Loading…
ACADEMIC FREEDOM – RHETORIC OR REALITY?
Academic freedom is a concept that has a particular significance in a University, not least in a University, which, uniquely in a British context, prides itself on its independence from the State. My interest in academic freedom was sparked by a set of instructions received in this instance from the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Denning law journal 2012-11, Vol.22 (1), p.117-141 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-7a3e677a1a21c9bacb115d866369d5628c9918c8f6feaa4ab68364b452c3614c3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 141 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 117 |
container_title | Denning law journal |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Beloff QC, Michael J |
description | Academic freedom is a concept that has a particular significance in a University, not least in a University, which, uniquely in a British context, prides itself on its independence from the State. My interest in academic freedom was sparked by a set of instructions received in this instance from the Government of Hong Kong. The issue in the prospective litigation was relatively simple. The Department of Education had planned some reforms. As is no more unusual in Hong Kong than it is in England, the proposals met with vocal opposition from certain academics. A senior civil servant telephoned the head of the faculty of the Hong Kong institution of Education, the focus of the controversy and – it was asserted and indeed found by a Commission of Inquiry (“the Commission”) established to investigate the affair – suggested that the turbulent teachers be disciplined. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5750/dlj.v22i1.356 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2661689218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2661689218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-7a3e677a1a21c9bacb115d866369d5628c9918c8f6feaa4ab68364b452c3614c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMFKw0AURQdRsFaX7gOuXCTOe5N5M7OSkKY20BIIdeFqmEwSaKmmJlZw5z_4h36J0bq6cDncC4exa-CRVJLf1btt9I64gUhIOmET5LEKUZE8ZROOZEIwiOfsYhi2nMekCCfsNkmTWbbK02BeZtmsWAXfn19BucjWRTmWRRmUWbLM10_3l-ysdbuhufrPKXucZ-t0ES6LhzxNlqEH4DpUTjSklAOH4E3lfAUga00kyNSSUHtjQHvdUts4F7uKtKC4iiV6QRB7MWU3x919370emuHNbrtD_zJeWiQC0gZBj1R4pHzfDUPftHbfb55d_2GB218bdrRh_2zY0Yb4AYvTTjM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2661689218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ACADEMIC FREEDOM – RHETORIC OR REALITY?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Beloff QC, Michael J</creator><creatorcontrib>Beloff QC, Michael J</creatorcontrib><description>Academic freedom is a concept that has a particular significance in a University, not least in a University, which, uniquely in a British context, prides itself on its independence from the State. My interest in academic freedom was sparked by a set of instructions received in this instance from the Government of Hong Kong. The issue in the prospective litigation was relatively simple. The Department of Education had planned some reforms. As is no more unusual in Hong Kong than it is in England, the proposals met with vocal opposition from certain academics. A senior civil servant telephoned the head of the faculty of the Hong Kong institution of Education, the focus of the controversy and – it was asserted and indeed found by a Commission of Inquiry (“the Commission”) established to investigate the affair – suggested that the turbulent teachers be disciplined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-1922</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-2765</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5750/dlj.v22i1.356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Buckingham: The University of Buckingham Press</publisher><subject>Academic freedom ; Litigation</subject><ispartof>Denning law journal, 2012-11, Vol.22 (1), p.117-141</ispartof><rights>2012. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-7a3e677a1a21c9bacb115d866369d5628c9918c8f6feaa4ab68364b452c3614c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2661689218?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,25731,27901,27902,36037,36989,44339,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beloff QC, Michael J</creatorcontrib><title>ACADEMIC FREEDOM – RHETORIC OR REALITY?</title><title>Denning law journal</title><description>Academic freedom is a concept that has a particular significance in a University, not least in a University, which, uniquely in a British context, prides itself on its independence from the State. My interest in academic freedom was sparked by a set of instructions received in this instance from the Government of Hong Kong. The issue in the prospective litigation was relatively simple. The Department of Education had planned some reforms. As is no more unusual in Hong Kong than it is in England, the proposals met with vocal opposition from certain academics. A senior civil servant telephoned the head of the faculty of the Hong Kong institution of Education, the focus of the controversy and – it was asserted and indeed found by a Commission of Inquiry (“the Commission”) established to investigate the affair – suggested that the turbulent teachers be disciplined.</description><subject>Academic freedom</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><issn>0269-1922</issn><issn>2047-2765</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotkMFKw0AURQdRsFaX7gOuXCTOe5N5M7OSkKY20BIIdeFqmEwSaKmmJlZw5z_4h36J0bq6cDncC4exa-CRVJLf1btt9I64gUhIOmET5LEKUZE8ZROOZEIwiOfsYhi2nMekCCfsNkmTWbbK02BeZtmsWAXfn19BucjWRTmWRRmUWbLM10_3l-ysdbuhufrPKXucZ-t0ES6LhzxNlqEH4DpUTjSklAOH4E3lfAUga00kyNSSUHtjQHvdUts4F7uKtKC4iiV6QRB7MWU3x919370emuHNbrtD_zJeWiQC0gZBj1R4pHzfDUPftHbfb55d_2GB218bdrRh_2zY0Yb4AYvTTjM</recordid><startdate>20121126</startdate><enddate>20121126</enddate><creator>Beloff QC, Michael J</creator><general>The University of Buckingham Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121126</creationdate><title>ACADEMIC FREEDOM – RHETORIC OR REALITY?</title><author>Beloff QC, Michael J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-7a3e677a1a21c9bacb115d866369d5628c9918c8f6feaa4ab68364b452c3614c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Academic freedom</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beloff QC, Michael J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Denning law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beloff QC, Michael J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ACADEMIC FREEDOM – RHETORIC OR REALITY?</atitle><jtitle>Denning law journal</jtitle><date>2012-11-26</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>117-141</pages><issn>0269-1922</issn><eissn>2047-2765</eissn><abstract>Academic freedom is a concept that has a particular significance in a University, not least in a University, which, uniquely in a British context, prides itself on its independence from the State. My interest in academic freedom was sparked by a set of instructions received in this instance from the Government of Hong Kong. The issue in the prospective litigation was relatively simple. The Department of Education had planned some reforms. As is no more unusual in Hong Kong than it is in England, the proposals met with vocal opposition from certain academics. A senior civil servant telephoned the head of the faculty of the Hong Kong institution of Education, the focus of the controversy and – it was asserted and indeed found by a Commission of Inquiry (“the Commission”) established to investigate the affair – suggested that the turbulent teachers be disciplined.</abstract><cop>Buckingham</cop><pub>The University of Buckingham Press</pub><doi>10.5750/dlj.v22i1.356</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-1922 |
ispartof | Denning law journal, 2012-11, Vol.22 (1), p.117-141 |
issn | 0269-1922 2047-2765 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2661689218 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; ABI/INFORM Global |
subjects | Academic freedom Litigation |
title | ACADEMIC FREEDOM – RHETORIC OR REALITY? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T18%3A14%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ACADEMIC%20FREEDOM%20%E2%80%93%20RHETORIC%20OR%20REALITY?&rft.jtitle=Denning%20law%20journal&rft.au=Beloff%20QC,%20Michael%20J&rft.date=2012-11-26&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=117-141&rft.issn=0269-1922&rft.eissn=2047-2765&rft_id=info:doi/10.5750/dlj.v22i1.356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2661689218%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1108-7a3e677a1a21c9bacb115d866369d5628c9918c8f6feaa4ab68364b452c3614c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2661689218&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |