Loading…

Reintegrative shaming in international relations: NATO’s military intervention in Libya

The existing scholarship in international relations (IR) has tended to underrate the conceptual implications of different types of shaming. This article advances a new terminology of shaming. Drawing from social and criminal psychology, the article distinguishes the social distancing effects of sham...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of international relations and development 2022-06, Vol.25 (2), p.497-522
Main Author:	Koschut, Simon
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	Area Studies Armed forces Community Conflict resolution Consciousness Criminal psychology Development Studies International Relations Military intervention Original Article Political Science and International Relations Political Science and International Studies Psychology Social distancing Social order Social psychology Terminology
Citations:	Items that this one cites Items that cite this one
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6168567aaed75aa3ec4d023de1e9944a19d3908d34d524a57a5da67377dae7373
cites	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6168567aaed75aa3ec4d023de1e9944a19d3908d34d524a57a5da67377dae7373
container_end_page	522
container_issue	2
container_start_page	497
container_title	Journal of international relations and development
container_volume	25
creator	Koschut, Simon
description	The existing scholarship in international relations (IR) has tended to underrate the conceptual implications of different types of shaming. This article advances a new terminology of shaming. Drawing from social and criminal psychology, the article distinguishes the social distancing effects of shaming that is disintegrative from the community-building effects of shaming that is reintegrative. This is important because it offers additional ways of seeing how it may be equally important to shed light on the multifaceted role and multiple effects of shaming in maintaining social order in world politics. The main argument raised here is that reintegrative shaming – shaming, which is followed by efforts to reintegrate the offender back into the community – is central to peaceful conflict resolution in a security community. This argument is empirically illustrated by the case of NATO’s military intervention in Libya.
doi_str_mv	10.1057/s41268-021-00249-5
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2659826165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2659826165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6168567aaed75aa3ec4d023de1e9944a19d3908d34d524a57a5da67377dae7373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4GrAdTS_k8RdKf5BsSB14Spcm7SmTGdqMhW68zV8PZ_ETEdw5-oeLt-593AQOqfkkhKprpKgrNSYMIoJYcJgeYAGVGqKqdHkMGtBNC6zPkYnKa0IoYoTPUAvTz7UrV9GaMOHL9IbrEO9LEJddOtY53VTQ1VEX-1lui4eR7Pp9-dXKtahCi3EXY9--LoDOuskvO7gFB0toEr-7HcO0fPtzWx8jyfTu4fxaILnnJoWl7TUslQA3ikJwP1cOMK489QbIwRQ47gh2nHhJBMgFUgHpeJKOfB58CG66O9uYvO-9am1q2abg1fJslIazfIHmSnWU_PYpBT9wm5iWOfwlhLbVWj7Cm2u0O4rtJ2J96aU4Xrp49_pf1w_epx1ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2659826165</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reintegrative shaming in international relations: NATO’s military intervention in Libya</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Nexis UK</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Koschut, Simon</creator><creatorcontrib>Koschut, Simon</creatorcontrib><description>The existing scholarship in international relations (IR) has tended to underrate the conceptual implications of different types of shaming. This article advances a new terminology of shaming. Drawing from social and criminal psychology, the article distinguishes the social distancing effects of shaming that is disintegrative from the community-building effects of shaming that is reintegrative. This is important because it offers additional ways of seeing how it may be equally important to shed light on the multifaceted role and multiple effects of shaming in maintaining social order in world politics. The main argument raised here is that reintegrative shaming – shaming, which is followed by efforts to reintegrate the offender back into the community – is central to peaceful conflict resolution in a security community. This argument is empirically illustrated by the case of NATO’s military intervention in Libya.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1408-6980</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1581-1980</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41268-021-00249-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Area Studies ; Armed forces ; Community ; Conflict resolution ; Consciousness ; Criminal psychology ; Development Studies ; International Relations ; Military intervention ; Original Article ; Political Science and International Relations ; Political Science and International Studies ; Psychology ; Social distancing ; Social order ; Social psychology ; Terminology</subject><ispartof>Journal of international relations and development, 2022-06, Vol.25 (2), p.497-522</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2021</rights><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6168567aaed75aa3ec4d023de1e9944a19d3908d34d524a57a5da67377dae7373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6168567aaed75aa3ec4d023de1e9944a19d3908d34d524a57a5da67377dae7373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2659826165/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2659826165?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12823,12825,21365,21372,27320,27900,27901,33199,33587,33750,33961,43708,43923,74191,74437</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koschut, Simon</creatorcontrib><title>Reintegrative shaming in international relations: NATO’s military intervention in Libya</title><title>Journal of international relations and development</title><addtitle>J Int Relat Dev</addtitle><description>The existing scholarship in international relations (IR) has tended to underrate the conceptual implications of different types of shaming. This article advances a new terminology of shaming. Drawing from social and criminal psychology, the article distinguishes the social distancing effects of shaming that is disintegrative from the community-building effects of shaming that is reintegrative. This is important because it offers additional ways of seeing how it may be equally important to shed light on the multifaceted role and multiple effects of shaming in maintaining social order in world politics. The main argument raised here is that reintegrative shaming – shaming, which is followed by efforts to reintegrate the offender back into the community – is central to peaceful conflict resolution in a security community. This argument is empirically illustrated by the case of NATO’s military intervention in Libya.</description><subject>Area Studies</subject><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Conflict resolution</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Criminal psychology</subject><subject>Development Studies</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>Military intervention</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><subject>Political Science and International Studies</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social distancing</subject><subject>Social order</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><issn>1408-6980</issn><issn>1581-1980</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4GrAdTS_k8RdKf5BsSB14Spcm7SmTGdqMhW68zV8PZ_ETEdw5-oeLt-593AQOqfkkhKprpKgrNSYMIoJYcJgeYAGVGqKqdHkMGtBNC6zPkYnKa0IoYoTPUAvTz7UrV9GaMOHL9IbrEO9LEJddOtY53VTQ1VEX-1lui4eR7Pp9-dXKtahCi3EXY9--LoDOuskvO7gFB0toEr-7HcO0fPtzWx8jyfTu4fxaILnnJoWl7TUslQA3ikJwP1cOMK489QbIwRQ47gh2nHhJBMgFUgHpeJKOfB58CG66O9uYvO-9am1q2abg1fJslIazfIHmSnWU_PYpBT9wm5iWOfwlhLbVWj7Cm2u0O4rtJ2J96aU4Xrp49_pf1w_epx1ng</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Koschut, Simon</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Reintegrative shaming in international relations: NATO’s military intervention in Libya</title><author>Koschut, Simon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6168567aaed75aa3ec4d023de1e9944a19d3908d34d524a57a5da67377dae7373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Area Studies</topic><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Conflict resolution</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Criminal psychology</topic><topic>Development Studies</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>Military intervention</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><topic>Political Science and International Studies</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social distancing</topic><topic>Social order</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koschut, Simon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of international relations and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koschut, Simon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reintegrative shaming in international relations: NATO’s military intervention in Libya</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international relations and development</jtitle><stitle>J Int Relat Dev</stitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>497</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>497-522</pages><issn>1408-6980</issn><eissn>1581-1980</eissn><abstract>The existing scholarship in international relations (IR) has tended to underrate the conceptual implications of different types of shaming. This article advances a new terminology of shaming. Drawing from social and criminal psychology, the article distinguishes the social distancing effects of shaming that is disintegrative from the community-building effects of shaming that is reintegrative. This is important because it offers additional ways of seeing how it may be equally important to shed light on the multifaceted role and multiple effects of shaming in maintaining social order in world politics. The main argument raised here is that reintegrative shaming – shaming, which is followed by efforts to reintegrate the offender back into the community – is central to peaceful conflict resolution in a security community. This argument is empirically illustrated by the case of NATO’s military intervention in Libya.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/s41268-021-00249-5</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1408-6980
ispartof	Journal of international relations and development, 2022-06, Vol.25 (2), p.497-522
issn	1408-6980 1581-1980
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_journals_2659826165
source	International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Nexis UK; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Springer Nature; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects	Area Studies Armed forces Community Conflict resolution Consciousness Criminal psychology Development Studies International Relations Military intervention Original Article Political Science and International Relations Political Science and International Studies Psychology Social distancing Social order Social psychology Terminology
title	Reintegrative shaming in international relations: NATO’s military intervention in Libya
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T06%3A26%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reintegrative%20shaming%20in%20international%20relations:%20NATO%E2%80%99s%20military%20intervention%20in%20Libya&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20relations%20and%20development&rft.au=Koschut,%20Simon&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=497&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=497-522&rft.issn=1408-6980&rft.eissn=1581-1980&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41268-021-00249-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2659826165%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6168567aaed75aa3ec4d023de1e9944a19d3908d34d524a57a5da67377dae7373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2659826165&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true