Perceived threats and the trade-off between security and human rights

It is well established that exposure to threats causes citizens to prioritize security considerations and accept restrictions on civil liberties. Yet most studies on which these findings are based come from longstanding democracies and do not distinguish among types of threat. This article argues th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of peace research 2022-05, Vol.59 (3), p.367-381
Main Author: Radnitz, Scott
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anxiety
Authoritarianism
Civil liberties
Human rights
Human security
Multiculturalism & pluralism
National security
Political institutions
Psychological processes
Threats
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:It is well established that exposure to threats causes citizens to prioritize security considerations and accept restrictions on civil liberties. Yet most studies on which these findings are based come from longstanding democracies and do not distinguish among types of threat. This article argues that the effects of internal and external threats are conditional on regime type. It tests the argument via an experiment embedded in an original survey of Georgia and Kazakhstan, countries that vary in regime type but face similar levels of threat. In authoritarian Kazakhstan, there is no difference in attitudes by threat type, whereas external threats produce greater support for security than internal ones in more pluralistic Georgia. Contrary to previous research, security preferences are not mediated by the triggering of anxiety. The findings contribute to literatures on the link between threats and authoritarian preferences, the rally-round-the-flag effect, and the ways that political institutions mediate psychological processes.
ISSN:0022-3433
1460-3578
DOI:10.1177/00223433211020809