao, Xue-Feng ; Liu, Wei</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Siying ; Zhong, Yifan ; Feng, Dawei ; Li, Rita Yi Man ; Shao, Xue-Feng ; Liu, Wei</creatorcontrib><description>•Robot application increases the rate of occupational injuries in developing countries.•Robot application does not have a persistent impact on occupational injuries.•Local governments can reduce the effect of robot application by strengthening safety regulations.•Robot application imposes a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments.
Recent research argues that robots could replace workers in dangerous work environments to reduce occupational injuries. However, robot development and usage in most developing countries remain at an infant stage, robots may increase the likelihood of occupational injuries due to conditions such as limited human capital and defects. By using a city-level dataset based on the Guangdong Province in China, we find that robot application is associated with an increase in the rate of occupational injuries in the first two years, and then exhibits nonsignificant and even negative effects afterwards. We also find that local governments can reduce or even eliminate the effect of robot application on occupational injuries by strengthening safety regulations. In addition, although local governments are keen on pushing robot application and industrial intelligence, the wide application of robots may impose a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments due to occupational injuries. This study extends our knowledge by challenging the traditional view that robot application can reduce the rate of occupational injuries, and also provides suggestions on the safety regulations of developing countries at the early stage of industrial intelligence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-7535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105623</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Developing countries ; Human capital ; Industrial intelligence ; Injuries ; Injury prevention ; Intelligence ; LDCs ; Local government ; Occupational accidents ; Occupational health ; Occupational injuries ; Occupational safety ; Public health ; Public health expenditure ; Regulations ; Robot ; Robots ; Safety ; Safety regulation ; Safety regulations</subject><ispartof>Safety science, 2022-03, Vol.147, p.105623, Article 105623</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Mar 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-86d4fc67eda011fe3bb968eda6688c50b8f40602fa2eda2ec0d2db01ed3492c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-86d4fc67eda011fe3bb968eda6688c50b8f40602fa2eda2ec0d2db01ed3492c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Siying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Dawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Rita Yi Man</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Xue-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wei</creatorcontrib><title>Robot application and occupational injuries: Are robots necessarily safer?</title><title>Safety science</title><description>•Robot application increases the rate of occupational injuries in developing countries.•Robot application does not have a persistent impact on occupational injuries.•Local governments can reduce the effect of robot application by strengthening safety regulations.•Robot application imposes a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments.
Recent research argues that robots could replace workers in dangerous work environments to reduce occupational injuries. However, robot development and usage in most developing countries remain at an infant stage, robots may increase the likelihood of occupational injuries due to conditions such as limited human capital and defects. By using a city-level dataset based on the Guangdong Province in China, we find that robot application is associated with an increase in the rate of occupational injuries in the first two years, and then exhibits nonsignificant and even negative effects afterwards. We also find that local governments can reduce or even eliminate the effect of robot application on occupational injuries by strengthening safety regulations. In addition, although local governments are keen on pushing robot application and industrial intelligence, the wide application of robots may impose a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments due to occupational injuries. This study extends our knowledge by challenging the traditional view that robot application can reduce the rate of occupational injuries, and also provides suggestions on the safety regulations of developing countries at the early stage of industrial intelligence.</description><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Industrial intelligence</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Occupational accidents</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational injuries</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health expenditure</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Robot</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety regulation</subject><subject>Safety regulations</subject><issn>0925-7535</issn><issn>1879-1042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcB1x3zaNNUBBkGnwwIouuQJreQUpuatML8e1Pr2tXlHM53ORyELinZUELFdbuJ0bgNI4wmoxCMH6EVlWWVUZKzY7QiFSuysuDFKTqLsSWEUC7oCr28-dqPWA9D54wene-x7i32xkzDr9Qddn07BQfxBm8D4DADEfdgIEYdXHfAUTcQ7s7RSaO7CBd_d40-Hu7fd0_Z_vXxebfdZ4ZX-ZhJYfPGiBKsJpQ2wOu6EjIpIaQ0BallkxNBWKNZMhkYYpmtCQXL84oZztfoavk7BP81QRxV66eQikbFBJdlSctKphRbUib4GAM0agjuU4eDokTNm6lWzZupeTO1bJag2wWC1P_bQVApAb0B6wKYUVnv_sN_AKbjdeg</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Yang, Siying</creator><creator>Zhong, Yifan</creator><creator>Feng, Dawei</creator><creator>Li, Rita Yi Man</creator><creator>Shao, Xue-Feng</creator><creator>Liu, Wei</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Robot application and occupational injuries: Are robots necessarily safer?</title><author>Yang, Siying ; Zhong, Yifan ; Feng, Dawei ; Li, Rita Yi Man ; Shao, Xue-Feng ; Liu, Wei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-86d4fc67eda011fe3bb968eda6688c50b8f40602fa2eda2ec0d2db01ed3492c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Industrial intelligence</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Occupational accidents</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational injuries</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health expenditure</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Robot</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety regulation</topic><topic>Safety regulations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Siying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Dawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Rita Yi Man</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Xue-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wei</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Siying</au><au>Zhong, Yifan</au><au>Feng, Dawei</au><au>Li, Rita Yi Man</au><au>Shao, Xue-Feng</au><au>Liu, Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robot application and occupational injuries: Are robots necessarily safer?</atitle><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>147</volume><spage>105623</spage><pages>105623-</pages><artnum>105623</artnum><issn>0925-7535</issn><eissn>1879-1042</eissn><abstract>•Robot application increases the rate of occupational injuries in developing countries.•Robot application does not have a persistent impact on occupational injuries.•Local governments can reduce the effect of robot application by strengthening safety regulations.•Robot application imposes a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments.
Recent research argues that robots could replace workers in dangerous work environments to reduce occupational injuries. However, robot development and usage in most developing countries remain at an infant stage, robots may increase the likelihood of occupational injuries due to conditions such as limited human capital and defects. By using a city-level dataset based on the Guangdong Province in China, we find that robot application is associated with an increase in the rate of occupational injuries in the first two years, and then exhibits nonsignificant and even negative effects afterwards. We also find that local governments can reduce or even eliminate the effect of robot application on occupational injuries by strengthening safety regulations. In addition, although local governments are keen on pushing robot application and industrial intelligence, the wide application of robots may impose a burden on the public health expenditure of local governments due to occupational injuries. This study extends our knowledge by challenging the traditional view that robot application can reduce the rate of occupational injuries, and also provides suggestions on the safety regulations of developing countries at the early stage of industrial intelligence.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105623</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0925-7535 |
ispartof | Safety science, 2022-03, Vol.147, p.105623, Article 105623 |
issn | 0925-7535 1879-1042 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2638771798 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Developing countries Human capital Industrial intelligence Injuries Injury prevention Intelligence LDCs Local government Occupational accidents Occupational health Occupational injuries Occupational safety Public health Public health expenditure Regulations Robot Robots Safety Safety regulation Safety regulations |
title | Robot application and occupational injuries: Are robots necessarily safer? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A01%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robot%20application%20and%20occupational%20injuries:%20Are%20robots%20necessarily%20safer?&rft.jtitle=Safety%20science&rft.au=Yang,%20Siying&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=147&rft.spage=105623&rft.pages=105623-&rft.artnum=105623&rft.issn=0925-7535&rft.eissn=1879-1042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105623&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2638771798%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-86d4fc67eda011fe3bb968eda6688c50b8f40602fa2eda2ec0d2db01ed3492c33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2638771798&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |