Loading…
Co-resourcing and actors' practices as catalysts for agricultural innovation
In this work, we aim to shed light on how co-resourcing and actors' practices impact the agricultural innovation process. In a first step, we conceptualized agricultural innovation as the process during which actors exchange solutions that enable innovation to emerge. To provide these solutions...
Saved in:
Published in: | The journal of agricultural education and extension 2022-03, Vol.28 (2), p.209-229 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55356253b263c39485818cce62d7dac158d8006f8ffad71129a3e4bd33f2792b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55356253b263c39485818cce62d7dac158d8006f8ffad71129a3e4bd33f2792b3 |
container_end_page | 229 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 209 |
container_title | The journal of agricultural education and extension |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Lioutas, Evagelos D. Charatsari, Chrysanthi De Rosa, Marcello La Rocca, Giuseppe Černič Istenič, Majda |
description | In this work, we aim to shed light on how co-resourcing and actors' practices impact the agricultural innovation process.
In a first step, we conceptualized agricultural innovation as the process during which actors exchange solutions that enable innovation to emerge. To provide these solutions, actors integrate operand and operant resources while simultaneously changing the context within which the innovation process takes place through their practices. By using three case studies, we present how co-resourcing and actors' practices catalyze agricultural innovation.
Actors participate in solution networks having different aims. After setting forth value propositions, they engage in co-resourcing processes, using a wide array of practices (even 'dark' ones) to extract value from the innovation.
This study suggests the need for both research and policy to pay close attention to the process of co-resourcing and the practices used by actors involved in agricultural innovation networks.
The present work reveals that actors who have access to or own key resources take dominant positions in innovation networks, thus having the potential to form institutions in a way that serves their individual interests.
This study uncovers that actors' practices during co-resourcing catalyze the agricultural innovation process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/1389224X.2021.1953547 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2638855038</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1331247</ericid><sourcerecordid>2638855038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55356253b263c39485818cce62d7dac158d8006f8ffad71129a3e4bd33f2792b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_oRDw4GlrPja72ZtS6hcFLwrewjSbLSnbpCZZpf_e1KpHTzMw7zsz74PQhJIpJZJcUy4bxsq3KSOMTmkjuCjrIzSitSCFrBg7zn3WFHvRKTqLcU2IYFLyEVrMfBFM9EPQ1q0wuBaDTj7EK7wNubPaRAwRa0jQ72KKuPMBwypYPfRpCNBj65z_gGS9O0cnHfTRXPzUMXq9m7_MHorF8_3j7HZRaF6RVIj8YMUEX7KKa96UUkgqtTYVa-sWNBWylYRUnew6aGtKWQPclMuW847VDVvyMbo87N0G_z6YmNQ6B3D5pMorpRSCcJlV4qDSwccYTKe2wW4g7BQlag9O_YJTe3DqB1z2TQ4-k0P-eeZPlHPKvuc3h7l1mcUGPn3oW5Vg1_vQBXDaRsX_P_EFds1-OQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2638855038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Co-resourcing and actors' practices as catalysts for agricultural innovation</title><source>ERIC</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Lioutas, Evagelos D. ; Charatsari, Chrysanthi ; De Rosa, Marcello ; La Rocca, Giuseppe ; Černič Istenič, Majda</creator><creatorcontrib>Lioutas, Evagelos D. ; Charatsari, Chrysanthi ; De Rosa, Marcello ; La Rocca, Giuseppe ; Černič Istenič, Majda</creatorcontrib><description>In this work, we aim to shed light on how co-resourcing and actors' practices impact the agricultural innovation process.
In a first step, we conceptualized agricultural innovation as the process during which actors exchange solutions that enable innovation to emerge. To provide these solutions, actors integrate operand and operant resources while simultaneously changing the context within which the innovation process takes place through their practices. By using three case studies, we present how co-resourcing and actors' practices catalyze agricultural innovation.
Actors participate in solution networks having different aims. After setting forth value propositions, they engage in co-resourcing processes, using a wide array of practices (even 'dark' ones) to extract value from the innovation.
This study suggests the need for both research and policy to pay close attention to the process of co-resourcing and the practices used by actors involved in agricultural innovation networks.
The present work reveals that actors who have access to or own key resources take dominant positions in innovation networks, thus having the potential to form institutions in a way that serves their individual interests.
This study uncovers that actors' practices during co-resourcing catalyze the agricultural innovation process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-224X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1750-8622</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2021.1953547</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Agricultural education ; Agricultural innovation systems ; Agricultural practices ; Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Case Studies ; Catalysts ; co-resourcing ; Foreign Countries ; Innovation ; Innovations ; Networks ; Operant conditioning ; practices ; resource integration ; Resources ; service ecosystems ; Social Networks ; solution networks</subject><ispartof>The journal of agricultural education and extension, 2022-03, Vol.28 (2), p.209-229</ispartof><rights>2021 Wageningen University 2021</rights><rights>2021 Wageningen University</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55356253b263c39485818cce62d7dac158d8006f8ffad71129a3e4bd33f2792b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55356253b263c39485818cce62d7dac158d8006f8ffad71129a3e4bd33f2792b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3784-9553 ; 0000-0002-5053-6861 ; 0000-0001-5264-6370 ; 0000-0002-9160-3469</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1331247$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lioutas, Evagelos D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charatsari, Chrysanthi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Rosa, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>La Rocca, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Černič Istenič, Majda</creatorcontrib><title>Co-resourcing and actors' practices as catalysts for agricultural innovation</title><title>The journal of agricultural education and extension</title><description>In this work, we aim to shed light on how co-resourcing and actors' practices impact the agricultural innovation process.
In a first step, we conceptualized agricultural innovation as the process during which actors exchange solutions that enable innovation to emerge. To provide these solutions, actors integrate operand and operant resources while simultaneously changing the context within which the innovation process takes place through their practices. By using three case studies, we present how co-resourcing and actors' practices catalyze agricultural innovation.
Actors participate in solution networks having different aims. After setting forth value propositions, they engage in co-resourcing processes, using a wide array of practices (even 'dark' ones) to extract value from the innovation.
This study suggests the need for both research and policy to pay close attention to the process of co-resourcing and the practices used by actors involved in agricultural innovation networks.
The present work reveals that actors who have access to or own key resources take dominant positions in innovation networks, thus having the potential to form institutions in a way that serves their individual interests.
This study uncovers that actors' practices during co-resourcing catalyze the agricultural innovation process.</description><subject>Agricultural education</subject><subject>Agricultural innovation systems</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>co-resourcing</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Operant conditioning</subject><subject>practices</subject><subject>resource integration</subject><subject>Resources</subject><subject>service ecosystems</subject><subject>Social Networks</subject><subject>solution networks</subject><issn>1389-224X</issn><issn>1750-8622</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_oRDw4GlrPja72ZtS6hcFLwrewjSbLSnbpCZZpf_e1KpHTzMw7zsz74PQhJIpJZJcUy4bxsq3KSOMTmkjuCjrIzSitSCFrBg7zn3WFHvRKTqLcU2IYFLyEVrMfBFM9EPQ1q0wuBaDTj7EK7wNubPaRAwRa0jQ72KKuPMBwypYPfRpCNBj65z_gGS9O0cnHfTRXPzUMXq9m7_MHorF8_3j7HZRaF6RVIj8YMUEX7KKa96UUkgqtTYVa-sWNBWylYRUnew6aGtKWQPclMuW847VDVvyMbo87N0G_z6YmNQ6B3D5pMorpRSCcJlV4qDSwccYTKe2wW4g7BQlag9O_YJTe3DqB1z2TQ4-k0P-eeZPlHPKvuc3h7l1mcUGPn3oW5Vg1_vQBXDaRsX_P_EFds1-OQ</recordid><startdate>20220315</startdate><enddate>20220315</enddate><creator>Lioutas, Evagelos D.</creator><creator>Charatsari, Chrysanthi</creator><creator>De Rosa, Marcello</creator><creator>La Rocca, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Černič Istenič, Majda</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3784-9553</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5053-6861</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5264-6370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9160-3469</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220315</creationdate><title>Co-resourcing and actors' practices as catalysts for agricultural innovation</title><author>Lioutas, Evagelos D. ; Charatsari, Chrysanthi ; De Rosa, Marcello ; La Rocca, Giuseppe ; Černič Istenič, Majda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55356253b263c39485818cce62d7dac158d8006f8ffad71129a3e4bd33f2792b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural education</topic><topic>Agricultural innovation systems</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>co-resourcing</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Operant conditioning</topic><topic>practices</topic><topic>resource integration</topic><topic>Resources</topic><topic>service ecosystems</topic><topic>Social Networks</topic><topic>solution networks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lioutas, Evagelos D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charatsari, Chrysanthi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Rosa, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>La Rocca, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Černič Istenič, Majda</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The journal of agricultural education and extension</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lioutas, Evagelos D.</au><au>Charatsari, Chrysanthi</au><au>De Rosa, Marcello</au><au>La Rocca, Giuseppe</au><au>Černič Istenič, Majda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1331247</ericid><atitle>Co-resourcing and actors' practices as catalysts for agricultural innovation</atitle><jtitle>The journal of agricultural education and extension</jtitle><date>2022-03-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>229</epage><pages>209-229</pages><issn>1389-224X</issn><eissn>1750-8622</eissn><abstract>In this work, we aim to shed light on how co-resourcing and actors' practices impact the agricultural innovation process.
In a first step, we conceptualized agricultural innovation as the process during which actors exchange solutions that enable innovation to emerge. To provide these solutions, actors integrate operand and operant resources while simultaneously changing the context within which the innovation process takes place through their practices. By using three case studies, we present how co-resourcing and actors' practices catalyze agricultural innovation.
Actors participate in solution networks having different aims. After setting forth value propositions, they engage in co-resourcing processes, using a wide array of practices (even 'dark' ones) to extract value from the innovation.
This study suggests the need for both research and policy to pay close attention to the process of co-resourcing and the practices used by actors involved in agricultural innovation networks.
The present work reveals that actors who have access to or own key resources take dominant positions in innovation networks, thus having the potential to form institutions in a way that serves their individual interests.
This study uncovers that actors' practices during co-resourcing catalyze the agricultural innovation process.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/1389224X.2021.1953547</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3784-9553</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5053-6861</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5264-6370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9160-3469</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1389-224X |
ispartof | The journal of agricultural education and extension, 2022-03, Vol.28 (2), p.209-229 |
issn | 1389-224X 1750-8622 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2638855038 |
source | ERIC; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Agricultural education Agricultural innovation systems Agricultural practices Agriculture Agronomy Case Studies Catalysts co-resourcing Foreign Countries Innovation Innovations Networks Operant conditioning practices resource integration Resources service ecosystems Social Networks solution networks |
title | Co-resourcing and actors' practices as catalysts for agricultural innovation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A28%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Co-resourcing%20and%20actors'%20practices%20as%20catalysts%20for%20agricultural%20innovation&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20education%20and%20extension&rft.au=Lioutas,%20Evagelos%20D.&rft.date=2022-03-15&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=229&rft.pages=209-229&rft.issn=1389-224X&rft.eissn=1750-8622&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1953547&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2638855038%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55356253b263c39485818cce62d7dac158d8006f8ffad71129a3e4bd33f2792b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2638855038&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1331247&rfr_iscdi=true |