Post release monitoring of rehabilitated gray seal pups over large temporal and spatial scales

Wildlife rescue and rehabilitation is used globally to aid the conservation and welfare of marine species, however, postrelease monitoring is challenging. Here, long‐term, regional postrelease monitoring provides feedback for rehabilitation centers for gray seals (Halichoerus grypus). Data from 1,09...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine mammal science 2022-04, Vol.38 (2), p.539-556
Main Authors: Sayer, Sue, Allen, Rebecca, Bellman, Katie, Beaulieu, Marion, Cooper, Tamara, Dyer, Natalie, Hockin, Kirsten, Hockley, Kate, Jarvis, Dan, Jones, Grace, Oaten, Paul, Waddington, Natalie, Witt, Matthew J., Hawkes, Lucy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aquatic mammals
conservation
Conspecifics
gray seal
Grey seals
Halichoerus
Halichoerus grypus
Monitoring
photo‐identification
post monitoring
postweaning dispersal
Rehabilitation
release
rescue
Seals
Survival
Wildlife
Wildlife conservation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Wildlife rescue and rehabilitation is used globally to aid the conservation and welfare of marine species, however, postrelease monitoring is challenging. Here, long‐term, regional postrelease monitoring provides feedback for rehabilitation centers for gray seals (Halichoerus grypus). Data from 1,094 rehabilitated gray seals over 19 years across the southwest UK were examined to assess postrelease survivorship and the impact of release site on movements and range. Using flipper tags combined with photo identification, 391 rehabilitated seals (35.7%) were resighted, including 188 seals (17.2%) that were traced back to a specific rehabilitated individual with release data. The maximum monitoring duration for a single rehabilitated seal was 17 years, although the majority (151/188; 80%) were sighted for less than 5 years and 80/188 (43%) were resighted for less than a year. Almost all 188 traced rehabilitated seals (n = 176, 93.6%) visited the St Ives Bay Wild Site, yet only half had been released at the adjacent St Ives Bay Release Site. Rehabilitated seals had similar dispersal patterns to their wild conspecifics but over a smaller area. Once released, rehabilitated animals face the same threats as their wild counterparts.
ISSN:0824-0469
1748-7692
DOI:10.1111/mms.12885