Loading…

The Good Side of COVID‐19

This commentary focuses on one of the positive impacts of COVID‐19, which was to tie societal inequity to testing in a manner that could motivate the reimagining of our field. That reimagining needs to account for our nation's dramatically changing demographics so that assessment generally, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 2022-03, Vol.41 (1), p.61-63
Main Author: Bennett, Randy E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3516-b70392924bbf733785e2c8892be1bf7e16e7b683bf29ef10b688336f5a87d39e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3516-b70392924bbf733785e2c8892be1bf7e16e7b683bf29ef10b688336f5a87d39e3
container_end_page 63
container_issue 1
container_start_page 61
container_title Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice
container_volume 41
creator Bennett, Randy E.
description This commentary focuses on one of the positive impacts of COVID‐19, which was to tie societal inequity to testing in a manner that could motivate the reimagining of our field. That reimagining needs to account for our nation's dramatically changing demographics so that assessment generally, and standardized testing specifically, better fit the needs of a multicultural society.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/emip.12496
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_COVID</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2639972781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1330098</ericid><sourcerecordid>2625164276</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3516-b70392924bbf733785e2c8892be1bf7e16e7b683bf29ef10b688336f5a87d39e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKA0EQRRtRMEY3bkUYcCdM7Oqa6cdSkhgjkQhGt808qnFC4sQeg2TnJ_iNfokdR1ymNlXcOtwqLmOnwHsQ6oqW1aoHIjFyj3VAJWmMxoh91uEKId4Kh-yoaeacQyqN6rCz2QtFo7ouo8eqpKh2UX_6PB58f36BOWYHLls0dPLXu-zpZjjr38aT6Wjcv57EBaYg41xxNMKIJM-dQlQ6JVFobUROEBQCSSqXGnMnDDngYdaI0qWZViUawi67aH1Xvn5bU_Nu5_Xav4aTVsjwvxJKw25KhEcSoWSgLluq8HXTeHJ25atl5jcWuN1GZLcR2d-IAnzewuSr4h8c3gEi50aHPbT7j2pBmx1Odng_fmg9fwBQ9m3x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2625164276</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Good Side of COVID‐19</title><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Bennett, Randy E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Randy E.</creatorcontrib><description>This commentary focuses on one of the positive impacts of COVID‐19, which was to tie societal inequity to testing in a manner that could motivate the reimagining of our field. That reimagining needs to account for our nation's dramatically changing demographics so that assessment generally, and standardized testing specifically, better fit the needs of a multicultural society.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-3992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/emip.12496</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley</publisher><subject>assessment ; COVID-19 ; equity ; Evaluation Methods ; fairness ; Pandemics ; Social Justice ; Standardized Tests ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2022-03, Vol.41 (1), p.61-63</ispartof><rights>2022 by the National Council on Measurement in Education</rights><rights>2022. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://novel-coronavirus.onlinelibrary.wiley.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3516-b70392924bbf733785e2c8892be1bf7e16e7b683bf29ef10b688336f5a87d39e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3516-b70392924bbf733785e2c8892be1bf7e16e7b683bf29ef10b688336f5a87d39e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2625164276?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,38493,43871</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2625164276?pq-origsite=primo$$EView_record_in_ProQuest$$FView_record_in_$$GProQuest</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1330098$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Randy E.</creatorcontrib><title>The Good Side of COVID‐19</title><title>Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice</title><description>This commentary focuses on one of the positive impacts of COVID‐19, which was to tie societal inequity to testing in a manner that could motivate the reimagining of our field. That reimagining needs to account for our nation's dramatically changing demographics so that assessment generally, and standardized testing specifically, better fit the needs of a multicultural society.</description><subject>assessment</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>equity</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>fairness</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Social Justice</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>0731-1745</issn><issn>1745-3992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKA0EQRRtRMEY3bkUYcCdM7Oqa6cdSkhgjkQhGt808qnFC4sQeg2TnJ_iNfokdR1ymNlXcOtwqLmOnwHsQ6oqW1aoHIjFyj3VAJWmMxoh91uEKId4Kh-yoaeacQyqN6rCz2QtFo7ouo8eqpKh2UX_6PB58f36BOWYHLls0dPLXu-zpZjjr38aT6Wjcv57EBaYg41xxNMKIJM-dQlQ6JVFobUROEBQCSSqXGnMnDDngYdaI0qWZViUawi67aH1Xvn5bU_Nu5_Xav4aTVsjwvxJKw25KhEcSoWSgLluq8HXTeHJ25atl5jcWuN1GZLcR2d-IAnzewuSr4h8c3gEi50aHPbT7j2pBmx1Odng_fmg9fwBQ9m3x</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Bennett, Randy E.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>COVID</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>The Good Side of COVID‐19</title><author>Bennett, Randy E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3516-b70392924bbf733785e2c8892be1bf7e16e7b683bf29ef10b688336f5a87d39e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>assessment</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>equity</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>fairness</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Social Justice</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Randy E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><jtitle>Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bennett, Randy E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1330098</ericid><atitle>The Good Side of COVID‐19</atitle><jtitle>Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice</jtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>61-63</pages><issn>0731-1745</issn><eissn>1745-3992</eissn><abstract>This commentary focuses on one of the positive impacts of COVID‐19, which was to tie societal inequity to testing in a manner that could motivate the reimagining of our field. That reimagining needs to account for our nation's dramatically changing demographics so that assessment generally, and standardized testing specifically, better fit the needs of a multicultural society.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/emip.12496</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0731-1745
ispartof Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2022-03, Vol.41 (1), p.61-63
issn 0731-1745
1745-3992
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2639972781
source Coronavirus Research Database
subjects assessment
COVID-19
equity
Evaluation Methods
fairness
Pandemics
Social Justice
Standardized Tests
Testing
title The Good Side of COVID‐19
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A25%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_COVID&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Good%20Side%20of%20COVID%E2%80%9019&rft.jtitle=Educational%20Measurement:%20Issues%20and%20Practice&rft.au=Bennett,%20Randy%20E.&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=61-63&rft.issn=0731-1745&rft.eissn=1745-3992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/emip.12496&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_COVID%3E2625164276%3C/proquest_COVID%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3516-b70392924bbf733785e2c8892be1bf7e16e7b683bf29ef10b688336f5a87d39e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2625164276&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1330098&rfr_iscdi=true