Loading…

Audiobooks, Print, and Comprehension: What We Know and What We Need to Know

The purpose of this review was to examine the effects that audiobook listening and print reading have on comprehension performance and the role that learner characteristics, text features, and contextual factors play in reported outcomes. The review, which included 32 documents, covered elementary,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Educational psychology review 2022-06, Vol.34 (2), p.677-715
Main Authors: Singh, Anisha, Alexander, Patricia A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ed0782f305ce7c95d6962c85b1724b70d8b4b23ccdd85ccf230a47b908500cd13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ed0782f305ce7c95d6962c85b1724b70d8b4b23ccdd85ccf230a47b908500cd13
container_end_page 715
container_issue 2
container_start_page 677
container_title Educational psychology review
container_volume 34
creator Singh, Anisha
Alexander, Patricia A.
description The purpose of this review was to examine the effects that audiobook listening and print reading have on comprehension performance and the role that learner characteristics, text features, and contextual factors play in reported outcomes. The review, which included 32 documents, covered elementary, secondary, and college students who processed narrative and expository texts aurally via audiobooks and visually on paper or screen. Analysis showed that the majority of studies were conducted in classrooms where audiobooks were co-presented with printed texts. It was also shown that audiobooks by themselves tended to facilitate comprehension better than print when students were younger ( g  = .28 to g  = .58). For identified populations, such as struggling readers and EFLs, the co-presentation of audiobooks with print proved better for comprehension than print alone ( g  =  . 32 to g  = 1.67). There was a paucity of studies that directly compared audiobook listening to print reading; targeted older students with no identified learning needs; or focused on exposition. Implications for instructional practice and future research are forwarded, based on the patterns that emerged from this review.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10648-021-09653-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2659824761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A706506904</galeid><ericid>EJ1334752</ericid><sourcerecordid>A706506904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ed0782f305ce7c95d6962c85b1724b70d8b4b23ccdd85ccf230a47b908500cd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1PwjAUhhejiYj-AROTJd4yPP3evCMEvyDqhQbumq3tYAgttiPGf-9gftyZXrQ5z3nOad4oOkfQRwDiKiDgNE0AowQyzkiCD6IOYoIkhPDZYfMGConAfHYcnYSwBIBMUNKJxoOtrlzh3Fvoxc--snUvzq2Oh2698WZhbKicvY6ni7yOpyYeW_ex5z-FR2N0XLs9OI2OynwVzNn33Y1eb0Yvw7tk8nR7PxxMEkVSqBOjQaS4JMCUESpjmmccq5QVSGBaCNBpQQtMlNI6ZUqVmEBORZFBygCURqQbXbZzN969b02o5dJtvW1WSsxZlmIq-K6r33bN85WRlS1d7XPVHG3WlXLWlFVTHwjgDHgGtBFwKyjvQvCmlBtfrXP_KRHIXcqyTVk2Kct9yhI30kUrGV-pX2H0gAihgu04aXlomJ0b__fXf6Z-Af8Rhn0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2659824761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Audiobooks, Print, and Comprehension: What We Know and What We Need to Know</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Singh, Anisha ; Alexander, Patricia A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Anisha ; Alexander, Patricia A.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this review was to examine the effects that audiobook listening and print reading have on comprehension performance and the role that learner characteristics, text features, and contextual factors play in reported outcomes. The review, which included 32 documents, covered elementary, secondary, and college students who processed narrative and expository texts aurally via audiobooks and visually on paper or screen. Analysis showed that the majority of studies were conducted in classrooms where audiobooks were co-presented with printed texts. It was also shown that audiobooks by themselves tended to facilitate comprehension better than print when students were younger ( g  = .28 to g  = .58). For identified populations, such as struggling readers and EFLs, the co-presentation of audiobooks with print proved better for comprehension than print alone ( g  =  . 32 to g  = 1.67). There was a paucity of studies that directly compared audiobook listening to print reading; targeted older students with no identified learning needs; or focused on exposition. Implications for instructional practice and future research are forwarded, based on the patterns that emerged from this review.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-726X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-336X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10648-021-09653-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Age Differences ; Audio Books ; Audiobooks ; Child and School Psychology ; College Students ; Education ; Educational Needs ; Educational Psychology ; Elementary School Students ; Learning and Instruction ; Listening ; Listening comprehension ; Printed Materials ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading Difficulties ; Reading Materials ; Review Article ; Secondary School Students ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Educational psychology review, 2022-06, Vol.34 (2), p.677-715</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ed0782f305ce7c95d6962c85b1724b70d8b4b23ccdd85ccf230a47b908500cd13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ed0782f305ce7c95d6962c85b1724b70d8b4b23ccdd85ccf230a47b908500cd13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4405-5612 ; 0000-0001-7060-2582</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2659824761/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2659824761?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,27924,27925,33611,33877,43733,43880,74221,74397</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1334752$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Anisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Patricia A.</creatorcontrib><title>Audiobooks, Print, and Comprehension: What We Know and What We Need to Know</title><title>Educational psychology review</title><addtitle>Educ Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>The purpose of this review was to examine the effects that audiobook listening and print reading have on comprehension performance and the role that learner characteristics, text features, and contextual factors play in reported outcomes. The review, which included 32 documents, covered elementary, secondary, and college students who processed narrative and expository texts aurally via audiobooks and visually on paper or screen. Analysis showed that the majority of studies were conducted in classrooms where audiobooks were co-presented with printed texts. It was also shown that audiobooks by themselves tended to facilitate comprehension better than print when students were younger ( g  = .28 to g  = .58). For identified populations, such as struggling readers and EFLs, the co-presentation of audiobooks with print proved better for comprehension than print alone ( g  =  . 32 to g  = 1.67). There was a paucity of studies that directly compared audiobook listening to print reading; targeted older students with no identified learning needs; or focused on exposition. Implications for instructional practice and future research are forwarded, based on the patterns that emerged from this review.</description><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Audio Books</subject><subject>Audiobooks</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Needs</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>Listening comprehension</subject><subject>Printed Materials</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Difficulties</subject><subject>Reading Materials</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Secondary School Students</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>1040-726X</issn><issn>1573-336X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1PwjAUhhejiYj-AROTJd4yPP3evCMEvyDqhQbumq3tYAgttiPGf-9gftyZXrQ5z3nOad4oOkfQRwDiKiDgNE0AowQyzkiCD6IOYoIkhPDZYfMGConAfHYcnYSwBIBMUNKJxoOtrlzh3Fvoxc--snUvzq2Oh2698WZhbKicvY6ni7yOpyYeW_ex5z-FR2N0XLs9OI2OynwVzNn33Y1eb0Yvw7tk8nR7PxxMEkVSqBOjQaS4JMCUESpjmmccq5QVSGBaCNBpQQtMlNI6ZUqVmEBORZFBygCURqQbXbZzN969b02o5dJtvW1WSsxZlmIq-K6r33bN85WRlS1d7XPVHG3WlXLWlFVTHwjgDHgGtBFwKyjvQvCmlBtfrXP_KRHIXcqyTVk2Kct9yhI30kUrGV-pX2H0gAihgu04aXlomJ0b__fXf6Z-Af8Rhn0</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Singh, Anisha</creator><creator>Alexander, Patricia A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4405-5612</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7060-2582</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Audiobooks, Print, and Comprehension: What We Know and What We Need to Know</title><author>Singh, Anisha ; Alexander, Patricia A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ed0782f305ce7c95d6962c85b1724b70d8b4b23ccdd85ccf230a47b908500cd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Audio Books</topic><topic>Audiobooks</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Needs</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>Listening comprehension</topic><topic>Printed Materials</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Difficulties</topic><topic>Reading Materials</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Secondary School Students</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Anisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Patricia A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Educational psychology review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Anisha</au><au>Alexander, Patricia A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1334752</ericid><atitle>Audiobooks, Print, and Comprehension: What We Know and What We Need to Know</atitle><jtitle>Educational psychology review</jtitle><stitle>Educ Psychol Rev</stitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>677</spage><epage>715</epage><pages>677-715</pages><issn>1040-726X</issn><eissn>1573-336X</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this review was to examine the effects that audiobook listening and print reading have on comprehension performance and the role that learner characteristics, text features, and contextual factors play in reported outcomes. The review, which included 32 documents, covered elementary, secondary, and college students who processed narrative and expository texts aurally via audiobooks and visually on paper or screen. Analysis showed that the majority of studies were conducted in classrooms where audiobooks were co-presented with printed texts. It was also shown that audiobooks by themselves tended to facilitate comprehension better than print when students were younger ( g  = .28 to g  = .58). For identified populations, such as struggling readers and EFLs, the co-presentation of audiobooks with print proved better for comprehension than print alone ( g  =  . 32 to g  = 1.67). There was a paucity of studies that directly compared audiobook listening to print reading; targeted older students with no identified learning needs; or focused on exposition. Implications for instructional practice and future research are forwarded, based on the patterns that emerged from this review.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10648-021-09653-2</doi><tpages>39</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4405-5612</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7060-2582</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-726X
ispartof Educational psychology review, 2022-06, Vol.34 (2), p.677-715
issn 1040-726X
1573-336X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2659824761
source Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; ERIC; Education Collection
subjects Age Differences
Audio Books
Audiobooks
Child and School Psychology
College Students
Education
Educational Needs
Educational Psychology
Elementary School Students
Learning and Instruction
Listening
Listening comprehension
Printed Materials
Reading Comprehension
Reading Difficulties
Reading Materials
Review Article
Secondary School Students
Teaching Methods
title Audiobooks, Print, and Comprehension: What We Know and What We Need to Know
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T04%3A49%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Audiobooks,%20Print,%20and%20Comprehension:%20What%20We%20Know%20and%20What%20We%20Need%20to%20Know&rft.jtitle=Educational%20psychology%20review&rft.au=Singh,%20Anisha&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=677&rft.epage=715&rft.pages=677-715&rft.issn=1040-726X&rft.eissn=1573-336X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10648-021-09653-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA706506904%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-ed0782f305ce7c95d6962c85b1724b70d8b4b23ccdd85ccf230a47b908500cd13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2659824761&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A706506904&rft_ericid=EJ1334752&rfr_iscdi=true