Loading…

Diversity Discourse as Racialized and Double-edged: Findings from a National Survey

The keyword diversity is common in contemporary U.S. culture, but it can refer to many forms of difference; questions remain about the meaning and consequences of “diversity,” especially regarding whether this concept is commonly recognized in the American imagination and how diversity discourse rel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sociology of race and ethnicity (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) Calif.), 2022-04, Vol.8 (2), p.315-332
Main Authors: Rajasekar, Neeraj, Aguilar-Champeau, Matthew, Hartmann, Douglas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-d24db8b0b562500c13c1146e48a2ccd5766e96896f15f19c598664d35a7ca86c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-d24db8b0b562500c13c1146e48a2ccd5766e96896f15f19c598664d35a7ca86c3
container_end_page 332
container_issue 2
container_start_page 315
container_title Sociology of race and ethnicity (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)
container_volume 8
creator Rajasekar, Neeraj
Aguilar-Champeau, Matthew
Hartmann, Douglas
description The keyword diversity is common in contemporary U.S. culture, but it can refer to many forms of difference; questions remain about the meaning and consequences of “diversity,” especially regarding whether this concept is commonly recognized in the American imagination and how diversity discourse relates to racial hierarchy in the United States. We use nationally representative survey data to address these questions through a critical race theory lens. First, we conduct factor analysis upon three different items that ask participants to evaluate or characterize “diversity.” These three items are well-predicted by a single latent factor, and this factor proves distinct from possible confounders such as prejudicial attitudes, misgivings about immigration and demographic change, and color-blind racial attitudes. Second, we see that diversity attitudes have a double-edged relationship with other attitudes that relate to racial hierarchy in the United States. Using regressions, we find that positivity toward diversity predicts equitable, non-racist stances on several race-related attitudes such as support for affirmative action and acknowledgment of white privilege. On the contrary, positivity toward diversity is also associated with core cultural ideologies which normalize racial inequality and implicitly denigrate minorities, such as color-blind racism and meritocracy. Thus, our study establishes that a coherent and distinct recognition of diversity exists in the American imagination and that diversity discourse has a double-edged relationship with racial hierarchy.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/23326492221078303
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2646688321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_23326492221078303</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2646688321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-d24db8b0b562500c13c1146e48a2ccd5766e96896f15f19c598664d35a7ca86c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOOY-gG8Bnztzk-Y29U02_8FQcPpc0iQdGV07k3YwP70dU3wQn-7h8juHwyHkEtgUIMuuuRAc05xzDixTgokTMjr8EpQMT3_0AJyTSYxrxhikEgH5iCznfudC9N2ezn00bR-iozrSV228rv2ns1Q3ls7bvqxd4uzK2Rt67xvrm1WkVWg3VNNn3fm20TVd9mHn9hfkrNJ1dJPvOybv93dvs8dk8fLwNLtdJIanvEssT22pSlZK5JIxA8IApOhSpbkxVmaILkeVYwWygtzIXCGmVkidGa3QiDG5OuZuQ_vRu9gV66H_0CMWwxyISgkOAwVHyoQ2xuCqYhv8Rod9Aaw4zFf8mW_wTI-eqFfuN_V_wxcTbm19</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2646688321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diversity Discourse as Racialized and Double-edged: Findings from a National Survey</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Rajasekar, Neeraj ; Aguilar-Champeau, Matthew ; Hartmann, Douglas</creator><creatorcontrib>Rajasekar, Neeraj ; Aguilar-Champeau, Matthew ; Hartmann, Douglas</creatorcontrib><description>The keyword diversity is common in contemporary U.S. culture, but it can refer to many forms of difference; questions remain about the meaning and consequences of “diversity,” especially regarding whether this concept is commonly recognized in the American imagination and how diversity discourse relates to racial hierarchy in the United States. We use nationally representative survey data to address these questions through a critical race theory lens. First, we conduct factor analysis upon three different items that ask participants to evaluate or characterize “diversity.” These three items are well-predicted by a single latent factor, and this factor proves distinct from possible confounders such as prejudicial attitudes, misgivings about immigration and demographic change, and color-blind racial attitudes. Second, we see that diversity attitudes have a double-edged relationship with other attitudes that relate to racial hierarchy in the United States. Using regressions, we find that positivity toward diversity predicts equitable, non-racist stances on several race-related attitudes such as support for affirmative action and acknowledgment of white privilege. On the contrary, positivity toward diversity is also associated with core cultural ideologies which normalize racial inequality and implicitly denigrate minorities, such as color-blind racism and meritocracy. Thus, our study establishes that a coherent and distinct recognition of diversity exists in the American imagination and that diversity discourse has a double-edged relationship with racial hierarchy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2332-6492</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2332-6506</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/23326492221078303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Affirmative action ; Attitudes ; Critical race theory ; Demographic change ; Discourse ; Hierarchies ; Imagination ; Minority groups ; Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism ; Race ; Race relations ; Racial inequality ; Racism ; Social privilege</subject><ispartof>Sociology of race and ethnicity (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2022-04, Vol.8 (2), p.315-332</ispartof><rights>American Sociological Association 2022</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-d24db8b0b562500c13c1146e48a2ccd5766e96896f15f19c598664d35a7ca86c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-d24db8b0b562500c13c1146e48a2ccd5766e96896f15f19c598664d35a7ca86c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6436-2209 ; 0000-0002-9372-8791</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rajasekar, Neeraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar-Champeau, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Douglas</creatorcontrib><title>Diversity Discourse as Racialized and Double-edged: Findings from a National Survey</title><title>Sociology of race and ethnicity (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)</title><description>The keyword diversity is common in contemporary U.S. culture, but it can refer to many forms of difference; questions remain about the meaning and consequences of “diversity,” especially regarding whether this concept is commonly recognized in the American imagination and how diversity discourse relates to racial hierarchy in the United States. We use nationally representative survey data to address these questions through a critical race theory lens. First, we conduct factor analysis upon three different items that ask participants to evaluate or characterize “diversity.” These three items are well-predicted by a single latent factor, and this factor proves distinct from possible confounders such as prejudicial attitudes, misgivings about immigration and demographic change, and color-blind racial attitudes. Second, we see that diversity attitudes have a double-edged relationship with other attitudes that relate to racial hierarchy in the United States. Using regressions, we find that positivity toward diversity predicts equitable, non-racist stances on several race-related attitudes such as support for affirmative action and acknowledgment of white privilege. On the contrary, positivity toward diversity is also associated with core cultural ideologies which normalize racial inequality and implicitly denigrate minorities, such as color-blind racism and meritocracy. Thus, our study establishes that a coherent and distinct recognition of diversity exists in the American imagination and that diversity discourse has a double-edged relationship with racial hierarchy.</description><subject>Affirmative action</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Critical race theory</subject><subject>Demographic change</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Imagination</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Race relations</subject><subject>Racial inequality</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Social privilege</subject><issn>2332-6492</issn><issn>2332-6506</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOOY-gG8Bnztzk-Y29U02_8FQcPpc0iQdGV07k3YwP70dU3wQn-7h8juHwyHkEtgUIMuuuRAc05xzDixTgokTMjr8EpQMT3_0AJyTSYxrxhikEgH5iCznfudC9N2ezn00bR-iozrSV228rv2ns1Q3ls7bvqxd4uzK2Rt67xvrm1WkVWg3VNNn3fm20TVd9mHn9hfkrNJ1dJPvOybv93dvs8dk8fLwNLtdJIanvEssT22pSlZK5JIxA8IApOhSpbkxVmaILkeVYwWygtzIXCGmVkidGa3QiDG5OuZuQ_vRu9gV66H_0CMWwxyISgkOAwVHyoQ2xuCqYhv8Rod9Aaw4zFf8mW_wTI-eqFfuN_V_wxcTbm19</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Rajasekar, Neeraj</creator><creator>Aguilar-Champeau, Matthew</creator><creator>Hartmann, Douglas</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6436-2209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9372-8791</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Diversity Discourse as Racialized and Double-edged: Findings from a National Survey</title><author>Rajasekar, Neeraj ; Aguilar-Champeau, Matthew ; Hartmann, Douglas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-d24db8b0b562500c13c1146e48a2ccd5766e96896f15f19c598664d35a7ca86c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Affirmative action</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Critical race theory</topic><topic>Demographic change</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Imagination</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Race relations</topic><topic>Racial inequality</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Social privilege</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rajasekar, Neeraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar-Champeau, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Douglas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociology of race and ethnicity (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rajasekar, Neeraj</au><au>Aguilar-Champeau, Matthew</au><au>Hartmann, Douglas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diversity Discourse as Racialized and Double-edged: Findings from a National Survey</atitle><jtitle>Sociology of race and ethnicity (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>315-332</pages><issn>2332-6492</issn><eissn>2332-6506</eissn><abstract>The keyword diversity is common in contemporary U.S. culture, but it can refer to many forms of difference; questions remain about the meaning and consequences of “diversity,” especially regarding whether this concept is commonly recognized in the American imagination and how diversity discourse relates to racial hierarchy in the United States. We use nationally representative survey data to address these questions through a critical race theory lens. First, we conduct factor analysis upon three different items that ask participants to evaluate or characterize “diversity.” These three items are well-predicted by a single latent factor, and this factor proves distinct from possible confounders such as prejudicial attitudes, misgivings about immigration and demographic change, and color-blind racial attitudes. Second, we see that diversity attitudes have a double-edged relationship with other attitudes that relate to racial hierarchy in the United States. Using regressions, we find that positivity toward diversity predicts equitable, non-racist stances on several race-related attitudes such as support for affirmative action and acknowledgment of white privilege. On the contrary, positivity toward diversity is also associated with core cultural ideologies which normalize racial inequality and implicitly denigrate minorities, such as color-blind racism and meritocracy. Thus, our study establishes that a coherent and distinct recognition of diversity exists in the American imagination and that diversity discourse has a double-edged relationship with racial hierarchy.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/23326492221078303</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6436-2209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9372-8791</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2332-6492
ispartof Sociology of race and ethnicity (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2022-04, Vol.8 (2), p.315-332
issn 2332-6492
2332-6506
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2646688321
source SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); Sociological Abstracts
subjects Affirmative action
Attitudes
Critical race theory
Demographic change
Discourse
Hierarchies
Imagination
Minority groups
Multiculturalism & pluralism
Race
Race relations
Racial inequality
Racism
Social privilege
title Diversity Discourse as Racialized and Double-edged: Findings from a National Survey
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T07%3A43%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diversity%20Discourse%20as%20Racialized%20and%20Double-edged:%20Findings%20from%20a%20National%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Sociology%20of%20race%20and%20ethnicity%20(Thousand%20Oaks,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Rajasekar,%20Neeraj&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=315-332&rft.issn=2332-6492&rft.eissn=2332-6506&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/23326492221078303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2646688321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-d24db8b0b562500c13c1146e48a2ccd5766e96896f15f19c598664d35a7ca86c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2646688321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_23326492221078303&rfr_iscdi=true