Loading…

R (ON THE APPLICATION OF BEGUM) v HEADTEACHER AND GOVERNORS OF DENBIGH HIGH SCHOOL HL [2006] UKHL 15, [2006] ALL ER (D) 320 (MAR), (APPROVED JUDGMENT)

The Jilbab ControversyOn March 22nd 2006, the House of Lords allowed an appeal by the defendant school, Denbigh High School in Luton and ruled that the school’s uniform policy which disallowed a particular variation of Islamic dress - the “jilbab” (a long sleeved floor length loose fitting tunic dre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Denning law journal 2012-11, Vol.18 (1), p.221-232
Main Author: Edwards, Susan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 232
container_issue 1
container_start_page 221
container_title Denning law journal
container_volume 18
creator Edwards, Susan
description The Jilbab ControversyOn March 22nd 2006, the House of Lords allowed an appeal by the defendant school, Denbigh High School in Luton and ruled that the school’s uniform policy which disallowed a particular variation of Islamic dress - the “jilbab” (a long sleeved floor length loose fitting tunic dress) - did not amount to an interference with the respondent’s right to manifest her religion. Denbigh High School’s, school uniform, for those who were of the Islamic faith was in the form of the “shalwar kameeze” (a tunic and a particular style of shaped trousers). This uniform variation was worn by those Muslim girls who wished to wear it and was also worn by non-Muslim girls of Hindu and Sikh faiths who attended the school. Shabina Begum had attended the school since the age of eleven years and had worn the shalwar kameeze. When she was thirteen she no longer wished to wear the shalwar kameeze, instead she said she wanted to wear a jilbab which she maintained was  “the appropriate” dress code for a Muslim woman after puberty. Moreover, she refused to attend school unless she could wear this form of dress.
doi_str_mv 10.5750/dlj.v18i1.316
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2661695499</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2661695499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669-4f3b8d68b56910e987c944a5c8a7a8c0cd41f5c755c228b7aff6d29d369fe7fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE9PwkAQxTdGExE9ep_ES0ko7m67u91jbZcWLS0pxYsxTemfBIKCrZD4Rfy8LqKXmXnJy5uZH0K3BI-YYPi-2qxHB-KsyMgi_Az1KLaFSQVn56iHKZcmkZReoquuW2Nsc8FpD32nYCQxZKECdzaLJp6bTbROxvCggsV0AAcIletnyvVClYIb-xAkzyqNk3R-dPkqfpgEIYTHMvfCJIkgjOCFYsxfYfGkZ8KG_9qNItAphj8Ai2Iwpm46GIKhN6c61IfHhR9MVZwNrtFFU2y6-uav91E2VpkXmlES6Bsjs-T6H7uxlk7FnSXjkuBaOqKUtl2w0ilE4ZS4rGzSsFIwVlLqLEXRNLyisrK4bGrRFFYf3Z1id-32Y193n_l6u2_f9cacck64ZLaU2mWeXGW77bq2bvJdu3or2q-c4PxIPtfk81_yuSZv_QAtzWh-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2661695499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>R (ON THE APPLICATION OF BEGUM) v HEADTEACHER AND GOVERNORS OF DENBIGH HIGH SCHOOL HL [2006] UKHL 15, [2006] ALL ER (D) 320 (MAR), (APPROVED JUDGMENT)</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Edwards, Susan</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Susan</creatorcontrib><description>The Jilbab ControversyOn March 22nd 2006, the House of Lords allowed an appeal by the defendant school, Denbigh High School in Luton and ruled that the school’s uniform policy which disallowed a particular variation of Islamic dress - the “jilbab” (a long sleeved floor length loose fitting tunic dress) - did not amount to an interference with the respondent’s right to manifest her religion. Denbigh High School’s, school uniform, for those who were of the Islamic faith was in the form of the “shalwar kameeze” (a tunic and a particular style of shaped trousers). This uniform variation was worn by those Muslim girls who wished to wear it and was also worn by non-Muslim girls of Hindu and Sikh faiths who attended the school. Shabina Begum had attended the school since the age of eleven years and had worn the shalwar kameeze. When she was thirteen she no longer wished to wear the shalwar kameeze, instead she said she wanted to wear a jilbab which she maintained was  “the appropriate” dress code for a Muslim woman after puberty. Moreover, she refused to attend school unless she could wear this form of dress.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-1922</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-2765</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5750/dlj.v18i1.316</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Buckingham: The University of Buckingham Press</publisher><subject>Muslims ; Secondary schools ; Uniforms</subject><ispartof>Denning law journal, 2012-11, Vol.18 (1), p.221-232</ispartof><rights>2012. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2661695499?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,25753,27924,27925,36060,37012,44363,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Susan</creatorcontrib><title>R (ON THE APPLICATION OF BEGUM) v HEADTEACHER AND GOVERNORS OF DENBIGH HIGH SCHOOL HL [2006] UKHL 15, [2006] ALL ER (D) 320 (MAR), (APPROVED JUDGMENT)</title><title>Denning law journal</title><description>The Jilbab ControversyOn March 22nd 2006, the House of Lords allowed an appeal by the defendant school, Denbigh High School in Luton and ruled that the school’s uniform policy which disallowed a particular variation of Islamic dress - the “jilbab” (a long sleeved floor length loose fitting tunic dress) - did not amount to an interference with the respondent’s right to manifest her religion. Denbigh High School’s, school uniform, for those who were of the Islamic faith was in the form of the “shalwar kameeze” (a tunic and a particular style of shaped trousers). This uniform variation was worn by those Muslim girls who wished to wear it and was also worn by non-Muslim girls of Hindu and Sikh faiths who attended the school. Shabina Begum had attended the school since the age of eleven years and had worn the shalwar kameeze. When she was thirteen she no longer wished to wear the shalwar kameeze, instead she said she wanted to wear a jilbab which she maintained was  “the appropriate” dress code for a Muslim woman after puberty. Moreover, she refused to attend school unless she could wear this form of dress.</description><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Uniforms</subject><issn>0269-1922</issn><issn>2047-2765</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kE9PwkAQxTdGExE9ep_ES0ko7m67u91jbZcWLS0pxYsxTemfBIKCrZD4Rfy8LqKXmXnJy5uZH0K3BI-YYPi-2qxHB-KsyMgi_Az1KLaFSQVn56iHKZcmkZReoquuW2Nsc8FpD32nYCQxZKECdzaLJp6bTbROxvCggsV0AAcIletnyvVClYIb-xAkzyqNk3R-dPkqfpgEIYTHMvfCJIkgjOCFYsxfYfGkZ8KG_9qNItAphj8Ai2Iwpm46GIKhN6c61IfHhR9MVZwNrtFFU2y6-uav91E2VpkXmlES6Bsjs-T6H7uxlk7FnSXjkuBaOqKUtl2w0ilE4ZS4rGzSsFIwVlLqLEXRNLyisrK4bGrRFFYf3Z1id-32Y193n_l6u2_f9cacck64ZLaU2mWeXGW77bq2bvJdu3or2q-c4PxIPtfk81_yuSZv_QAtzWh-</recordid><startdate>20121123</startdate><enddate>20121123</enddate><creator>Edwards, Susan</creator><general>The University of Buckingham Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121123</creationdate><title>R (ON THE APPLICATION OF BEGUM) v HEADTEACHER AND GOVERNORS OF DENBIGH HIGH SCHOOL HL [2006] UKHL 15, [2006] ALL ER (D) 320 (MAR), (APPROVED JUDGMENT)</title><author>Edwards, Susan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669-4f3b8d68b56910e987c944a5c8a7a8c0cd41f5c755c228b7aff6d29d369fe7fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Uniforms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Susan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Denning law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwards, Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>R (ON THE APPLICATION OF BEGUM) v HEADTEACHER AND GOVERNORS OF DENBIGH HIGH SCHOOL HL [2006] UKHL 15, [2006] ALL ER (D) 320 (MAR), (APPROVED JUDGMENT)</atitle><jtitle>Denning law journal</jtitle><date>2012-11-23</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>221-232</pages><issn>0269-1922</issn><eissn>2047-2765</eissn><abstract>The Jilbab ControversyOn March 22nd 2006, the House of Lords allowed an appeal by the defendant school, Denbigh High School in Luton and ruled that the school’s uniform policy which disallowed a particular variation of Islamic dress - the “jilbab” (a long sleeved floor length loose fitting tunic dress) - did not amount to an interference with the respondent’s right to manifest her religion. Denbigh High School’s, school uniform, for those who were of the Islamic faith was in the form of the “shalwar kameeze” (a tunic and a particular style of shaped trousers). This uniform variation was worn by those Muslim girls who wished to wear it and was also worn by non-Muslim girls of Hindu and Sikh faiths who attended the school. Shabina Begum had attended the school since the age of eleven years and had worn the shalwar kameeze. When she was thirteen she no longer wished to wear the shalwar kameeze, instead she said she wanted to wear a jilbab which she maintained was  “the appropriate” dress code for a Muslim woman after puberty. Moreover, she refused to attend school unless she could wear this form of dress.</abstract><cop>Buckingham</cop><pub>The University of Buckingham Press</pub><doi>10.5750/dlj.v18i1.316</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-1922
ispartof Denning law journal, 2012-11, Vol.18 (1), p.221-232
issn 0269-1922
2047-2765
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2661695499
source ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Muslims
Secondary schools
Uniforms
title R (ON THE APPLICATION OF BEGUM) v HEADTEACHER AND GOVERNORS OF DENBIGH HIGH SCHOOL HL [2006] UKHL 15, [2006] ALL ER (D) 320 (MAR), (APPROVED JUDGMENT)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A19%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=R%20(ON%20THE%20APPLICATION%20OF%20BEGUM)%20v%20HEADTEACHER%20AND%20GOVERNORS%20OF%20DENBIGH%20HIGH%20SCHOOL%20HL%20%5B2006%5D%20UKHL%2015,%20%5B2006%5D%20ALL%20ER%20(D)%20320%20(MAR),%20(APPROVED%20JUDGMENT)&rft.jtitle=Denning%20law%20journal&rft.au=Edwards,%20Susan&rft.date=2012-11-23&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=221-232&rft.issn=0269-1922&rft.eissn=2047-2765&rft_id=info:doi/10.5750/dlj.v18i1.316&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2661695499%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669-4f3b8d68b56910e987c944a5c8a7a8c0cd41f5c755c228b7aff6d29d369fe7fa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2661695499&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true