Loading…

A Systematic Review of Research Comparing Mobile Technology Speech-Generating Devices to Other AAC Modes with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder

As 30% of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) demonstrate difficulties with vocal output, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention can provide a means for those persons to have the ability to communicate with others. To determine the most effective mode of AAC for in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of developmental and physical disabilities 2022-04, Vol.34 (2), p.187-210
Main Authors: Lorah, Elizabeth R., Holyfield, Christine, Miller, Jessica, Griffen, Brenna, Lindbloom, Cody
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6fcbd7787e895aee67a2680f832d0563613cba683bf2f334ebc049bd0532a8ae3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6fcbd7787e895aee67a2680f832d0563613cba683bf2f334ebc049bd0532a8ae3
container_end_page 210
container_issue 2
container_start_page 187
container_title Journal of developmental and physical disabilities
container_volume 34
creator Lorah, Elizabeth R.
Holyfield, Christine
Miller, Jessica
Griffen, Brenna
Lindbloom, Cody
description As 30% of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) demonstrate difficulties with vocal output, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention can provide a means for those persons to have the ability to communicate with others. To determine the most effective mode of AAC for individuals with ASD, practitioners must have access to current comparative research in order to make evidence-based decisions. This systematic review searched ERIC, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, and Science Direct databases for studies that compared AAC modes, including mobile technology based speech-generating devices, in intervention with individuals with ASD. The search yielded nine (n = 9) alternating treatment design single case studies including a total of 36 participants with ASD with a mean age of seven (range: 3–13). The included studies were compared to evaluate operants, evidence-based best practices, preferences, and participant performance across AAC modes. Visual and statistical analyses indicated most participants not only preferred using the SGD but had performed better when using such devices compared to picture exchange and manual sign. Findings suggest that practitioners should consider using mobile technology based SGDs to promote verbal behavior from children with a diagnosis of ASD. Additionally, research evaluating verbal operants beyond the initial mand (request) and incorporating participants who are adolescents or adults is needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10882-021-09803-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2638858039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2638858039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6fcbd7787e895aee67a2680f832d0563613cba683bf2f334ebc049bd0532a8ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UclOwzAUjBBIrD_AyRJng2PTxDlGLZsEqsQicbMc56V11cTBdqjyJfwurxSJG6e3eGaePJMk5ym7TBnLr0LKpOSU8ZSyQjJBx73kKJ3kgoqJZPvYs0lGeSbeD5PjEFaMsYwXxVHyVZKXMURodbSGPMOnhQ1xDXYBtDdLMnVtr73tFuTJVXYN5BXMsnNrtxjJSw840DvowCMfMTMUMBBIdGQel-BJWU6RWONqY-OSPHS1_bT1oNe_i3KINrRbJRP90JKZDc7X4E-TgwZBcPZbT5K325vX6T19nN89TMtHakRaRJo1pqrzXOYgi4kGyHLNM8kaKXiNPxZZKkylMymqhjdCXENl2HVR4ZvgWmoQJ8nFTrf37mOAENXKDb7DkwrdkhLdEwWi-A5lvAvBQ6N6b1vtR5UytQ1A7QJQGID6CUCNSBI7Uui3_oH_k_6H9Q3o-Iuj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2638858039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Systematic Review of Research Comparing Mobile Technology Speech-Generating Devices to Other AAC Modes with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Lorah, Elizabeth R. ; Holyfield, Christine ; Miller, Jessica ; Griffen, Brenna ; Lindbloom, Cody</creator><creatorcontrib>Lorah, Elizabeth R. ; Holyfield, Christine ; Miller, Jessica ; Griffen, Brenna ; Lindbloom, Cody</creatorcontrib><description>As 30% of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) demonstrate difficulties with vocal output, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention can provide a means for those persons to have the ability to communicate with others. To determine the most effective mode of AAC for individuals with ASD, practitioners must have access to current comparative research in order to make evidence-based decisions. This systematic review searched ERIC, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, and Science Direct databases for studies that compared AAC modes, including mobile technology based speech-generating devices, in intervention with individuals with ASD. The search yielded nine (n = 9) alternating treatment design single case studies including a total of 36 participants with ASD with a mean age of seven (range: 3–13). The included studies were compared to evaluate operants, evidence-based best practices, preferences, and participant performance across AAC modes. Visual and statistical analyses indicated most participants not only preferred using the SGD but had performed better when using such devices compared to picture exchange and manual sign. Findings suggest that practitioners should consider using mobile technology based SGDs to promote verbal behavior from children with a diagnosis of ASD. Additionally, research evaluating verbal operants beyond the initial mand (request) and incorporating participants who are adolescents or adults is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1056-263X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3580</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10882-021-09803-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Augmentative and alternative communication ; Autism ; Autism Spectrum Disorders ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Best practice ; Case Studies ; Child and School Psychology ; Comparative analysis ; Evidence based research ; Intervention ; Medical diagnosis ; Pediatrics ; Portable computers ; Psychology ; Public Health ; Review Article ; Single case studies ; Speech ; Systematic review ; Technology ; Verbal behaviour ; Verbal Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 2022-04, Vol.34 (2), p.187-210</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6fcbd7787e895aee67a2680f832d0563613cba683bf2f334ebc049bd0532a8ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6fcbd7787e895aee67a2680f832d0563613cba683bf2f334ebc049bd0532a8ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2638858039?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,21378,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,33611,33877,34530,43733,43880,44115</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lorah, Elizabeth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holyfield, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffen, Brenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindbloom, Cody</creatorcontrib><title>A Systematic Review of Research Comparing Mobile Technology Speech-Generating Devices to Other AAC Modes with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder</title><title>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</title><addtitle>J Dev Phys Disabil</addtitle><description>As 30% of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) demonstrate difficulties with vocal output, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention can provide a means for those persons to have the ability to communicate with others. To determine the most effective mode of AAC for individuals with ASD, practitioners must have access to current comparative research in order to make evidence-based decisions. This systematic review searched ERIC, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, and Science Direct databases for studies that compared AAC modes, including mobile technology based speech-generating devices, in intervention with individuals with ASD. The search yielded nine (n = 9) alternating treatment design single case studies including a total of 36 participants with ASD with a mean age of seven (range: 3–13). The included studies were compared to evaluate operants, evidence-based best practices, preferences, and participant performance across AAC modes. Visual and statistical analyses indicated most participants not only preferred using the SGD but had performed better when using such devices compared to picture exchange and manual sign. Findings suggest that practitioners should consider using mobile technology based SGDs to promote verbal behavior from children with a diagnosis of ASD. Additionally, research evaluating verbal operants beyond the initial mand (request) and incorporating participants who are adolescents or adults is needed.</description><subject>Augmentative and alternative communication</subject><subject>Autism</subject><subject>Autism Spectrum Disorders</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Evidence based research</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Portable computers</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Single case studies</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Verbal behaviour</subject><subject>Verbal Stimuli</subject><issn>1056-263X</issn><issn>1573-3580</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UclOwzAUjBBIrD_AyRJng2PTxDlGLZsEqsQicbMc56V11cTBdqjyJfwurxSJG6e3eGaePJMk5ym7TBnLr0LKpOSU8ZSyQjJBx73kKJ3kgoqJZPvYs0lGeSbeD5PjEFaMsYwXxVHyVZKXMURodbSGPMOnhQ1xDXYBtDdLMnVtr73tFuTJVXYN5BXMsnNrtxjJSw840DvowCMfMTMUMBBIdGQel-BJWU6RWONqY-OSPHS1_bT1oNe_i3KINrRbJRP90JKZDc7X4E-TgwZBcPZbT5K325vX6T19nN89TMtHakRaRJo1pqrzXOYgi4kGyHLNM8kaKXiNPxZZKkylMymqhjdCXENl2HVR4ZvgWmoQJ8nFTrf37mOAENXKDb7DkwrdkhLdEwWi-A5lvAvBQ6N6b1vtR5UytQ1A7QJQGID6CUCNSBI7Uui3_oH_k_6H9Q3o-Iuj</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Lorah, Elizabeth R.</creator><creator>Holyfield, Christine</creator><creator>Miller, Jessica</creator><creator>Griffen, Brenna</creator><creator>Lindbloom, Cody</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>A Systematic Review of Research Comparing Mobile Technology Speech-Generating Devices to Other AAC Modes with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder</title><author>Lorah, Elizabeth R. ; Holyfield, Christine ; Miller, Jessica ; Griffen, Brenna ; Lindbloom, Cody</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6fcbd7787e895aee67a2680f832d0563613cba683bf2f334ebc049bd0532a8ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Augmentative and alternative communication</topic><topic>Autism</topic><topic>Autism Spectrum Disorders</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Evidence based research</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Portable computers</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Single case studies</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Verbal behaviour</topic><topic>Verbal Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lorah, Elizabeth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holyfield, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffen, Brenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindbloom, Cody</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lorah, Elizabeth R.</au><au>Holyfield, Christine</au><au>Miller, Jessica</au><au>Griffen, Brenna</au><au>Lindbloom, Cody</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Systematic Review of Research Comparing Mobile Technology Speech-Generating Devices to Other AAC Modes with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder</atitle><jtitle>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</jtitle><stitle>J Dev Phys Disabil</stitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>187-210</pages><issn>1056-263X</issn><eissn>1573-3580</eissn><abstract>As 30% of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) demonstrate difficulties with vocal output, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention can provide a means for those persons to have the ability to communicate with others. To determine the most effective mode of AAC for individuals with ASD, practitioners must have access to current comparative research in order to make evidence-based decisions. This systematic review searched ERIC, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, and Science Direct databases for studies that compared AAC modes, including mobile technology based speech-generating devices, in intervention with individuals with ASD. The search yielded nine (n = 9) alternating treatment design single case studies including a total of 36 participants with ASD with a mean age of seven (range: 3–13). The included studies were compared to evaluate operants, evidence-based best practices, preferences, and participant performance across AAC modes. Visual and statistical analyses indicated most participants not only preferred using the SGD but had performed better when using such devices compared to picture exchange and manual sign. Findings suggest that practitioners should consider using mobile technology based SGDs to promote verbal behavior from children with a diagnosis of ASD. Additionally, research evaluating verbal operants beyond the initial mand (request) and incorporating participants who are adolescents or adults is needed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10882-021-09803-y</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1056-263X
ispartof Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 2022-04, Vol.34 (2), p.187-210
issn 1056-263X
1573-3580
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2638858039
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Springer Link; Education Collection
subjects Augmentative and alternative communication
Autism
Autism Spectrum Disorders
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Best practice
Case Studies
Child and School Psychology
Comparative analysis
Evidence based research
Intervention
Medical diagnosis
Pediatrics
Portable computers
Psychology
Public Health
Review Article
Single case studies
Speech
Systematic review
Technology
Verbal behaviour
Verbal Stimuli
title A Systematic Review of Research Comparing Mobile Technology Speech-Generating Devices to Other AAC Modes with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A19%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Research%20Comparing%20Mobile%20Technology%20Speech-Generating%20Devices%20to%20Other%20AAC%20Modes%20with%20Individuals%20with%20Autism%20Spectrum%20Disorder&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20developmental%20and%20physical%20disabilities&rft.au=Lorah,%20Elizabeth%20R.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=187-210&rft.issn=1056-263X&rft.eissn=1573-3580&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10882-021-09803-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2638858039%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6fcbd7787e895aee67a2680f832d0563613cba683bf2f334ebc049bd0532a8ae3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2638858039&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true