Loading…
Validation methodology for PEM fuel cell three-dimensional simulation
•A comprehensive validation for three-dimensional simulation is implemented.•The combined influence of ohmic and concentration voltage losses is analyzed.•The validation methodology is clarified with details.•The liquid water in gas channel has a double effect on cell performance. For modeling and s...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of heat and mass transfer 2022-06, Vol.189, p.122705, Article 122705 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6649c9be9300dd82da3e60d529050d549b836af2c388303d0b85aa3f048052ab3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6649c9be9300dd82da3e60d529050d549b836af2c388303d0b85aa3f048052ab3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 122705 |
container_title | International journal of heat and mass transfer |
container_volume | 189 |
creator | Xie, Biao Ni, Meng Zhang, Guobin Sheng, Xia Tang, Houwen Xu, Yifan Zhai, Guizhen Jiao, Kui |
description | •A comprehensive validation for three-dimensional simulation is implemented.•The combined influence of ohmic and concentration voltage losses is analyzed.•The validation methodology is clarified with details.•The liquid water in gas channel has a double effect on cell performance.
For modeling and simulation of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell, validation has been an essential and challenging task. This study implements a comprehensive validation including both overall cell performance and local distribution characteristics under different operating conditions with experimental data from two public sources. Polarization curve, cell ohmic resistance, current density distribution and temperature distribution are all involved. A “three dimensional + one dimensional” (“3D+1D”) model is adopted which simplifies part of cell components in order to boost the calculation efficiency. The validation methodology is clarified by listing those undetermined model parameters and analyzing their “accessibility” as well as correlations with the three kinds of voltage losses (activation, ohmic and mass transfer). It is found that the control regions of ohmic voltage loss and concentration voltage loss overlap among a wide current density range, which may lead to misjudgment in the validation process. The details of parameter adjustment are also shared. Simulation results of the two validation tests both obtain decent agreement with the experiments and reflect consistent variation trends as the condition changes. The liquid water in gas channel is proved to have a double effect on cell performance and should be taken into careful consideration especially under low humidification and high current density working conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122705 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2649760139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0017931022001879</els_id><sourcerecordid>2649760139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6649c9be9300dd82da3e60d529050d549b836af2c388303d0b85aa3f048052ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-h4IXL62TpB_JTZH1ixU9qNeQNlM3pW3WpBX239u13rx4GoZ552HmIeSCQkKB5pdNYpsN6qHTIQxe96FGnzBgLKGMFZAdkAUVhYwZFfKQLABoEUtO4ZichNDsW0jzBVm969YaPVjXRx0OG2dc6z52Ue189LJ6iuoR26jCto2GjUeMje2wD1Nat1Gw3dj-rJ6So1q3Ac9-65K83a5eb-7j9fPdw831Oq5SJoY4z1NZyRIlBzBGMKM55mAyJiGbSipLwXNds4oLwYEbKEWmNa8hFZAxXfIlOZ-5W-8-RwyDatzop1uCYhO7yIFyOaWu5lTlXQgea7X1ttN-pyiovTzVqL_y1F6emuVNiMcZgdM3X3aahspiX6GxHqtBGWf_D_sGYHyEMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649760139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation methodology for PEM fuel cell three-dimensional simulation</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Xie, Biao ; Ni, Meng ; Zhang, Guobin ; Sheng, Xia ; Tang, Houwen ; Xu, Yifan ; Zhai, Guizhen ; Jiao, Kui</creator><creatorcontrib>Xie, Biao ; Ni, Meng ; Zhang, Guobin ; Sheng, Xia ; Tang, Houwen ; Xu, Yifan ; Zhai, Guizhen ; Jiao, Kui</creatorcontrib><description>•A comprehensive validation for three-dimensional simulation is implemented.•The combined influence of ohmic and concentration voltage losses is analyzed.•The validation methodology is clarified with details.•The liquid water in gas channel has a double effect on cell performance.
For modeling and simulation of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell, validation has been an essential and challenging task. This study implements a comprehensive validation including both overall cell performance and local distribution characteristics under different operating conditions with experimental data from two public sources. Polarization curve, cell ohmic resistance, current density distribution and temperature distribution are all involved. A “three dimensional + one dimensional” (“3D+1D”) model is adopted which simplifies part of cell components in order to boost the calculation efficiency. The validation methodology is clarified by listing those undetermined model parameters and analyzing their “accessibility” as well as correlations with the three kinds of voltage losses (activation, ohmic and mass transfer). It is found that the control regions of ohmic voltage loss and concentration voltage loss overlap among a wide current density range, which may lead to misjudgment in the validation process. The details of parameter adjustment are also shared. Simulation results of the two validation tests both obtain decent agreement with the experiments and reflect consistent variation trends as the condition changes. The liquid water in gas channel is proved to have a double effect on cell performance and should be taken into careful consideration especially under low humidification and high current density working conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-9310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Channel liquid water ; Current density ; Current density distribution ; Density distribution ; Electric potential ; Fuel cells ; Humidification ; Mass transfer ; Mathematical models ; PEM fuel cell ; Process parameters ; Proton exchange membrane fuel cells ; Simulation ; Temperature distribution ; Three dimensional models ; Three-dimensional simulation ; Validation ; Voltage ; Water</subject><ispartof>International journal of heat and mass transfer, 2022-06, Vol.189, p.122705, Article 122705</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jun 15, 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6649c9be9300dd82da3e60d529050d549b836af2c388303d0b85aa3f048052ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6649c9be9300dd82da3e60d529050d549b836af2c388303d0b85aa3f048052ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5310-4039 ; 0000-0002-4922-4967</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xie, Biao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Guobin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Houwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Guizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Kui</creatorcontrib><title>Validation methodology for PEM fuel cell three-dimensional simulation</title><title>International journal of heat and mass transfer</title><description>•A comprehensive validation for three-dimensional simulation is implemented.•The combined influence of ohmic and concentration voltage losses is analyzed.•The validation methodology is clarified with details.•The liquid water in gas channel has a double effect on cell performance.
For modeling and simulation of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell, validation has been an essential and challenging task. This study implements a comprehensive validation including both overall cell performance and local distribution characteristics under different operating conditions with experimental data from two public sources. Polarization curve, cell ohmic resistance, current density distribution and temperature distribution are all involved. A “three dimensional + one dimensional” (“3D+1D”) model is adopted which simplifies part of cell components in order to boost the calculation efficiency. The validation methodology is clarified by listing those undetermined model parameters and analyzing their “accessibility” as well as correlations with the three kinds of voltage losses (activation, ohmic and mass transfer). It is found that the control regions of ohmic voltage loss and concentration voltage loss overlap among a wide current density range, which may lead to misjudgment in the validation process. The details of parameter adjustment are also shared. Simulation results of the two validation tests both obtain decent agreement with the experiments and reflect consistent variation trends as the condition changes. The liquid water in gas channel is proved to have a double effect on cell performance and should be taken into careful consideration especially under low humidification and high current density working conditions.</description><subject>Channel liquid water</subject><subject>Current density</subject><subject>Current density distribution</subject><subject>Density distribution</subject><subject>Electric potential</subject><subject>Fuel cells</subject><subject>Humidification</subject><subject>Mass transfer</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>PEM fuel cell</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Proton exchange membrane fuel cells</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Temperature distribution</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Three-dimensional simulation</subject><subject>Validation</subject><subject>Voltage</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>0017-9310</issn><issn>1879-2189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-h4IXL62TpB_JTZH1ixU9qNeQNlM3pW3WpBX239u13rx4GoZ552HmIeSCQkKB5pdNYpsN6qHTIQxe96FGnzBgLKGMFZAdkAUVhYwZFfKQLABoEUtO4ZichNDsW0jzBVm969YaPVjXRx0OG2dc6z52Ue189LJ6iuoR26jCto2GjUeMje2wD1Nat1Gw3dj-rJ6So1q3Ac9-65K83a5eb-7j9fPdw831Oq5SJoY4z1NZyRIlBzBGMKM55mAyJiGbSipLwXNds4oLwYEbKEWmNa8hFZAxXfIlOZ-5W-8-RwyDatzop1uCYhO7yIFyOaWu5lTlXQgea7X1ttN-pyiovTzVqL_y1F6emuVNiMcZgdM3X3aahspiX6GxHqtBGWf_D_sGYHyEMQ</recordid><startdate>20220615</startdate><enddate>20220615</enddate><creator>Xie, Biao</creator><creator>Ni, Meng</creator><creator>Zhang, Guobin</creator><creator>Sheng, Xia</creator><creator>Tang, Houwen</creator><creator>Xu, Yifan</creator><creator>Zhai, Guizhen</creator><creator>Jiao, Kui</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5310-4039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4922-4967</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220615</creationdate><title>Validation methodology for PEM fuel cell three-dimensional simulation</title><author>Xie, Biao ; Ni, Meng ; Zhang, Guobin ; Sheng, Xia ; Tang, Houwen ; Xu, Yifan ; Zhai, Guizhen ; Jiao, Kui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6649c9be9300dd82da3e60d529050d549b836af2c388303d0b85aa3f048052ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Channel liquid water</topic><topic>Current density</topic><topic>Current density distribution</topic><topic>Density distribution</topic><topic>Electric potential</topic><topic>Fuel cells</topic><topic>Humidification</topic><topic>Mass transfer</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>PEM fuel cell</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Proton exchange membrane fuel cells</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Temperature distribution</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Three-dimensional simulation</topic><topic>Validation</topic><topic>Voltage</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xie, Biao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Guobin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Houwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Guizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Kui</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>International journal of heat and mass transfer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xie, Biao</au><au>Ni, Meng</au><au>Zhang, Guobin</au><au>Sheng, Xia</au><au>Tang, Houwen</au><au>Xu, Yifan</au><au>Zhai, Guizhen</au><au>Jiao, Kui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation methodology for PEM fuel cell three-dimensional simulation</atitle><jtitle>International journal of heat and mass transfer</jtitle><date>2022-06-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>189</volume><spage>122705</spage><pages>122705-</pages><artnum>122705</artnum><issn>0017-9310</issn><eissn>1879-2189</eissn><abstract>•A comprehensive validation for three-dimensional simulation is implemented.•The combined influence of ohmic and concentration voltage losses is analyzed.•The validation methodology is clarified with details.•The liquid water in gas channel has a double effect on cell performance.
For modeling and simulation of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell, validation has been an essential and challenging task. This study implements a comprehensive validation including both overall cell performance and local distribution characteristics under different operating conditions with experimental data from two public sources. Polarization curve, cell ohmic resistance, current density distribution and temperature distribution are all involved. A “three dimensional + one dimensional” (“3D+1D”) model is adopted which simplifies part of cell components in order to boost the calculation efficiency. The validation methodology is clarified by listing those undetermined model parameters and analyzing their “accessibility” as well as correlations with the three kinds of voltage losses (activation, ohmic and mass transfer). It is found that the control regions of ohmic voltage loss and concentration voltage loss overlap among a wide current density range, which may lead to misjudgment in the validation process. The details of parameter adjustment are also shared. Simulation results of the two validation tests both obtain decent agreement with the experiments and reflect consistent variation trends as the condition changes. The liquid water in gas channel is proved to have a double effect on cell performance and should be taken into careful consideration especially under low humidification and high current density working conditions.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122705</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5310-4039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4922-4967</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-9310 |
ispartof | International journal of heat and mass transfer, 2022-06, Vol.189, p.122705, Article 122705 |
issn | 0017-9310 1879-2189 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2649760139 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Channel liquid water Current density Current density distribution Density distribution Electric potential Fuel cells Humidification Mass transfer Mathematical models PEM fuel cell Process parameters Proton exchange membrane fuel cells Simulation Temperature distribution Three dimensional models Three-dimensional simulation Validation Voltage Water |
title | Validation methodology for PEM fuel cell three-dimensional simulation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A04%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20methodology%20for%20PEM%20fuel%20cell%20three-dimensional%20simulation&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20heat%20and%20mass%20transfer&rft.au=Xie,%20Biao&rft.date=2022-06-15&rft.volume=189&rft.spage=122705&rft.pages=122705-&rft.artnum=122705&rft.issn=0017-9310&rft.eissn=1879-2189&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122705&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2649760139%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6649c9be9300dd82da3e60d529050d549b836af2c388303d0b85aa3f048052ab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649760139&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |