Loading…
Small Campaign Donors
We study the characteristics and behavior of small campaign donors and compare them to large donors by building a dataset including all the 340 million individual contributions reported to the U.S. Federal Election Commission between 2005 and 2020. Thanks to the reporting requirements of online fund...
Saved in:
Published in: | NBER Working Paper Series 2022-05 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c845-9c5fbbfdc69517e8c450fee7771eedf6fb3fdbf10f2b982c7d6614dd5677e5653 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | NBER Working Paper Series |
container_volume | |
creator | Bouton, Laurent Cagé, Julia Dewitte, Edgard Pons, Vincent |
description | We study the characteristics and behavior of small campaign donors and compare them to large donors by building a dataset including all the 340 million individual contributions reported to the U.S. Federal Election Commission between 2005 and 2020. Thanks to the reporting requirements of online fundraising platforms first used by Democrats (ActBlue) and now Republicans (WinRed), we observe contribution-level information on the vast majority of small donations. We first show that the number of small donors (donors who do not give more than $200 to any committee during a two-year electoral cycle) and their total contributions have been growing rapidly. Second, small donors include more women and more ethnic minorities than large donors, but their geographical distribution does not differ much. Third, using a saturated fixed effects model, we find that race closeness, candidate ideological extremeness, whether candidates and donors live in the same district or state, and whether they have the same ethnicity increase contributions, with lower effects for small donors. Finally, we show that campaign TV ads affect the number and size of contributions to congressional candidates, particularly for small donors, indicating that pull factors are relevant to explain their behavior. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3386/w30050 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2664809885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2664809885</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c845-9c5fbbfdc69517e8c450fee7771eedf6fb3fdbf10f2b982c7d6614dd5677e5653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzT1PAkEQgOEtMBFROnsS69PZ3ZvZ2dKciiYkFNCT248hkuMObiX-fU20ervnVWqu4dFapqdvC4AwUVNgz5Xx1l2rm1IOAIYZ9FTdb45t1y2a9nhqP_f94mXoh7Hcqitpu5Lv_jtT27fXbfNerdbLj-Z5VUWusfIRJQRJkTxqlznWCJKzc07nnIQkWElBNIgJnk10iUjXKSE5l5HQztTDH3sah_Mll6_dYbiM_e9xZ4hqBs-M9gcLhjfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2664809885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Small Campaign Donors</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bouton, Laurent ; Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Pons, Vincent</creator><creatorcontrib>Bouton, Laurent ; Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Pons, Vincent</creatorcontrib><description>We study the characteristics and behavior of small campaign donors and compare them to large donors by building a dataset including all the 340 million individual contributions reported to the U.S. Federal Election Commission between 2005 and 2020. Thanks to the reporting requirements of online fundraising platforms first used by Democrats (ActBlue) and now Republicans (WinRed), we observe contribution-level information on the vast majority of small donations. We first show that the number of small donors (donors who do not give more than $200 to any committee during a two-year electoral cycle) and their total contributions have been growing rapidly. Second, small donors include more women and more ethnic minorities than large donors, but their geographical distribution does not differ much. Third, using a saturated fixed effects model, we find that race closeness, candidate ideological extremeness, whether candidates and donors live in the same district or state, and whether they have the same ethnicity increase contributions, with lower effects for small donors. Finally, we show that campaign TV ads affect the number and size of contributions to congressional candidates, particularly for small donors, indicating that pull factors are relevant to explain their behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w30050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</publisher><subject>Economic theory ; Elections</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2022-05</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. May 2022</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c845-9c5fbbfdc69517e8c450fee7771eedf6fb3fdbf10f2b982c7d6614dd5677e5653</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2664809885?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>776,780,11667,27902,36037,44339</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bouton, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cagé, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewitte, Edgard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pons, Vincent</creatorcontrib><title>Small Campaign Donors</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>We study the characteristics and behavior of small campaign donors and compare them to large donors by building a dataset including all the 340 million individual contributions reported to the U.S. Federal Election Commission between 2005 and 2020. Thanks to the reporting requirements of online fundraising platforms first used by Democrats (ActBlue) and now Republicans (WinRed), we observe contribution-level information on the vast majority of small donations. We first show that the number of small donors (donors who do not give more than $200 to any committee during a two-year electoral cycle) and their total contributions have been growing rapidly. Second, small donors include more women and more ethnic minorities than large donors, but their geographical distribution does not differ much. Third, using a saturated fixed effects model, we find that race closeness, candidate ideological extremeness, whether candidates and donors live in the same district or state, and whether they have the same ethnicity increase contributions, with lower effects for small donors. Finally, we show that campaign TV ads affect the number and size of contributions to congressional candidates, particularly for small donors, indicating that pull factors are relevant to explain their behavior.</description><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Elections</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNotzT1PAkEQgOEtMBFROnsS69PZ3ZvZ2dKciiYkFNCT248hkuMObiX-fU20ervnVWqu4dFapqdvC4AwUVNgz5Xx1l2rm1IOAIYZ9FTdb45t1y2a9nhqP_f94mXoh7Hcqitpu5Lv_jtT27fXbfNerdbLj-Z5VUWusfIRJQRJkTxqlznWCJKzc07nnIQkWElBNIgJnk10iUjXKSE5l5HQztTDH3sah_Mll6_dYbiM_e9xZ4hqBs-M9gcLhjfA</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Bouton, Laurent</creator><creator>Cagé, Julia</creator><creator>Dewitte, Edgard</creator><creator>Pons, Vincent</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Small Campaign Donors</title><author>Bouton, Laurent ; Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Pons, Vincent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c845-9c5fbbfdc69517e8c450fee7771eedf6fb3fdbf10f2b982c7d6614dd5677e5653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Elections</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bouton, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cagé, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewitte, Edgard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pons, Vincent</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bouton, Laurent</au><au>Cagé, Julia</au><au>Dewitte, Edgard</au><au>Pons, Vincent</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Small Campaign Donors</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>We study the characteristics and behavior of small campaign donors and compare them to large donors by building a dataset including all the 340 million individual contributions reported to the U.S. Federal Election Commission between 2005 and 2020. Thanks to the reporting requirements of online fundraising platforms first used by Democrats (ActBlue) and now Republicans (WinRed), we observe contribution-level information on the vast majority of small donations. We first show that the number of small donors (donors who do not give more than $200 to any committee during a two-year electoral cycle) and their total contributions have been growing rapidly. Second, small donors include more women and more ethnic minorities than large donors, but their geographical distribution does not differ much. Third, using a saturated fixed effects model, we find that race closeness, candidate ideological extremeness, whether candidates and donors live in the same district or state, and whether they have the same ethnicity increase contributions, with lower effects for small donors. Finally, we show that campaign TV ads affect the number and size of contributions to congressional candidates, particularly for small donors, indicating that pull factors are relevant to explain their behavior.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</pub><doi>10.3386/w30050</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-2937 |
ispartof | NBER Working Paper Series, 2022-05 |
issn | 0898-2937 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2664809885 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Economic theory Elections |
title | Small Campaign Donors |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T23%3A54%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Small%20Campaign%20Donors&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Bouton,%20Laurent&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w30050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2664809885%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c845-9c5fbbfdc69517e8c450fee7771eedf6fb3fdbf10f2b982c7d6614dd5677e5653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2664809885&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |