Loading…

Validation methodology for PEM fuel cell three-dimensional simulation

•A comprehensive validation for three-dimensional simulation is implemented.•The combined influence of ohmic and concentration voltage losses is analyzed.•The validation methodology is clarified with details.•The liquid water in gas channel has a double effect on cell performance. For modeling and s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of heat and mass transfer 2022-06, Vol.189, p.122705, Article 122705
Main Authors: Xie, Biao, Ni, Meng, Zhang, Guobin, Sheng, Xia, Tang, Houwen, Xu, Yifan, Zhai, Guizhen, Jiao, Kui
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6649c9be9300dd82da3e60d529050d549b836af2c388303d0b85aa3f048052ab3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6649c9be9300dd82da3e60d529050d549b836af2c388303d0b85aa3f048052ab3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 122705
container_title International journal of heat and mass transfer
container_volume 189
creator Xie, Biao
Ni, Meng
Zhang, Guobin
Sheng, Xia
Tang, Houwen
Xu, Yifan
Zhai, Guizhen
Jiao, Kui
description •A comprehensive validation for three-dimensional simulation is implemented.•The combined influence of ohmic and concentration voltage losses is analyzed.•The validation methodology is clarified with details.•The liquid water in gas channel has a double effect on cell performance. For modeling and simulation of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell, validation has been an essential and challenging task. This study implements a comprehensive validation including both overall cell performance and local distribution characteristics under different operating conditions with experimental data from two public sources. Polarization curve, cell ohmic resistance, current density distribution and temperature distribution are all involved. A “three dimensional + one dimensional” (“3D+1D”) model is adopted which simplifies part of cell components in order to boost the calculation efficiency. The validation methodology is clarified by listing those undetermined model parameters and analyzing their “accessibility” as well as correlations with the three kinds of voltage losses (activation, ohmic and mass transfer). It is found that the control regions of ohmic voltage loss and concentration voltage loss overlap among a wide current density range, which may lead to misjudgment in the validation process. The details of parameter adjustment are also shared. Simulation results of the two validation tests both obtain decent agreement with the experiments and reflect consistent variation trends as the condition changes. The liquid water in gas channel is proved to have a double effect on cell performance and should be taken into careful consideration especially under low humidification and high current density working conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122705
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2649760139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0017931022001879</els_id><sourcerecordid>2649760139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6649c9be9300dd82da3e60d529050d549b836af2c388303d0b85aa3f048052ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-h4IXL62TpB_JTZH1ixU9qNeQNlM3pW3WpBX239u13rx4GoZ552HmIeSCQkKB5pdNYpsN6qHTIQxe96FGnzBgLKGMFZAdkAUVhYwZFfKQLABoEUtO4ZichNDsW0jzBVm969YaPVjXRx0OG2dc6z52Ue189LJ6iuoR26jCto2GjUeMje2wD1Nat1Gw3dj-rJ6So1q3Ac9-65K83a5eb-7j9fPdw831Oq5SJoY4z1NZyRIlBzBGMKM55mAyJiGbSipLwXNds4oLwYEbKEWmNa8hFZAxXfIlOZ-5W-8-RwyDatzop1uCYhO7yIFyOaWu5lTlXQgea7X1ttN-pyiovTzVqL_y1F6emuVNiMcZgdM3X3aahspiX6GxHqtBGWf_D_sGYHyEMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649760139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation methodology for PEM fuel cell three-dimensional simulation</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Xie, Biao ; Ni, Meng ; Zhang, Guobin ; Sheng, Xia ; Tang, Houwen ; Xu, Yifan ; Zhai, Guizhen ; Jiao, Kui</creator><creatorcontrib>Xie, Biao ; Ni, Meng ; Zhang, Guobin ; Sheng, Xia ; Tang, Houwen ; Xu, Yifan ; Zhai, Guizhen ; Jiao, Kui</creatorcontrib><description>•A comprehensive validation for three-dimensional simulation is implemented.•The combined influence of ohmic and concentration voltage losses is analyzed.•The validation methodology is clarified with details.•The liquid water in gas channel has a double effect on cell performance. For modeling and simulation of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell, validation has been an essential and challenging task. This study implements a comprehensive validation including both overall cell performance and local distribution characteristics under different operating conditions with experimental data from two public sources. Polarization curve, cell ohmic resistance, current density distribution and temperature distribution are all involved. A “three dimensional + one dimensional” (“3D+1D”) model is adopted which simplifies part of cell components in order to boost the calculation efficiency. The validation methodology is clarified by listing those undetermined model parameters and analyzing their “accessibility” as well as correlations with the three kinds of voltage losses (activation, ohmic and mass transfer). It is found that the control regions of ohmic voltage loss and concentration voltage loss overlap among a wide current density range, which may lead to misjudgment in the validation process. The details of parameter adjustment are also shared. Simulation results of the two validation tests both obtain decent agreement with the experiments and reflect consistent variation trends as the condition changes. The liquid water in gas channel is proved to have a double effect on cell performance and should be taken into careful consideration especially under low humidification and high current density working conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-9310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Channel liquid water ; Current density ; Current density distribution ; Density distribution ; Electric potential ; Fuel cells ; Humidification ; Mass transfer ; Mathematical models ; PEM fuel cell ; Process parameters ; Proton exchange membrane fuel cells ; Simulation ; Temperature distribution ; Three dimensional models ; Three-dimensional simulation ; Validation ; Voltage ; Water</subject><ispartof>International journal of heat and mass transfer, 2022-06, Vol.189, p.122705, Article 122705</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jun 15, 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6649c9be9300dd82da3e60d529050d549b836af2c388303d0b85aa3f048052ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6649c9be9300dd82da3e60d529050d549b836af2c388303d0b85aa3f048052ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5310-4039 ; 0000-0002-4922-4967</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xie, Biao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Guobin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Houwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Guizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Kui</creatorcontrib><title>Validation methodology for PEM fuel cell three-dimensional simulation</title><title>International journal of heat and mass transfer</title><description>•A comprehensive validation for three-dimensional simulation is implemented.•The combined influence of ohmic and concentration voltage losses is analyzed.•The validation methodology is clarified with details.•The liquid water in gas channel has a double effect on cell performance. For modeling and simulation of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell, validation has been an essential and challenging task. This study implements a comprehensive validation including both overall cell performance and local distribution characteristics under different operating conditions with experimental data from two public sources. Polarization curve, cell ohmic resistance, current density distribution and temperature distribution are all involved. A “three dimensional + one dimensional” (“3D+1D”) model is adopted which simplifies part of cell components in order to boost the calculation efficiency. The validation methodology is clarified by listing those undetermined model parameters and analyzing their “accessibility” as well as correlations with the three kinds of voltage losses (activation, ohmic and mass transfer). It is found that the control regions of ohmic voltage loss and concentration voltage loss overlap among a wide current density range, which may lead to misjudgment in the validation process. The details of parameter adjustment are also shared. Simulation results of the two validation tests both obtain decent agreement with the experiments and reflect consistent variation trends as the condition changes. The liquid water in gas channel is proved to have a double effect on cell performance and should be taken into careful consideration especially under low humidification and high current density working conditions.</description><subject>Channel liquid water</subject><subject>Current density</subject><subject>Current density distribution</subject><subject>Density distribution</subject><subject>Electric potential</subject><subject>Fuel cells</subject><subject>Humidification</subject><subject>Mass transfer</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>PEM fuel cell</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Proton exchange membrane fuel cells</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Temperature distribution</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Three-dimensional simulation</subject><subject>Validation</subject><subject>Voltage</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>0017-9310</issn><issn>1879-2189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-h4IXL62TpB_JTZH1ixU9qNeQNlM3pW3WpBX239u13rx4GoZ552HmIeSCQkKB5pdNYpsN6qHTIQxe96FGnzBgLKGMFZAdkAUVhYwZFfKQLABoEUtO4ZichNDsW0jzBVm969YaPVjXRx0OG2dc6z52Ue189LJ6iuoR26jCto2GjUeMje2wD1Nat1Gw3dj-rJ6So1q3Ac9-65K83a5eb-7j9fPdw831Oq5SJoY4z1NZyRIlBzBGMKM55mAyJiGbSipLwXNds4oLwYEbKEWmNa8hFZAxXfIlOZ-5W-8-RwyDatzop1uCYhO7yIFyOaWu5lTlXQgea7X1ttN-pyiovTzVqL_y1F6emuVNiMcZgdM3X3aahspiX6GxHqtBGWf_D_sGYHyEMQ</recordid><startdate>20220615</startdate><enddate>20220615</enddate><creator>Xie, Biao</creator><creator>Ni, Meng</creator><creator>Zhang, Guobin</creator><creator>Sheng, Xia</creator><creator>Tang, Houwen</creator><creator>Xu, Yifan</creator><creator>Zhai, Guizhen</creator><creator>Jiao, Kui</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5310-4039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4922-4967</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220615</creationdate><title>Validation methodology for PEM fuel cell three-dimensional simulation</title><author>Xie, Biao ; Ni, Meng ; Zhang, Guobin ; Sheng, Xia ; Tang, Houwen ; Xu, Yifan ; Zhai, Guizhen ; Jiao, Kui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6649c9be9300dd82da3e60d529050d549b836af2c388303d0b85aa3f048052ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Channel liquid water</topic><topic>Current density</topic><topic>Current density distribution</topic><topic>Density distribution</topic><topic>Electric potential</topic><topic>Fuel cells</topic><topic>Humidification</topic><topic>Mass transfer</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>PEM fuel cell</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Proton exchange membrane fuel cells</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Temperature distribution</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Three-dimensional simulation</topic><topic>Validation</topic><topic>Voltage</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xie, Biao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Guobin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Houwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Guizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Kui</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>International journal of heat and mass transfer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xie, Biao</au><au>Ni, Meng</au><au>Zhang, Guobin</au><au>Sheng, Xia</au><au>Tang, Houwen</au><au>Xu, Yifan</au><au>Zhai, Guizhen</au><au>Jiao, Kui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation methodology for PEM fuel cell three-dimensional simulation</atitle><jtitle>International journal of heat and mass transfer</jtitle><date>2022-06-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>189</volume><spage>122705</spage><pages>122705-</pages><artnum>122705</artnum><issn>0017-9310</issn><eissn>1879-2189</eissn><abstract>•A comprehensive validation for three-dimensional simulation is implemented.•The combined influence of ohmic and concentration voltage losses is analyzed.•The validation methodology is clarified with details.•The liquid water in gas channel has a double effect on cell performance. For modeling and simulation of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell, validation has been an essential and challenging task. This study implements a comprehensive validation including both overall cell performance and local distribution characteristics under different operating conditions with experimental data from two public sources. Polarization curve, cell ohmic resistance, current density distribution and temperature distribution are all involved. A “three dimensional + one dimensional” (“3D+1D”) model is adopted which simplifies part of cell components in order to boost the calculation efficiency. The validation methodology is clarified by listing those undetermined model parameters and analyzing their “accessibility” as well as correlations with the three kinds of voltage losses (activation, ohmic and mass transfer). It is found that the control regions of ohmic voltage loss and concentration voltage loss overlap among a wide current density range, which may lead to misjudgment in the validation process. The details of parameter adjustment are also shared. Simulation results of the two validation tests both obtain decent agreement with the experiments and reflect consistent variation trends as the condition changes. The liquid water in gas channel is proved to have a double effect on cell performance and should be taken into careful consideration especially under low humidification and high current density working conditions.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122705</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5310-4039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4922-4967</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-9310
ispartof International journal of heat and mass transfer, 2022-06, Vol.189, p.122705, Article 122705
issn 0017-9310
1879-2189
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2649760139
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Channel liquid water
Current density
Current density distribution
Density distribution
Electric potential
Fuel cells
Humidification
Mass transfer
Mathematical models
PEM fuel cell
Process parameters
Proton exchange membrane fuel cells
Simulation
Temperature distribution
Three dimensional models
Three-dimensional simulation
Validation
Voltage
Water
title Validation methodology for PEM fuel cell three-dimensional simulation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A04%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20methodology%20for%20PEM%20fuel%20cell%20three-dimensional%20simulation&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20heat%20and%20mass%20transfer&rft.au=Xie,%20Biao&rft.date=2022-06-15&rft.volume=189&rft.spage=122705&rft.pages=122705-&rft.artnum=122705&rft.issn=0017-9310&rft.eissn=1879-2189&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122705&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2649760139%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-6649c9be9300dd82da3e60d529050d549b836af2c388303d0b85aa3f048052ab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649760139&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true