Predicting Vertical LNAPL Distribution in the Subsurface under the Fluctuating Water Table Effect

The present study proposes a methodology for predicting the vertical light nonaqueous‐phase liquids (LNAPLs) distribution within an aquifer by considering the influence of water table fluctuations. The LNAPL distribution is predicted by combining (1) information on air/LNAPL and LNAPL/water interfac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ground water monitoring & remediation 2022-03, Vol.42 (2), p.47-58
Main Authors: Boumaiza, Lamine, Chesnaux, Romain, Walter, Julien, Lenhard, Robert J., Hassanizadeh, Seyed M., Dokou, Zoi, Alazaiza, Motasem Y.D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aeration zone
Aquifers
Distribution
Field tests
Fluctuations
Groundwater
Groundwater table
Liquids
Methodology
Methods
Observation wells
Soil
Thickness
Unsaturated soils
Vadose water
Vertical distribution
Water monitoring
Water table
Water table fluctuations
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The present study proposes a methodology for predicting the vertical light nonaqueous‐phase liquids (LNAPLs) distribution within an aquifer by considering the influence of water table fluctuations. The LNAPL distribution is predicted by combining (1) information on air/LNAPL and LNAPL/water interface elevations with (2) the initial elevation of the water table without LNAPL effect. Data used in the present study were collected during groundwater monitoring undertaken over a period of 4 months at a LNAPL‐impacted observation well. In this study, the water table fluctuations raised the free LNAPL in the subsurface to an elevation of 206.63 m, while the lowest elevation was 205.70 m, forming a thickness of 0.93 m of LNAPL‐impacted soil. Results show that the apparent LNAPL thickness in the observation well is found to be three times greater than the actual free LNAPL thickness in soil; a finding that agrees with previous studies reporting that apparent LNAPL thickness in observation wells typically exceeds the free LNAPL thickness within soil by a factor estimated to range between 2 and 10. The present study provides insights concerning the transient variation of LNAPL distribution within the subsurface and highlights the capability of the proposed methodology to mathematically predict the actual LNAPL thickness in the subsurface, without the need to conduct laborious field tests. Practitioners can use the proposed methodology to determine by how much the water table should be lowered, through pumping, to isolate the LNAPL‐impacted soil within the unsaturated zone, which can then be subjected to in situ vadose zone remedial treatment.
ISSN:1069-3629
1745-6592
DOI:10.1111/gwmr.12497