Loading…
A Systematic Review of Research Comparing Mobile Technology Speech-Generating Devices to Other AAC Modes with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder
As 30% of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) demonstrate difficulties with vocal output, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention can provide a means for those persons to have the ability to communicate with others. To determine the most effective mode of AAC for in...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of developmental and physical disabilities 2022-04, Vol.34 (2), p.187-210 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6fcbd7787e895aee67a2680f832d0563613cba683bf2f334ebc049bd0532a8ae3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6fcbd7787e895aee67a2680f832d0563613cba683bf2f334ebc049bd0532a8ae3 |
container_end_page | 210 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 187 |
container_title | Journal of developmental and physical disabilities |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Lorah, Elizabeth R. Holyfield, Christine Miller, Jessica Griffen, Brenna Lindbloom, Cody |
description | As 30% of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) demonstrate difficulties with vocal output, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention can provide a means for those persons to have the ability to communicate with others. To determine the most effective mode of AAC for individuals with ASD, practitioners must have access to current comparative research in order to make evidence-based decisions. This systematic review searched ERIC, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, and Science Direct databases for studies that compared AAC modes, including mobile technology based speech-generating devices, in intervention with individuals with ASD. The search yielded nine (n = 9) alternating treatment design single case studies including a total of 36 participants with ASD with a mean age of seven (range: 3–13). The included studies were compared to evaluate operants, evidence-based best practices, preferences, and participant performance across AAC modes. Visual and statistical analyses indicated most participants not only preferred using the SGD but had performed better when using such devices compared to picture exchange and manual sign. Findings suggest that practitioners should consider using mobile technology based SGDs to promote verbal behavior from children with a diagnosis of ASD. Additionally, research evaluating verbal operants beyond the initial mand (request) and incorporating participants who are adolescents or adults is needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10882-021-09803-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2638858039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2638858039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6fcbd7787e895aee67a2680f832d0563613cba683bf2f334ebc049bd0532a8ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UclOwzAUjBBIrD_AyRJng2PTxDlGLZsEqsQicbMc56V11cTBdqjyJfwurxSJG6e3eGaePJMk5ym7TBnLr0LKpOSU8ZSyQjJBx73kKJ3kgoqJZPvYs0lGeSbeD5PjEFaMsYwXxVHyVZKXMURodbSGPMOnhQ1xDXYBtDdLMnVtr73tFuTJVXYN5BXMsnNrtxjJSw840DvowCMfMTMUMBBIdGQel-BJWU6RWONqY-OSPHS1_bT1oNe_i3KINrRbJRP90JKZDc7X4E-TgwZBcPZbT5K325vX6T19nN89TMtHakRaRJo1pqrzXOYgi4kGyHLNM8kaKXiNPxZZKkylMymqhjdCXENl2HVR4ZvgWmoQJ8nFTrf37mOAENXKDb7DkwrdkhLdEwWi-A5lvAvBQ6N6b1vtR5UytQ1A7QJQGID6CUCNSBI7Uui3_oH_k_6H9Q3o-Iuj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2638858039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Systematic Review of Research Comparing Mobile Technology Speech-Generating Devices to Other AAC Modes with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Lorah, Elizabeth R. ; Holyfield, Christine ; Miller, Jessica ; Griffen, Brenna ; Lindbloom, Cody</creator><creatorcontrib>Lorah, Elizabeth R. ; Holyfield, Christine ; Miller, Jessica ; Griffen, Brenna ; Lindbloom, Cody</creatorcontrib><description>As 30% of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) demonstrate difficulties with vocal output, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention can provide a means for those persons to have the ability to communicate with others. To determine the most effective mode of AAC for individuals with ASD, practitioners must have access to current comparative research in order to make evidence-based decisions. This systematic review searched ERIC, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, and Science Direct databases for studies that compared AAC modes, including mobile technology based speech-generating devices, in intervention with individuals with ASD. The search yielded nine (n = 9) alternating treatment design single case studies including a total of 36 participants with ASD with a mean age of seven (range: 3–13). The included studies were compared to evaluate operants, evidence-based best practices, preferences, and participant performance across AAC modes. Visual and statistical analyses indicated most participants not only preferred using the SGD but had performed better when using such devices compared to picture exchange and manual sign. Findings suggest that practitioners should consider using mobile technology based SGDs to promote verbal behavior from children with a diagnosis of ASD. Additionally, research evaluating verbal operants beyond the initial mand (request) and incorporating participants who are adolescents or adults is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1056-263X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3580</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10882-021-09803-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Augmentative and alternative communication ; Autism ; Autism Spectrum Disorders ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Best practice ; Case Studies ; Child and School Psychology ; Comparative analysis ; Evidence based research ; Intervention ; Medical diagnosis ; Pediatrics ; Portable computers ; Psychology ; Public Health ; Review Article ; Single case studies ; Speech ; Systematic review ; Technology ; Verbal behaviour ; Verbal Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 2022-04, Vol.34 (2), p.187-210</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6fcbd7787e895aee67a2680f832d0563613cba683bf2f334ebc049bd0532a8ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6fcbd7787e895aee67a2680f832d0563613cba683bf2f334ebc049bd0532a8ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2638858039?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,21378,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,33611,33877,34530,43733,43880,44115</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lorah, Elizabeth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holyfield, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffen, Brenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindbloom, Cody</creatorcontrib><title>A Systematic Review of Research Comparing Mobile Technology Speech-Generating Devices to Other AAC Modes with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder</title><title>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</title><addtitle>J Dev Phys Disabil</addtitle><description>As 30% of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) demonstrate difficulties with vocal output, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention can provide a means for those persons to have the ability to communicate with others. To determine the most effective mode of AAC for individuals with ASD, practitioners must have access to current comparative research in order to make evidence-based decisions. This systematic review searched ERIC, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, and Science Direct databases for studies that compared AAC modes, including mobile technology based speech-generating devices, in intervention with individuals with ASD. The search yielded nine (n = 9) alternating treatment design single case studies including a total of 36 participants with ASD with a mean age of seven (range: 3–13). The included studies were compared to evaluate operants, evidence-based best practices, preferences, and participant performance across AAC modes. Visual and statistical analyses indicated most participants not only preferred using the SGD but had performed better when using such devices compared to picture exchange and manual sign. Findings suggest that practitioners should consider using mobile technology based SGDs to promote verbal behavior from children with a diagnosis of ASD. Additionally, research evaluating verbal operants beyond the initial mand (request) and incorporating participants who are adolescents or adults is needed.</description><subject>Augmentative and alternative communication</subject><subject>Autism</subject><subject>Autism Spectrum Disorders</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Evidence based research</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Portable computers</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Single case studies</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Verbal behaviour</subject><subject>Verbal Stimuli</subject><issn>1056-263X</issn><issn>1573-3580</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UclOwzAUjBBIrD_AyRJng2PTxDlGLZsEqsQicbMc56V11cTBdqjyJfwurxSJG6e3eGaePJMk5ym7TBnLr0LKpOSU8ZSyQjJBx73kKJ3kgoqJZPvYs0lGeSbeD5PjEFaMsYwXxVHyVZKXMURodbSGPMOnhQ1xDXYBtDdLMnVtr73tFuTJVXYN5BXMsnNrtxjJSw840DvowCMfMTMUMBBIdGQel-BJWU6RWONqY-OSPHS1_bT1oNe_i3KINrRbJRP90JKZDc7X4E-TgwZBcPZbT5K325vX6T19nN89TMtHakRaRJo1pqrzXOYgi4kGyHLNM8kaKXiNPxZZKkylMymqhjdCXENl2HVR4ZvgWmoQJ8nFTrf37mOAENXKDb7DkwrdkhLdEwWi-A5lvAvBQ6N6b1vtR5UytQ1A7QJQGID6CUCNSBI7Uui3_oH_k_6H9Q3o-Iuj</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Lorah, Elizabeth R.</creator><creator>Holyfield, Christine</creator><creator>Miller, Jessica</creator><creator>Griffen, Brenna</creator><creator>Lindbloom, Cody</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>A Systematic Review of Research Comparing Mobile Technology Speech-Generating Devices to Other AAC Modes with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder</title><author>Lorah, Elizabeth R. ; Holyfield, Christine ; Miller, Jessica ; Griffen, Brenna ; Lindbloom, Cody</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6fcbd7787e895aee67a2680f832d0563613cba683bf2f334ebc049bd0532a8ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Augmentative and alternative communication</topic><topic>Autism</topic><topic>Autism Spectrum Disorders</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Evidence based research</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Portable computers</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Single case studies</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Verbal behaviour</topic><topic>Verbal Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lorah, Elizabeth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holyfield, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffen, Brenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindbloom, Cody</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lorah, Elizabeth R.</au><au>Holyfield, Christine</au><au>Miller, Jessica</au><au>Griffen, Brenna</au><au>Lindbloom, Cody</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Systematic Review of Research Comparing Mobile Technology Speech-Generating Devices to Other AAC Modes with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder</atitle><jtitle>Journal of developmental and physical disabilities</jtitle><stitle>J Dev Phys Disabil</stitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>187-210</pages><issn>1056-263X</issn><eissn>1573-3580</eissn><abstract>As 30% of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) demonstrate difficulties with vocal output, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention can provide a means for those persons to have the ability to communicate with others. To determine the most effective mode of AAC for individuals with ASD, practitioners must have access to current comparative research in order to make evidence-based decisions. This systematic review searched ERIC, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, and Science Direct databases for studies that compared AAC modes, including mobile technology based speech-generating devices, in intervention with individuals with ASD. The search yielded nine (n = 9) alternating treatment design single case studies including a total of 36 participants with ASD with a mean age of seven (range: 3–13). The included studies were compared to evaluate operants, evidence-based best practices, preferences, and participant performance across AAC modes. Visual and statistical analyses indicated most participants not only preferred using the SGD but had performed better when using such devices compared to picture exchange and manual sign. Findings suggest that practitioners should consider using mobile technology based SGDs to promote verbal behavior from children with a diagnosis of ASD. Additionally, research evaluating verbal operants beyond the initial mand (request) and incorporating participants who are adolescents or adults is needed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10882-021-09803-y</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1056-263X |
ispartof | Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 2022-04, Vol.34 (2), p.187-210 |
issn | 1056-263X 1573-3580 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2638858039 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Springer Link; Education Collection |
subjects | Augmentative and alternative communication Autism Autism Spectrum Disorders Behavioral Science and Psychology Best practice Case Studies Child and School Psychology Comparative analysis Evidence based research Intervention Medical diagnosis Pediatrics Portable computers Psychology Public Health Review Article Single case studies Speech Systematic review Technology Verbal behaviour Verbal Stimuli |
title | A Systematic Review of Research Comparing Mobile Technology Speech-Generating Devices to Other AAC Modes with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A19%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Research%20Comparing%20Mobile%20Technology%20Speech-Generating%20Devices%20to%20Other%20AAC%20Modes%20with%20Individuals%20with%20Autism%20Spectrum%20Disorder&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20developmental%20and%20physical%20disabilities&rft.au=Lorah,%20Elizabeth%20R.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=187-210&rft.issn=1056-263X&rft.eissn=1573-3580&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10882-021-09803-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2638858039%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6fcbd7787e895aee67a2680f832d0563613cba683bf2f334ebc049bd0532a8ae3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2638858039&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |