Loading…

Effects of rain on CFOSAT scatterometer measurements

The Ku-band scatterometer onboard China France Oceanography Satellite (CFOSAT) observes the sea surface with two conically scanning fan beams. Compared to the prior Ku-band pencil beam scatterometers, this innovative observing mechanism provides more independent backscatter measurements at varying i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote sensing of environment 2022-06, Vol.274, p.113015, Article 113015
Main Authors: Zhao, Xiaokang, Lin, Wenming, Portabella, Marcos, Wang, Zhixiong, He, Yijun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f39fba9a237714b8b943c4ff8ab305f2cbdd463120208a2500e7fab3ddc8092e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f39fba9a237714b8b943c4ff8ab305f2cbdd463120208a2500e7fab3ddc8092e3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 113015
container_title Remote sensing of environment
container_volume 274
creator Zhao, Xiaokang
Lin, Wenming
Portabella, Marcos
Wang, Zhixiong
He, Yijun
description The Ku-band scatterometer onboard China France Oceanography Satellite (CFOSAT) observes the sea surface with two conically scanning fan beams. Compared to the prior Ku-band pencil beam scatterometers, this innovative observing mechanism provides more independent backscatter measurements at varying incidence and azimuth angles, as such it brings challenges for the sea surface wind inversion, particularly under rainy conditions. In this paper, the rain effects on the CFOSAT SCATterometer (CSCAT) are investigated using the collocated numerical weather prediction (NWP) wind data and the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) microwave imager (GMI) rain data. Similar to the prior Ku-band or C-band scatterometers, the sensitivity of CSCAT radar backscatter to rain substantially varies with wind speed, radar polarization and incidence angle. However, due to the complex observation geometries, rain effects on the CSCAT retrieved winds is more complex than that of prior scatterometers, which may lead to a remarkable underestimation of CSCAT wind speed at high winds and heavy rain conditions. A simple simulation method is used to clarify the relation between the retrieved wind speed and the dependency of radar rain effects on the incidence angle. It is found that the backscatter measurements at low incidence angles, which are generally underestimated at high winds and heavy rainy conditions, have a larger influence on the wind inversion minimization, leading to much lower retrieved wind speeds than those of ECMWF and the pencil beam scatterometer (e.g., Haiyang-2B scattometer). Under low and moderate rain conditions though, a more compensated effect between low and high incidence angle measurements is found, leading to generally unbiased CSCAT high winds, in contrast to the generally underestimated pencil-beam scatterometer winds. •High winds under heavy rain are underestimated by the CFOSAT scatterometer (CSCAT).•The dependency of rain effect on the incidence angle is explored for CSCAT.•Rain effect on the CSCAT σ0is more complex than that of prior scatteormeters.•A simulation method is used to investigate the rain impact on the wind retrieval.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113015
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2658289158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0034425722001298</els_id><sourcerecordid>2658289158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f39fba9a237714b8b943c4ff8ab305f2cbdd463120208a2500e7fab3ddc8092e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwAbhV4tzi_GmTitM0bQNp0g6Mc5SmjtSKNiPpkPj2ZCpnLvbB79nPP0IeKRQUaPXcFyFiwYCxglIOtLwiC6pknYMEcU0WAFzkgpXyltzF2ENSKEkXRGycQzvFzLssmG7M_Jitt4f31TGL1kwTBj9gqtmAJp4DDjhO8Z7cOPMZ8eGvL8nHdnNcv-b7w-5tvdrnlldqyh2vXWNqw7iUVDSqqQW3wjllGg6lY7ZpW1FxmlKDMqwEQOnSrG2tgpohX5Knee8p-K8zxkn3_hzGdFKzqlRM1emLpKKzygYfY0CnT6EbTPjRFPQFju51gqMvcPQMJ3leZg-m-N8dBh1th6PFtgsJh25994_7F1anaxY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2658289158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of rain on CFOSAT scatterometer measurements</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhao, Xiaokang ; Lin, Wenming ; Portabella, Marcos ; Wang, Zhixiong ; He, Yijun</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaokang ; Lin, Wenming ; Portabella, Marcos ; Wang, Zhixiong ; He, Yijun</creatorcontrib><description>The Ku-band scatterometer onboard China France Oceanography Satellite (CFOSAT) observes the sea surface with two conically scanning fan beams. Compared to the prior Ku-band pencil beam scatterometers, this innovative observing mechanism provides more independent backscatter measurements at varying incidence and azimuth angles, as such it brings challenges for the sea surface wind inversion, particularly under rainy conditions. In this paper, the rain effects on the CFOSAT SCATterometer (CSCAT) are investigated using the collocated numerical weather prediction (NWP) wind data and the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) microwave imager (GMI) rain data. Similar to the prior Ku-band or C-band scatterometers, the sensitivity of CSCAT radar backscatter to rain substantially varies with wind speed, radar polarization and incidence angle. However, due to the complex observation geometries, rain effects on the CSCAT retrieved winds is more complex than that of prior scatterometers, which may lead to a remarkable underestimation of CSCAT wind speed at high winds and heavy rain conditions. A simple simulation method is used to clarify the relation between the retrieved wind speed and the dependency of radar rain effects on the incidence angle. It is found that the backscatter measurements at low incidence angles, which are generally underestimated at high winds and heavy rainy conditions, have a larger influence on the wind inversion minimization, leading to much lower retrieved wind speeds than those of ECMWF and the pencil beam scatterometer (e.g., Haiyang-2B scattometer). Under low and moderate rain conditions though, a more compensated effect between low and high incidence angle measurements is found, leading to generally unbiased CSCAT high winds, in contrast to the generally underestimated pencil-beam scatterometer winds. •High winds under heavy rain are underestimated by the CFOSAT scatterometer (CSCAT).•The dependency of rain effect on the incidence angle is explored for CSCAT.•Rain effect on the CSCAT σ0is more complex than that of prior scatteormeters.•A simulation method is used to investigate the rain impact on the wind retrieval.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-4257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Backscatter ; Backscattering ; C band ; CFOSAT ; Global precipitation ; Heavy rainfall ; Incidence angle ; Inversion ; Numerical prediction ; Numerical weather forecasting ; Oceanography ; Pencil beams ; Radar ; Radar backscatter ; Rain ; Rain effects ; Rainfall ; Rainfall simulators ; Satellite observation ; Scatterometer ; Scatterometers ; Superhigh frequencies ; Surface wind ; Weather forecasting ; Wind ; Wind data ; Wind quality ; Wind speed</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing of environment, 2022-06, Vol.274, p.113015, Article 113015</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jun 1, 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f39fba9a237714b8b943c4ff8ab305f2cbdd463120208a2500e7fab3ddc8092e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f39fba9a237714b8b943c4ff8ab305f2cbdd463120208a2500e7fab3ddc8092e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaokang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Wenming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portabella, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhixiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yijun</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of rain on CFOSAT scatterometer measurements</title><title>Remote sensing of environment</title><description>The Ku-band scatterometer onboard China France Oceanography Satellite (CFOSAT) observes the sea surface with two conically scanning fan beams. Compared to the prior Ku-band pencil beam scatterometers, this innovative observing mechanism provides more independent backscatter measurements at varying incidence and azimuth angles, as such it brings challenges for the sea surface wind inversion, particularly under rainy conditions. In this paper, the rain effects on the CFOSAT SCATterometer (CSCAT) are investigated using the collocated numerical weather prediction (NWP) wind data and the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) microwave imager (GMI) rain data. Similar to the prior Ku-band or C-band scatterometers, the sensitivity of CSCAT radar backscatter to rain substantially varies with wind speed, radar polarization and incidence angle. However, due to the complex observation geometries, rain effects on the CSCAT retrieved winds is more complex than that of prior scatterometers, which may lead to a remarkable underestimation of CSCAT wind speed at high winds and heavy rain conditions. A simple simulation method is used to clarify the relation between the retrieved wind speed and the dependency of radar rain effects on the incidence angle. It is found that the backscatter measurements at low incidence angles, which are generally underestimated at high winds and heavy rainy conditions, have a larger influence on the wind inversion minimization, leading to much lower retrieved wind speeds than those of ECMWF and the pencil beam scatterometer (e.g., Haiyang-2B scattometer). Under low and moderate rain conditions though, a more compensated effect between low and high incidence angle measurements is found, leading to generally unbiased CSCAT high winds, in contrast to the generally underestimated pencil-beam scatterometer winds. •High winds under heavy rain are underestimated by the CFOSAT scatterometer (CSCAT).•The dependency of rain effect on the incidence angle is explored for CSCAT.•Rain effect on the CSCAT σ0is more complex than that of prior scatteormeters.•A simulation method is used to investigate the rain impact on the wind retrieval.</description><subject>Backscatter</subject><subject>Backscattering</subject><subject>C band</subject><subject>CFOSAT</subject><subject>Global precipitation</subject><subject>Heavy rainfall</subject><subject>Incidence angle</subject><subject>Inversion</subject><subject>Numerical prediction</subject><subject>Numerical weather forecasting</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Pencil beams</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Radar backscatter</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rain effects</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall simulators</subject><subject>Satellite observation</subject><subject>Scatterometer</subject><subject>Scatterometers</subject><subject>Superhigh frequencies</subject><subject>Surface wind</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Wind data</subject><subject>Wind quality</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><issn>0034-4257</issn><issn>1879-0704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwAbhV4tzi_GmTitM0bQNp0g6Mc5SmjtSKNiPpkPj2ZCpnLvbB79nPP0IeKRQUaPXcFyFiwYCxglIOtLwiC6pknYMEcU0WAFzkgpXyltzF2ENSKEkXRGycQzvFzLssmG7M_Jitt4f31TGL1kwTBj9gqtmAJp4DDjhO8Z7cOPMZ8eGvL8nHdnNcv-b7w-5tvdrnlldqyh2vXWNqw7iUVDSqqQW3wjllGg6lY7ZpW1FxmlKDMqwEQOnSrG2tgpohX5Knee8p-K8zxkn3_hzGdFKzqlRM1emLpKKzygYfY0CnT6EbTPjRFPQFju51gqMvcPQMJ3leZg-m-N8dBh1th6PFtgsJh25994_7F1anaxY</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Zhao, Xiaokang</creator><creator>Lin, Wenming</creator><creator>Portabella, Marcos</creator><creator>Wang, Zhixiong</creator><creator>He, Yijun</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Effects of rain on CFOSAT scatterometer measurements</title><author>Zhao, Xiaokang ; Lin, Wenming ; Portabella, Marcos ; Wang, Zhixiong ; He, Yijun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f39fba9a237714b8b943c4ff8ab305f2cbdd463120208a2500e7fab3ddc8092e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Backscatter</topic><topic>Backscattering</topic><topic>C band</topic><topic>CFOSAT</topic><topic>Global precipitation</topic><topic>Heavy rainfall</topic><topic>Incidence angle</topic><topic>Inversion</topic><topic>Numerical prediction</topic><topic>Numerical weather forecasting</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Pencil beams</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Radar backscatter</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rain effects</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall simulators</topic><topic>Satellite observation</topic><topic>Scatterometer</topic><topic>Scatterometers</topic><topic>Superhigh frequencies</topic><topic>Surface wind</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Wind data</topic><topic>Wind quality</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaokang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Wenming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portabella, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhixiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yijun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Xiaokang</au><au>Lin, Wenming</au><au>Portabella, Marcos</au><au>Wang, Zhixiong</au><au>He, Yijun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of rain on CFOSAT scatterometer measurements</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>274</volume><spage>113015</spage><pages>113015-</pages><artnum>113015</artnum><issn>0034-4257</issn><eissn>1879-0704</eissn><abstract>The Ku-band scatterometer onboard China France Oceanography Satellite (CFOSAT) observes the sea surface with two conically scanning fan beams. Compared to the prior Ku-band pencil beam scatterometers, this innovative observing mechanism provides more independent backscatter measurements at varying incidence and azimuth angles, as such it brings challenges for the sea surface wind inversion, particularly under rainy conditions. In this paper, the rain effects on the CFOSAT SCATterometer (CSCAT) are investigated using the collocated numerical weather prediction (NWP) wind data and the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) microwave imager (GMI) rain data. Similar to the prior Ku-band or C-band scatterometers, the sensitivity of CSCAT radar backscatter to rain substantially varies with wind speed, radar polarization and incidence angle. However, due to the complex observation geometries, rain effects on the CSCAT retrieved winds is more complex than that of prior scatterometers, which may lead to a remarkable underestimation of CSCAT wind speed at high winds and heavy rain conditions. A simple simulation method is used to clarify the relation between the retrieved wind speed and the dependency of radar rain effects on the incidence angle. It is found that the backscatter measurements at low incidence angles, which are generally underestimated at high winds and heavy rainy conditions, have a larger influence on the wind inversion minimization, leading to much lower retrieved wind speeds than those of ECMWF and the pencil beam scatterometer (e.g., Haiyang-2B scattometer). Under low and moderate rain conditions though, a more compensated effect between low and high incidence angle measurements is found, leading to generally unbiased CSCAT high winds, in contrast to the generally underestimated pencil-beam scatterometer winds. •High winds under heavy rain are underestimated by the CFOSAT scatterometer (CSCAT).•The dependency of rain effect on the incidence angle is explored for CSCAT.•Rain effect on the CSCAT σ0is more complex than that of prior scatteormeters.•A simulation method is used to investigate the rain impact on the wind retrieval.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rse.2022.113015</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-4257
ispartof Remote sensing of environment, 2022-06, Vol.274, p.113015, Article 113015
issn 0034-4257
1879-0704
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2658289158
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Backscatter
Backscattering
C band
CFOSAT
Global precipitation
Heavy rainfall
Incidence angle
Inversion
Numerical prediction
Numerical weather forecasting
Oceanography
Pencil beams
Radar
Radar backscatter
Rain
Rain effects
Rainfall
Rainfall simulators
Satellite observation
Scatterometer
Scatterometers
Superhigh frequencies
Surface wind
Weather forecasting
Wind
Wind data
Wind quality
Wind speed
title Effects of rain on CFOSAT scatterometer measurements
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T09%3A38%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20rain%20on%20CFOSAT%20scatterometer%20measurements&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20of%20environment&rft.au=Zhao,%20Xiaokang&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=274&rft.spage=113015&rft.pages=113015-&rft.artnum=113015&rft.issn=0034-4257&rft.eissn=1879-0704&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2658289158%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f39fba9a237714b8b943c4ff8ab305f2cbdd463120208a2500e7fab3ddc8092e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2658289158&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true