A comparison of likelihood-free methods with and without summary statistics

Likelihood-free methods are useful for parameter estimation of complex models with intractable likelihood functions for which it is easy to simulate data. Such models are prevalent in many disciplines including genetics, biology, ecology and cosmology. Likelihood-free methods avoid explicit likeliho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Statistics and computing 2022-06, Vol.32 (3), Article 42
Main Authors: Drovandi, Christopher, Frazier, David T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence
Astronomical models
Computer Science
Cosmology
Parameter estimation
Probability and Statistics in Computer Science
Statistical methods
Statistical Theory and Methods
Statistics and Computing/Statistics Programs
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Likelihood-free methods are useful for parameter estimation of complex models with intractable likelihood functions for which it is easy to simulate data. Such models are prevalent in many disciplines including genetics, biology, ecology and cosmology. Likelihood-free methods avoid explicit likelihood evaluation by finding parameter values of the model that generate data close to the observed data. The general consensus has been that it is most efficient to compare datasets on the basis of a low dimensional informative summary statistic, incurring information loss in favour of reduced dimensionality. More recently, researchers have explored various approaches for efficiently comparing empirical distributions of the data in the likelihood-free context in an effort to avoid data summarisation. This article provides a review of these full data distance based approaches, and conducts the first comprehensive comparison of such methods, both qualitatively and empirically. We also conduct a substantive empirical comparison with summary statistic based likelihood-free methods. The discussion and results offer guidance to practitioners considering a likelihood-free approach. Whilst we find the best approach to be problem dependent, we also find that the full data distance based approaches are promising and warrant further development. We discuss some opportunities for future research in this space. Computer code to implement the methods discussed in this paper can be found at https://github.com/cdrovandi/ABC-dist-compare .
ISSN:0960-3174
1573-1375
DOI:10.1007/s11222-022-10092-4