Expert survey on management of prostate cancer in India: Real-world insights into practice patterns

• Published in: Indian journal of cancer 2022-03, Vol.59 (5), p.19-45
• Main Authors: Bakshi, Ganesh, Tongaonkar, Hemant, Addla, Sanjai, Menon, Santosh, Pradhan, Aditya, Kumar, Abhay, Bapat, Abhijit, Gore, Adwaita, Joshi, Amit, Raja, Anand, Bradoo, Anil, Ramesh, Anita, Kumar, Anup, Agrawal, Archi, Ambekar, Asawari, Joshi, Ashish, Singh, Ashish, Singh, Bhupendra, Dabkara, Deepak, Khadakban, Dhiraj, Gautam, Gagan, Prakash, Gagan, Pahwa, Harvinder, Goel, Hemant, Kulkarni, Jagdeesh, Mishra, Jeeban, Patel, Kaushal, Pal, Mahendra, Chibber, Percy, Tiwari, Priya, Naik, Radheshyam, Raghunath, S, Krishnatry, Rahul, Shimpi, Rajendra, Sharma, Rakesh, Taran, Rakesh, Trivedi, Sameer, Nabar, Sanjay, Surekha, Sanjoy, Kumar, Satish, Sawaimoon, Satyakam, Raina, Shailesh, Narasimha, Srivatsa, Advani, Suresh, Ghouse, Syed, Muddu, Vamshi, Maniar, Vashishth, Venkat, Vivek, Murthy, Vedang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agreements; Prostate cancer; Sharma, Rakesh; Surveys
• ISSN: 0019-509X; 1998-4774
• DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_1145_21

To gain insights on the diverse practice patterns and treatment pathways for prostate cancer (PC) in India, the Urological Cancer Foundation convened the first Indian survey to discuss all aspects of PC, with the objective of guiding clinicians on optimizing management in PC. A modified Delphi method was used, wherein a multidisciplinary panel of oncologists treating PC across India developed a questionnaire related to screening, diagnosis and management of early, locally advanced and metastatic PC and participated in a web-based survey (WBS) (n = 62). An expert committee meeting (CM) (n = 48, subset from WBS) reviewed the ambiguous questions for better comprehension and reanalyzed the evidence to establish a revote for specific questions. The threshold for strong agreement and agreement was ≥90% and ≥75% agreement, respectively. Sixty-two questions were answered in the WBS; in the CM 31 questions were revoted and 4 questions were added. The panelists selected answers based on their best opinion and closest to their practice strategy, not considering financial constraints and access challenges. Of the 66 questions, strong agreement was reached for 17 questions and agreement was achieved for 22 questions. There were heterogeneous responses for 27 questions indicative of variegated management approaches. This is one of the first Indian survey, documenting the diverse clinical practice patterns in the management of PC in India. It aims to provide guidance in the face of technological advances, resource constraints and sparse high-level evidence..