Loading…
Prioritizing and overcoming biomass energy barriers: Application of AHP and G-TOPSIS approaches
•Prioritized biomass energy barriers using modified Delphi approach.•Weights of major barriers and sub-barriers were determined using the AHP approach.•Technological & infrastructural" barrier is the top-ranked major barrier.•Technological complexity ranks highest among all sub-barriers.•G-...
Saved in:
Published in: | Technological forecasting & social change 2022-04, Vol.177, p.121524, Article 121524 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-abe58f10e5e9cc873dd156aaa4e378735ddc28b651a111b7938986bb7d66cb2b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-abe58f10e5e9cc873dd156aaa4e378735ddc28b651a111b7938986bb7d66cb2b3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 121524 |
container_title | Technological forecasting & social change |
container_volume | 177 |
creator | Irfan, Muhammad Elavarasan, Rajvikram Madurai Ahmad, Munir Mohsin, Muhammad Dagar, Vishal Hao, Yu |
description | •Prioritized biomass energy barriers using modified Delphi approach.•Weights of major barriers and sub-barriers were determined using the AHP approach.•Technological & infrastructural" barrier is the top-ranked major barrier.•Technological complexity ranks highest among all sub-barriers.•G-TOPSIS results show that enhancing R&D activities is the best alternative solution.
India strives to utilize optimum biomass potential to overcome the prevailing energy crises. However, a variety of barriers are hindering the development of the biomass industry. Some scholars have considered these barriers in previous studies; however, it has been largely unknown the extent to which these barriers obstruct the Indian biomass industry. To address this issue, this study systematically prioritizes barriers based on their importance. A total of twenty-four barriers are recognized and classified into five major categories using an extensive literature review and a modified Delphi approach. The rankings of major barriers and sub-barriers are determined based on weight allocation using the Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP). The Grey Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (G-TOPSIS) is used to rank the alternative solutions to these barriers. The research results specify that the "technological & infrastructural" barrier is the top-ranked barrier among major categories, followed by economic & financial, political & institutional, cultural & behavioral, and meteorological barriers. The overall ranking indicates that "technological complexity" ranks highest among all sub-barriers across all categories. It has been posited that "enhancing research and development (R&D) activities" would prove to be the best alternative solution. Based on study findings, it is recommended that policymakers, stakeholders, and government institutions should work in a consistent and coherent way to make sure the availability of adequate subsidies, increase feedstock supply and provide training to local inhabitants for the sake of accelerating the currently crawling progress of the Indian biomass industry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121524 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2656306925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0040162522000567</els_id><sourcerecordid>2656306925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-abe58f10e5e9cc873dd156aaa4e378735ddc28b651a111b7938986bb7d66cb2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFLwzAUhYMoOKd_QQI-dyZpk7Y-OYZug8EGm88hSW-3lK2pSTeYv97O6rNPlwP3nHPvh9AjJSNKqHiuRi2YXek8jBhhbEQZ5Sy5QgOapXHEOcmv0YCQhERUMH6L7kKoCCFpnIkBkitvnbet_bL1Fqu6wO4E3rjDRWrrDioEDDX47Rlr5b0FH17wuGn21qjWuhq7Eo9nqx_rNNosV-v5Gqum8U6ZHYR7dFOqfYCH3zlEH-9vm8ksWiyn88l4EZmE522kNPCspAQ45MZ0dxcF5UIplUCcdpIXhWGZFpwqSqlO8zjLM6F1WghhNNPxED31uV3x5xFCKyt39HVXKZngIiYiZ7zbEv2W8S4ED6VsvD0of5aUyAtMWck_mPICU_YwO-Nrb4Tuh1MHQQZjoTZQWA-mlYWz_0V8A5AngPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2656306925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prioritizing and overcoming biomass energy barriers: Application of AHP and G-TOPSIS approaches</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Irfan, Muhammad ; Elavarasan, Rajvikram Madurai ; Ahmad, Munir ; Mohsin, Muhammad ; Dagar, Vishal ; Hao, Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Irfan, Muhammad ; Elavarasan, Rajvikram Madurai ; Ahmad, Munir ; Mohsin, Muhammad ; Dagar, Vishal ; Hao, Yu</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[•Prioritized biomass energy barriers using modified Delphi approach.•Weights of major barriers and sub-barriers were determined using the AHP approach.•Technological & infrastructural" barrier is the top-ranked major barrier.•Technological complexity ranks highest among all sub-barriers.•G-TOPSIS results show that enhancing R&D activities is the best alternative solution.
India strives to utilize optimum biomass potential to overcome the prevailing energy crises. However, a variety of barriers are hindering the development of the biomass industry. Some scholars have considered these barriers in previous studies; however, it has been largely unknown the extent to which these barriers obstruct the Indian biomass industry. To address this issue, this study systematically prioritizes barriers based on their importance. A total of twenty-four barriers are recognized and classified into five major categories using an extensive literature review and a modified Delphi approach. The rankings of major barriers and sub-barriers are determined based on weight allocation using the Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP). The Grey Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (G-TOPSIS) is used to rank the alternative solutions to these barriers. The research results specify that the "technological & infrastructural" barrier is the top-ranked barrier among major categories, followed by economic & financial, political & institutional, cultural & behavioral, and meteorological barriers. The overall ranking indicates that "technological complexity" ranks highest among all sub-barriers across all categories. It has been posited that "enhancing research and development (R&D) activities" would prove to be the best alternative solution. Based on study findings, it is recommended that policymakers, stakeholders, and government institutions should work in a consistent and coherent way to make sure the availability of adequate subsidies, increase feedstock supply and provide training to local inhabitants for the sake of accelerating the currently crawling progress of the Indian biomass industry.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-1625</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>AHP ; Analytic hierarchy process ; Barriers ; Biofuels ; Biomass energy ; Biomass energy production ; Categories ; Classification ; Delphi method ; Energy development ; G-TOPSIS ; India ; Literature reviews ; Modified delphi ; Policy making ; R&D ; Ratings & rankings ; Research & development</subject><ispartof>Technological forecasting & social change, 2022-04, Vol.177, p.121524, Article 121524</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-abe58f10e5e9cc873dd156aaa4e378735ddc28b651a111b7938986bb7d66cb2b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-abe58f10e5e9cc873dd156aaa4e378735ddc28b651a111b7938986bb7d66cb2b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Irfan, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elavarasan, Rajvikram Madurai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Munir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohsin, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagar, Vishal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Yu</creatorcontrib><title>Prioritizing and overcoming biomass energy barriers: Application of AHP and G-TOPSIS approaches</title><title>Technological forecasting & social change</title><description><![CDATA[•Prioritized biomass energy barriers using modified Delphi approach.•Weights of major barriers and sub-barriers were determined using the AHP approach.•Technological & infrastructural" barrier is the top-ranked major barrier.•Technological complexity ranks highest among all sub-barriers.•G-TOPSIS results show that enhancing R&D activities is the best alternative solution.
India strives to utilize optimum biomass potential to overcome the prevailing energy crises. However, a variety of barriers are hindering the development of the biomass industry. Some scholars have considered these barriers in previous studies; however, it has been largely unknown the extent to which these barriers obstruct the Indian biomass industry. To address this issue, this study systematically prioritizes barriers based on their importance. A total of twenty-four barriers are recognized and classified into five major categories using an extensive literature review and a modified Delphi approach. The rankings of major barriers and sub-barriers are determined based on weight allocation using the Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP). The Grey Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (G-TOPSIS) is used to rank the alternative solutions to these barriers. The research results specify that the "technological & infrastructural" barrier is the top-ranked barrier among major categories, followed by economic & financial, political & institutional, cultural & behavioral, and meteorological barriers. The overall ranking indicates that "technological complexity" ranks highest among all sub-barriers across all categories. It has been posited that "enhancing research and development (R&D) activities" would prove to be the best alternative solution. Based on study findings, it is recommended that policymakers, stakeholders, and government institutions should work in a consistent and coherent way to make sure the availability of adequate subsidies, increase feedstock supply and provide training to local inhabitants for the sake of accelerating the currently crawling progress of the Indian biomass industry.]]></description><subject>AHP</subject><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biomass energy</subject><subject>Biomass energy production</subject><subject>Categories</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Energy development</subject><subject>G-TOPSIS</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Modified delphi</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><issn>0040-1625</issn><issn>1873-5509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFFLwzAUhYMoOKd_QQI-dyZpk7Y-OYZug8EGm88hSW-3lK2pSTeYv97O6rNPlwP3nHPvh9AjJSNKqHiuRi2YXek8jBhhbEQZ5Sy5QgOapXHEOcmv0YCQhERUMH6L7kKoCCFpnIkBkitvnbet_bL1Fqu6wO4E3rjDRWrrDioEDDX47Rlr5b0FH17wuGn21qjWuhq7Eo9nqx_rNNosV-v5Gqum8U6ZHYR7dFOqfYCH3zlEH-9vm8ksWiyn88l4EZmE522kNPCspAQ45MZ0dxcF5UIplUCcdpIXhWGZFpwqSqlO8zjLM6F1WghhNNPxED31uV3x5xFCKyt39HVXKZngIiYiZ7zbEv2W8S4ED6VsvD0of5aUyAtMWck_mPICU_YwO-Nrb4Tuh1MHQQZjoTZQWA-mlYWz_0V8A5AngPk</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Irfan, Muhammad</creator><creator>Elavarasan, Rajvikram Madurai</creator><creator>Ahmad, Munir</creator><creator>Mohsin, Muhammad</creator><creator>Dagar, Vishal</creator><creator>Hao, Yu</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Prioritizing and overcoming biomass energy barriers: Application of AHP and G-TOPSIS approaches</title><author>Irfan, Muhammad ; Elavarasan, Rajvikram Madurai ; Ahmad, Munir ; Mohsin, Muhammad ; Dagar, Vishal ; Hao, Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-abe58f10e5e9cc873dd156aaa4e378735ddc28b651a111b7938986bb7d66cb2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>AHP</topic><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biomass energy</topic><topic>Biomass energy production</topic><topic>Categories</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Energy development</topic><topic>G-TOPSIS</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Modified delphi</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Irfan, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elavarasan, Rajvikram Madurai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Munir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohsin, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagar, Vishal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Technological forecasting & social change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Irfan, Muhammad</au><au>Elavarasan, Rajvikram Madurai</au><au>Ahmad, Munir</au><au>Mohsin, Muhammad</au><au>Dagar, Vishal</au><au>Hao, Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prioritizing and overcoming biomass energy barriers: Application of AHP and G-TOPSIS approaches</atitle><jtitle>Technological forecasting & social change</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>177</volume><spage>121524</spage><pages>121524-</pages><artnum>121524</artnum><issn>0040-1625</issn><eissn>1873-5509</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[•Prioritized biomass energy barriers using modified Delphi approach.•Weights of major barriers and sub-barriers were determined using the AHP approach.•Technological & infrastructural" barrier is the top-ranked major barrier.•Technological complexity ranks highest among all sub-barriers.•G-TOPSIS results show that enhancing R&D activities is the best alternative solution.
India strives to utilize optimum biomass potential to overcome the prevailing energy crises. However, a variety of barriers are hindering the development of the biomass industry. Some scholars have considered these barriers in previous studies; however, it has been largely unknown the extent to which these barriers obstruct the Indian biomass industry. To address this issue, this study systematically prioritizes barriers based on their importance. A total of twenty-four barriers are recognized and classified into five major categories using an extensive literature review and a modified Delphi approach. The rankings of major barriers and sub-barriers are determined based on weight allocation using the Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP). The Grey Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (G-TOPSIS) is used to rank the alternative solutions to these barriers. The research results specify that the "technological & infrastructural" barrier is the top-ranked barrier among major categories, followed by economic & financial, political & institutional, cultural & behavioral, and meteorological barriers. The overall ranking indicates that "technological complexity" ranks highest among all sub-barriers across all categories. It has been posited that "enhancing research and development (R&D) activities" would prove to be the best alternative solution. Based on study findings, it is recommended that policymakers, stakeholders, and government institutions should work in a consistent and coherent way to make sure the availability of adequate subsidies, increase feedstock supply and provide training to local inhabitants for the sake of accelerating the currently crawling progress of the Indian biomass industry.]]></abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121524</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-1625 |
ispartof | Technological forecasting & social change, 2022-04, Vol.177, p.121524, Article 121524 |
issn | 0040-1625 1873-5509 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2656306925 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | AHP Analytic hierarchy process Barriers Biofuels Biomass energy Biomass energy production Categories Classification Delphi method Energy development G-TOPSIS India Literature reviews Modified delphi Policy making R&D Ratings & rankings Research & development |
title | Prioritizing and overcoming biomass energy barriers: Application of AHP and G-TOPSIS approaches |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T12%3A46%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prioritizing%20and%20overcoming%20biomass%20energy%20barriers:%20Application%20of%20AHP%20and%20G-TOPSIS%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Technological%20forecasting%20&%20social%20change&rft.au=Irfan,%20Muhammad&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=177&rft.spage=121524&rft.pages=121524-&rft.artnum=121524&rft.issn=0040-1625&rft.eissn=1873-5509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121524&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2656306925%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-abe58f10e5e9cc873dd156aaa4e378735ddc28b651a111b7938986bb7d66cb2b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2656306925&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |