Modeling of streamflow in a 30 km long reach spanning 5 years using OpenFOAM 5.x

• Published in: Geoscientific Model Development 2022-04, Vol.15 (7), p.2917-2947
• Main Authors: Chen, Yunxiang, Bao, Jie, Fang, Yilin, Perkins, William A, Ren, Huiying, Song, Xuehang, Duan, Zhuoran, Hou, Zhangshuan, He, Xiaoliang, Scheibe, Timothy D
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler; Analysis; Bathymetry; bed shear stress; Boundary conditions; Calibration; CFD; Climate; Climate change; Climate prediction; Coefficients; Computational efficiency; Computational fluid dynamics; Computer applications; Computing costs; Computing time; Correlation coefficient; Correlation coefficients; Creeks & streams; Discharge; Doppler sonar; Dynamic pressure; Efficiency; Evaluation; Flow velocity; Fluid dynamics; Fluid mechanics; GEOSCIENCES; Heterogeneity; Human influences; Hydraulic models; Hydraulic roughness; Hydrodynamics; Hydrology; Hydrostatic pressure; Impact prediction; Inflow; large-scale and long-term modeling; Model accuracy; Modelling; OpenFOAM; Optimization; Outflow; Polls & surveys; River corridor; Rivers; Roughness; Sediment transport; Stream discharge; Stream flow; Streambeds; Streamflow; streamwater; Surveying; Surveys; Three dimensional models; Topography; Turbulence models; Variation; Velocity; Velocity distribution; Water depth; Water quality
• ISSN: 1991-9603; 1991-959X; 1991-962X; 1991-9603; 1991-962X
• DOI: 10.5194/gmd-15-2917-2022

Developing accurate and efficient modeling techniques for streamflow at the tens-of-kilometers spatial scale and multi-year temporal scale is critical for evaluating and predicting the impact of climate- and human-induced discharge variations on river hydrodynamics. However, achieving such a goal is challenging because of limited surveys of streambed hydraulic roughness, uncertain boundary condition specifications, and high computational costs. We demonstrate that accurate and efficient three-dimensional (3-D) hydrodynamic modeling of natural rivers at 30 km and 5-year scales is feasible using the following three techniques within OpenFOAM, an open-source computational fluid dynamics platform: (1) generating a distributed hydraulic roughness field for the streambed by integrating water-stage observation data, a rough wall theory, and a local roughness optimization and adjustment strategy; (2) prescribing the boundary condition for the inflow and outflow by integrating precomputed results of a one-dimensional (1-D) hydraulic model with the 3-D model; and (3) reducing computational time using multiple parallel runs constrained by 1-D inflow and outflow boundary conditions. Streamflow modeling for a 30 km long reach in the Columbia River (CR) over 58 months can be achieved in less than 6 d using 1.1 million CPU hours. The mean error between the modeled and the observed water stages for our simulated CR reach ranges from −16 to 9 cm (equivalent to approximately ±7 % relative to the average water depth) at seven locations during most of the years between 2011 and 2019. We can reproduce the velocity distribution measured by the acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP). The correlation coefficients of the depth-averaged velocity between the model and ADCP measurements are in the range between 0.71 and 0.83 at 75 % of the survey cross sections. With the validated model, we further show that the relative importance of dynamic pressure versus hydrostatic pressure varies with discharge variations and topography heterogeneity. Given the model's high accuracy and computational efficiency, the model framework provides a generic approach to evaluate and predict the impacts of climate- and human-induced discharge variations on river hydrodynamics at tens-of-kilometers and decadal scales.