Loading…

Small Campaign Donors

We study the characteristics and behavior of small campaign donors and compare them to large donors by building a dataset including all the 340 million individual contributions reported to the U.S. Federal Election Commission between 2005 and 2020. Thanks to the reporting requirements of online fund...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:NBER Working Paper Series 2022-05
Main Authors: Bouton, Laurent, Cagé, Julia, Dewitte, Edgard, Pons, Vincent
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c845-9c5fbbfdc69517e8c450fee7771eedf6fb3fdbf10f2b982c7d6614dd5677e5653
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title NBER Working Paper Series
container_volume
creator Bouton, Laurent
Cagé, Julia
Dewitte, Edgard
Pons, Vincent
description We study the characteristics and behavior of small campaign donors and compare them to large donors by building a dataset including all the 340 million individual contributions reported to the U.S. Federal Election Commission between 2005 and 2020. Thanks to the reporting requirements of online fundraising platforms first used by Democrats (ActBlue) and now Republicans (WinRed), we observe contribution-level information on the vast majority of small donations. We first show that the number of small donors (donors who do not give more than $200 to any committee during a two-year electoral cycle) and their total contributions have been growing rapidly. Second, small donors include more women and more ethnic minorities than large donors, but their geographical distribution does not differ much. Third, using a saturated fixed effects model, we find that race closeness, candidate ideological extremeness, whether candidates and donors live in the same district or state, and whether they have the same ethnicity increase contributions, with lower effects for small donors. Finally, we show that campaign TV ads affect the number and size of contributions to congressional candidates, particularly for small donors, indicating that pull factors are relevant to explain their behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.3386/w30050
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2664809885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2664809885</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c845-9c5fbbfdc69517e8c450fee7771eedf6fb3fdbf10f2b982c7d6614dd5677e5653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzT1PAkEQgOEtMBFROnsS69PZ3ZvZ2dKciiYkFNCT248hkuMObiX-fU20ervnVWqu4dFapqdvC4AwUVNgz5Xx1l2rm1IOAIYZ9FTdb45t1y2a9nhqP_f94mXoh7Hcqitpu5Lv_jtT27fXbfNerdbLj-Z5VUWusfIRJQRJkTxqlznWCJKzc07nnIQkWElBNIgJnk10iUjXKSE5l5HQztTDH3sah_Mll6_dYbiM_e9xZ4hqBs-M9gcLhjfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2664809885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Small Campaign Donors</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bouton, Laurent ; Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Pons, Vincent</creator><creatorcontrib>Bouton, Laurent ; Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Pons, Vincent</creatorcontrib><description>We study the characteristics and behavior of small campaign donors and compare them to large donors by building a dataset including all the 340 million individual contributions reported to the U.S. Federal Election Commission between 2005 and 2020. Thanks to the reporting requirements of online fundraising platforms first used by Democrats (ActBlue) and now Republicans (WinRed), we observe contribution-level information on the vast majority of small donations. We first show that the number of small donors (donors who do not give more than $200 to any committee during a two-year electoral cycle) and their total contributions have been growing rapidly. Second, small donors include more women and more ethnic minorities than large donors, but their geographical distribution does not differ much. Third, using a saturated fixed effects model, we find that race closeness, candidate ideological extremeness, whether candidates and donors live in the same district or state, and whether they have the same ethnicity increase contributions, with lower effects for small donors. Finally, we show that campaign TV ads affect the number and size of contributions to congressional candidates, particularly for small donors, indicating that pull factors are relevant to explain their behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w30050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</publisher><subject>Economic theory ; Elections</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2022-05</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. May 2022</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c845-9c5fbbfdc69517e8c450fee7771eedf6fb3fdbf10f2b982c7d6614dd5677e5653</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2664809885?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>776,780,11667,27902,36037,44339</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bouton, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cagé, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewitte, Edgard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pons, Vincent</creatorcontrib><title>Small Campaign Donors</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>We study the characteristics and behavior of small campaign donors and compare them to large donors by building a dataset including all the 340 million individual contributions reported to the U.S. Federal Election Commission between 2005 and 2020. Thanks to the reporting requirements of online fundraising platforms first used by Democrats (ActBlue) and now Republicans (WinRed), we observe contribution-level information on the vast majority of small donations. We first show that the number of small donors (donors who do not give more than $200 to any committee during a two-year electoral cycle) and their total contributions have been growing rapidly. Second, small donors include more women and more ethnic minorities than large donors, but their geographical distribution does not differ much. Third, using a saturated fixed effects model, we find that race closeness, candidate ideological extremeness, whether candidates and donors live in the same district or state, and whether they have the same ethnicity increase contributions, with lower effects for small donors. Finally, we show that campaign TV ads affect the number and size of contributions to congressional candidates, particularly for small donors, indicating that pull factors are relevant to explain their behavior.</description><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Elections</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNotzT1PAkEQgOEtMBFROnsS69PZ3ZvZ2dKciiYkFNCT248hkuMObiX-fU20ervnVWqu4dFapqdvC4AwUVNgz5Xx1l2rm1IOAIYZ9FTdb45t1y2a9nhqP_f94mXoh7Hcqitpu5Lv_jtT27fXbfNerdbLj-Z5VUWusfIRJQRJkTxqlznWCJKzc07nnIQkWElBNIgJnk10iUjXKSE5l5HQztTDH3sah_Mll6_dYbiM_e9xZ4hqBs-M9gcLhjfA</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Bouton, Laurent</creator><creator>Cagé, Julia</creator><creator>Dewitte, Edgard</creator><creator>Pons, Vincent</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Small Campaign Donors</title><author>Bouton, Laurent ; Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Pons, Vincent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c845-9c5fbbfdc69517e8c450fee7771eedf6fb3fdbf10f2b982c7d6614dd5677e5653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Elections</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bouton, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cagé, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewitte, Edgard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pons, Vincent</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bouton, Laurent</au><au>Cagé, Julia</au><au>Dewitte, Edgard</au><au>Pons, Vincent</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Small Campaign Donors</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>We study the characteristics and behavior of small campaign donors and compare them to large donors by building a dataset including all the 340 million individual contributions reported to the U.S. Federal Election Commission between 2005 and 2020. Thanks to the reporting requirements of online fundraising platforms first used by Democrats (ActBlue) and now Republicans (WinRed), we observe contribution-level information on the vast majority of small donations. We first show that the number of small donors (donors who do not give more than $200 to any committee during a two-year electoral cycle) and their total contributions have been growing rapidly. Second, small donors include more women and more ethnic minorities than large donors, but their geographical distribution does not differ much. Third, using a saturated fixed effects model, we find that race closeness, candidate ideological extremeness, whether candidates and donors live in the same district or state, and whether they have the same ethnicity increase contributions, with lower effects for small donors. Finally, we show that campaign TV ads affect the number and size of contributions to congressional candidates, particularly for small donors, indicating that pull factors are relevant to explain their behavior.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</pub><doi>10.3386/w30050</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-2937
ispartof NBER Working Paper Series, 2022-05
issn 0898-2937
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2664809885
source ABI/INFORM Global; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Economic theory
Elections
title Small Campaign Donors
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T23%3A54%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Small%20Campaign%20Donors&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Bouton,%20Laurent&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w30050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2664809885%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c845-9c5fbbfdc69517e8c450fee7771eedf6fb3fdbf10f2b982c7d6614dd5677e5653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2664809885&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true