Loading…
Use of Non‐Matrix Matched Reference Materials for the Accurate Analysis of Calcium Carbonate by LA‐ICP‐MS
Advances in laser ablation inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry have improved analytical precision for mineral analysis, expanding geological interpretations from LA‐ICP‐MS results. However, with improvements in analytical precision, systematic errors from calibration can become more obvious...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geostandards and geoanalytical research 2022-03, Vol.46 (1), p.97-115 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-fa68a4b491b47a8f95eef929351015504a1da141b35d8b2eca384d45a39ed3893 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-fa68a4b491b47a8f95eef929351015504a1da141b35d8b2eca384d45a39ed3893 |
container_end_page | 115 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 97 |
container_title | Geostandards and geoanalytical research |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Thompson, Jennifer A. Thompson, Jay M. Goemann, Karsten Lounejeva, Elena Cooke, David R. Danyushevsky, Leonid |
description | Advances in laser ablation inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry have improved analytical precision for mineral analysis, expanding geological interpretations from LA‐ICP‐MS results. However, with improvements in analytical precision, systematic errors from calibration can become more obvious and affect data quality. To improve the accuracy of the LA‐ICP‐MS technique, a fully quantified method is presented for the analysis of minerals with a CaCO3 matrix. An in‐house calcite sample (P‐Cal) was developed with an independently constrained composition and compared with measurement results from LA‐ICP‐MS analysis, generated using multiple spot sizes, laser fluences and calibration methods. For many elements, calibration against NIST SRM 612 as a calibration reference material and USGS GSD‐1G and USGS BCR‐2G as secondary reference materials (calibration B) provided the best accuracy for CaCO3 analysis. Ablation rates and element yield (ICP‐MS signal intensity in counts per second for a given isotope relative to the mass fraction of the respective element) in calcium carbonate closely resembles NIST SRM 612; however, the down‐hole fractionation curves of USGS BCR‐2G (basaltic glass matrix) are a better fit for carbonate. Variations in accuracy for measurements at different spot sizes are negligible compared with the other effects discussed. Additionally, ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments produce a negligible effect on the accuracy of the results for calcium carbonate.
Key Points
Described method provided accurate analysis of calcium carbonate by LA?ICP?MS with 20–60 μm spot sizes.
For many elements, using NIST SRM 612 as the calibrator and USGS GSD?1G and BCR?2G as secondary RMs provided the best accuracy.
Ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments had a negligible effect on the accuracy of results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ggr.12405 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2639171157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2639171157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-fa68a4b491b47a8f95eef929351015504a1da141b35d8b2eca384d45a39ed3893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9PwyAYh4nRxDk9-A1IPHnoBgVWODaNziXzT6ZLvBHawtalKxPWaG9-BD-jn0TqvMrlR14enrz5AXCJ0QiHM16t3AjHFLEjMMAJw5FA_PU43CdERJRyfgrOvN8gxKhgeADs0mtoDXywzffn173au-oDhijWuoQLbbTTTaH7iXaVqj001sH9WsO0KFoXpjBtVN35yveWTNVF1W5Dutw2_WvewXkazLPsqfc_n4MTEzT64i-HYHl785LdRfPH6SxL55EijLHIqAlXNKcC5zRR3AimtRGxIAwjzBiiCpcKU5wTVvI81oUinJaUKSJ0SbggQ3B18O6cfWu138uNbV1Y1cs4VIETjFkSqOsDVTjrvdNG7ly1Va6TGMm-Txn6lL99BnZ8YN-rWnf_g3I6XRx-_AB3lnh9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2639171157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Non‐Matrix Matched Reference Materials for the Accurate Analysis of Calcium Carbonate by LA‐ICP‐MS</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Thompson, Jennifer A. ; Thompson, Jay M. ; Goemann, Karsten ; Lounejeva, Elena ; Cooke, David R. ; Danyushevsky, Leonid</creator><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Jennifer A. ; Thompson, Jay M. ; Goemann, Karsten ; Lounejeva, Elena ; Cooke, David R. ; Danyushevsky, Leonid</creatorcontrib><description>Advances in laser ablation inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry have improved analytical precision for mineral analysis, expanding geological interpretations from LA‐ICP‐MS results. However, with improvements in analytical precision, systematic errors from calibration can become more obvious and affect data quality. To improve the accuracy of the LA‐ICP‐MS technique, a fully quantified method is presented for the analysis of minerals with a CaCO3 matrix. An in‐house calcite sample (P‐Cal) was developed with an independently constrained composition and compared with measurement results from LA‐ICP‐MS analysis, generated using multiple spot sizes, laser fluences and calibration methods. For many elements, calibration against NIST SRM 612 as a calibration reference material and USGS GSD‐1G and USGS BCR‐2G as secondary reference materials (calibration B) provided the best accuracy for CaCO3 analysis. Ablation rates and element yield (ICP‐MS signal intensity in counts per second for a given isotope relative to the mass fraction of the respective element) in calcium carbonate closely resembles NIST SRM 612; however, the down‐hole fractionation curves of USGS BCR‐2G (basaltic glass matrix) are a better fit for carbonate. Variations in accuracy for measurements at different spot sizes are negligible compared with the other effects discussed. Additionally, ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments produce a negligible effect on the accuracy of the results for calcium carbonate.
Key Points
Described method provided accurate analysis of calcium carbonate by LA?ICP?MS with 20–60 μm spot sizes.
For many elements, using NIST SRM 612 as the calibrator and USGS GSD?1G and BCR?2G as secondary RMs provided the best accuracy.
Ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments had a negligible effect on the accuracy of results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1639-4488</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-908X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ggr.12405</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Accuracy ; Analysis ; Calcite ; Calcium ; Calcium carbonate ; Calcium carbonates ; Calibration ; Carbonates ; chemical analysis ; Crystals ; Fractionation ; Isotopes ; Lasers ; LA‐ICP‐MS ; Mass spectrometry ; Mass spectroscopy ; method validation ; mineral chemistry ; Reference materials ; Volcanic glass</subject><ispartof>Geostandards and geoanalytical research, 2022-03, Vol.46 (1), p.97-115</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research © 2021 International Association of Geoanalysts</rights><rights>Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research © 2022 International Association of Geoanalysts</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-fa68a4b491b47a8f95eef929351015504a1da141b35d8b2eca384d45a39ed3893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-fa68a4b491b47a8f95eef929351015504a1da141b35d8b2eca384d45a39ed3893</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5805-1770 ; 0000-0003-3322-0870</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Jay M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goemann, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lounejeva, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danyushevsky, Leonid</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Non‐Matrix Matched Reference Materials for the Accurate Analysis of Calcium Carbonate by LA‐ICP‐MS</title><title>Geostandards and geoanalytical research</title><description>Advances in laser ablation inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry have improved analytical precision for mineral analysis, expanding geological interpretations from LA‐ICP‐MS results. However, with improvements in analytical precision, systematic errors from calibration can become more obvious and affect data quality. To improve the accuracy of the LA‐ICP‐MS technique, a fully quantified method is presented for the analysis of minerals with a CaCO3 matrix. An in‐house calcite sample (P‐Cal) was developed with an independently constrained composition and compared with measurement results from LA‐ICP‐MS analysis, generated using multiple spot sizes, laser fluences and calibration methods. For many elements, calibration against NIST SRM 612 as a calibration reference material and USGS GSD‐1G and USGS BCR‐2G as secondary reference materials (calibration B) provided the best accuracy for CaCO3 analysis. Ablation rates and element yield (ICP‐MS signal intensity in counts per second for a given isotope relative to the mass fraction of the respective element) in calcium carbonate closely resembles NIST SRM 612; however, the down‐hole fractionation curves of USGS BCR‐2G (basaltic glass matrix) are a better fit for carbonate. Variations in accuracy for measurements at different spot sizes are negligible compared with the other effects discussed. Additionally, ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments produce a negligible effect on the accuracy of the results for calcium carbonate.
Key Points
Described method provided accurate analysis of calcium carbonate by LA?ICP?MS with 20–60 μm spot sizes.
For many elements, using NIST SRM 612 as the calibrator and USGS GSD?1G and BCR?2G as secondary RMs provided the best accuracy.
Ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments had a negligible effect on the accuracy of results.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Calcite</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Calcium carbonate</subject><subject>Calcium carbonates</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>chemical analysis</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>Fractionation</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>LA‐ICP‐MS</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mass spectroscopy</subject><subject>method validation</subject><subject>mineral chemistry</subject><subject>Reference materials</subject><subject>Volcanic glass</subject><issn>1639-4488</issn><issn>1751-908X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9PwyAYh4nRxDk9-A1IPHnoBgVWODaNziXzT6ZLvBHawtalKxPWaG9-BD-jn0TqvMrlR14enrz5AXCJ0QiHM16t3AjHFLEjMMAJw5FA_PU43CdERJRyfgrOvN8gxKhgeADs0mtoDXywzffn173au-oDhijWuoQLbbTTTaH7iXaVqj001sH9WsO0KFoXpjBtVN35yveWTNVF1W5Dutw2_WvewXkazLPsqfc_n4MTEzT64i-HYHl785LdRfPH6SxL55EijLHIqAlXNKcC5zRR3AimtRGxIAwjzBiiCpcKU5wTVvI81oUinJaUKSJ0SbggQ3B18O6cfWu138uNbV1Y1cs4VIETjFkSqOsDVTjrvdNG7ly1Va6TGMm-Txn6lL99BnZ8YN-rWnf_g3I6XRx-_AB3lnh9</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Thompson, Jennifer A.</creator><creator>Thompson, Jay M.</creator><creator>Goemann, Karsten</creator><creator>Lounejeva, Elena</creator><creator>Cooke, David R.</creator><creator>Danyushevsky, Leonid</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-1770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3322-0870</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Use of Non‐Matrix Matched Reference Materials for the Accurate Analysis of Calcium Carbonate by LA‐ICP‐MS</title><author>Thompson, Jennifer A. ; Thompson, Jay M. ; Goemann, Karsten ; Lounejeva, Elena ; Cooke, David R. ; Danyushevsky, Leonid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-fa68a4b491b47a8f95eef929351015504a1da141b35d8b2eca384d45a39ed3893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Calcite</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Calcium carbonate</topic><topic>Calcium carbonates</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>chemical analysis</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>Fractionation</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>LA‐ICP‐MS</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mass spectroscopy</topic><topic>method validation</topic><topic>mineral chemistry</topic><topic>Reference materials</topic><topic>Volcanic glass</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Jay M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goemann, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lounejeva, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danyushevsky, Leonid</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geostandards and geoanalytical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thompson, Jennifer A.</au><au>Thompson, Jay M.</au><au>Goemann, Karsten</au><au>Lounejeva, Elena</au><au>Cooke, David R.</au><au>Danyushevsky, Leonid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Non‐Matrix Matched Reference Materials for the Accurate Analysis of Calcium Carbonate by LA‐ICP‐MS</atitle><jtitle>Geostandards and geoanalytical research</jtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>97-115</pages><issn>1639-4488</issn><eissn>1751-908X</eissn><abstract>Advances in laser ablation inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry have improved analytical precision for mineral analysis, expanding geological interpretations from LA‐ICP‐MS results. However, with improvements in analytical precision, systematic errors from calibration can become more obvious and affect data quality. To improve the accuracy of the LA‐ICP‐MS technique, a fully quantified method is presented for the analysis of minerals with a CaCO3 matrix. An in‐house calcite sample (P‐Cal) was developed with an independently constrained composition and compared with measurement results from LA‐ICP‐MS analysis, generated using multiple spot sizes, laser fluences and calibration methods. For many elements, calibration against NIST SRM 612 as a calibration reference material and USGS GSD‐1G and USGS BCR‐2G as secondary reference materials (calibration B) provided the best accuracy for CaCO3 analysis. Ablation rates and element yield (ICP‐MS signal intensity in counts per second for a given isotope relative to the mass fraction of the respective element) in calcium carbonate closely resembles NIST SRM 612; however, the down‐hole fractionation curves of USGS BCR‐2G (basaltic glass matrix) are a better fit for carbonate. Variations in accuracy for measurements at different spot sizes are negligible compared with the other effects discussed. Additionally, ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments produce a negligible effect on the accuracy of the results for calcium carbonate.
Key Points
Described method provided accurate analysis of calcium carbonate by LA?ICP?MS with 20–60 μm spot sizes.
For many elements, using NIST SRM 612 as the calibrator and USGS GSD?1G and BCR?2G as secondary RMs provided the best accuracy.
Ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments had a negligible effect on the accuracy of results.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ggr.12405</doi><tpages>115</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-1770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3322-0870</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1639-4488 |
ispartof | Geostandards and geoanalytical research, 2022-03, Vol.46 (1), p.97-115 |
issn | 1639-4488 1751-908X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2639171157 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Ablation Accuracy Analysis Calcite Calcium Calcium carbonate Calcium carbonates Calibration Carbonates chemical analysis Crystals Fractionation Isotopes Lasers LA‐ICP‐MS Mass spectrometry Mass spectroscopy method validation mineral chemistry Reference materials Volcanic glass |
title | Use of Non‐Matrix Matched Reference Materials for the Accurate Analysis of Calcium Carbonate by LA‐ICP‐MS |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T16%3A05%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Non%E2%80%90Matrix%20Matched%20Reference%20Materials%20for%20the%20Accurate%20Analysis%20of%20Calcium%20Carbonate%20by%20LA%E2%80%90ICP%E2%80%90MS&rft.jtitle=Geostandards%20and%20geoanalytical%20research&rft.au=Thompson,%20Jennifer%20A.&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=97-115&rft.issn=1639-4488&rft.eissn=1751-908X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ggr.12405&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2639171157%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-fa68a4b491b47a8f95eef929351015504a1da141b35d8b2eca384d45a39ed3893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2639171157&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |