Lessons learnt from the recent EURADOS intercomparisons in computational dosimetry

Organized by Working Group 6 "Computational Dosimetry" of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), a group of intercomparison exercises was conducted in which participants were asked to solve predefined problems in computational dosimetry. The results of these comparisons were pub...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2022-05
Main Authors: Rabus, Hans, Zankl, Maria, Gomez-Ros, Jose Maria, Villagrasa, Carmen, Eakins, Jonathan, Huet, Christelle, Brkic, Hrvoje, Tanner, Rick
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Dosimeters
Dosimetry
Quality assurance
Radiation
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Rabus, Hans
Zankl, Maria
Gomez-Ros, Jose Maria
Villagrasa, Carmen
Eakins, Jonathan
Huet, Christelle
Brkic, Hrvoje
Tanner, Rick
description Organized by Working Group 6 "Computational Dosimetry" of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), a group of intercomparison exercises was conducted in which participants were asked to solve predefined problems in computational dosimetry. The results of these comparisons were published in a series of articles in this virtual special issue of Radiation Measurements. This paper reviews the experience gained from the various exercises and highlights the resulting conclusions for future exercises, as well as regarding the state of the art and the need for development in terms of quality assurance for computational dosimetry techniques.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2205.07321
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2665377092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2665377092</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a522-be4af2833c3493b0987b604c824973523487b0f2365d798d95930c17f76251483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjstqwzAUREWh0JDmA7oTdG1XvlfPZUjTBxgCaboOsi1TB9tKJbm0f1_3sRrOcBiGkJuC5VwLwe5s-Ow-cgAmcqYQiguyAMQi0xzgiqxiPDHGQCoQAhdkX7oY_Rhp72wYE22DH2h6czS42s28fd2v73cvtBuTC7UfzjZ0v3430h-ckk2dH21PGx-7waXwdU0uW9tHt_rPJTk8bA-bp6zcPT5v1mVmBUBWOW5b0Ig1coMVM1pVkvFaAzcKBSCfC9YCStEooxsjDLK6UK2SIAqucUlu_2bPwb9PLqbjyU9hfhKPIKVApZgB_AacNVAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2665377092</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lessons learnt from the recent EURADOS intercomparisons in computational dosimetry</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Rabus, Hans ; Zankl, Maria ; Gomez-Ros, Jose Maria ; Villagrasa, Carmen ; Eakins, Jonathan ; Huet, Christelle ; Brkic, Hrvoje ; Tanner, Rick</creator><creatorcontrib>Rabus, Hans ; Zankl, Maria ; Gomez-Ros, Jose Maria ; Villagrasa, Carmen ; Eakins, Jonathan ; Huet, Christelle ; Brkic, Hrvoje ; Tanner, Rick</creatorcontrib><description>Organized by Working Group 6 "Computational Dosimetry" of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), a group of intercomparison exercises was conducted in which participants were asked to solve predefined problems in computational dosimetry. The results of these comparisons were published in a series of articles in this virtual special issue of Radiation Measurements. This paper reviews the experience gained from the various exercises and highlights the resulting conclusions for future exercises, as well as regarding the state of the art and the need for development in terms of quality assurance for computational dosimetry techniques.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2205.07321</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Dosimeters ; Dosimetry ; Quality assurance ; Radiation</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2022-05</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2665377092?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25751,27923,37010,44588</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rabus, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zankl, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez-Ros, Jose Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villagrasa, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eakins, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huet, Christelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brkic, Hrvoje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanner, Rick</creatorcontrib><title>Lessons learnt from the recent EURADOS intercomparisons in computational dosimetry</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Organized by Working Group 6 "Computational Dosimetry" of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), a group of intercomparison exercises was conducted in which participants were asked to solve predefined problems in computational dosimetry. The results of these comparisons were published in a series of articles in this virtual special issue of Radiation Measurements. This paper reviews the experience gained from the various exercises and highlights the resulting conclusions for future exercises, as well as regarding the state of the art and the need for development in terms of quality assurance for computational dosimetry techniques.</description><subject>Dosimeters</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotjstqwzAUREWh0JDmA7oTdG1XvlfPZUjTBxgCaboOsi1TB9tKJbm0f1_3sRrOcBiGkJuC5VwLwe5s-Ow-cgAmcqYQiguyAMQi0xzgiqxiPDHGQCoQAhdkX7oY_Rhp72wYE22DH2h6czS42s28fd2v73cvtBuTC7UfzjZ0v3430h-ckk2dH21PGx-7waXwdU0uW9tHt_rPJTk8bA-bp6zcPT5v1mVmBUBWOW5b0Ig1coMVM1pVkvFaAzcKBSCfC9YCStEooxsjDLK6UK2SIAqucUlu_2bPwb9PLqbjyU9hfhKPIKVApZgB_AacNVAA</recordid><startdate>20220515</startdate><enddate>20220515</enddate><creator>Rabus, Hans</creator><creator>Zankl, Maria</creator><creator>Gomez-Ros, Jose Maria</creator><creator>Villagrasa, Carmen</creator><creator>Eakins, Jonathan</creator><creator>Huet, Christelle</creator><creator>Brkic, Hrvoje</creator><creator>Tanner, Rick</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220515</creationdate><title>Lessons learnt from the recent EURADOS intercomparisons in computational dosimetry</title><author>Rabus, Hans ; Zankl, Maria ; Gomez-Ros, Jose Maria ; Villagrasa, Carmen ; Eakins, Jonathan ; Huet, Christelle ; Brkic, Hrvoje ; Tanner, Rick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a522-be4af2833c3493b0987b604c824973523487b0f2365d798d95930c17f76251483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Dosimeters</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rabus, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zankl, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez-Ros, Jose Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villagrasa, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eakins, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huet, Christelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brkic, Hrvoje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanner, Rick</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rabus, Hans</au><au>Zankl, Maria</au><au>Gomez-Ros, Jose Maria</au><au>Villagrasa, Carmen</au><au>Eakins, Jonathan</au><au>Huet, Christelle</au><au>Brkic, Hrvoje</au><au>Tanner, Rick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lessons learnt from the recent EURADOS intercomparisons in computational dosimetry</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2022-05-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Organized by Working Group 6 "Computational Dosimetry" of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), a group of intercomparison exercises was conducted in which participants were asked to solve predefined problems in computational dosimetry. The results of these comparisons were published in a series of articles in this virtual special issue of Radiation Measurements. This paper reviews the experience gained from the various exercises and highlights the resulting conclusions for future exercises, as well as regarding the state of the art and the need for development in terms of quality assurance for computational dosimetry techniques.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2205.07321</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2022-05
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2665377092
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Dosimeters
Dosimetry
Quality assurance
Radiation
title Lessons learnt from the recent EURADOS intercomparisons in computational dosimetry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A45%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lessons%20learnt%20from%20the%20recent%20EURADOS%20intercomparisons%20in%20computational%20dosimetry&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Rabus,%20Hans&rft.date=2022-05-15&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2205.07321&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2665377092%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a522-be4af2833c3493b0987b604c824973523487b0f2365d798d95930c17f76251483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2665377092&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true