Loading…

Use of Non‐Matrix Matched Reference Materials for the Accurate Analysis of Calcium Carbonate by LA‐ICP‐MS

Advances in laser ablation inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry have improved analytical precision for mineral analysis, expanding geological interpretations from LA‐ICP‐MS results. However, with improvements in analytical precision, systematic errors from calibration can become more obvious...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geostandards and geoanalytical research 2022-03, Vol.46 (1), p.97-115
Main Authors: Thompson, Jennifer A., Thompson, Jay M., Goemann, Karsten, Lounejeva, Elena, Cooke, David R., Danyushevsky, Leonid
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-fa68a4b491b47a8f95eef929351015504a1da141b35d8b2eca384d45a39ed3893
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-fa68a4b491b47a8f95eef929351015504a1da141b35d8b2eca384d45a39ed3893
container_end_page 115
container_issue 1
container_start_page 97
container_title Geostandards and geoanalytical research
container_volume 46
creator Thompson, Jennifer A.
Thompson, Jay M.
Goemann, Karsten
Lounejeva, Elena
Cooke, David R.
Danyushevsky, Leonid
description Advances in laser ablation inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry have improved analytical precision for mineral analysis, expanding geological interpretations from LA‐ICP‐MS results. However, with improvements in analytical precision, systematic errors from calibration can become more obvious and affect data quality. To improve the accuracy of the LA‐ICP‐MS technique, a fully quantified method is presented for the analysis of minerals with a CaCO3 matrix. An in‐house calcite sample (P‐Cal) was developed with an independently constrained composition and compared with measurement results from LA‐ICP‐MS analysis, generated using multiple spot sizes, laser fluences and calibration methods. For many elements, calibration against NIST SRM 612 as a calibration reference material and USGS GSD‐1G and USGS BCR‐2G as secondary reference materials (calibration B) provided the best accuracy for CaCO3 analysis. Ablation rates and element yield (ICP‐MS signal intensity in counts per second for a given isotope relative to the mass fraction of the respective element) in calcium carbonate closely resembles NIST SRM 612; however, the down‐hole fractionation curves of USGS BCR‐2G (basaltic glass matrix) are a better fit for carbonate. Variations in accuracy for measurements at different spot sizes are negligible compared with the other effects discussed. Additionally, ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments produce a negligible effect on the accuracy of the results for calcium carbonate. Key Points Described method provided accurate analysis of calcium carbonate by LA?ICP?MS with 20–60 μm spot sizes. For many elements, using NIST SRM 612 as the calibrator and USGS GSD?1G and BCR?2G as secondary RMs provided the best accuracy. Ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments had a negligible effect on the accuracy of results.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ggr.12405
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2639171157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2639171157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-fa68a4b491b47a8f95eef929351015504a1da141b35d8b2eca384d45a39ed3893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9PwyAYh4nRxDk9-A1IPHnoBgVWODaNziXzT6ZLvBHawtalKxPWaG9-BD-jn0TqvMrlR14enrz5AXCJ0QiHM16t3AjHFLEjMMAJw5FA_PU43CdERJRyfgrOvN8gxKhgeADs0mtoDXywzffn173au-oDhijWuoQLbbTTTaH7iXaVqj001sH9WsO0KFoXpjBtVN35yveWTNVF1W5Dutw2_WvewXkazLPsqfc_n4MTEzT64i-HYHl785LdRfPH6SxL55EijLHIqAlXNKcC5zRR3AimtRGxIAwjzBiiCpcKU5wTVvI81oUinJaUKSJ0SbggQ3B18O6cfWu138uNbV1Y1cs4VIETjFkSqOsDVTjrvdNG7ly1Va6TGMm-Txn6lL99BnZ8YN-rWnf_g3I6XRx-_AB3lnh9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2639171157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Non‐Matrix Matched Reference Materials for the Accurate Analysis of Calcium Carbonate by LA‐ICP‐MS</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Thompson, Jennifer A. ; Thompson, Jay M. ; Goemann, Karsten ; Lounejeva, Elena ; Cooke, David R. ; Danyushevsky, Leonid</creator><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Jennifer A. ; Thompson, Jay M. ; Goemann, Karsten ; Lounejeva, Elena ; Cooke, David R. ; Danyushevsky, Leonid</creatorcontrib><description>Advances in laser ablation inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry have improved analytical precision for mineral analysis, expanding geological interpretations from LA‐ICP‐MS results. However, with improvements in analytical precision, systematic errors from calibration can become more obvious and affect data quality. To improve the accuracy of the LA‐ICP‐MS technique, a fully quantified method is presented for the analysis of minerals with a CaCO3 matrix. An in‐house calcite sample (P‐Cal) was developed with an independently constrained composition and compared with measurement results from LA‐ICP‐MS analysis, generated using multiple spot sizes, laser fluences and calibration methods. For many elements, calibration against NIST SRM 612 as a calibration reference material and USGS GSD‐1G and USGS BCR‐2G as secondary reference materials (calibration B) provided the best accuracy for CaCO3 analysis. Ablation rates and element yield (ICP‐MS signal intensity in counts per second for a given isotope relative to the mass fraction of the respective element) in calcium carbonate closely resembles NIST SRM 612; however, the down‐hole fractionation curves of USGS BCR‐2G (basaltic glass matrix) are a better fit for carbonate. Variations in accuracy for measurements at different spot sizes are negligible compared with the other effects discussed. Additionally, ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments produce a negligible effect on the accuracy of the results for calcium carbonate. Key Points Described method provided accurate analysis of calcium carbonate by LA?ICP?MS with 20–60 μm spot sizes. For many elements, using NIST SRM 612 as the calibrator and USGS GSD?1G and BCR?2G as secondary RMs provided the best accuracy. Ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments had a negligible effect on the accuracy of results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1639-4488</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-908X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ggr.12405</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Accuracy ; Analysis ; Calcite ; Calcium ; Calcium carbonate ; Calcium carbonates ; Calibration ; Carbonates ; chemical analysis ; Crystals ; Fractionation ; Isotopes ; Lasers ; LA‐ICP‐MS ; Mass spectrometry ; Mass spectroscopy ; method validation ; mineral chemistry ; Reference materials ; Volcanic glass</subject><ispartof>Geostandards and geoanalytical research, 2022-03, Vol.46 (1), p.97-115</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research © 2021 International Association of Geoanalysts</rights><rights>Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research © 2022 International Association of Geoanalysts</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-fa68a4b491b47a8f95eef929351015504a1da141b35d8b2eca384d45a39ed3893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-fa68a4b491b47a8f95eef929351015504a1da141b35d8b2eca384d45a39ed3893</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5805-1770 ; 0000-0003-3322-0870</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Jay M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goemann, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lounejeva, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danyushevsky, Leonid</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Non‐Matrix Matched Reference Materials for the Accurate Analysis of Calcium Carbonate by LA‐ICP‐MS</title><title>Geostandards and geoanalytical research</title><description>Advances in laser ablation inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry have improved analytical precision for mineral analysis, expanding geological interpretations from LA‐ICP‐MS results. However, with improvements in analytical precision, systematic errors from calibration can become more obvious and affect data quality. To improve the accuracy of the LA‐ICP‐MS technique, a fully quantified method is presented for the analysis of minerals with a CaCO3 matrix. An in‐house calcite sample (P‐Cal) was developed with an independently constrained composition and compared with measurement results from LA‐ICP‐MS analysis, generated using multiple spot sizes, laser fluences and calibration methods. For many elements, calibration against NIST SRM 612 as a calibration reference material and USGS GSD‐1G and USGS BCR‐2G as secondary reference materials (calibration B) provided the best accuracy for CaCO3 analysis. Ablation rates and element yield (ICP‐MS signal intensity in counts per second for a given isotope relative to the mass fraction of the respective element) in calcium carbonate closely resembles NIST SRM 612; however, the down‐hole fractionation curves of USGS BCR‐2G (basaltic glass matrix) are a better fit for carbonate. Variations in accuracy for measurements at different spot sizes are negligible compared with the other effects discussed. Additionally, ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments produce a negligible effect on the accuracy of the results for calcium carbonate. Key Points Described method provided accurate analysis of calcium carbonate by LA?ICP?MS with 20–60 μm spot sizes. For many elements, using NIST SRM 612 as the calibrator and USGS GSD?1G and BCR?2G as secondary RMs provided the best accuracy. Ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments had a negligible effect on the accuracy of results.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Calcite</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Calcium carbonate</subject><subject>Calcium carbonates</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>chemical analysis</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>Fractionation</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>LA‐ICP‐MS</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mass spectroscopy</subject><subject>method validation</subject><subject>mineral chemistry</subject><subject>Reference materials</subject><subject>Volcanic glass</subject><issn>1639-4488</issn><issn>1751-908X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9PwyAYh4nRxDk9-A1IPHnoBgVWODaNziXzT6ZLvBHawtalKxPWaG9-BD-jn0TqvMrlR14enrz5AXCJ0QiHM16t3AjHFLEjMMAJw5FA_PU43CdERJRyfgrOvN8gxKhgeADs0mtoDXywzffn173au-oDhijWuoQLbbTTTaH7iXaVqj001sH9WsO0KFoXpjBtVN35yveWTNVF1W5Dutw2_WvewXkazLPsqfc_n4MTEzT64i-HYHl785LdRfPH6SxL55EijLHIqAlXNKcC5zRR3AimtRGxIAwjzBiiCpcKU5wTVvI81oUinJaUKSJ0SbggQ3B18O6cfWu138uNbV1Y1cs4VIETjFkSqOsDVTjrvdNG7ly1Va6TGMm-Txn6lL99BnZ8YN-rWnf_g3I6XRx-_AB3lnh9</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Thompson, Jennifer A.</creator><creator>Thompson, Jay M.</creator><creator>Goemann, Karsten</creator><creator>Lounejeva, Elena</creator><creator>Cooke, David R.</creator><creator>Danyushevsky, Leonid</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-1770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3322-0870</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Use of Non‐Matrix Matched Reference Materials for the Accurate Analysis of Calcium Carbonate by LA‐ICP‐MS</title><author>Thompson, Jennifer A. ; Thompson, Jay M. ; Goemann, Karsten ; Lounejeva, Elena ; Cooke, David R. ; Danyushevsky, Leonid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-fa68a4b491b47a8f95eef929351015504a1da141b35d8b2eca384d45a39ed3893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Calcite</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Calcium carbonate</topic><topic>Calcium carbonates</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>chemical analysis</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>Fractionation</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>LA‐ICP‐MS</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mass spectroscopy</topic><topic>method validation</topic><topic>mineral chemistry</topic><topic>Reference materials</topic><topic>Volcanic glass</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Jay M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goemann, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lounejeva, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danyushevsky, Leonid</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geostandards and geoanalytical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thompson, Jennifer A.</au><au>Thompson, Jay M.</au><au>Goemann, Karsten</au><au>Lounejeva, Elena</au><au>Cooke, David R.</au><au>Danyushevsky, Leonid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Non‐Matrix Matched Reference Materials for the Accurate Analysis of Calcium Carbonate by LA‐ICP‐MS</atitle><jtitle>Geostandards and geoanalytical research</jtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>97-115</pages><issn>1639-4488</issn><eissn>1751-908X</eissn><abstract>Advances in laser ablation inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry have improved analytical precision for mineral analysis, expanding geological interpretations from LA‐ICP‐MS results. However, with improvements in analytical precision, systematic errors from calibration can become more obvious and affect data quality. To improve the accuracy of the LA‐ICP‐MS technique, a fully quantified method is presented for the analysis of minerals with a CaCO3 matrix. An in‐house calcite sample (P‐Cal) was developed with an independently constrained composition and compared with measurement results from LA‐ICP‐MS analysis, generated using multiple spot sizes, laser fluences and calibration methods. For many elements, calibration against NIST SRM 612 as a calibration reference material and USGS GSD‐1G and USGS BCR‐2G as secondary reference materials (calibration B) provided the best accuracy for CaCO3 analysis. Ablation rates and element yield (ICP‐MS signal intensity in counts per second for a given isotope relative to the mass fraction of the respective element) in calcium carbonate closely resembles NIST SRM 612; however, the down‐hole fractionation curves of USGS BCR‐2G (basaltic glass matrix) are a better fit for carbonate. Variations in accuracy for measurements at different spot sizes are negligible compared with the other effects discussed. Additionally, ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments produce a negligible effect on the accuracy of the results for calcium carbonate. Key Points Described method provided accurate analysis of calcium carbonate by LA?ICP?MS with 20–60 μm spot sizes. For many elements, using NIST SRM 612 as the calibrator and USGS GSD?1G and BCR?2G as secondary RMs provided the best accuracy. Ablation characteristics for powdered crystals versus large fragments had a negligible effect on the accuracy of results.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ggr.12405</doi><tpages>115</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-1770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3322-0870</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1639-4488
ispartof Geostandards and geoanalytical research, 2022-03, Vol.46 (1), p.97-115
issn 1639-4488
1751-908X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2639171157
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Ablation
Accuracy
Analysis
Calcite
Calcium
Calcium carbonate
Calcium carbonates
Calibration
Carbonates
chemical analysis
Crystals
Fractionation
Isotopes
Lasers
LA‐ICP‐MS
Mass spectrometry
Mass spectroscopy
method validation
mineral chemistry
Reference materials
Volcanic glass
title Use of Non‐Matrix Matched Reference Materials for the Accurate Analysis of Calcium Carbonate by LA‐ICP‐MS
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T16%3A05%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Non%E2%80%90Matrix%20Matched%20Reference%20Materials%20for%20the%20Accurate%20Analysis%20of%20Calcium%20Carbonate%20by%20LA%E2%80%90ICP%E2%80%90MS&rft.jtitle=Geostandards%20and%20geoanalytical%20research&rft.au=Thompson,%20Jennifer%20A.&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=97-115&rft.issn=1639-4488&rft.eissn=1751-908X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ggr.12405&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2639171157%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-fa68a4b491b47a8f95eef929351015504a1da141b35d8b2eca384d45a39ed3893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2639171157&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true